Low incidence of hemorrhagic complications both during and after surgical procedures in patients maintained on prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy

Flow diversion with hydrophilic polymer coating with prasugrel as single antiplatelet therapy in the treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter case series, complication and occlusion rates

BACKGROUND

This study reports a multicenter experience of using hydrophilic polymer-coated (HPC) flow diverters with prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy to treat ruptured aneurysms with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

METHODS

Patients treated for intracranial aneurysms within 30 days after SAH with a p64/p48 MW HPC flow diverter were prospectively identified. Clinical presentation and outcomes, periprocedural and postprocedural complications, and degree of occlusion at follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were treated in 88 sessions (54.5% women; mean age 53.3 years). Four patients (4.7%) experienced flow diverter-dependent complications. No cases of aneurysm re-rupture or hemorrhagic complications related to antiplatelet therapy were recorded. Immediate complete occlusion was achieved in 27.4% of cases (23/84). The rate of complete occlusion among survivors was 83% in early follow-up, 90.2% in mid-term follow-up, and 92.3% in the latest possible follow-up.

CONCLUSION

p64/p48 MW HPC flow diverters with prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy were associated with safety from aneurysm re-rupture and high occlusion rates at medium- and long-term follow-up in managing ruptured aneurysms. Adequate management of single antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel is crucial, particularly with higher doses than usual, to avoid both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications.

Review: Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms

The invention of flow diverting stents (FDS) is a novel milestone in the field of endovascular aneurysm therapy, promoting physiological healing of the vessel segment contrary to prior deconstructive treatment strategies, such as coiling. The effects of FDS are based on changes in flow patterns, segmental wall stabilization, and the growth of a neointima. Although flow diversion is already well established for cerebral aneurysms in proximal segments, peripheral locations remain challenging. Especially the middle cerebral artery (MCA) with its predominance of non-collateralized perforators and functional end arteries that supply the eloquent areas of the brain is of major concern.The literature was reviewed for flow diversion of the MCA and antiplatelet therapy.Resulting from the special anatomical characteristics of the MCA, FDS implantation in this territory is completely different from the proximal vessel segments. Still, flow diversion represents an effective endovascular strategy, especially in otherwise non-accessible or sufficiently treatable lesions. However, the risk of ischemic adverse events might be increased. Special attention to the individual decision regarding device selection, antiplatelet regimen, and exact definition of the proximal and distal landing zone considering the jailed side branches is essential for a good angiographic and clinical outcome. · MCA aneurysms can be sufficiently treated by FDS.. · The anatomic and hemodynamic characteristics of the MCA result in an increased risk of thromboembolism.. · Individual device selection and antiplatelet regimen are essential for treatment success.. · Schüngel M, Wohlgemuth WA, Elolf E et al. Review: Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2343-0046.