Influence of cognitive impairment on the management of ischaemic stroke

Patient Cognitive Status and Physician Recommendations for Cardiovascular Disease Treatment: Results of Two Nationwide, Randomized Survey Studies

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines recommend that older patients (65+) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early-stage dementia receive similar guideline-concordant care after cardiovascular disease (CVD) events as those with normal cognition (NC). However, older patients with MCI and dementia receive less care for CVD and other conditions than those with NC. Whether physician recommendations for guideline-concordant treatments after two common CVD events, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute ischemic stroke (stroke), differ between older patients with NC, MCI, and early-stage dementia is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To test the influence of patient cognitive status (NC, MCI, early-stage dementia) on physicians' recommendations for guideline-concordant treatments for AMI and stroke.

DESIGN

We conducted two parallel, randomized survey studies for AMI and stroke in the US using clinical vignettes where the hypothetical patient's cognitive status was randomized between physicians.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included cardiologists, neurologists, and generalists who care for most patients hospitalized for AMI and stroke.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was a composite quality score representing the number of five guideline-concordant treatments physicians recommended for a hypothetical patient after AMI or stroke.

KEY RESULTS

1,031 physicians completed the study (58.5% response rate). Of 1,031 respondents, 980 physicians had complete information. After adjusting for physician factors, physicians recommended similar treatments after AMI and stroke in hypothetical patients with pre-existing MCI (adjusted ratio of expected composite quality score, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.94, 1.02]; P = 0.36) as hypothetical patients with NC. Physicians recommended fewer treatments to hypothetical patients with pre-existing early-stage dementia than to hypothetical patients with NC (adjusted ratio of expected composite quality score, 0.90 [0.86, 0.94]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In these randomized survey studies, physicians recommended fewer guideline-concordant AMI and stroke treatments to hypothetical patients with early-stage dementia than those with NC. We did not find evidence that physicians recommend fewer treatments to hypothetical patients with MCI than those with NC.

Influence of mild cognitive impairment on patient and care partner decision-making for acute ischemic stroke

GOALS

Evidence suggests that patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) receive fewer treatments for acute ischemic stroke and other cardiovascular diseases than patients with normal cognition. Little is known about how patient and care partner preferences for ischemic stroke treatment differ between the patient population with MCI and the population with normal cognition. This study aimed to understand how patient MCI diagnosis influences patient and care partner decision-making for acute ischemic stroke treatments.

METHODS

Multi-center qualitative study using in-person semi-structured interviews with 20 MCI and normal cognition patient-care partner dyads using a standard guide. The present study reports results on patient and care partner preferences for a clinical vignette patient to receive three non-invasive treatments (intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, inpatient rehabilitation, and secondary preventive medications) and two invasive treatments (feeding tube and carotid endarterectomy) after acute ischemic stroke. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes.

FINDINGS

We identified three major themes: (1) Patients with MCI desired non-invasive treatments after stroke, similar to patients with normal cognition and for similar reasons; (2) Patients with MCI expressed different preferences than patients with normal cognition for two invasive treatments after stroke: carotid endarterectomy and feeding tube placement; and (3) Patients with MCI expressed more skepticism of the stroke treatment options and less decisiveness in decision-making than patients with normal cognition.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that patient MCI diagnosis may contribute to differences in patient and care partner preferences for invasive treatments after stroke, but not for non-invasive treatments.

Preexisting Mild Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, and Receipt of Treatments for Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Differences in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment by cognitive status are unclear, but some studies have found patients with preexisting dementia get less treatment. We compared AIS care by preexisting cognitive status.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of prospectively obtained data on 836 adults ≥45 with AIS from the population-based Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi project from 2008 to 2013. We compared receipt of a composite quality measure representing the percentage of 7 treatments/procedures received (ordinal scale; values, <0.75, 0.75-0.99, and 1.0), a binary defect-free quality score, and individual treatments after AIS between patients with preexisting dementia (Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly score ≥3.44), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, score 3.1-3.43), and normal cognition (score ≤3).

RESULTS

Among patients with AIS, 42% had normal cognition (47% women; median age [interquartile range], 65 [56-76]), 32% had MCI (54% women; median age, 70 [60-78]), 26% had dementia (56% women; median age, 78 [64-85]). After AIS, 44% of patients with preexisting dementia and 55% of patients with preexisting MCI or normal cognition received defect-free care. Compared with cognitively normal patients, patients with preexisting MCI had similar cumulative odds (unadjusted cumulative odds ratio =0.99, P=0.92), and patients with preexisting dementia had 36% lower cumulative odds of receiving the composite quality measure (unadjusted cumulative odds ratio [OR]=0.64, P=0.005). However, the dementia-quality association became nonsignificant after adjusting for patient factors, namely sex, comorbidity, and body mass index (adjusted cumulative OR [acOR]=0.79, P=0.19). Independent of patient factors, preexisting MCI was negatively associated with receipt of IV tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator; acOR=0.36, P=0.04), rehabilitation assessment (acOR=0.28, P=0.016), and echocardiogram (acOR=0.48, P<0.001). Preexisting dementia was negatively associated with receipt of antithrombotic by day 2 (acOR=0.39, P=0.04) and echocardiogram (acOR=0.42, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with preexisting MCI and dementia, compared with cognitively normal patients, may receive less frequently some treatments and procedures, but not the composite quality measure, after AIS.