1
|
Grossberg S. How children learn to understand language meanings: a neural model of adult-child multimodal interactions in real-time. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1216479. [PMID: 37599779 PMCID: PMC10435915 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
This article describes a biological neural network model that can be used to explain how children learn to understand language meanings about the perceptual and affective events that they consciously experience. This kind of learning often occurs when a child interacts with an adult teacher to learn language meanings about events that they experience together. Multiple types of self-organizing brain processes are involved in learning language meanings, including processes that control conscious visual perception, joint attention, object learning and conscious recognition, cognitive working memory, cognitive planning, emotion, cognitive-emotional interactions, volition, and goal-oriented actions. The article shows how all of these brain processes interact to enable the learning of language meanings to occur. The article also contrasts these human capabilities with AI models such as ChatGPT. The current model is called the ChatSOME model, where SOME abbreviates Self-Organizing MEaning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Korai Y, Miura K. A dynamical model of visual motion processing for arbitrary stimuli including type II plaids. Neural Netw 2023; 162:46-68. [PMID: 36878170 DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
To explore the operating principle of visual motion processing in the brain underlying perception and eye movements, we model the information processing of velocity estimate of the visual stimulus at the algorithmic level using the dynamical system approach. In this study, we formulate the model as an optimization process of an appropriately defined objective function. The model is applicable to arbitrary visual stimuli. We find that our theoretical predictions qualitatively agree with time evolution of eye movement reported by previous works across various types of stimulus. Our results suggest that the brain implements the present framework as the internal model of motion vision. We anticipate our model to be a promising building block for more profound understanding of visual motion processing as well as for the development of robotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Korai
- Integrated Clinical Education Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Kenichiro Miura
- Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Department of Pathology of Mental Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grossberg S. The Embodied Brain of SOVEREIGN2: From Space-Variant Conscious Percepts During Visual Search and Navigation to Learning Invariant Object Categories and Cognitive-Emotional Plans for Acquiring Valued Goals. Front Comput Neurosci 2019; 13:36. [PMID: 31333437 PMCID: PMC6620614 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This article develops a model of how reactive and planned behaviors interact in real time. Controllers for both animals and animats need reactive mechanisms for exploration, and learned plans to efficiently reach goal objects once an environment becomes familiar. The SOVEREIGN model embodied these capabilities, and was tested in a 3D virtual reality environment. Neural models have characterized important adaptive and intelligent processes that were not included in SOVEREIGN. A major research program is summarized herein by which to consistently incorporate them into an enhanced model called SOVEREIGN2. Key new perceptual, cognitive, cognitive-emotional, and navigational processes require feedback networks which regulate resonant brain states that support conscious experiences of seeing, feeling, and knowing. Also included are computationally complementary processes of the mammalian neocortical What and Where processing streams, and homologous mechanisms for spatial navigation and arm movement control. These include: Unpredictably moving targets are tracked using coordinated smooth pursuit and saccadic movements. Estimates of target and present position are computed in the Where stream, and can activate approach movements. Motion cues can elicit orienting movements to bring new targets into view. Cumulative movement estimates are derived from visual and vestibular cues. Arbitrary navigational routes are incrementally learned as a labeled graph of angles turned and distances traveled between turns. Noisy and incomplete visual sensor data are transformed into representations of visual form and motion. Invariant recognition categories are learned in the What stream. Sequences of invariant object categories are stored in a cognitive working memory, whereas sequences of movement positions and directions are stored in a spatial working memory. Stored sequences trigger learning of cognitive and spatial/motor sequence categories or plans, also called list chunks, which control planned decisions and movements toward valued goal objects. Predictively successful list chunk combinations are selectively enhanced or suppressed via reinforcement learning and incentive motivational learning. Expected vs. unexpected event disconfirmations regulate these enhancement and suppressive processes. Adaptively timed learning enables attention and action to match task constraints. Social cognitive joint attention enables imitation learning of skills by learners who observe teachers from different spatial vantage points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Departments of Mathematics & Statistics, Psychological & Brain Sciences, and Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Markkula G, Boer E, Romano R, Merat N. Sustained sensorimotor control as intermittent decisions about prediction errors: computational framework and application to ground vehicle steering. BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS 2018; 112:181-207. [PMID: 29453689 PMCID: PMC6002515 DOI: 10.1007/s00422-017-0743-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
A conceptual and computational framework is proposed for modelling of human sensorimotor control and is exemplified for the sensorimotor task of steering a car. The framework emphasises control intermittency and extends on existing models by suggesting that the nervous system implements intermittent control using a combination of (1) motor primitives, (2) prediction of sensory outcomes of motor actions, and (3) evidence accumulation of prediction errors. It is shown that approximate but useful sensory predictions in the intermittent control context can be constructed without detailed forward models, as a superposition of simple prediction primitives, resembling neurobiologically observed corollary discharges. The proposed mathematical framework allows straightforward extension to intermittent behaviour from existing one-dimensional continuous models in the linear control and ecological psychology traditions. Empirical data from a driving simulator are used in model-fitting analyses to test some of the framework's main theoretical predictions: it is shown that human steering control, in routine lane-keeping and in a demanding near-limit task, is better described as a sequence of discrete stepwise control adjustments, than as continuous control. Results on the possible roles of sensory prediction in control adjustment amplitudes, and of evidence accumulation mechanisms in control onset timing, show trends that match the theoretical predictions; these warrant further investigation. The results for the accumulation-based model align with other recent literature, in a possibly converging case against the type of threshold mechanisms that are often assumed in existing models of intermittent control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustav Markkula
- Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Erwin Boer
- Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Romano
- Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Natasha Merat
- Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grossberg S. Desirability, availability, credit assignment, category learning, and attention: Cognitive-emotional and working memory dynamics of orbitofrontal, ventrolateral, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. Brain Neurosci Adv 2018; 2:2398212818772179. [PMID: 32166139 PMCID: PMC7058233 DOI: 10.1177/2398212818772179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prefrontal cortices play an essential role in cognitive-emotional and working memory processes through interactions with multiple brain regions. METHODS This article further develops a unified neural architecture that explains many recent and classical data about prefrontal function and makes testable predictions. RESULTS Prefrontal properties of desirability, availability, credit assignment, category learning, and feature-based attention are explained. These properties arise through interactions of orbitofrontal, ventrolateral prefrontal, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices with the inferotemporal cortex, perirhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortices; ventral bank of the principal sulcus, ventral prearcuate gyrus, frontal eye fields, hippocampus, amygdala, basal ganglia, hypothalamus, and visual cortical areas V1, V2, V3A, V4, middle temporal cortex, medial superior temporal area, lateral intraparietal cortex, and posterior parietal cortex. Model explanations also include how the value of visual objects and events is computed, which objects and events cause desired consequences and which may be ignored as predictively irrelevant, and how to plan and act to realise these consequences, including how to selectively filter expected versus unexpected events, leading to movements towards, and conscious perception of, expected events. Modelled processes include reinforcement learning and incentive motivational learning; object and spatial working memory dynamics; and category learning, including the learning of object categories, value categories, object-value categories, and sequence categories, or list chunks. CONCLUSION This article hereby proposes a unified neural theory of prefrontal cortex and its functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Departments of Mathematics & Statistics, Psychological & Brain Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Naicker P, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Grant GD, Kavanagh JJ. Medications influencing central cholinergic neurotransmission affect saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements in healthy young adults. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2017; 234:63-71. [PMID: 27671681 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-016-4436-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Acetylcholine is an important neuromodulator in the central nervous system, where it plays a significant role in central functions such as the regulation of movement. OBJECTIVE This study investigated the pharmacological effects of over-the-counter anticholinergic medications on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements, in order to establish the significance of central cholinergic pathways in the control of these centrally regulated oculomotor processes. METHODS Sixteen subjects (mean age 23 ± 3 years, 9 females) performed pro-saccadic, anti-saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movement tests, while an eye tracker collected eye movement data. Oculomotor assessments were performed pre-ingestion, 0.5 and 2 h post-ingestion of drugs with varying degrees of central anticholinergic properties. The drugs tested were promethazine, hyoscine hydrobromide, hyoscine butylbromide and placebo. RESULTS The drug intervention with stronger central anticholinergic properties, promethazine, decreased amplitude and increased velocity in the pro-saccadic task and increased duration in the anti-saccadic task. Promethazine, once again, was the only drug to decrease eye velocity in the smooth pursuit test. CONCLUSION The prominent effects of the stronger central anticholinergic promethazine, on saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements, potentially conveys the significance of central cholinergic pathways in the control of these centrally regulated oculomotor processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preshanta Naicker
- Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.,School of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie
- Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.,School of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Gary D Grant
- Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.,School of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Justin J Kavanagh
- Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. .,Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neural Dynamics of the Basal Ganglia During Perceptual, Cognitive, and Motor Learning and Gating. INNOVATIONS IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42743-0_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
8
|
Bieg HJ, Chuang LL, Bülthoff HH, Bresciani JP. Asymmetric saccade reaction times to smooth pursuit. Exp Brain Res 2015; 233:2527-38. [PMID: 26048158 PMCID: PMC4534514 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4323-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2014] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Before initiating a saccade to a moving target, the brain must take into account the target’s eccentricity as well as its movement direction and speed. We tested how the kinematic characteristics of the target influence the time course of this oculomotor response. Participants performed a step-ramp task in which the target object stepped from a central to an eccentric position and moved at constant velocity either to the fixation position (foveopetal) or further to the periphery (foveofugal). The step size and target speed were varied. Of particular interest were trials that exhibited an initial saccade prior to a smooth pursuit eye movement. Measured saccade reaction times were longer in the foveopetal than in the foveofugal condition. In the foveopetal (but not the foveofugal) condition, the occurrence of an initial saccade, its reaction time as well as the strength of the pre-saccadic pursuit response depended on both the target’s speed and the step size. A common explanation for these results may be found in the neural mechanisms that select between oculomotor response alternatives, i.e., a saccadic or smooth response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Joachim Bieg
- Department of Human Perception, Cognition, and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Murdison TS, Leclercq G, Lefèvre P, Blohm G. Computations underlying the visuomotor transformation for smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurophysiol 2015; 113:1377-99. [PMID: 25475344 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00273.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Smooth pursuit eye movements are driven by retinal motion and enable us to view moving targets with high acuity. Complicating the generation of these movements is the fact that different eye and head rotations can produce different retinal stimuli but giving rise to identical smooth pursuit trajectories. However, because our eyes accurately pursue targets regardless of eye and head orientation (Blohm G, Lefèvre P. J Neurophysiol 104: 2103-2115, 2010), the brain must somehow take these signals into account. To learn about the neural mechanisms potentially underlying this visual-to-motor transformation, we trained a physiologically inspired neural network model to combine two-dimensional (2D) retinal motion signals with three-dimensional (3D) eye and head orientation and velocity signals to generate a spatially correct 3D pursuit command. We then simulated conditions of 1) head roll-induced ocular counterroll, 2) oblique gaze-induced retinal rotations, 3) eccentric gazes (invoking the half-angle rule), and 4) optokinetic nystagmus to investigate how units in the intermediate layers of the network accounted for different 3D constraints. Simultaneously, we simulated electrophysiological recordings (visual and motor tunings) and microstimulation experiments to quantify the reference frames of signals at each processing stage. We found a gradual retinal-to-intermediate-to-spatial feedforward transformation through the hidden layers. Our model is the first to describe the general 3D transformation for smooth pursuit mediated by eye- and head-dependent gain modulation. Based on several testable experimental predictions, our model provides a mechanism by which the brain could perform the 3D visuomotor transformation for smooth pursuit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Scott Murdison
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Action and Perception Network (CAPnet), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Association for Canadian Neuroinformatics and Computational Neuroscience (CNCN); and
| | - Guillaume Leclercq
- ICTEAM Institute and Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Philippe Lefèvre
- ICTEAM Institute and Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Gunnar Blohm
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Action and Perception Network (CAPnet), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Association for Canadian Neuroinformatics and Computational Neuroscience (CNCN); and
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grossberg S, Srinivasan K, Yazdanbakhsh A. Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements. Front Psychol 2015; 5:1457. [PMID: 25642198 PMCID: PMC4294135 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
How does the brain maintain stable fusion of 3D scenes when the eyes move? Every eye movement causes each retinal position to process a different set of scenic features, and thus the brain needs to binocularly fuse new combinations of features at each position after an eye movement. Despite these breaks in retinotopic fusion due to each movement, previously fused representations of a scene in depth often appear stable. The 3D ARTSCAN neural model proposes how the brain does this by unifying concepts about how multiple cortical areas in the What and Where cortical streams interact to coordinate processes of 3D boundary and surface perception, spatial attention, invariant object category learning, predictive remapping, eye movement control, and learned coordinate transformations. The model explains data from single neuron and psychophysical studies of covert visual attention shifts prior to eye movements. The model further clarifies how perceptual, attentional, and cognitive interactions among multiple brain regions (LGN, V1, V2, V3A, V4, MT, MST, PPC, LIP, ITp, ITa, SC) may accomplish predictive remapping as part of the process whereby view-invariant object categories are learned. These results build upon earlier neural models of 3D vision and figure-ground separation and the learning of invariant object categories as the eyes freely scan a scene. A key process concerns how an object's surface representation generates a form-fitting distribution of spatial attention, or attentional shroud, in parietal cortex that helps maintain the stability of multiple perceptual and cognitive processes. Predictive eye movement signals maintain the stability of the shroud, as well as of binocularly fused perceptual boundaries and surface representations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Grossberg
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science and Technology, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, and Department of Mathematics Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karthik Srinivasan
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science and Technology, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, and Department of Mathematics Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arash Yazdanbakhsh
- Center for Adaptive Systems, Graduate Program in Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science and Technology, Center for Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, and Department of Mathematics Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Srihasam K, Bullock D, Grossberg S. Target Selection by the Frontal Cortex during Coordinated Saccadic and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements. J Cogn Neurosci 2009; 21:1611-27. [DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Oculomotor tracking of moving objects is an important component of visually based cognition and planning. Such tracking is achieved by a combination of saccades and smooth-pursuit eye movements. In particular, the saccadic and smooth-pursuit systems interact to often choose the same target, and to maximize its visibility through time. How do multiple brain regions interact, including frontal cortical areas, to decide the choice of a target among several competing moving stimuli? How is target selection information that is created by a bias (e.g., electrical stimulation) transferred from one movement system to another? These saccade–pursuit interactions are clarified by a new computational neural model, which describes interactions between motion processing areas: the middle temporal area, the middle superior temporal area, the frontal pursuit area, and the dorsal lateral pontine nucleus; saccade specification, selection, and planning areas: the lateral intraparietal area, the frontal eye fields, the substantia nigra pars reticulata, and the superior colliculus; the saccadic generator in the brain stem; and the cerebellum. Model simulations explain a broad range of neuroanatomical and neurophysiological data. These results are in contrast with the simplest parallel model with no interactions between saccades and pursuit other than common-target selection and recruitment of shared motoneurons. Actual tracking episodes in primates reveal multiple systematic deviations from predictions of the simplest parallel model, which are explained by the current model.
Collapse
|