μ-Opioid receptor in the CA1 involves in tramadol and morphine cross state-dependent memory

Cross state-dependent memory retrieval between tramadol and ethanol: involvement of dorsal hippocampal GABAA receptors

RATIONALE

Tramadol and ethanol, as psychoactive agents, are often abused. Discovering the molecular pathways of drug-induced memory creation may contribute to preventing drug addiction and relapse.

OBJECTIVE

The tramadol- and ethanol-induced state-dependent memory (SDM) and cross-SDM retrieval between tramadol and ethanol were examined in this study. Moreover, because of the confirmed involvement of GABAA receptors and GABAergic neurotransmission in memory retrieval impairment, we assessed cross-SDM retrieval between tramadol and ethanol with a specific emphasis on the role of the GABAA receptors. The first hypothesis of this study was the presence of cross-SDM between tramadol and ethanol, and the second hypothesis was related to possible role of GABAA receptors in memory retrieval impairment within the dorsal hippocampus. The cannulae were inserted into the hippocampal CA1 area of NMRI mice, and a step-down inhibitory avoidance test was used to evaluate state dependence and memory recovery.

RESULTS

The post-training and/or pre-test administration of tramadol (2.5 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) and/or ethanol (0.5 and 1 g/kg, i.p.) induced amnesia, which was restored after the administration of the drugs 24 h later during the pre-test period, proposing ethanol and tramadol SDM. The pre-test injection of ethanol (0.25 and 0.5 g/kg, i.p.) with tramadol at an ineffective dose (1.25 mg/kg) enhanced tramadol SDM. Moreover, tramadol injection (1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg) with ethanol at the ineffective dose (0.25 g/kg) promoted ethanol SDM. Furthermore, the pre-test intra-CA1 injection of bicuculline (0.0625, 0.125, and 0.25 μg/mouse), a GABAA receptor antagonist, 5 min before the injection of tramadol (5 mg/kg) or ethanol (1 g/kg) inhibited tramadol- and ethanol-induced SDM dose-dependently.

CONCLUSION

The findings strongly confirmed cross-SDM between tramadol and ethanol and the critical role of dorsal hippocampal GABAA receptors in the cross-SDM between tramadol and ethanol.

Effect of tramadol on apoptosis and synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons: The possible role of µ-opioid receptor

Tramadol is a synthetic opioid with centrally acting analgesic activity that alleviates moderate to severe pain and treats withdrawal symptoms of the other opioids. Like other opioid drugs, tramadol abuse has adverse effects on central nervous system components. Chronic administration of tramadol induces maladaptive plasticity in brain structures responsible for cognitive function, such as the hippocampus. However, the mechanisms by which tramadol induces these alternations are not entirely understood. Here, we examine the effect of tramadol on apoptosis and synaptogenesis of hippocampal neuronal in vitro. First, the primary culture of hippocampal neurons from neonatal rats was established, and the purity of the neuronal cells was verified by immunofluorescent staining. To evaluate the effect of tramadol on neuronal cell viability MTT assay was carried out. The western blot analysis technique was performed for the assessment of apoptosis and synaptogenesis markers. Results show that chronic exposure to tramadol reduces cell viability of neuronal cells and naloxone reverses this effect. Also, the level of caspase-3 significantly increased in tramadol-exposed hippocampal neurons. Moreover, tramadol downregulates protein levels of synaptophysin and stathmin as synaptogenesis markers. Interestingly, the effects of tramadol were abrogated by naloxone treatment. These findings suggest that tramadol can induce neurotoxicity in hippocampal neuronal cells, and this effect was partly mediated through opioid receptors.

The effect of orexin-2 and endocannabinoid-1 antagonists on neuronal activity of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in response to tramadol in rats

Background:

CA1, as a major structure involved in learning and memory, has been shown to be affected by tramadol addiction. Both orexin and endocannabinoid receptors express in CA1 and play an important role in drug dependency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the modulatory effects of orexin-2 (OX2R) and endocannabinoid-1 (CB1R) receptors on neuronal activity in CA1, in response to tramadol in rats.

Materials and Methods:

Male Wistar rats were divided into 8 groups (n = 6–7); saline-dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tramadol-DMSO, saline-TCS-OX2-29, saline-AM251, tramadol-TCS-OX2-29, tramadol-AM251, saline-TCS-OX2-29-AM251, tramadol-TCS-OX2-29-AM251. Tramadol was injected intraperitoneally, and then, AM251 (1 nmol/0.3 μL), CB1R antagonist and TCS-OX2-29 (1 nmol/0.3 μL), OX2R antagonist, were microinjected individually or concurrently into the CA1. Using in vivo extracellular single-unit recording, the firing of CA1 pyramidal neurons was investigated.

Results:

Tramadol decreased neuronal activity in CA1 (P < 0.01) but increased it after micro-injection of DMSO. TCS-OX2-29 increased neuronal activity in saline group (P < 0.05) but decreased it in tramadol group. AM251 had no effect on saline group but decreased neuronal activity in tramadol group (P < 0.05). Concurrent micro-injection of TCS-OX2-29 and AM251 had no effect on saline group but decreased neuronal activity in tramadol group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest that neural activity in CA1 is rapidly affected by acute use of tramadol, and some of these effects may be induced through the endocannabinoid and orexin systems. Thus, the function of endocannabinoid and orexin systems in CA1 may play a role in tramadol addiction.

State-dependent memory and its modulation by different brain areas and neurotransmitters

The state-dependent memory defines as a state that the retrieval of recently obtained information may be potential if the subject exists in a similar physiological situation as for the period of the encoding stage. Studies revealed that exogenous and endogenous compounds could induce state-dependent memory. The state-dependent memory made it probable to differentiate the effects of drugs per se on learning from the effects due to alterations in drug state during the task. Studies proposed the role of regions beyond the limbic formation and illustrated that state-dependent memory produced by various neurotransmitter systems and pharmacological compounds. Our review of the literature revealed that: (a) re-administration of drugs on the same state induce state-dependent memory; (b) many neurotransmitters induce endogenous state-dependent memory; (c) there are cross state-dependent learning and memory between some drugs; (d) some sites of the brain including the CA1 areas of the hippocampus, central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), septum, ventral tegmental area (VTA), and nucleus accumbens (NAC) are involved in state-dependent memory. See also Figure 1(Fig. 1).

Cross state-dependent memory retrieval between morphine and norharmane in the mouse dorsal hippocampus

State-dependent memory (SDM) describes a phenomenon that memory is efficiently restored only when the brain state during restoration matches the state during encoding. Some psychoactive drugs such as morphine, ethanol, and cocaine evoke SDM. The scope of this study was to investigate the cross SDM between morphine and norharmane injected into the dorsal hippocampus of male NMRI mice, and the involvement of μ-opioid receptors (MORs) in the SDM of the drugs. Bilateral cannulae were implanted into the CA1 regions (intra-CA1), and memory retrieval was measured by the step-down apparatus. Results showed that pre-test microinjection of morphine (1 μg/mouse, intra-CA1) reversed amnesia induced by pre-training administration of the same dose of morphine, indicating morphine SDM. Moreover, norharmane (10 μg/mouse) also exerted a SDM. Pre-test microinjection of naloxone (0.5 μg/mouse) abolished amnesia induced by morphine or norharmane, and impaired SDM produced by each drug. The results demonstrated the contribution of MORs in the SDM induced by morphine as well as norharmane. Pre-test administration of morphine (1 μg/mouse, intra-CA1) also inhibited amnesia induced by pre-training intra-CA1 microinjection of norharmane (10 μg/mouse) and vice versa, suggesting a cross SDM between the drugs. In conclusion, it seems that there may be a cross SDM between morphine and norharmane, and MORs have a critical role in this phenomenon.