Evaluating reproducibility and subject-specificity of microstructure-informed connectivity

MRI noise and auditory health: Can one hundred scans be linked to hearing loss? The case of the Courtois NeuroMod project

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most commonly used tools in neuroscience. However, it implies exposure to high noise levels. Exposure to noise can lead to temporary or permanent hearing loss, especially when the exposure is long and/or repeated. Little is known about the hearing risks for people undergoing several MRI examinations, especially in the context of longitudinal studies. The goal of this study was to assess the potential impact of repeated exposure to MRI noise on hearing in research participants undergoing dozens of MRI scans. This investigation was made possible thanks to an unprecedented intensive MRI research data collection effort (the Courtois NeuroMod project) where participants have been scanned weekly (up to twice a week), with the use of hearing protection, since 2018. Their hearing was tested periodically, over a period of 1.5 years. First, baseline pure-tone thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes were acquired before the beginning of this study. Hearing tests were then scheduled immediately before/immediately after a scan and with a delay of two to seven days after a scan. Pure-tone thresholds and DPOAE amplitudes showed no scanner noise impact right after the scan session when compared to the values acquired right before the scan session. Pure-tone thresholds and DPOAE amplitudes acquired in the delayed condition and compared to the baseline showed similar results. These results suggest an absence of impact from MRI noise exposure. Overall, our results show that an intensive longitudinal MRI study like the Courtois NeuroMod project likely does not cause hearing damage to participants when they properly utilize adequate hearing protection.

Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms changes laterality of structural connectome

Diffusion MRI-driven tractography, a non-invasive technique that reveals how the brain is connected, is widely used in brain lateralization studies. To improve the accuracy of tractography in showing the underlying anatomy of the brain, various tractography filtering methods were applied to reduce false positives. Based on different algorithms, tractography filtering methods are able to identify the fibers most consistent with the original diffusion data while removing fibers that do not align with the original signals, ensuring the tractograms are as biologically accurate as possible. However, the impact of tractography filtering on the lateralization of the brain connectome remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the relationship between fiber filtering and laterality changes in brain structural connectivity. Three typical tracking algorithms were used to construct the raw tractography, and two popular fiber filtering methods(SIFT and SIFT2) were employed to filter the tractography across a range of parameters. Laterality indices were computed for six popular biological features, including four microstructural measures (AD, FA, RD, and T1/T2 ratio) and two structural features (fiber length and connectivity) for each brain region. The results revealed that tractography filtering may cause significant laterality changes in more than 10% of connections, up to 25% for probabilistic tracking, and deterministic tracking exhibited minimal laterality changes compared to probabilistic tracking, experiencing only about 6%. Except for tracking algorithms, different fiber filtering methods, along with the various biological features themselves, displayed more variable patterns of laterality change. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the intricate relationship between fiber filtering and laterality changes in brain structural connectivity. These findings can be used to develop improved tractography filtering methods, ultimately leading to more robust and reliable measurements of brain asymmetry in lateralization studies.

The human brain connectome weighted by the myelin content and total intra-axonal cross-sectional area of white matter tracts

A central goal in neuroscience is the development of a comprehensive mapping between structural and functional brain features, which facilitates mechanistic interpretation of brain function. However, the interpretability of structure-function brain models remains limited by a lack of biological detail. Here, we characterize human structural brain networks weighted by multiple white matter microstructural features including total intra-axonal cross-sectional area and myelin content. We report edge-weight-dependent spatial distributions, variance, small-worldness, rich club, hubs, as well as relationships with function, edge length, and myelin. Contrasting networks weighted by the total intra-axonal cross-sectional area and myelin content of white matter tracts, we find opposite relationships with functional connectivity, an edge-length-independent inverse relationship with each other, and the lack of a canonical rich club in myelin-weighted networks. When controlling for edge length, networks weighted by either fractional anisotropy, radial diffusivity, or neurite density show no relationship with whole-brain functional connectivity. We conclude that the co-utilization of structural networks weighted by total intra-axonal cross-sectional area and myelin content could improve our understanding of the mechanisms mediating the structure-function brain relationship.

Evaluation of tractogram filtering methods using human-like connectome phantoms

Tractography algorithms are prone to reconstructing spurious connections. The set of streamlines generated with tractography can be post-processed to retain the streamlines that are most biologically plausible. Several microstructure-informed filtering algorithms are available for this purpose, however, the comparative performance of these methods has not been extensively evaluated. In this study, we aim to evaluate streamline filtering and post-processing algorithms using simulated connectome phantoms. We first establish a framework for generating connectome phantoms featuring brain-like white matter fiber architectures. We then use our phantoms to systematically evaluate the performance of a range of streamline filtering algorithms, including SIFT, COMMIT, and LiFE. We find that all filtering methods successfully improve connectome accuracy, although filter performance depends on the complexity of the underlying white matter fiber architecture. Filtering algorithms can markedly improve tractography accuracy for simple tubular fiber bundles (F-measure deterministic- unfiltered: 0.49 and best filter: 0.72; F-measure probabilistic- unfiltered: 0.37 and best filter: 0.81), but for more complex brain-like fiber architectures, the improvement is modest (F-measure deterministic- unfiltered: 0.53 and best filter: 0.54; F-measure probabilistic- unfiltered: 0.46 and best filter: 0.50). Overall, filtering algorithms have the potential to improve the accuracy of connectome mapping pipelines, particularly for weighted connectomes and pipelines using probabilistic tractography methods. Our results highlight the need for further advances tractography and streamline filtering to improve the accuracy of connectome mapping.

Exploring personalized structural connectomics for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

Graph theoretical analysis of the structural connectome has been employed successfully to characterize brain network alterations in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, heterogeneity in neuropathology is a well-known issue in the TBI population, such that group comparisons of patients against controls are confounded by within-group variability. Recently, novel single-subject profiling approaches have been developed to capture inter-patient heterogeneity. We present a personalized connectomics approach that examines structural brain alterations in five chronic patients with moderate to severe TBI who underwent anatomical and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. We generated individualized profiles of lesion characteristics and network measures (including personalized graph metric GraphMe plots, and nodal and edge-based brain network alterations) and compared them against healthy reference cases (N = 12) to assess brain damage qualitatively and quantitatively at the individual level. Our findings revealed alterations of brain networks with high variability between patients. With validation and comparison to stratified, normative healthy control comparison cohorts, this approach could be used by clinicians to formulate a neuroscience-guided integrative rehabilitation program for TBI patients, and for designing personalized rehabilitation protocols based on their unique lesion load and connectome.

Toward individualized medicine in stroke—The TiMeS project: Protocol of longitudinal, multi-modal, multi-domain study in stroke

Despite recent improvements, complete motor recovery occurs in <15% of stroke patients. To improve the therapeutic outcomes, there is a strong need to tailor treatments to each individual patient. However, there is a lack of knowledge concerning the precise neuronal mechanisms underlying the degree and course of motor recovery and its individual differences, especially in the view of brain network properties despite the fact that it became more and more clear that stroke is a network disorder. The TiMeS project is a longitudinal exploratory study aiming at characterizing stroke phenotypes of a large, representative stroke cohort through an extensive, multi-modal and multi-domain evaluation. The ultimate goal of the study is to identify prognostic biomarkers allowing to predict the individual degree and course of motor recovery and its underlying neuronal mechanisms paving the way for novel interventions and treatment stratification for the individual patients. A total of up to 100 patients will be assessed at 4 timepoints over the first year after the stroke: during the first (T1) and third (T2) week, then three (T3) and twelve (T4) months after stroke onset. To assess underlying mechanisms of recovery with a focus on network analyses and brain connectivity, we will apply synergistic state-of-the-art systems neuroscience methods including functional, diffusion, and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electrophysiological evaluation based on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coupled with electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG). In addition, an extensive, multi-domain neuropsychological evaluation will be performed at each timepoint, covering all sensorimotor and cognitive domains. This project will significantly add to the understanding of underlying mechanisms of motor recovery with a strong focus on the interactions between the motor and other cognitive domains and multimodal network analyses. The population-based, multi-dimensional dataset will serve as a basis to develop biomarkers to predict outcome and promote personalized stratification toward individually tailored treatment concepts using neuro-technologies, thus paving the way toward personalized precision medicine approaches in stroke rehabilitation.