Consolidation of use-dependent motor memories induced by passive movement training

Memory decay and generalization following distinct motor learning mechanisms

Motor skill learning is considered to arise out of contributions from multiple learning mechanisms, including error-based learning (EBL), use-dependent learning (UDL), and reinforcement learning (RL). These learning mechanisms exhibit dissociable roles and engage different neural circuits during skill acquisition. However, it remains largely unknown how a newly formed motor memory acquired through each learning mechanism decays over time and whether distinct learning mechanisms produce different generalization patterns. Here, we used variants of reaching paradigms that dissociated these learning mechanisms to examine the time course of memory decay following each learning and the generalization patterns of each learning. We found that motor memories acquired through these learning mechanisms decayed as a function of time. Notably, 15 min, 6 h, and 24 h after acquisition, the memory of EBL decayed much greater than that of RL. The memory acquired through UDL faded away within a few minutes. Motor memories formed through EBL and RL for given movement directions generalized to untrained movement directions, with the generalization of EBL being greater than that of RL. In contrast, motor memory of UDL could not generalize to untrained movement directions. These results suggest that distinct learning mechanisms exhibit different patterns of memory decay and generalization.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Motor skill learning is likely to involve error-based learning, use-dependent plasticity, and operant reinforcement. Here, we showed that these dissociable learning mechanisms exhibited distinct patterns of memory decay and generalization. With a better understanding of the characteristics of these learning mechanisms, it becomes possible to regulate each learning process separately to improve neurological rehabilitation.

Reduced feedback barely slows down proprioceptive recalibration

Introducing altered visual feedback of the hand produces quick adaptation of reaching movements. Our lab has shown that the associated shifts in estimates of the felt position of the hand saturate within a few training trials. The current study investigates whether the rapid changes in felt hand position that occur during classic visuomotor adaptation are diminished or slowed when training feedback is reduced. We reduced feedback by either providing visual feedback only at the end of the reach (terminal feedback) or constraining hand movements to reduce motor adaptation-related error signals such as sensory prediction errors and task errors (exposure). We measured changes as participants completed reaches with a 30° rotation, a -30° rotation, and clamped visual feedback, with these two "impoverished" training conditions, along with classic visuomotor adaptation training, while continuously estimating their felt hand position. Training with terminal feedback slightly reduced the initial rate of change in overall adaptation. However, the rate of change in hand localization, as well as the asymptote of hand localization shifts in both the terminal feedback group and the exposure training group was not noticeably different from those in the classic training group. Taken together, shifts in felt hand position are rapid and robust responses to sensory mismatches and are at best slightly modulated when feedback is reduced. This suggests that given the speed and invariance to the quality of feedback of proprioceptive recalibration, it could immediately contribute to all kinds of reach adaptation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Reaching to targets with altered visual feedback about hand position leads to adaptation of movements as well as shifts in estimates of felt hand position. Felt hand position can shift in as little as one trial, and here we show that there is no noticeable reduction in speed when the feedback about movements is impoverished, indicating the robustness of the process of recalibrating felt hand position.

Effects of guided exploration on reaching measures of auditory peripersonal space

Despite the recognized importance of bodily movements in spatial audition, few studies have integrated action-based protocols with spatial hearing in the peripersonal space. Recent work shows that tactile feedback and active exploration allow participants to improve performance in auditory distance perception tasks. However, the role of the different aspects involved in the learning phase, such as voluntary control of movement, proprioceptive cues, and the possibility of self-correcting errors, is still unclear. We study the effect of guided reaching exploration on perceptual learning of auditory distance in peripersonal space. We implemented a pretest-posttest experimental design in which blindfolded participants must reach for a sound source located in this region. They were divided into three groups that were differentiated by the intermediate training phase: Guided, an experimenter guides the participant’s arm to contact the sound source; Active, the participant freely explores the space until contacting the source; and Control, without tactile feedback. The effects of exploration feedback on auditory distance perception in the peripersonal space are heterogeneous. Both the Guided and Active groups change their performance. However, participants in the Guided group tended to overestimate distances more than those in the Active group. The response error of the Guided group corresponds to a generalized calibration criterion over the entire range of reachable distances. Whereas the Active group made different adjustments for proximal and distal positions. The results suggest that guided exploration can induce changes on the boundary of the auditory reachable space. We postulate that aspects of agency such as initiation, control, and monitoring of movement, assume different degrees of involvement in both guided and active tasks, reinforcing a non-binary approach to the question of activity-passivity in perceptual learning and supporting a complex view of the phenomena involved in action-based learning.

Facilitative effects of use-dependent learning on interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation in a person with congenital mirror movements

It has been shown that use-dependent learning can facilitate interlimb transfer of motor learning in neurologically intact individuals. However, it is unknown whether it can also facilitate interlimb transfer in individuals with neurological impairment. In this case study, we examined the effect of use-dependent learning on interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation in a person with congenital mirror movements, DB, who showed no interlimb transfer in our previous studies (Bao, Morgan, Lei, & Wang, 2020; Javidialsaadi, & Wang, 2021). DB first performed reaching movements with the right arm repeatedly while adapting to a visuomotor rotation condition with the left arm (training session), and then adapted to the same rotation condition with the right arm (transfer session). DB's right arm performance in the transfer session was significantly better than that observed in our previous studies, indicating interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation. The percentage of transfer was over 90%, which is similar to that observed in healthy young adults previously. These findings suggest that interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation can occur by involving model-based learning, which is effector independent, and/or use-dependent (or model-free) learning, which is effector specific; and also that the relative contribution of use-dependent learning to interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation can be as large as that of model-based learning.