Goal conceptualization and symmetry of arm movements affect bimanual coordination in individuals after stroke

Goal conceptualization has distinct effects on spatial and temporal bimanual coordination after left- and right- hemisphere stroke

Perception of task goal influences motor performance and coordination. In bimanual actions, it is unclear how one's perception of task goals influences bimanual coordination and performance in individuals with unilateral stroke. We characterized inter-limb coordination differences in individuals with chronic right- and left-hemisphere damaged (RCVA: n = 24, LCVA: n = 24) stroke and age-matched neurotypical controls (n = 24) as they completed bimanual reaching tasks under distinct goal conditions. In the dual-goal condition, participants reached to move two virtual bricks (cursors) assigned to each hand toward independent targets. In the common-goal condition, they moved a central common virtual brick representing both hands to a single, central target. Spatial and temporal coordination (cross-correlation coefficients of hand velocity and their time-lag), the redundant axis deviations (the hand deviations in the axis orthogonal to the axis along the cursor-target direction), and the contribution ratio of the paretic hand were measured. Compared to the dual-goal condition, reaching actions to the common-goal demonstrated better spatial bimanual coordination in all three participant groups. Temporal coordination was better during common-goal than dual-goal actions only for the LCVA group. Additionally, and novel to this field, sex, as a biological variable, differently influenced movement time and redundant axis deviation in participants with stroke under the common-goal condition. Specifically, female stroke survivors showed larger movements in the redundant axes and, consequently, longer movement times, which was more prominent in the LCVA group. Our results indicate that perception of task goals influences bimanual coordination, with common goal improving spatial coordination in neurotypical individuals and individuals with unilateral stroke and providing additional advantage for temporal coordination in those with LCVA. Sex influences bimanual performance in stroke survivors and needs to be considered in future investigations.

Post-stroke deficits in the anticipatory control and bimanual coordination during naturalistic cooperative bimanual action

BACKGROUND

Unilateral stroke leads to asymmetric deficits in movement performance; yet its effects on naturalistic bimanual actions, a key aspect of everyday functions, are understudied. Particularly, how naturalistic bimanual actions that require the two hands to cooperatively interact with each other while manipulating a single common object are planned, executed, and coordinated after stroke is not known. In the present study, we compared the anticipatory planning, execution, and coordination of force between individuals with left and right hemisphere stroke and neurotypical controls in a naturalistic bimanual common-goal task, lifting a box.

METHOD

Thirty-three individuals with chronic stroke (15 LCVA, 18 RCVA) and 8 neurotypical age-matched controls used both hands to lift a box fitted with force transducers under unweighted and weighted conditions. Primary dependent variables included measures of anticipation (peak grip and load force rate), execution (peak grip force, load force), and measures of within-hand (grip-load force coordination) and between-hand coordination (force rate cross-correlations). Primary analyses were performed using linear mixed effects modeling. Exploratory backward stepwise regression examined predictors of individual variability within participants with stroke.

RESULTS

Participants with stroke, particularly the RCVA group, showed impaired scaling of grip and load force rates with the addition of weight, indicating deficits in anticipatory control. While there were no group differences in peak grip force, participants with stroke showed significant impairments in peak load force and in grip-load force coordination with specific deficits in the evolution of load force prior to object lift-off. Finally, there were differences in spatial coordination of load force rates for participants with stroke, and especially the RCVA group, as compared to controls. Unimanual motor performance of the paretic arm and hemisphere of lesion (right hemisphere) were the key predictors of impairments in anticipatory planning of grip force and bimanual coordination among participants with stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that individuals with stroke, particularly those with right hemisphere damage, have impairments in anticipatory planning and interlimb coordination of symmetric cooperative bimanual tasks.

Upper extremity asymmetry due to nerve injuries or central neurologic conditions: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injuries and central neurologic conditions can result in extensive disabilities. In cases with unilateral impairment, assessing the asymmetry between the upper extremity has been used to assess outcomes of treatment and severity of injury. A wide variety of validated and novel tests and sensors have been utilized to determine the upper extremity asymmetry. The purpose of this article is to review the literature and define the current state of the art for describing upper extremity asymmetry in patients with peripheral nerve injuries or central neurologic conditions.

METHOD

An electronic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, OVID was performed for publications between 2000 to 2022. Eligibility criteria were subjects with neurological conditions/injuries who were analyzed for dissimilarities in use between the upper extremities. Data related to study population, target condition/injury, types of tests performed, sensors used, real-world data collection, outcome measures of interest, and results of the study were extracted. Sackett's Level of Evidence was used to judge the quality of the articles.

RESULTS

Of the 7281 unique articles, 112 articles met the inclusion criteria for the review. Eight target conditions/injuries were identified (Brachial Plexus Injury, Cerebral Palsy, Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Peripheral Nerve Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, Schizophrenia, and stroke). The tests performed were classified into thirteen categories based on the nature of the test and data collected. The general results related to upper extremity asymmetry were listed for all the reviewed articles. Stroke was the most studied condition, followed by cerebral palsy, with kinematics and strength measurement tests being the most frequently used tests. Studies with a level of evidence level II and III increased between 2000 and 2021. The use of real-world evidence-based data, and objective data collection tests also increased in the same period.

CONCLUSION

Adequately powered randomized controlled trials should be used to study upper extremity asymmetry. Neurological conditions other than stroke should be studied further. Upper extremity asymmetry should be measured using objective outcome measures like motion tracking and activity monitoring in the patient's daily living environment.

Bimanual coordination during reach-to-grasp actions is sensitive to task goal with distinctions between left- and right-hemispheric stroke

The perceptual feature of a task such as how a task goal is perceived influences performance and coordination of bimanual actions in neurotypical adults. To assess how bimanual task goal modifies paretic and non-paretic arm performance and bimanual coordination in individuals with stroke affecting left and right hemispheres, 30 participants with hemispheric stroke (15 right-hemisphere damage-RHD); 15 left-hemisphere damage-LHD) and 10 age-matched controls performed reach-to-grasp and pick-up actions under bimanual common-goal (i.e., two physically coupled dowels), bimanual independent-goal (two physically uncoupled dowels), and unimanual conditions. Reach-to-grasp time and peak grasp aperture indexed motor performance, while time lags between peak reach velocities, peak grasp apertures, and peak pick-up velocities of the two hands characterized reach, grasp, and pick-up coordination, respectively. Compared to unimanual actions, bimanual actions significantly slowed non-paretic arm speed to match paretic arm speed, thus affording no benefit to paretic arm performance. Detriments in non-paretic arm performance during bimanual actions was more pronounced in the RHD group. Under common-goal conditions, movements were faster with smaller peak grasp apertures compared to independent-goal conditions for all groups. Compared to controls, individuals with stroke demonstrated poor grasp and pick-up coordination. Of the patient groups, patients with LHD showed more pronounced deficits in grasp coordination between hands. Finally, grasp coordination deficits related to paretic arm motor deficits (upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score) for LHD group, and to Trail-Making Test performance for RHD group. Findings suggest that task goal and distinct clinical deficits influence bimanual performance and coordination in patients with left- and right-hemispheric stroke.

Bimanual motor skill learning after stroke: Combining robotics and anodal tDCS over the undamaged hemisphere: An exploratory study

Background

Since a stroke can impair bimanual activities, enhancing bimanual cooperation through motor skill learning may improve neurorehabilitation. Therefore, robotics and neuromodulation with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are promising approaches. To date, tDCS has failed to enhance bimanual motor control after stroke possibly because it was not integrating the hypothesis that the undamaged hemisphere becomes the major poststroke hub for bimanual control.

Objective

We tested the following hypotheses: (I) In patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke training on a robotic device, anodal tDCS applied over the primary motor cortex of the undamaged hemisphere enhances bimanual motor skill learning compared to sham tDCS. (II) The severity of impairment correlates with the effect of tDCS on bimanual motor skill learning. (III) Bimanual motor skill learning is less efficient in patients than in healthy individuals (HI).

Methods

A total of 17 patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke and 7 healthy individuals learned a complex bimanual cooperation skill on the REAplan® neurorehabilitation robot. The bimanual speed/accuracy trade-off (biSAT), bimanual coordination (biCo), and bimanual force (biFOP) scores were computed for each performance. In patients, real/sham tDCS was applied in a crossover, randomized, double-blind approach.

Results

Compared to sham, real tDCS did not enhance bimanual motor skill learning, retention, or generalization in patients, and no correlation with impairment was noted. The healthy individuals performed better than patients on bimanual motor skill learning, but generalization was similar in both groups.

Conclusion

A short motor skill learning session with a robotic device resulted in the retention and generalization of a complex skill involving bimanual cooperation. The tDCS strategy that would best enhance bimanual motor skill learning after stroke remains unknown.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02308852, identifier: NCT02308852.

A trade-off between kinematic and dynamic control of bimanual reaching in virtual reality

Bimanual coordination is an essential component of human movement. Cooperative bimanual reaching tasks are widely used to assess the optimal control of goal-directed reaching. However, little is known about the neuromuscular mechanisms governing these tasks. Twelve healthy, right-handed participants performed a bimanual reaching task in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. They controlled a shared cursor, located at the midpoint between the hands, and reached targets located at 80% of full arm extension. Following a baseline of normal reaches, we placed a wrist weight on one arm and measured the change in coordination. Relative contribution (RC) was computed as the displacement of the right hand divided by the sum of displacements of both hands. We used surface electromyography placed over the anterior deltoid and biceps brachii to compute muscle contribution (MC) from root mean squared muscle activity data. We found RC was no different than 50% during baseline, indicating participants reached equal displacements when no weights were applied. Participants systematically altered limb coordination in response to altered limb dynamics. RC increased by 0.91% and MC decreased by 5.3% relative to baseline when the weight was applied to the left arm; RC decreased by 0.94% and MC increased by 6.3% when the weight was applied to the right arm. Participants adopted an optimal control strategy that attempted to minimize both kinematic and muscular asymmetries between limbs. What emerged was a trade-off between these two parameters, and we propose this trade-off as a potential neuromuscular mechanism of cooperative bimanual reaching.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to propose a trade-off between kinematic and dynamic control parameters governing goal-directed reaching. We propose a straightforward tool to assess this trade-off without the need for computational modeling. The technologies and techniques developed in this study are discussed in the context of upper extremity rehabilitation.

Bimanual motor skill learning with robotics in chronic stroke: comparison between minimally impaired and moderately impaired patients, and healthy individuals

BACKGROUND

Most activities of daily life (ADL) require cooperative bimanual movements. A unilateral stroke may severely impair bimanual ADL. How patients with stroke (re)learn to coordinate their upper limbs (ULs) is largely unknown. The objectives are to determine whether patients with chronic supratentorial stroke could achieve bimanual motor skill learning (bim-MSkL) and to compare bim-MSkL between patients and healthy individuals (HIs).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients and ten HIs trained over 3 consecutive days on an asymmetrical bimanual coordination task (CIRCUIT) implemented as a serious game in the REAplan® robot. With a common cursor controlled by coordinated movements of the ULs through robotic handles, they performed as many laps as possible (speed constraint) on the CIRCUIT while keeping the cursor within the track (accuracy constraint). The primary outcome was a bimanual speed/accuracy trade-off (biSAT), we used a bimanual coordination factor (biCO) and bimanual forces (biFOP) for the secondary outcomes. Several clinical scales were used to evaluate motor and cognitive functions.

RESULTS

Overall, the patients showed improvements on biSAT and biCO. Based on biSAT progression, the HI achieved a larger bim-MSkL than the patients with mild to moderate impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE): 28-55, n = 15) but not significantly different from those with minimal motor impairment (FMA-UE: 66, n = 9). There was a significant positive correlation between biSAT evolution and the FMA-UE and Stroke Impact Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HI and patients with chronic stroke training on a robotic device achieved bim-MSkL, although the more impaired patients were less efficient. Bim-MSkL with REAplan® may be interesting for neurorehabilitation after stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT03974750. Registered 05 June 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03974750?cond=NCT03974750&draw=2&rank=1.

Analysis of Upper Limbs Target-Reaching Movement and Muscle Co-Activation in Patients with First Time Stroke for Rehabilitation Progress Monitoring

In this paper, the authors analysed changes occurring during the rehabilitation processes in patients after early stroke based on analysis of their upper limbs’ target-reaching movement and muscle co-activation. Ischemic stroke often results in reduced mobility of the upper extremities and frequently is a cause for long-term disability. The ever-developing technology of 3D movement analysis and miniaturisation of equipment for testing the bioelectrical activity of muscles can help to assess the progress of rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to examine the use of analysis of target-reaching movement indicators and muscle co-activation for diagnosing the rehabilitation process in post-stroke patients. Twenty ischemic stroke patients in the early post-stroke phase (up to three months after the stroke), and twenty healthy subjects (the control group) took part in the experiments. The novel approach of the proposed research proved the usefulness of this approach in the diagnosis of the rehabilitation efficiency of rehabilitation in early post-stroke phase patients.

The modulation of short and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition during bimanually coordinated movements

Bimanual coordination is essential for the performance of many everyday tasks. There are several types of bimanually coordinated movements, classified according to whether the arms are acting to achieve a single goal (cooperative) or separate goals (independent), and whether the arms are moving symmetrically or asymmetrically. Symmetric bimanual movements are thought to facilitate corticomotor excitability (CME), while asymmetric bimanual movements are thought to recruit interhemispheric inhibition to reduce functional coupling between the motor cortices. The influences of movement symmetry and goal conceptualisation on interhemispheric interactions have not been studied together, and not during bimanually active dynamic tasks. The present study used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the modulation of CME and short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI and LIHI, respectively) during bimanually active dynamic tasks requiring different types of bimanual coordination. Twenty healthy right-handed adults performed four bimanual tasks in which they held a dumbbell in each hand (independent) or a custom device between both hands (cooperative) while rhythmically flexing and extending their wrists symmetrically or asymmetrically. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the right extensor carpi ulnaris. We found CME was greater during asymmetric tasks than symmetric tasks, and movement symmetry did not modulate SIHI or LIHI. There was no effect of goal conceptualisation nor any interaction with movement symmetry for CME, SIHI or LIHI. Based on these results, movement symmetry and goal conceptualisation may not modulate interhemispheric inhibition during dynamic bimanual tasks. These findings contradict prevailing thinking about the roles of CME and interhemispheric inhibition in bimanual coordination.

Kinematic Measures of Bimanual Performance are Associated With Callosum White Matter Change in People With Chronic Stroke

Objectives

To investigate the relationship between bimanual performance deficits measured using kinematics and callosum (CC) white matter changes that occur in people with chronic stroke.

Design

Cross-sectional, observational study of participants with chronic stroke and age-matched controls.

Setting

Recruitment and assessments occurred at a stroke recovery research center. Behavioral assessments were performed in a controlled laboratory setting. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed at the Center for Biomedical Imaging.

Participants

Individuals were enrolled and completed the study (N=39; 21 participants with chronic stroke; 18 age-matched controls with at least 2 stroke risk factors).

Main Outcome Measures

Diffusion imaging metrics were obtained for each individual’s CC and corticospinal tract (CST), including mean kurtosis (MK) and fractional anisotropy (FA). A battery of motor assessments, including bimanual kinematics, were collected from individuals while performing bimanual reaching.

Results

Participants with stroke had lower FA and MK in the CST of the lesioned hemisphere when compared with the non-lesioned hemisphere. The FA and MK values in the CST were correlated with measures of unimanual hand performance. In addition, participants with stroke had significantly lower FA and MK in the CC than matched controls. CC diffusion metrics positively correlated with hand asymmetry and trunk displacement during bimanual performance, even when correcting for age and lesion volume.

Conclusions

These data confirm previous studies that linked CST integrity to unimanual performance and provide new data demonstrating a link between CC integrity and both bimanual motor deficits and compensatory movements.

•

Fractional anisotropy and mean kurtosis in the corpus callosum are lower in participants with stroke.

•

Hand position symmetry and trunk displacement are disrupted during bimanual tasks.

•

Corpus callosum white matter correlated with bimanual kinematics in participants with stroke.

Bimanual motor skill learning and robotic assistance for chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled trial

Using robotic devices might improve recovery post-stroke, but the optimal way to apply robotic assistance has yet to be determined. The current study aimed to investigate whether training under the robotic active-assisted mode improves bimanual motor skill learning (biMSkL) more than training under the active mode in stroke patients. Twenty-six healthy individuals (HI) and 23 chronic hemiparetic stroke patients with a detectable lesion on MRI or CT scan, who demonstrated motor deficits in the upper limb, were randomly allocated to two parallel groups. The protocol included a two-day training on a new bimanual cooperative task, LIFT-THE-TRAY, under either the active or active-assisted modes (where assistance decreased in a pre-determined stepwise fashion) with the bimanual version of the REAplan® robotic device. The hypothesis was that the active-assisted mode would result in greater biMSkL than the active mode. The biMSkL was quantified by a speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) before (T1) and immediately after (T2) training on days 1 and 2 (T3 and T4). The change in SAT after 2 days of training (T4/T1) indicated that both HI and stroke patients learned and retained the bimanual cooperative task. After 2 days of training, the active-assisted mode did not improve biMSkL more than the active mode (T4/T1) in HI nor stroke patients. Whereas HI generalized the learned bimanual skill to different execution speeds in both the active and active-assisted subgroups, the stroke patients generalized the learned skill only in the active subgroup. Taken together, the active-assisted mode, applied in a pre-determined stepwise decreasing fashion, did not improve biMSkL more than the active mode in HI and stroke subjects. Stroke subjects might benefit more from robotic assistance when applied “as-needed.” This study was approved by the local ethical committee (Comité d’éthique médicale, CHU UCL Namur, Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium; Internal number: 54/2010, EudraCT number: NUB B039201317382) on July 14, 2016 and was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03974750) on June 5, 2019.

Bimanual Coordination Functions between Paretic and Nonparetic Arms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bimanual coordination is essential for performing many everyday interlimb actions that require successful spatiotemporal interactions between the 2 arms. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates bimanual coordination function of the upper extremities in patients with stroke.

METHODS

Seventeen studies that compared bimanual coordination functions in patients with stroke and age-matched healthy controls qualified for this meta-analysis. We categorized 25 comparisons from the 17 qualified studies into 6 types of bimanual actions based on 3 task constraints: (1), symmetry versus asymmetry movements, (2) parallel versus cooperative movements, and (3) independent goals versus a common goal.

RESULTS

Random effects meta-analysis revealed that patients with stroke had impaired kinematic (Hedges's g = -1.232 and P < .0001) and kinetic (Hedges's g = -.712 and P = .001) control of bimanual coordination as compared with the age-matched healthy controls. The moderator variable analysis on the 6 types of bimanual actions showed that bimanual coordination impairments after stroke appeared while performing both asymmetrical bimanual movements and symmetrical bimanual movements to achieve a common goal. Moreover, we observed a potential relationship between greater time since stroke onset and increased interlimb coordination impairments for chronic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that restoring interlimb coordination functions after stroke may be a crucial rehabilitation goal for facilitating progress toward stroke motor recovery.

Learning a Bimanual Cooperative Skill in Chronic Stroke Under Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been suggested to improve poststroke recovery. However, its effects on bimanual motor learning after stroke have not previously been explored. Objective. We investigated whether dual-tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1), with cathodal and anodal tDCS applied over undamaged and damaged hemispheres, respectively, improves learning and retention of a new bimanual cooperative motor skill in stroke patients. Method. Twenty-one chronic hemiparetic patients were recruited for a randomized, double-blinded, cross-over, sham-controlled trial. While receiving real or sham dual-tDCS, they trained on a bimanual cooperative task called CIRCUIT. Changes in performance were quantified via bimanual speed/accuracy trade-off (Bi-SAT) and bimanual coordination factor (Bi-Co) before, during, and 0, 30, and 60 minutes after dual-tDCS, as well as one week later to measure retention. A generalization test then followed, where patients were asked to complete a new CIRCUIT layout. Results. The patients were able to learn and retain the bimanual cooperative skill. However, a general linear mixed model did not detect a significant difference in retention between the real and sham dual-tDCS conditions for either Bi-SAT or Bi-Co. Similarly, no difference in generalization was detected for Bi-SAT or Bi-Co. Conclusion. The chronic hemiparetic stroke patients learned and retained the complex bimanual cooperative task and generalized the newly acquired skills to other tasks, indicating that bimanual CIRCUIT training is promising as a neurorehabilitation approach. However, bimanual motor skill learning was not enhanced by dual-tDCS in these patients.

Functional differences in upper limb movement after early and chronic stroke based on kinematic motion indicators

AIMS

The main purpose of this study was to determine the changes in kinematic parameters of ischemic stroke affected upper limbs, during simple functional activity, to determine the most relevant changes.

METHODS

The OptiTrack system was used for motion capture. To determine upper extremity function in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks. During particular phases, the following matrices were chosen: mean and peak speed, normalized movement unit, normalized jerk and phase movement time. The chosen matrices represent the speed and smoothness profile of end-point data. The the arm-trunk compensation was also taken into consideration. Twenty stroke patients, in early (G1 from 1 to 3 months after stroke) and chronic stage (G2 from 6 months to 1 year), were studied. The large and small cylinder forward and back transporting phases were evaluated.

RESULTS

The most significant differences between groups G1 and G2 were in mean and peak speed of the forward transport of the large and small cylinders for the paretic limb. Significant differences were also found for the smoothness (measured by movement unit, mean and peak speed and jerk) where the G2 group had a rougher motion. There were also differences in arm-trunk compensation in the frontal plane.

CONCLUSION

The variables used in the study showed applicability in assessing kinematic parameters in both the early and chronic period after stroke.

Bimanual coordination: A missing piece of arm rehabilitation after stroke

Inability to use the arm in daily actions significantly lowers quality of life after stroke. Most contemporary post-stroke arm rehabilitation strategies that aspire to re-engage the weaker arm in functional activities have been greatly limited in their effectiveness. Most actions of daily life engage the two arms in a highly coordinated manner. In contrast, most rehabilitation approaches predominantly focus on restitution of the impairments and unilateral practice of the weaker hand alone. We present a perspective that this misalignment between real world requirements and intervention strategies may limit the transfer of unimanual capability to spontaneous arm use and functional recovery. We propose that if improving spontaneous engagement and use of the weaker arm in real life is the goal, arm rehabilitation research and treatment need to address the coordinated interaction between arms in targeted theory-guided interventions. Current narrow focus on unimanual deficits alone, difficulty in quantifying bimanual coordination in real-world actions and limited theory-guided focus on control and remediation of different coordination modes are some of the biggest obstacles to successful implementation of effective interventions to improve bimanual coordination in the real world. We present a theory-guided taxonomy of bimanual actions that will facilitate quantification of coordination for different real-world tasks and provide treatment targets for addressing coordination deficits. We then present evidence in the literature that points to bimanual coordination deficits in stroke survivors and demonstrate how current rehabilitation approaches are limited in their impact on bimanual coordination. Importantly, we suggest theory-based areas of future investigation that may assist quantification, identification of neural mechanisms and scientifically-based training/remediation approaches for bimanual coordination deficits post-stroke. Advancing the science and practice of arm rehabilitation to incorporate bimanual coordination will lead to a more complete functional recovery of the weaker arm, thus improving the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions and augmenting quality of life after stroke.

Neural motor control differs between bimanual common-goal vs. bimanual dual-goal tasks

Coordinating bimanual movements is essential for everyday activities. Two common types of bimanual tasks are common goal, where two arms share a united goal, and dual goal, which involves independent goals for each arm. Here, we examine how the neural control mechanisms differ between these two types of bimanual tasks. Ten non-disabled individuals performed isometric force tasks of the elbow at 10% of their maximal voluntary force in both bimanual common and dual goals as well as unimanual conditions. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we concurrently examined the intracortical inhibitory modulation (short-interval intracortical inhibition, SICI) as well as the interlimb coordination strategies utilized between common- vs. dual-goal tasks. Results showed a reduction of SICI in both hemispheres during dual-goal compared to common-goal tasks (dominant hemisphere: P = 0.04, non-dominant hemisphere: P = 0.03) and unimanual tasks (dominant hemisphere: P = 0.001, non-dominant hemisphere: P = 0.001). For the common-goal task, a reduction of SICI was only seen in the dominant hemisphere compared to unimanual tasks (P = 0.03). Behaviorally, two interlimb coordination patterns were identified. For the common-goal task, both arms were organized into a cooperative "give and take" movement pattern. Control of the non-dominant arm affected stabilization of bimanual force (R² = 0.74, P = 0.001). In contrast, for the dual-goal task, both arms were coupled together in a positive fashion and neither arm affected stabilization of bimanual force (R² = 0.31, P = 0.1). The finding that intracortical inhibition and interlimb coordination patterns were different based on the goal conceptualization of bimanual tasks has implications for future research.