Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in rat spinal cord after peripheral noxious stimulation

PPARα Modulation-Based Therapy in Central Nervous System Diseases

The burden of neurodegenerative diseases in the central nervous system (CNS) is increasing globally. There are various risk factors for the development and progression of CNS diseases, such as inflammatory responses and metabolic derangements. Thus, curing CNS diseases requires the modulation of damaging signaling pathways through a multitude of mechanisms. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a family of nuclear hormone receptors (PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and PPARγ), and they work as master sensors and modulators of cellular metabolism. In this regard, PPARs have recently been suggested as promising therapeutic targets for suppressing the development of CNS diseases and their progressions. While the therapeutic role of PPARγ modulation in CNS diseases has been well reviewed, the role of PPARα modulation in these diseases has not been comprehensively summarized. The current review focuses on the therapeutic roles of PPARα modulation in CNS diseases, including those affecting the brain, spinal cord, and eye, with recent advances. Our review will enable more comprehensive therapeutic approaches to modulate PPARα for the prevention of and protection from various CNS diseases.

Inhibition of the Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase as an Analgesic Strategy: A Review of Preclinical Evidence

Chronic pain is a complicated condition which causes substantial physical, emotional, and financial impacts on individuals and society. However, due to high cost, lack of efficacy and safety problems, current treatments are insufficient. There is a clear unmet medical need for safe, nonaddictive and effective therapies in the management of pain. Epoxy-fatty acids (EpFAs), which are natural signaling molecules, play key roles in mediation of both inflammatory and neuropathic pain sensation. However, their molecular mechanisms of action remain largely unknown. Soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) rapidly converts EpFAs into less bioactive fatty acid diols in vivo; therefore, inhibition of sEH is an emerging therapeutic target to enhance the beneficial effect of natural EpFAs. In this review, we will discuss sEH inhibition as an analgesic strategy for pain management and the underlying molecular mechanisms.

PPARγ Agonists Attenuate Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma isoform (PPARγ), in trigeminal neuropathic pain utilizing a novel mouse trigeminal inflammatory compression (TIC) injury model.

RESULTS

The study determined that the PPARγ nuclear receptor plays a significant role in trigeminal nociception transmission, evidenced by: 1) Intense PPARγ immunoreactivity is expressed 3 weeks after TIC nerve injury in the spinal trigeminal caudalis, the termination site of trigeminal nociceptive nerve fibers. 2) Systemic administration of a PPARγ agonist, pioglitazone (PIO), attenuates whisker pad mechanical allodynia at doses of 300 mg/kg i.p. and 600 mg/kg p.o. 3) Administration of a PPARγ antagonist, GW9662 (30 mg/kg i.p.), prior to providing the optimal dose of PIO (300 mg/kg i.p.) blocked the analgesic effect of PIO.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study localizing PPARγ immunoreactivity throughout the brainstem trigeminal sensory spinal nucleus (spV) and its increase three weeks after TIC nerve injury. This is also the first study to demonstrate that activation of PPARγ attenuates trigeminal hypersensitivity in the mouse TIC nerve injury model. The findings presented here suggest the possibility of utilizing the FDA approved diabetic treatment drug, PIO, as a new therapeutic that targets PPARγ for treatment of patients suffering from orofacial neuropathic pain.

PPARs and pain

Chronic pain is a common cause of disability worldwide and remains a global health and socio-economic challenge. Current analgesics are either ineffective in a significant proportion of patients with chronic pain or associated with significant adverse side effects. The PPARs, a family of nuclear hormone transcription factors, have emerged as important modulators of pain in preclinical studies and therefore a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of pain. Modulation of nociceptive processing by PPARs is likely to involve both transcription-dependent and transcription-independent mechanisms. This review presents a comprehensive overview of preclinical studies investigating the contribution of PPAR signalling to nociceptive processing in animal models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. We examine current evidence from anatomical, molecular and pharmacological studies demonstrating a role for PPARs in pain control. We also discuss the limited evidence available from relevant clinical studies and identify areas that warrant further research. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on 8^th European Workshop on Cannabinoid Research. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v176.10/issuetoc.

Systemic administration of WY-14643, a selective synthetic agonist of peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-alpha, alters spinal neuronal firing in a rodent model of neuropathic pain

Background and aims

The clinical management of chronic neuropathic pain remains a global health challenge. Current treatments are either ineffective, or associated with unwanted side-effects. The development of effective, safe therapies requires the identification of novel therapeutic targets using clinically relevant animal models of neuropathic pain.

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARα), is a member of the nuclear hormone family of transcription factors, which is widely distributed in the peripheral and central nervous systems. Pharmacological studies report antinociceptive effects of PPARα agonists following systemic administration in rodent models of neuropathic pain, however the neuronal mechanisms and sites of action mediating these effects are unclear.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of systemic administration of the synthetic PPARα agonist, WY-14643 on mechanically-evoked responses of spinal cord dorsal horn wide dynamic range (WDR) neurones in the spinal nerve ligated (SNL) model of neuropathic pain in rats. In addition, comparative molecular analysis of mRNA coding for PPARα and PPARα protein expression in the spinal cord of sham-operated and neuropathic rats was performed.

Methods

Lumbar L5–L6 spinal nerve ligation was performed in male Sprague–Dawley rats (110–130 g) under isoflurane anaesthesia. Sham controls underwent similar surgical conditions, but without ligation of the L5–L6 spinal nerves. Hindpaw withdrawal thresholds were measured on the day of surgery -day 0, and on days- 2, 4, 7, 10 and 14 post-surgery. At day 14 extracellular single-unit recordings of spinal (WDR) dorsal horn neurons were performed in both sham and SNL neuropathic rats under anaesthesia. The effects of intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of WY-14643 (15 and 30 mg/kg) or vehicle on evoked responses of WDR neurons to punctate mechanical stimulation of the peripheral receptive field of varying bending force (8–60 g) were recorded. In a separate cohort of SNL and sham neuropathic rats, the expression of mRNA coding for PPARα and protein expression in the ipsilateral and contralateral spinal cord was determined using quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blotting techniques respectively.

Results

WY-14643 (15 and 30mg/kg i.p.) rapidly attenuated mechanically evoked (8, 10 and 15g) responses of spinal WDR neurones in SNL, but not sham-operated rats. Molecular analysis revealed significantly increased PPARα protein, but not mRNA, expression in the ipsilateral spinal cord of SNL, compared to the contralateral side in SNL rats. There were no changes in PPARα mRNA or protein expression in the sham controls.

Conclusion

The observation that levels of PPARα protein were increased in ipsilateral spinal cord of neuropathic rats supports a contribution of spinal sites of action mediating the effects of systemic WY-14643. Our data suggests that the inhibitory effects of a PPARα agonist on spinal neuronal responses may account, at least in part, for their analgesic effects of in neuropathic pain.

Implication

Selective activation of PPARα in the spinal cord may be therapeutically relevant for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

A role for PPARα in the medial prefrontal cortex in formalin-evoked nociceptive responding in rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The nuclear hormone receptor, PPARα, and its endogenous ligands, are involved in pain modulation. PPARα is expressed in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), a key brain region involved in both the cognitive-affective component of pain and in descending modulation of pain. However, the role of PPARα in the mPFC in pain responding has not been investigated. Here, we investigated the effects of pharmacological modulation of PPARα in the rat mPFC on formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour and the impact of formalin-induced nociception on components of PPARα signalling in the mPFC.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The effects of intra-mPFC microinjection of a PPARα agonist (GW7647) or a PPARα antagonist (GW6471) on formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour in rats were studied. Quantitative real-time PCR and LC-MS/MS were used to study the effects of intraplantar injection of formalin on PPARα mRNA expression and levels of endogenous ligands, respectively, in the mPFC.

KEY RESULTS

Intra-mPFC administration of GW6471, but not GW7647, resulted in delayed onset of the early second phase of formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour. Furthermore, formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour was associated with significant reductions in mPFC levels of endogenous PPARα ligands (N-palmitoylethanolamide and N-oleoylethanolamide) and a 70% reduction in PPARα mRNA but not protein expression.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These data suggest that endogenous ligands may act at PPARα in the mPFC to play a facilitatory/permissive role in second phase formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviour in rats.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Cannabinoids 2013. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2014.171.issue-6.

Spinal cord injury induced changes of nuclear receptors PPARα and LXRβ and modulation with oleic acid/albumin treatment

In previous studies with animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI) pharmacological activation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPAR) and liver X receptors (LXR) were used to reduce tissue damage and promote behavioral recovery in animal models. We have studied the endogenous expression of the transcription factors PPARα and LXRβ in the chronic stage after SCI in rats. The immunohistochemical investigation revealed a long lasting increase in the level of PPARα in white matter in the vicinity of the lesion site. The source of this signal was identified in a subpopulation of astrocytes outside of the glial scar area. Intrathecal injections of oleic acid/albumin reduced the lesion-induced PPARα immunoreactivity. In addition, ependymal cells displayed a prominent PPARα signal in the non-injured spinal cord, and continued to express the receptor as they proliferated and migrated within the damaged tissue. The nuclear receptor LXRβ was detected at similar levels after SCI as in sham operated animals. We found high levels of immunoreactivity in the gray matter, while in the white matter it was present in subpopulations of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Macrophages that had accumulated within the center of the lesion contained LXRβ in their cell nuclei. Possible endogenous functions of PPARα and LXRβ after SCI are discussed, specifically the control of fatty acid and cholesterol metabolism and the regulation of inflammatory reactions.

Nuclear control of the inflammatory response in mammals by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that play pivotal roles in the regulation of a very large number of biological processes including inflammation. Using specific examples, this paper focuses on the interplay between PPARs and innate immunity/inflammation and, when possible, compares it among species. We focus on recent discoveries establishing how inflammation and PPARs interact in the context of obesity-induced inflammation and type 2 diabetes, mostly in mouse and humans. We illustrate that PPAR γ ability to alleviate obesity-associated inflammation raises an interesting pharmacologic potential. In the light of recent findings, the protective role of PPAR α and PPAR β / δ against the hepatic inflammatory response is also addressed. While PPARs agonists are well-established agents that can treat numerous inflammatory issues in rodents and humans, surprisingly very little has been described in other species. We therefore also review the implication of PPARs in inflammatory bowel disease; acute-phase response; and central, cardiac, and endothelial inflammation and compare it along different species (mainly mouse, rat, human, and pig). In the light of the data available in the literature, there is no doubt that more studies concerning the impact of PPAR ligands in livestock should be undertaken because it may finally raise unconsidered health and sanitary benefits.

GW0742, a high-affinity PPAR-δ agonist, mediates protection in an organotypic model of spinal cord damage

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental study of spinal cord injury (SCI) using an organotypic slice culture.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the protective mechanism of PPAR-δ agonist GW0742 in the injured spinal cord using an in vitro model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In vivo data suggest that ligands of the δ isoform have activity in a number of disease models that are partly driven by the inflammatory response. Moreover, reports from in vivo studies using models of ischemia reperfusion and Parkinson disease also have shown neuroprotection conferred by PPAR-δ. The biological role and function of PPAR-δ remains relatively unclear.

METHODS

Spinal cord from 6-week-old mice was cut into transverse slices of 400-μm thickness to generate the organotypic slice cultures. The slices were injured using a weight dropped onto the center of the slice. PPAR-δ agonist was applied at 10 μM at 1 hour before injury.

RESULTS

Our study shows that GW0742 incubation (10 μM) at 1 hour before transverse lesion significantly reduced (1) p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), (2) c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK/SAP kinase), (3) NF-κB activation, (4) loss of neurotrophic factors (BDNF, GDNF), (5) COX-2 expression, and (6) cell death.

CONCLUSION

GW0742 reduces the cellular and molecular changes occurring in SCI by targeting different downstream pathways modulating PPAR-δ receptors.

Effects of intra-ventrolateral periaqueductal grey palmitoylethanolamide on thermoceptive threshold and rostral ventromedial medulla cell activity

Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) ligand, exerts antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects. PEA (3 and 6 nmol) was microinjected in the ventrolateral periaqueductal grey (VL PAG) of male rats and effects on nociceptive responses and ongoing and tail flick-related activities of rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) ON and OFF cells were recorded. Intra-PAG microinjection of PEA reduced the ongoing activity of ON and OFF cells and produced an increase in the latency of the nociceptive reaction. These effects were prevented by a selective PPAR-α antagonist, GW6471 and by a large-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channel inhibitor, charybdotoxin. Cannabinoid 1 (CB(1)) receptor blockade by AM251 increased the PEA-induced effect both on the ongoing activity of the ON cell and on the latency to tail flick without affecting the effect of PEA on the OFF cell. Conversely, a transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV(1)) blocker, I-RTX, had no effect on the ON cell activity and tail flick latency, whereas it blocked the PEA-induced decrease in ongoing activity of the OFF cell. PEA decreased the burst and increased the latency of tail flick-evoked onset of ON cell activity in a manner antagonised by GW6471 and charybdotoxin. AM251 and I-RTX, instead, enhanced these latter effects. In conclusion, intra-VL PAG PEA induces antinociceptive effects associated with a decrease in RVM ON and OFF cell activities. PPAR-α receptors mediate, and CB(1) and TRPV(1) receptors antagonise, PEA-induced effects within the PAG-RVM circuitry.

Chronic expression of PPAR-delta by oligodendrocyte lineage cells in the injured rat spinal cord

The transcription factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-delta promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelin formation in vitro and is prevalent throughout the brain and spinal cord. Its expression after injury, however, has not been examined. Thus, we used a spinal contusion model to examine the spatiotemporal expression of PPAR-delta in naïve and injured spinal cords from adult rats. As previously reported, PPAR-delta was expressed by neurons and oligodendrocytes in uninjured spinal cords; PPAR-delta was also detected in NG2 cells (potential oligodendrocyte progenitors) within the white matter and gray matter. After spinal cord injury (SCI), PPAR-delta mRNA and protein were present early and increased over time. Overall PPAR-delta+ cell numbers declined at 1 day post injury (dpi), likely reflecting neuron loss, and then rose through 14 dpi. A large proportion of NG2 cells expressed PPAR-delta after SCI, especially along lesion borders. PPAR-delta+ NG2 cell numbers were significantly higher than naive by 7 dpi and remained elevated through at least 28 dpi. PPAR-delta+ oligodendrocyte numbers declined at 1 dpi and then increased over time such that >20% of oligodendrocytes expressed PPAR-delta after SCI compared with approximately 10% in uninjured tissue. The most prominent increase in PPAR-delta+ oligodendrocytes was along lesion borders where at least a portion of newly generated oligodendrocytes (bromodeoxyuridine+) were PPAR-delta+. Consistent with its role in cellular differentiation, the early rise in PPAR-delta+ NG2 cells followed by an increase in new PPAR-delta+ oligodendrocytes suggests that this transcription factor may be involved in the robust oligodendrogenesis detected previously along SCI lesion borders.

Palmitoylethanolamide modulates pentobarbital-evoked hypnotic effect in mice: involvement of allopregnanolone biosynthesis

Palmitoylethanolamde (PEA) is an endogenous lipid neuromodulator that mediates a broad spectrum of pharmacological effects by activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha). Detectable or high levels of PEA in the CNS have been found, but the specific function of this lipid remains to be clarified. Here we report evidence that PEA, activating PPAR-alpha receptor and involving neurosteroids de novo synthesis, modulates pentobarbital-evoked hypnotic effect. A single i.c.v. administration of PEA (1-5microg) increases pentobarbital induced loss of righting reflex (LORR) duration in mice. This effect is mimicked by GW7647 (3microg), a synthetic PPAR-alpha agonist, and disappears in PPAR-alpha knockout mice. Antagonism experiments strongly support the engaging of neurosteroidogenic pathway in the increase of LORR duration induced by PEA. This effect disappeared using two inhibitors blocking the key steps of neurosteroids synthesis, aminogluthetimide and finasteride. Moreover, we demonstrated that in brainstem PEA increased the expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) and cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage (P450scc), both involved in neurosteroidogenesis. Accordingly, allopregnanolone (ALLO) levels were in turn higher in brainstem of PEA and pentobarbital treated mice vs pentobarbital alone, as revealed by quantitative analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. A Our results demonstrate that exogenous administration of PEA, through a PPAR-alpha-dependent mechanism, modulates neurosteroids formation increasing ALLO levels and leading to a positive modulation of GABA(A) receptor. These data further strengthen our previous data on the role of PPAR-alpha in PEA's actions and could provide a new framework to understand its role in the CNS.

Central administration of palmitoylethanolamide reduces hyperalgesia in mice via inhibition of NF-kappaB nuclear signalling in dorsal root ganglia

Despite the clear roles played by peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha) in lipid metabolism, inflammation and feeding, the effects of its activation in the central nervous system (CNS) are largely unknown. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), a member of the fatty-acid ethanolamide family, acts peripherally as an endogenous PPAR-alpha agonist, exerting analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Both PPAR-alpha and PEA are present in the CNS, but the specific functions of this lipid and its receptor remain to be clarified. Using the carrageenan-induced paw model of hyperalgesia in mice, we report here that intracerebroventricular administration of PEA (0.1-1 microg) 30 min before carrageenan injection markedly reduced mechanical hyperalgesia up to 24 h following inflammatory insult. This effect was mimicked by GW7647 (1 microg), a synthetic PPAR-alpha agonist. The obligatory role of PPAR-alpha in mediating PEA's actions was confirmed by the lack of anti-hyperalgesic effects in mutant mice lacking PPAR-alpha. PEA significantly reduced the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in sciatic nerves and restored carrageenan-induced reductions of PPAR-alpha in the L4-L6 dorsal root ganglia (DRG). To investigate the mechanism by which PEA attenuated hyperalgesia, we evaluated inhibitory kB-alpha (IkB-alpha) degradation and p65 nuclear factor kB (NF-kappaB) activation in DRG. PEA prevented IkB-alpha degradation and p65 NF-kappaB nuclear translocation, confirming the involvement of this transcriptional factor in the control of peripheral hyperalgesia. These results add further support to the broad-spectrum of biological and pharmacological effects induced by PPAR-alpha agonists, suggesting a centrally mediated component for these drugs in controlling inflammatory pain.

PPAR and Pain

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factor belonging to a nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, containing three isoforms (alpha, beta/delta, and gamma). PPARs play a critical physiological role as a primary lipid sensor and regulator of lipid metabolism. Thus, its ligands are clinically used for treatment of type 2 diabetes and hyperlipidemia. On the other hand, PPAR ligands exert the antineuroinflammatory activity through preventing upregulation of inflammatory mediators in animal models for neurodegenerative disease and autoimmune disease. Neuropathic pain and inflammatory pain, clinically important one, are chronically progressed and underlain by neuroinflammation. In a few years, some studies using experimental models emerge that administration of PPAR ligands reduces inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain. PPAR ligands repress expression of genes for inflammatory mediators involved in both pains, such as proinflammatory cytokines, by a molecular mechanism termed ligand-dependent direct transrepression. Alternative mechanism is independent of transcriptional regulation of target genes, such as inhibition of activity of ion channels involved in the development of inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain, and therefore the analgesic effect occurs with rapid onset. The effects of PPAR ligands on neuroinflammation in animal models suggest their possible use for treating human inflammatory pain and neuropathic pain.

Acute intracerebroventricular administration of palmitoylethanolamide, an endogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha agonist, modulates carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha is a nuclear transcription factor. Although the presence of this receptor in different areas of central nervous system (CNS) has been reported, its role remains unclear. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), a member of the fatty-acid ethanolamide family, acts peripherally as an endogenous PPAR-alpha ligand, exerting analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. High levels of PEA in the CNS have been found, but the specific function of this lipid remains to be clarified. Using carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice, we show that i.c.v. administration of PEA may control peripheral inflammation through central PPAR-alpha activation. A single i.c.v. administration of 0.01 to 1 microg of PEA, 30 min before carrageenan injection, reduced edema formation in the mouse carrageenan test. This effect was mimicked by 0.01 to 1 microg of GW7647 [2-[[4-[2-[[(cyclohexylamino)carbonyl](4-cyclohexylbutyl)amino]ethyl]phenyl]thio]-2-methylpropanoic acid], a synthetic PPAR-alpha agonist. Moreover, central PEA administration significantly reduced the expression of the proinflammatory enzymes cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric-oxide synthase, and it significantly restored carrageenan-induced PPAR-alpha reduction in the spinal cord. To investigate the mechanism by which i.c.v. PEA attenuated the development of carrageenan-induced paw edema, we evaluated inhibitor kappaB-alpha (I kappa B-alpha) degradation and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) p65 activation in the cytosolic or nuclear extracts from spinal cord tissue. PEA prevented IkB-alpha degradation and NF-kappaB nuclear translocation, confirming the involvement of this transcriptional factor in the control of peripheral inflammation. The obligatory role of PPAR-alpha in mediating the effects of PEA was confirmed by the lack of the compounds anti-inflammatory effects in mutant mice lacking PPAR-alpha. In conclusion, our data show for the first time that PPAR-alpha activation in the CNS can control peripheral inflammation.

Involvement of the renin–angiotensin system in migraine

Migraine is a common episodic headache that predominantly affects young adults, particularly women in their most productive years. Many of the prophylactic agents available today have side-effects that are not compatible with long-term use. The discovery that drugs influencing the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), which have few side-effects, were effective in some patients with migraine led to several studies investigating a possible link between the angiotensin system and migraine pathophysiology. Clinical trials indicated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are effective in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. These findings are further supported by pharmacoepidemiological, genetic, and physiological studies. In addition, it is known that the RAS has neurophysiological, chemical, and immunological effects that are of relevance in migraine pathophysiology. On the basis of evidence presented in this review, we find it likely that the RAS has a clinically important role in migraine pathophysiology. The effect of ARBs and ACEIs on migraine is probably not attributable to their effect on blood pressure. The RAS has several actions that may be relevant in migraine pathophysiology, but the reason for the prophylactic effect of ARBs/ACEIs in migraine remains a matter of speculation.