French guidelines on stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG): Editorial comment

Use of Compressed Sensing Accelerated, Low-Velocity Encoded, Isotropic Resolution, Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography for SEEG Electrode Implantation

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the feasibility of using compressed sensing accelerated, low-velocity encoded, isotropic resolution phase contrast (CLIP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for avascular trajectory planning of stereoelectroencephalography.

METHODS

Ten healthy subjects (1 woman and 9 men; age, 33.6 ± 9.0 years) and 20 consecutive patients (12 female patients; age, 22 ± 13.6 years) were enrolled in the present study. The healthy subjects underwent CLIP-MRA, and 3 other phase contrast MRA protocols with conventional parallel imaging (PI) acceleration, including low resolution with twofold PI (PI2), high resolution (HR) with fivefold PI (PI5), and HR-PI2. The patients underwent CLIP-MRA and computed tomography angiography (CTA). The image qualities were evaluated. The numbers and locations of trajectory-vessel conflict detected using CLIP-MRA were noted.

RESULTS

With similar scan durations, CLIP-MRA achieved higher spatial resolution compared with low resolution with PI2 and detected significantly more branches compared with HR-PI5. With the same spatial resolution, the signal/noise and contrast/noise ratios of CLIP-MRA were higher than those with HR-PI2 with a shorter scan duration. For the 12 adult patients (10 female patients; 28.8 ± 12.7 years), CLIP-MRA had better signal/noise and contrast/noise ratios than CTA. The trajectory had required modification for 14 of the 20 patients (70%), with a proportion of trajectory modification of 10.7% (23 of 215 electrodes). The middle meningeal artery, cortical vessel, and skull vessel were the main vessels with conflict (n = 11, n = 7, and n = 5, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, CLIP-MRA provided a clear cortical vascular display noninvasively without intravascular contrast and radiation. The middle meningeal artery and diploic and emissary veins were the main conflict vessels and could be clearly displayed using CLIP-MRA but not CTA.

A Novel Sublabial Anterior Transmaxillary Approach for Medically Refractory Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Comparative Anatomic Study

BACKGROUND

Current approaches for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy may result in suboptimal seizure control and cognitive decline. An incomplete treatment of the epileptogenic zone and unnecessary violation of functional cortical and subcortical areas may contribute to suboptimal results.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and test the anatomic feasibility of a novel endoscopic anterior transmaxillary (ATM) approach to the temporal lobe and to compare the described technique to other transfacial approaches.

METHODS

Twenty-four cadaveric brain hemispheres fixed in formalin were used to study anterior temporal surface anatomy. Two additional hemispheres were fixed in formalin and then frozen for white matter dissections. Subsequently, bilateral dissections on 4 injected cadaveric heads were used to describe the endoscopic ATM approach and to evaluate various anterior endoscopic corridors for the temporal pole and mesial temporal lobe structures.

RESULTS

The ATM approach was considered superior because of direct visualization of the temporal pole and natural alignment with the mesial temporal structures. The mean exposure corridor covered 49.1° in the sagittal plane and 66.2° in the axial plane. The ATM allowed direct access lateral to the maxillary and mandibular nerves with an anterior-posterior trajectory aligned to the longitudinal axis of the hippocampus formation, allowing for a selective amygdalohippocampectomy with preservation of the trigeminal branches and the lateral temporal neocortex.

CONCLUSION

The ATM approach is anatomically feasible, providing a direct and selective approach for the temporal pole and mesial temporal lobe structures, with a substantial angle of visualization because of its direct alignment with the mesial temporal lobe structures.

Recent developments in stereo electroencephalography monitoring for epilepsy surgery

Recently the utilization of the stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) method has exploded globally. It is now the preferred method of intracranial monitoring for epilepsy. Since its inception, the basic tenet of the SEEG method remains the same: strategic implantation of intracerebral electrodes based on a hypothesis grounded on anatomo-electroclinical correlation, interpretation of interictal and ictal abnormalities, and formation of a surgical plan based on these data. However, there are recent advancements in all these domains-electrodes implantations, data interpretation, and therapeutic strategy- that can make the SEEG a more accessible and effective approach. In this narrative review, these newer developments are discussed and summarized. Regarding implantation, efficient commercial robotic systems are now increasingly available, which are also more accurate in implanting electrodes. In terms of ictal and interictal abnormalities, newer studies focused on correlating these abnormalities with pathological substrates and surgical outcomes and analyzing high-frequency oscillations and cortical-subcortical connectivity. These abnormalities can now be further quantified using advanced tools (spectrum, spatiotemporal, connectivity analysis, and machine learning algorithms) for objective and efficient interpretation. Another aspect of recent development is renewed interest in SEEG-based electrical stimulation mapping (ESM). The SEEG-ESM has been used in defining epileptogenic networks, mapping eloquent cortex (primarily language), and analyzing cortico-cortical evoked potential. Regarding SEEG-guided direct therapeutic strategy, several clinical studies evaluated the use of radiofrequency thermocoagulation. As the emerging SEEG-based diagnosis and therapeutics are better evolved, treatments aimed at specific epileptogenic networks without compromising the eloquent cortex will become more easily accessible to improve the lives of individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).

The endoscopic anterior transmaxillary temporal pole approach for mesial temporal lobe epilepsies: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

In mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), the ideal surgical approach to achieve seizure freedom and minimize morbidity is an unsolved question. Selective approaches to mesial temporal structures often result in suboptimal seizure outcomes. The authors report the results of a pilot study intended to evaluate the clinical feasibility of using an endoscopic anterior transmaxillary (eATM) approach for minimally invasive management of MTLEs.

METHODS

The study is a prospectively collected case series of four consecutive patients who underwent the eATM approach for the treatment of MTLE and were followed for a minimum of 12 months. All participants underwent an epilepsy workup and surgical care at a tertiary referral comprehensive epilepsy center and had medically refractory epilepsy. The noninvasive evaluations and intracranial recordings of these patients confirmed the presence of anatomically restricted epileptogenic zones located in the mesial temporal structures. Data on seizure freedom at 1 year, neuropsychological outcomes, diffusion tractography, and adverse events were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

By applying the eATM technique and approaching the far anterior temporal lobe regions, mesial-basal resections of the temporal polar areas and mesial temporal structures were successfully achieved in all patients (2 with left-sided approaches, 2 with right-sided approaches). No neurological complications or neuropsychological declines were observed. All 4 patients achieved Engel class Ia outcome up to the end of the follow-up period (19, 15, 14, and 12 months). One patient developed hypoesthesia in the left V2 distribution but there were no other adverse events. The low degree of white matter injury from the eATM approach was analyzed using high-definition fiber tractography in 1 patient as a putative mechanism for preserving neuropsychological function.

CONCLUSIONS

The described series demonstrates the feasibility and potential safety profile of a novel approach for medically refractory MTLE. The study affirms the feasibility of performing efficacious mesial temporal lobe resections through an eATM approach.

Presurgical intracranial investigations in epilepsy surgery

Identification and localization of the "epileptogenic process" in the brain of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy for surgical cure is the goal of presurgical investigations. Intracranial recordings are required when conflicting data between seizure clinical semiology and EEG prevent precise localization within one hemisphere or lateralization, when a visible lesion on MRI seems unrelated to the electroclinical data, or in MRI-negative cases. Two methods are currently used. The objective of the subdural grid electrocorticography with or without depth electrodes (SDG/DE) is the best possible identification of the area of onset of spontaneous seizures and localization of the eloquent cortex. The objective of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is to define the epileptogenic zone (configured as a network) and its relation to an unmasked lesion. Two-dimensional (SDG) and three-dimensional (SEEG) brain sampling dictate different strategies for noninvasive presurgical phase I goals as well as for data analysis. SEEG must resolve several potential localization hypotheses in a manner that cannot be achieved with SDG. SDG operates through brain surface coverage, unlike SEEG, which samples networks. SDG estimates the extent of cortical resection through a lobar or sublobar localization of ictal onset and constraints from functional mapping. SEEG defines a tailored resection according to the results of anatomo-electro-clinical correlations in stereotaxic space that will guide the ablation of the epileptogenic zone. SEEG is currently expanding faster than SDG. The prerequisites (especially in the preimplantation hypothetical strategy) and technical tools (especially stimulation and functional mapping) in the two methods are very different. This chapter presents a comparative review of the rationale, indications, electrode implantation strategies, interpretation, and surgical decision making of these two approaches of presurgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery.