Altered taste function in mice deficient in the 65-kDa isoform of glutamate decarboxylase

Systemic mechanism of taste, flavour and palatability in brain

Taste is considered as one of the five traditional senses and has the ability to detect the flavour of food and certain minerals. Information of taste is transferred to the cortical gustatory area for identification and discrimination of taste quality. Animals have memory recognition power to maintain the familiar foods which are already encountered. Animal shows neophobic response when it encounters novel taste and shows no hesitation when the food is known to be safe. Palatability is the hedonic reward provided by foods and fluids. Palatability is closely related to neurochemicals, and this chemical influences the consumption of food and fluid. Even though, the food is palatable that can become aversive and avoided as a consequence of postingestional unpleasant experience such as malaise. This review presents the overall view on brain mechanisms of taste, flavour and palatability.

GABA, its receptors, and GABAergic inhibition in mouse taste buds

Taste buds consist of at least three principal cell types that have different functions in processing gustatory signals: glial-like (type I) cells, receptor (type II) cells, and presynaptic (type III) cells. Using a combination of Ca2+ imaging, single-cell reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunostaining, we show that GABA is an inhibitory transmitter in mouse taste buds, acting on GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors to suppress transmitter (ATP) secretion from receptor cells during taste stimulation. Specifically, receptor cells express GABA(A) receptor subunits β2, δ, and π, as well as GABA(B) receptors. In contrast, presynaptic cells express the GABA(A) β3 subunit and only occasionally GABA(B) receptors. In keeping with the distinct expression pattern of GABA receptors in presynaptic cells, we detected no GABAergic suppression of transmitter release from presynaptic cells. We suggest that GABA may serve function(s) in taste buds in addition to synaptic inhibition. Finally, we also defined the source of GABA in taste buds: GABA is synthesized by GAD65 in type I taste cells as well as by GAD67 in presynaptic (type III) taste cells and is stored in both those two cell types. We conclude that GABA is an inhibitory transmitter released during taste stimulation and possibly also during growth and differentiation of taste buds.

Two distinct mechanisms target GAD67 to vesicular pathways and presynaptic clusters

The inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) is synthesized by two isoforms of the enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD): GAD65 and GAD67. Whereas GAD67 is constitutively active and produces >90% of GABA in the central nervous system, GAD65 is transiently activated and augments GABA levels for rapid modulation of inhibitory neurotransmission. Hydrophobic lipid modifications of the GAD65 protein target it to Golgi membranes and synaptic vesicles in neuroendocrine cells. In contrast, the GAD67 protein remains hydrophilic but has been shown to acquire membrane association by heterodimerization with GAD65. Here, we identify a second mechanism that mediates robust membrane anchoring, axonal targeting, and presynaptic clustering of GAD67 but that is independent of GAD65. This mechanism is abolished by a leucine-103 to proline mutation that changes the conformation of the N-terminal domain but does not affect the GAD65-dependent membrane anchoring of GAD67. Thus two distinct mechanisms target the constitutively active GAD67 to presynaptic clusters to facilitate accumulation of GABA for rapid delivery into synapses.

Mice lacking Gad2 show altered behavioral effects of ethanol, flurazepam and gabaxadol

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is synthesized in brain by two isoforms of glutamic acid decarboxylase (Gad), Gad1 and Gad2. Gad1 provides most of the GABA in brain, but Gad2 can be rapidly activated in times of high GABA demand. Mice lacking Gad2 are viable whereas deletion of Gad1 is lethal. We produced null mutant mice for Gad2 on three different genetic backgrounds: predominantly C57BL/6J and one or two generations of backcrossing to 129S1/SvimJ (129N1, 129N2). We used these mice to determine if actions of alcohol are regulated by synthesis of GABA from this isoform. We also studied behavioral responses to a benzodiazepine (flurazepam) and a GABAA receptor agonist (gabaxadol). Deletion of Gad2 increased ethanol palatability and intake and slightly reduced the severity of ethanol-induced withdrawal, but these effects depended strongly on genetic background. Mutant mice on the 129N2 background showed the above three ethanol behavioral phenotypes, but the C57BL/6J inbred background did not show any of these phenotypes. Effects on ethanol consumption also depended on the test as the mutation did not alter consumption in limited access models. Deletion of Gad2 reduced the effect of flurazepam on motor incoordination and increased the effect of extrasynaptic GABAA receptor agonist gabaxadol without changing the duration of loss of righting reflex produced by these drugs. These results are consistent with earlier proposals that deletion of Gad2 (on 129N2 background) reduces synaptic GABA but also suggest changes in extrasynaptic receptor function.

Thermal hyperalgesia via supraspinal mechanisms in mice lacking glutamate decarboxylase 65

Gamma-aminobutyric acid, which is synthesized by two isoforms of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), inhibits the transfer of nociceptive signals from primary afferent fibers to the central nervous system. However, the roles of a 65-kDa isoform of GAD (GAD65)-mediated GABA in nociceptive processing are less clear. This study tested whether partial reductions in GABAergic inhibitory tone by GAD65 gene knockout [GAD65(-/-)] would contribute to the regulation of pain threshold in mice. Experiments were performed on male wild-type (WT) mice and GAD65(-/-) mice. Acute nociception and inflammatory pain tests were compared between WT mice and GAD65(-/-) mice. GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibitory postsynaptic currents were also examined by use of the whole-cell patch-clamp method in somatosensory cortical neurons in brain slices. In the hot plate test, which reflects supraspinal sensory integration, a significant reduction in the latency was observed for GAD65(-/-) mice. Intraperitoneal administration of the GABA transporter 1 inhibitor, 1-[2-[[(diphenylmethylene)imino]oxy]ethyl]-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-3-pyridinecarboxylic acid hydrochloride (C(21)H(22)N(2)O(3).HCl; NO-711), dose-dependently prolonged the latency in both genotypes, suggesting that GABA concentration contributes to acute thermal nociception. However, there was no genotype difference in responses to the tail-immersion test or the von Frey test, indicating that spinal reflex and mechanical nociception are kept intact in GAD65(-/-) mice. There was no genotype difference in responses to chemical inflammatory nociception (formalin test and carrageenan test). Although properties of the phasic component of inhibitory postsynaptic currents were similar in both genotypes, tonic inhibition was significantly reduced in GAD65(-/-) mice. These results support the hypothesis that GAD65-mediated GABA synthesis plays relatively small but significant roles in nociceptive processing via supraspinal mechanisms.

Alpha1- and alpha2-containing GABAA receptor modulation is not necessary for benzodiazepine-induced hyperphagia

Benzodiazepines increase food intake, an effect attributed to their ability to enhance palatability. We investigated which GABA(A) receptor subtypes may be involved in mediating benzodiazepine-induced hyperphagia. The role of the alpha2 subtype was investigated by observing the effects of midazolam, on the behavioural satiety sequence in mice with targeted deletion of the alpha2 gene (alpha2 knockout). Midazolam (0.125, 0.25 and 0.5mg/kg) increased food intake and the amount of time spent feeding in alpha2 knockout mice, suggesting that BZ-induced hyperphagia does not involve alpha2-containing GABA(A) receptors. We further investigated the roles of alpha1- and alpha3-containing GABA(A) receptors in mediating BZ-induced hyperphagia. We treated alpha2(H101R) mice, in which alpha2-containing receptors are rendered benzodiazepine insensitive, with L-838417, a compound which acts as a partial agonist at alpha2-, alpha3- and alpha5-receptors but is inactive at alpha1-containing receptors. L-838417 (10 and 30 mg/kg) increased food intake and the time spent feeding in both wildtype and alpha2(H101R) mice, demonstrating that benzodiazepine-induced hyperphagia does not require alpha1- and alpha2-containing GABA(A) receptors. These observations, together with evidence against the involvement of alpha5-containing GABA(A) receptors, suggest that alpha3-containing receptors mediate BZ-induced hyperphagia in the mouse.

Central mechanisms of roles of taste in reward and eating

Taste is unique among sensory systems in its innate association with mechanisms of reward and aversion in addition to its recognition of quality, e.g., sucrose is sweet and preferable, and quinine is bitter and aversive. Taste information is sent to the reward system and feeding center via the prefrontal cortices such as the mediodorsal and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices in rodents and the orbitofrontal cortex in primates. The amygdala, which receives taste inputs, also influences reward and feeding. In terms of neuroactive substances, palatability is closely related to benzodiazepine derivatives and beta-endorphin, both of which facilitate consumption of food and fluid. The reward system contains the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens and ventral pallidum and finally sends information to the lateral hypothalamic area, the feeding center. The dopaminergic system originating from the ventral tegmental area mediates the motivation to consume palatable food. The actual ingestive behavior is promoted by the orexigenic neuropeptides from the hypothalamus. Even palatable food can become aversive and avoided as a consequence of a postingestional unpleasant experience such as malaise. The neural mechanisms of this conditioned taste aversion will also be elucidated.

A palmitoylation cycle dynamically regulates partitioning of the GABA-synthesizing enzyme GAD65 between ER-Golgi and post-Golgi membranes

GAD65, the smaller isoform of the enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase, synthesizes GABA for fine-tuning of inhibitory neurotransmission. GAD65 is synthesized as a soluble hydrophilic protein but undergoes a hydrophobic post-translational modification and becomes anchored to the cytosolic face of Golgi membranes. A second hydrophobic modification, palmitoylation of Cys30 and Cys45 in GAD65, is not required for the initial membrane anchoring but is crucial for post-Golgi trafficking of the protein to presynaptic clusters. The mechanism by which palmitoylation directs targeting of GAD65 through and out of the Golgi complex is unknown. Here, we show that prior to palmitoylation, GAD65 anchors to both ER and Golgi membranes. Palmitoylation, however, clears GAD65 from the ER-Golgi, targets it to the trans-Golgi network and then to a post-Golgi vesicular pathway. FRAP analyses of trafficking of GAD65-GFP reveal a rapid and a slow pool of protein replenishing the Golgi complex. The rapid pool represents non-palmitoylated hydrophobic GAD65-GFP, which exchanges rapidly between the cytosol and ER/Golgi membranes. The slow pool represents palmitoylation-competent GAD65-GFP, which replenishes the Golgi complex via a non-vesicular pathway and at a rate consistent with a depalmitoylation step. We propose that a depalmitoylation-repalmitoylation cycle serves to cycle GAD65 between Golgi and post-Golgi membranes and dynamically control levels of enzyme directed to the synapse.

N/A

N/A