Posterior fossa tumors in children: Radiological tips & tricks in the age of genomic tumor classification and advance MR technology

Classification and neuroimaging of ependymal tumors

Ependymal tumors arise from the ependymal cell remnants of the cerebral ventricles, the central canal of the spinal cord, or the filum terminale or conus medullaris, although most pediatric supratentorial ependymomas do not exhibit clear communication or abutment of the ventricles. In this article, we discuss the classification, imaging characteristics, and clinical settings of these tumors. The WHO 2021 classification system has categorized ependymal tumors based on histopathologic and molecular features and location, in which they are grouped as supratentorial, posterior fossa (PF), and spinal. The supratentorial tumors are defined by either the ZFTA (formerly RELA) fusion or the YAP1 fusion. Posterior fossa tumors are divided into group A and group B based on methylation. On imaging, supratentorial and infratentorial ependymomas may arise from the ventricles and commonly contain calcifications and cystic components, with variable hemorrhage and heterogeneous enhancement. Spinal ependymomas are defined by MYCN amplification. These tumors are less commonly calcified and may present with the "cap sign," with T2 hypointensity due to hemosiderin deposition. Myxopapillary ependymoma and subependymoma remain tumor subtypes, with no change related to molecular classification as this does not provide additional clinical utility. Myxopapillary ependymomas are intradural and extramedullary tumors at the filum terminale and/or conus medullaris and may also present the cap sign. Subependymomas are homogeneous when small and may be heterogeneous and contain calcifications when larger. These tumors typically do not demonstrate enhancement. Clinical presentation and prognosis vary depending on tumor location and type. Knowledge of the updated WHO classification of the central nervous system in conjunction with imaging features is critical for accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Application of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Metrics for Differentiation of Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors : A Large Retrospective Study and Brief Review of Literature

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the application of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis to differentiate posterior fossa tumors (PFTs) in children.

METHODS

A total of 175 pediatric patients with PFT, including 75 pilocytic astrocytomas (PA), 59 medulloblastomas, 16 ependymomas, and 13 atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT), were analyzed. Tumors were visually assessed using DWI trace and conventional MRI images and manually segmented and post-processed using parametric software (pMRI). Furthermore, tumor ADC values were normalized to the thalamus and cerebellar cortex. The following histogram metrics were obtained: entropy, minimum, 10th, and 90th percentiles, maximum, mean, median, skewness, and kurtosis to distinguish the different types of tumors. Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to evaluate the differences. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to determine the optimal cut-off values for differentiating the various PFTs.

RESULTS

Most ADC histogram metrics showed significant differences between PFTs (p < 0.001) except for entropy, skewness, and kurtosis. There were significant pairwise differences in ADC metrics for PA versus medulloblastoma, PA versus ependymoma, PA versus ATRT, medulloblastoma versus ependymoma, and ependymoma versus ATRT (all p < 0.05). Our results showed no significant differences between medulloblastoma and ATRT. Normalized ADC data showed similar results to the absolute ADC value analysis. ROC curve analysis for normalized ADC_median values to thalamus showed 94.9% sensitivity (95% CI: 85-100%) and 93.3% specificity (95% CI: 87-100%) for differentiating medulloblastoma from ependymoma.

CONCLUSION

ADC histogram metrics can be applied to differentiate most types of posterior fossa tumors in children.

Machine Learning in the Classification of Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Systematic Review

Background: Posterior fossa tumors (PFTs) are a morbid group of central nervous system tumors that most often present in childhood. While early diagnosis is critical to drive appropriate treatment, definitive diagnosis is currently only achievable through invasive tissue collection and histopathological analyses. Machine learning has been investigated as an alternative means of diagnosis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the primary literature to identify all machine learning algorithms developed to classify and diagnose pediatric PFTs using imaging or molecular data. Methods: Of the 433 primary papers identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, 25 ultimately met the inclusion criteria. The included papers were extracted for algorithm architecture, study parameters, performance, strengths, and limitations. Results: The algorithms exhibited variable performance based on sample size, classifier(s) used, and individual tumor types being investigated. Ependymoma, medulloblastoma, and pilocytic astrocytoma were the most studied tumors with algorithm accuracies ranging from 37.5% to 94.5%. A minority of studies compared the developed algorithm to a trained neuroradiologist, with three imaging-based algorithms yielding superior performance. Common algorithm and study limitations included small sample sizes, uneven representation of individual tumor types, inconsistent performance reporting, and a lack of application in the clinical environment. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence has the potential to improve the speed and accuracy of diagnosis in this field if the right algorithm is applied to the right scenario. Work is needed to standardize outcome reporting and facilitate additional trials to allow for clinical uptake.

Toward MR-only proton therapy planning for pediatric brain tumors: synthesis of relative proton stopping power images with multiple sequence MRI and development of an online quality assurance tool

PURPOSE

To generate synthetic relative proton-stopping-power (sRPSP) images from MRI sequence(s) and develop an online quality assurance (QA) tool for sRPSP to facilitate safe integration of MR-only proton planning into clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Planning CT and MR images of 195 pediatric brain tumor patients were utilized (training: 150, testing: 45). Seventeen consistent-cycle Generative Adversarial Network (ccGAN) models were trained separately using paired CT-converted RPSP and MRI datasets to transform a subject's MRI into sRPSP. T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), and FLAIR MRI were permutated to form 17 combinations, with or without preprocessing, for determining the optimal training sequence(s). For evaluation, sRPSP images were converted to synthetic CT (sCT) and compared to the real CT in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) in HU. For QA, sCT was deformed and compared to a reference template built from training dataset to produce a flag map, highlighting pixels that deviate by >100 HU and fall outside the mean ± standard deviation reference intensity. The gamma intensity analysis (10%/3mm) of the deformed sCT against the QA template on the intensity difference was investigated as a surrogate of sCT accuracy.

RESULTS

The sRPSP images generated from a single T1W or T2W sequence outperformed that generated from multi-MRI sequences in terms of MAE (all P<0.05). Preprocessing with N4 bias and histogram matching reduced MAE of T2W MRI-based sCT (54±21 HU vs. 42±13 HU, P = .002). The gamma intensity analysis of sCT against the QA template was highly correlated with the MAE of sCT against the real CT in the testing cohort (r = -0.89 for T1W sCT; r = -0.93 for T2W sCT).

CONCLUSION

Accurate sRPSP images can be generated from T1W/T2W MRI for proton planning. A QA tool highlights regions of inaccuracy, flagging problematic cases unsuitable for clinical use. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Radiomic Signatures of Posterior Fossa Ependymoma: Molecular Subgroups and Risk Profiles

BACKGROUND

The risk profile for posterior fossa ependymoma (EP) depends on surgical and molecular status [Group A (PFA) versus Group B (PFB)]. While subtotal tumor resection is known to confer worse prognosis, MRI-based EP risk-profiling is unexplored. We aimed to apply machine learning strategies to link MRI-based biomarkers of high-risk EP and also to distinguish PFA from PFB.

METHODS

We extracted 1800 quantitative features from presurgical T2-weighted (T2-MRI) and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (T1-MRI) imaging of 157 EP patients. We implemented nested cross-validation to identify features for risk score calculations and apply a Cox model for survival analysis. We conducted additional feature selection for PFA versus PFB and examined performance across three candidate classifiers.

RESULTS

For all EP patients with GTR, we identified four T2-MRI-based features and stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups, with 5-year overall survival rates of 62% and 100%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Among presumed PFA patients with GTR, four T1-MRI and five T2-MRI features predicted divergence of high- and low-risk groups, with 5-year overall survival rates of 62.7% and 96.7%, respectively (p = 0.002). T1-MRI-based features showed the best performance distinguishing PFA from PFB with an AUC of 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

We present machine learning strategies to identify MRI phenotypes that distinguish PFA from PFB, as well as high- and low-risk PFA. We also describe quantitative image predictors of aggressive EP tumors that might assist risk-profiling after surgery. Future studies could examine translating radiomics as an adjunct to EP risk assessment when considering therapy strategies or trial candidacy.

Machine Assist for Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumor Diagnosis: A Multinational Study

BACKGROUND

Clinicians and machine classifiers reliably diagnose pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but less accurately distinguish medulloblastoma (MB) from ependymoma (EP). One strategy is to first rule out the most identifiable diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To hypothesize a sequential machine-learning classifier could improve diagnostic performance by mimicking a clinician's strategy of excluding PA before distinguishing MB from EP.

METHODS

We extracted 1800 total Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI)-based features from T2- and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images in a multinational cohort of 274 MB, 156 PA, and 97 EP. We designed a 2-step sequential classifier - first ruling out PA, and next distinguishing MB from EP. For each step, we selected the best performing model from 6-candidate classifier using a reduced feature set, and measured performance on a holdout test set with the microaveraged F1 score.

RESULTS

Optimal diagnostic performance was achieved using 2 decision steps, each with its own distinct imaging features and classifier method. A 3-way logistic regression classifier first distinguished PA from non-PA, with T2 uniformity and T1 contrast as the most relevant IBSI features (F1 score 0.8809). A 2-way neural net classifier next distinguished MB from EP, with T2 sphericity and T1 flatness as most relevant (F1 score 0.9189). The combined, sequential classifier was with F1 score 0.9179.

CONCLUSION

An MRI-based sequential machine-learning classifiers offer high-performance prediction of pediatric posterior fossa tumors across a large, multinational cohort. Optimization of this model with demographic, clinical, imaging, and molecular predictors could provide significant advantages for family counseling and surgical planning.

Radiomic Phenotypes Distinguish Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors from Medulloblastoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and medulloblastomas have similar imaging and histologic features but distinctly different outcomes. We hypothesized that they could be distinguished by MR imaging-based radiomic phenotypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assembled T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images of 48 posterior fossa atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and 96 match-paired medulloblastomas from 7 institutions. Using a holdout test set, we measured the performance of 6 candidate classifier models using 6 imaging features derived by sparse regression of 900 T2WI and 900 T1WI Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative-based radiomics features.

RESULTS

From the originally extracted 1800 total Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative-based features, sparse regression consistently reduced the feature set to 1 from T1WI and 5 from T2WI. Among classifier models, logistic regression performed with the highest AUC of 0.86, with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 scores of 0.80, 0.82, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively. The top 3 important Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative features, by decreasing order of relative contribution, included voxel intensity at the 90th percentile, inverse difference moment normalized, and kurtosis-all from T2WI.

CONCLUSIONS

Six quantitative signatures of image intensity, texture, and morphology distinguish atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors from medulloblastomas with high prediction performance across different machine learning strategies. Use of this technique for preoperative diagnosis of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors could significantly inform therapeutic strategies and patient care discussions.

Automatic Machine Learning to Differentiate Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumors on Routine MR Imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Differentiating the types of pediatric posterior fossa tumors on routine imaging may help in preoperative evaluation and guide surgical resection planning. However, qualitative radiologic MR imaging review has limited performance. This study aimed to compare different machine learning approaches to classify pediatric posterior fossa tumors on routine MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included preoperative MR imaging of 288 patients with pediatric posterior fossa tumors, including medulloblastoma (n = 111), ependymoma (n = 70), and pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 107). Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted images, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, and ADC maps. Models generated by standard manual optimization by a machine learning expert were compared with automatic machine learning via the Tree-Based Pipeline Optimization Tool for performance evaluation.

RESULTS

For 3-way classification, the radiomics model by automatic machine learning with the Tree-Based Pipeline Optimization Tool achieved a test micro-averaged area under the curve of 0.91 with an accuracy of 0.83, while the most optimized model based on the feature-selection method χ2 score and the Generalized Linear Model classifier achieved a test micro-averaged area under the curve of 0.92 with an accuracy of 0.74. Tree-Based Pipeline Optimization Tool models achieved significantly higher accuracy than average qualitative expert MR imaging review (0.83 versus 0.54, P < .001). For binary classification, Tree-Based Pipeline Optimization Tool models achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 with an accuracy of 0.85 for medulloblastoma versus nonmedulloblastoma, an area under the curve of 0.84 with an accuracy of 0.80 for ependymoma versus nonependymoma, and an area under the curve of 0.94 with an accuracy of 0.88 for pilocytic astrocytoma versus non-pilocytic astrocytoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Automatic machine learning based on routine MR imaging classified pediatric posterior fossa tumors with high accuracy compared with manual expert pipeline optimization and qualitative expert MR imaging review.