The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in nonimpaired individuals

Electroencephalography oscillations can predict the cortical response following theta burst stimulation

BACKGROUND

Continuous theta burst stimulation and intermittent theta burst stimulation are clinically popular models of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. However, they are limited by high variability between individuals in cortical excitability changes following stimulation. Although electroencephalography oscillations have been reported to modulate the cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation, their association remains unclear. This study aims to explore whether machine learning models based on EEG oscillation features can predict the cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

METHOD

Twenty-three young, healthy adults attended two randomly assigned sessions for continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation. In each session, ten minutes of resting-state electroencephalography were recorded before delivering brain stimulation. Participants were classified as responders or non-responders based on changes in resting motor thresholds. Support vector machines and multi-layer perceptrons were used to establish predictive models of individual responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

RESULT

Among the evaluated algorithms, support vector machines achieved the best performance in discriminating responders from non-responders for intermittent theta burst stimulation (accuracy: 91.30%) and continuous theta burst stimulation (accuracy: 95.66%). The global clustering coefficient and global characteristic path length in the beta band had the greatest impact on model output.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that EEG features can serve as markers of cortical response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. They offer insights into the association between neural oscillations and variability in individuals' responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation, aiding in the optimization of individualized protocols.

Prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation increases motor corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition in patients with neuropathic pain: An exploratory, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

A new paradigm for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), referred to as prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS), has recently received attention in the literature because of its advantages over high frequency repetitive TMS (HF-rTMS). Clinical advantages include less time per intervention session and the effects appear to be more robust and reproducible than HF-rTMS to modulate cortical excitability. HF-rTMS targeted at the primary motor cortex (M1) has demonstrated analgesic effects in patients with neuropathic pain but their mechanisms of action are unclear and pcTBS has been studied in healthy subjects only. This study examined the neural mechanisms that have been proposed to play a role in explaining the effects of pcTBS targeted at the M1 and DLPFC brain regions in neuropathic pain (NP) patients with Type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with painful diabetic neuropathy were randomized to receive a single session of pcTBS targeted at the left M1 or left DLPFC. pcTBS stimulation consisted of 1,200 pulses delivered in 1 min and 44 s with a 35-45 min gap between sham and active pcTBS stimulation. Both the activity of the descending pain system which was examined using conditioned pain modulation and the activity of the ascending pain system which was assessed using temporal summation of pain were recorded using a handheld pressure algometer by measuring pressure pain thresholds. The amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) was used to measure motor corticospinal excitability and GABA activity was assessed using short (SICI) and long intracortical inhibition (LICI). All these measurements were performed at baseline and post-pcTBS stimulation.

RESULTS

Following a single session of pcTBS targeted at M1 and DLPFC, there was no change in BPI-DN scores and on the activity of the descending (measured using conditioned pain modulation) and ascending pain systems (measured using temporal summation of pain) compared to baseline but there was a significant improvement of >13% in perception of acute pain intensity, increased motor corticospinal excitability (measured using MEP amplitude) and intracortical inhibition (measured using SICI and LICI).

CONCLUSION

In patients with NP, a single session of pcTBS targeted at the M1 and DLPFC modulated the neurophysiological mechanisms related to motor corticospinal excitability and neurochemical mechanisms linked to GABA activity, but it did not modulate the activity of the ascending and descending endogenous modulatory systems. In addition, although BPI-DN scores did not change, there was a 13% improvement in self-reported perception of acute pain intensity.

Effects of stimulus waveform on transcranial magnetic stimulation metrics in proximal and distal arm muscles

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of common transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) waveforms (monophasic and biphasic) on resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes in the biceps and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) because waveforms may affect motor targets differently. We also determined test-retest reliability.

METHODS

Ten individuals participated in two sessions of TMS delivered to the motor cortex. Monophasic stimulation to induce a posterior-anterior current in the brain (mono_PA) and biphasic posterior-anterior then anterior-posterior (bi_PA-AP) were applied in each session in random order. In each session, there were four blocks of measurements (2 muscles × 2 waveforms) of RMT, AMT and MEPs at the hotspot location. MEPs were normalized to the maximum EMG signal.

RESULTS

RMTs and AMTs were lower for mono_PA compared to bi_PA-AP stimulation for the biceps (p<0.01) and FDI (p<0.01). Normalized MEPs were greater for mono_PA compared to bi_PA-AP stimulation in the FDI (p=0.01) and not different in the biceps (p=0.86). Motor thresholds were not different between sessions suggesting high reliability (p<0.01). Normalized MEPs had very low reliability across sessions in the FDI, and moderate reliability in the biceps.

DISCUSSION

Preliminary investigation suggests the effect of TMS waveform on motor thresholds is similar in upper limb proximal and distal muscles, but the effect differs per motor target for MEPs. Further, test-retest reliability of waveform effects was sensitive to target muscle. These findings may contribute to improve the efficacy and reliability of TMS for clinical use.

Effect of neuroanatomy on corticomotor excitability during and after transcranial magnetic stimulation and intermittent theta burst stimulation

Individual neuroanatomy can influence motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and corticomotor excitability after intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between individual neuroanatomy and both TMS response measured using resting motor threshold (RMT) and iTBS measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) targeting the biceps brachii and first dorsal interosseus (FDI). Ten nonimpaired individuals completed sham‐controlled iTBS sessions and underwent MRI, from which anatomically accurate head models were generated. Neuroanatomical parameters established through fiber tractography were fiber tract surface area (FTSA), tract fiber count (TFC), and brain scalp distance (BSD) at the point of stimulation. Cortical magnetic field induced electric field strength (EFS) was obtained using finite element simulations. A linear mixed effects model was used to assess effects of these parameters on RMT and iTBS (post‐iTBS MEPs). FDI RMT was dependent on interactions between EFS and both FTSA and TFC. Biceps RMT was dependent on interactions between EFS and and both FTSA and BSD. There was no groupwide effect of iTBS on the FDI but individual changes in corticomotor excitability scaled with RMT, EFS, BSD, and FTSA. iTBS targeting the biceps was facilitatory, and dependent on FTSA and TFC. MRI‐based measures of neuroanatomy highlight how individual anatomy affects motor system responses to different TMS paradigms and may be useful for selecting appropriate motor targets when designing TMS based therapies.