Getting off track: Cortical feedback processing network modulated by continuous error signal during target-feedback mismatch

Investigating multilevel cognitive processing within error-free and error-prone feedback conditions in executed and observed car driving

Accident analyses repeatedly reported the considerable contribution of run-off-road incidents to fatalities in road traffic, and despite considerable advances in assistive technologies to mitigate devastating consequences, little insight into the drivers' brain response during such accident scenarios has been gained. While various literature documents neural correlates to steering motion, the driver's mental state, and the impact of distraction and fatigue on driving performance, the cortical substrate of continuous deviations of a car from the road - i.e., how the brain represents a varying discrepancy between the intended and observed car position and subsequently assigns customized levels of corrective measures - remains unclear. Furthermore, the superposition of multiple subprocesses, such as visual and erroneous feedback processing, performance monitoring, or motor control, complicates a clear interpretation of engaged brain regions within car driving tasks. In the present study, we thus attempted to disentangle these subprocesses, employing passive and active steering conditions within both error-free and error-prone vehicle operation conditions. We recorded EEG signals of 26 participants in 13 sessions, simultaneously measuring pairs of Executors (actively steering) and Observers (strictly observing) during a car driving task. We observed common brain patterns in the Executors regardless of error-free or error-prone vehicle operation, albeit with a shift in spectral activity from motor beta to occipital alpha oscillations within erroneous conditions. Further, significant frontocentral differences between Observers and Executors, tracing back to the caudal anterior cingulate cortex, arose during active steering conditions, indicating increased levels of motor-behavioral cognitive control. Finally, we present regression results of both the steering signal and the car position, indicating that a regression of continuous deviations from the road utilizing the EEG might be feasible.

Multimodal decoding of error processing in a virtual reality flight simulation

Technological advances in head-mounted displays (HMDs) facilitate the acquisition of physiological data of the user, such as gaze, pupil size, or heart rate. Still, interactions with such systems can be prone to errors, including unintended behavior or unexpected changes in the presented virtual environments. In this study, we investigated if multimodal physiological data can be used to decode error processing, which has been studied, to date, with brain signals only. We examined the feasibility of decoding errors solely with pupil size data and proposed a hybrid decoding approach combining electroencephalographic (EEG) and pupillometric signals. Moreover, we analyzed if hybrid approaches can improve existing EEG-based classification approaches and focused on setups that offer increased usability for practical applications, such as the presented game-like virtual reality flight simulation. Our results indicate that classifiers trained with pupil size data can decode errors above chance. Moreover, hybrid approaches yielded improved performance compared to EEG-based decoders in setups with a reduced number of channels, which is crucial for many out-of-the-lab scenarios. These findings contribute to the development of hybrid brain-computer interfaces, particularly in combination with wearable devices, which allow for easy acquisition of additional physiological data.

Towards unlocking motor control in spinal cord injured by applying an online EEG-based framework to decode motor intention, trajectory and error processing

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can translate brain signals directly into commands for external devices. Electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCIs mostly rely on the classification of discrete mental states, leading to unintuitive control. The ERC-funded project "Feel Your Reach" aimed to establish a novel framework based on continuous decoding of hand/arm movement intention, for a more natural and intuitive control. Over the years, we investigated various aspects of natural control, however, the individual components had not yet been integrated. Here, we present a first implementation of the framework in a comprehensive online study, combining (i) goal-directed movement intention, (ii) trajectory decoding, and (iii) error processing in a unique closed-loop control paradigm. Testing involved twelve able-bodied volunteers, performing attempted movements, and one spinal cord injured (SCI) participant. Similar movement-related cortical potentials and error potentials to previous studies were revealed, and the attempted movement trajectories were overall reconstructed. Source analysis confirmed the involvement of sensorimotor and posterior parietal areas for goal-directed movement intention and trajectory decoding. The increased experiment complexity and duration led to a decreased performance than each single BCI. Nevertheless, the study contributes to understanding natural motor control, providing insights for more intuitive strategies for individuals with motor impairments.

Continuous Erroneous Feedback Processing during Deviation from the Road within a 2D Steering Task. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2023;2023:1-4. [PMID: 38082976 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Recent research of our group indicated that erroneous feedback processing can not only be detected via established correlates in the electroencephalogram (EEG) for discrete stimuli, but also arises as modulations of the brain signals when faced with a continuous and periodic error signal. However, limitations in our previous paradigm prevented a definitive statement on the error signal as the exclusive source of the modulations, as well as on the connection between the observed error-related negativity (ERN)-like and error positivity (Pe)-like continuous correlates. Within a new paradigm involving EEG recordings of 10 participants, we disentangled modulation sources, substantiating our hypothesis that the observed periodicity arises primarily due to feedback processing. Further, we provide evidence that the continuous ERN- and Pe-like potentials are locked to separate phases in the error signal, rather than time-locked to a shared event, indicating that both potentials arise independently of one another.