‘The Move’, an innovative simulation-based medical education program using roleplay to teach neurological semiology: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions

Simulation effect on medical sciences students' motivation: A systematic review study

Simulation is an educational technology that can facilitate learning, improve performance, and develop critical thinking and self-confidence in students. Motivation is an effective factor in the level of efficiency and the use of individual talent, ability, and satisfaction. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of simulation on students' motivation based on existing studies. This systematic review was conducted using a full systematic search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for the identification of relevant literature in Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC electronic databases up to April 2023, utilizing search terms in the titles and abstracts. Finally, 21 articles were selected after being screened in accordance with our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 21 articles related to the study's aim, 19 articles (91%) were interventional studies (three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 16 non-RCTs) and two articles (9%) were noninterventional studies (cohort and cross-sectional). The results revealed that in 17 studies (77%), simulation studies had a positive effect on motivation, and in 19% of studies, simulation had no significant effect on motivation. Most of the studies improved students' learning motivation using different simulation methods. Simulation methods require appropriateness in three areas: comprehensiveness, the subjects of training, and the allocation of appropriate facilities.

Cognitive abilities and medical students' practice of physical exams: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

To highlight the importance of clinical simulations and simulated laboratories for student training, especially in physical examination teaching.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the gains obtained by medical students in their cognitive and practical performance of physical examinations (abdominal, cardiological, and pulmonary), as well as satisfaction and self-confidence in what they have learned, after concentrated practice developed in a skills and simulation laboratory.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A quantitative and quasi-experimental study in which 48 students were evaluated at the Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

A quantitative and descriptive study was conducted with regularly enrolled 2nd year medical students over 18 years of age who had content prior to data collection regarding anamnesis and physical examination remotely taught in a Moodle virtual learning environment. For data collection, the participants were subjected to a concentrated period of skill training (abdominal, cardiological, and pulmonary). Every day after the skill training session, they were subjected to a practical evaluation and completed a theoretical test before and after the practical activities. At the end of all activities, they answered the instrument to assess the simulated practices (self-confidence and satisfaction).

RESULTS

Among the 49 students evaluated, positive and significant theoretical and practical gains were identified in all three components (abdominal, cardiological, and pulmonary) (P = 0.000), as well as in the general evaluation (Theoretical 1 and Theoretical 2) (P = 0.000), satisfaction, and self-confidence (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Concentrated laboratory practice resulted in positive improvements in students' physical examination skills.

Education Research: Monitoring and Tracking Neurophobia: Evidence From a Temporal Analysis of Brazilian Medical Schools

Background and Objectives

Neurologic disorders are common medical conditions. However, even with a higher demand for neurologic care, the capacity to train neurologists is impaired. The fear of neurosciences/neurology by medical students, known as neurophobia, may cause multiple adverse effects in neurologic assistance. The objectives of this study were to estimate the current prevalence and characteristics of neurophobia in medical students in Brazil and to compare neurophobic symptoms at 2 time points.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study conducted with students from 4 medical schools in Pará, Brazil, who matriculated into the preclinical stage, clinical stage, and internship were submitted to a questionnaire to assess the perception of clinical specialties, including neurology. Reasons for neurophobia, probable strategies to improve neurologic education, and a specific scale to detect neurophobia were also evaluated. Furthermore, we performed a temporal comparison of current results with those from a previous study from 2015.

Results

Neurophobia was detected in 63.3% of medical students. The perception of the difficulty in neurology/neurosciences was very high in all stages, and the perception of interest and quality of teaching worsened during the internship. The need to understand neuroanatomy and neurophysiology was cited as the most important reason for neurophobia. More and better bedside tutorials were the most mentioned suggestion to improve neurologic education. The temporal comparison between 2015 and 2022 showed that the level of knowledge, quality of teaching, and likelihood of pursuing a career in neurology has become more favorable in 2022.

Discussion

The prevalence of neurophobia in Brazil was higher than that in high-income countries. Unfavorable opinions about neurology tended to increase throughout the medical course, but the temporal comparison showed that the impact of neurophobia has decreased. Surveillance systems for monitoring and tracking neurophobia should be implemented in medical schools.

Perception of Realism and Acquisition of Clinical Skills in Simulated Pediatric Dentistry Scenarios

Simulation, depending on the modality and fidelity of the scenarios, is an important resource for clinical teaching and achievement of learning outcomes in dentistry. The objectives of this study were to compare the degree of realism perceived by students and teachers in a simulated scenario, and to assess the level of competence acquired by the students.

METHOD

In the Pediatric Dentistry course, eight clinical scenarios were carried out, each one using a modified Erler Zimmer child simulator (handmade), a professional actress and two students (dentist and assistant) on the same pediatric dentistry case consisting of a pulp abscess in tooth 8.5. A total of 114 students in the 4th year of dentistry studies participated in the pediatric dentistry course. Questionnaires with Likert-type answers were elaborated to evaluate the educational intervention, applying them before and after the simulation.

RESULTS

The realism best valued by the students was that of the simulated participant and the worst that of the manikin, the latter being strongly related to the realism of the office. It was observed that students' perception of clinical competence increased as the overall realism of the scenario increased (p-value = 0.00576).

CONCLUSION

This research suggests that the creation of scenarios using handmade mannequins and simulated participants achieves a high level of realism, increasing the level of clinical competence perceived by dental students.

Health Sciences Students’ Attitude, Perception, and Experience of Using Educational Simulation in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Simulation-based education (SBE) provides a safe, effective, and stimulating environment for training medical and healthcare students. This is especially valuable for skills that cannot be practiced on real patients due to ethical and practical reasons. We aimed to assess medical students’ attitude, perception, and experience of simulation-based medical education in Saudi Arabia. Method: A validated cross-sectional survey, using the KidSIM scale, was conducted to measure the level of perception and experience of students from different health sciences specialties toward integrating simulation as an educational tool. Participants responded to questions investigated the importance of simulation, opportunities for Inter-Professional Education (IPE), communication, roles and responsibilities, and situation awareness. Only students with previous experience of SBE were considered for participation. Result: This survey was completed by 246 participants, of whom 165 (67%) were male students and 228 (93%) were aged between the range of 18–30 years old. Of the respondents, 104 (67%) were respiratory care students, 90 (37%) were anesthesia technology students, and 45 (18%) were nursing students. Most of the participants had previous experience in IPE simulation activities (84%), and more than half of the students (54%) had a grade point average (GPA) ranging between 5.00 and 4.50. Overall, students had positive attitudes toward and beliefs about SBE, with a mean score of 129.76 ± 14.27, on the KidSIM scale, out of 150. Students’ GPA was significantly associated with a better perception to the relevance of simulation (p = 0.005), communication (p = 0.003), roles and responsibilities (p = 0.04), and situation awareness (p = 0.009). GPA is merely the sole predictor for positive attitude toward simulation with coefficient Beta value of 4.285 (p = 0.001). There were no significant correlations between other students’ characteristic variables (gender, specialty, study year, experience in IPE, and prior critical care experience). Conclusion: We found that health sciences students’ perception of SBE in Saudi Arabia is generally positive, and students’ performance is a significant determinant of the positive perception.

The "Neurospeed" game: a fun tool to learn the neurological semiology

BACKGROUND

Neurological semiology is often considered by medical students as particularly difficult to learn. Finding alternative teaching methods may improve students' motivation and understanding of this field.

METHODS

We developed the "Neurospeed", a game to learn neurological syndromes. We assessed its efficiency on short-term learning of neurological syndromes in third-year medical students, through Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) before and after the game session. Students' satisfaction was evaluated by a satisfaction survey.

RESULTS

Out of the 199 third-year medical students of the Faculty of Medicine Sorbonne Paris Nord, 180 attended the Neurospeed in December 2020, and 148 answered 20 Multiple Choice Questions before and after the game, with significant improvement of their score (p < 0.001). Most of the participants agreed that the game was playful, stimulating, and helpful to learn neurological semiology.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our results show that the Neurospeed game is an interesting tool as a complement to traditional lectures. Further studies are necessary to compare the efficacy of different types of serious games on short-term and long-term learning of neurological semiology.

NeuroQ: A neurophobia screening tool assesses how roleplay challenges neurophobia

BACKGROUND

Neurophobia is a chronic disease of medical students and junior doctors. Early detection is needed to facilitate prevention and management as this fear can negatively impact patient care.

METHODS

We conducted a two-part mono-centric study at the faculty of Medicine, Sorbonne University, in Paris. Part one: a cross-sectional study to validate a newly constructed neurophobia scale, NeuroQ. Part two: a prospective longitudinal study to assess the impact of The Move on student neurophobia using NeuroQ. A population-based sample of second-year medical students of the 2019 and 2020 class of the Faculty of Medicine of Sorbonne University were invited to participate.

RESULTS

NeuroQ incorporates the main themes of the neurophobia definition and demonstrates uni-dimensionality. Three hundred and ninety-five medical students participated in the study (mean age was 20.0 years, SD: 2.1 years) assessing the effect of The Move teaching on neurophobia. Two hundred and eighty-eight (72.9%) students were female. After the Move teaching the mean NeuroQ score was significantly lower compared to the baseline NeuroQ score (mean [SD] variation, -1.1 [2.6], p < 0.001). There was a 22.3% relative reduction in the number of neurophobic students after The Move teaching.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight the utility of NeuroQ in assessing (i) baseline neurophobia and (ii) the impact of pre-clinical educational interventions on neurophobia. Furthermore, we have shown the importance of pre-clinical educational interventions, such as The Move, in tackling neurophobia.

Prospective study on a fast-track training in psychiatry for medical students: the psychiatric hat game

BACKGROUND

While medical students are losing interest in lectures in favor of other educational materials, many studies suggest the benefit of active learning, combined with gamified educational tools. The authors developed a psychiatric adaptation of the « Hat Game ». It was hypothesised that this game would increase both knowledge and motivation in medical students toward psychiatric semiology. The aim of the study was to assess the benefit of a Psychiatric Hat Game session for learning psychiatric symptoms in third-year medical students. Student performance was also evaluated at 3 months.

METHODS

This gamified fast-track training consists of two teams and each team has to guess as many psychiatric semiology terms as possible using different techniques (i.e. speech, mime). The study involved a pre- and post-evaluation of knowledge (Multiple Choice Questions) and a satisfaction survey. Baseline, post-immediate, and three-months scores were compared by using Friedman analysis for paired samples. Comparisons of mean scores at two different times were performed by using Wilcoxon test for paired samples.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-six students were proposed to take part in the study. Among them 129 completed the whole program (response rate = 77.7%). Mean scores measured at the three points in time were significantly different (p < 0.001, N = 129). Knowledge mean scores were significantly higher after the game than before (+ 28.6%, p < 0.001). Improvement was maintained 3 months after the game (+ 18.9%, p < 0.001). Satisfaction survey items highlighted that students enjoyed and would recommend this type of gamified training.

CONCLUSIONS

The Psychiatric Hat Game improved knowledge of psychiatric semiology in medical students. Results suggest that it is a promising and efficient tool to playfully teach medical semiology, with transferable features, utility and acceptability from one medical field to another. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge advocating for serious games and gamified training in medical education.

[Evaluation of the use of a simulation software in the learning of cardiopulmonary auscultation in undergraduate medical students]

INTRODUCTION

Medsounds™ software allows to create an auscultation learning platform, by providing real pre-recorded cardiopulmonary sounds on virtual chests. The study aimed at comparing the skills in cardiopulmonary auscultation between students who benefited from this platform and students who did not have access to it.

METHODS

A controlled trial was conducted with 2nd year medical students randomised into three groups. Groups A, B and C received 10 h of cardiopulmonary clinical training. In addition, group B benefited from an online access to the educative platform, and group C had a demonstration of the platform during their clinical training, then an online access. The main outcome was a 3-point multiple-choice questionnaire based on 2 original case vignettes about the description of cardiopulmonary sounds. The secondary outcome was the faculty exam on high-fidelity cardiopulmonary simulator.

RESULTS

Groups A and B included 127 students, and group C 117. Students in group C had a significantly higher score than those in group A (1.72/3 versus 1.48/3; p = 0.02), without difference between the groups B and C. Students who actually had a demonstration of the platform and used it at home had a higher score than those who did not use it (1.87 versus 1.51; p = 0.01). Students who had a demonstration of the platform before using it performed a better pulmonary examination on high-fidelity simulators.

CONCLUSION

The supervised use of an online auscultation simulation software in addition to the traditional clinical training seems to improve the auscultation performances of undergraduated medical students.

The "Neurological Hat Game": A fun way to learn the neurological semiology

INTRODUCTION

In-class courses are deserted by medical students who tend to find it more beneficial to study in books and through online material. New interactive teaching methods, such as serious games increase both performance and motivation. We developed and assessed a new teaching method for neurological semiology using the "Hat Game" as a basis.

METHODS

In this game, two teams of second-year medical students are playing against one another. The game is played with a deck of cards. A neurological symptom or sign is written on each card. Each team gets a predefined period of time to guess as many words as possible. One member is the clue-giver and the others are the guessers. There are three rounds: during the first round, the clue-giver uses any descriptive term he wants and as many as he wants to make his team guess the maximum number of words within the allocated time. During the second round, the clue-giver can only choose one clue-word and, during the third round, he mimes the symptom or sign. The team that has guessed the most cards wins the game. To assess the efficacy of this learning procedure, multiple choices questions (MCQs) were asked before and after the game. Exam results of second-year students on their final university Neurology exam were analyzed. A satisfaction survey was proposed to all participating students.

RESULTS

Among 373 students, 121 volunteers (32.4%) were enrolled in the "Neurology Hat Game" and 112 attended the game. One hundred and seven of the 112 students completed the MCQs with a significant improvement in their responses after the game (P<0.001). The 112 students who completed the satisfaction self-administered questionnaire were very satisfied with this funny new teaching method.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching neurological semiology via the "Hat Game" is an interesting method because it is student-centered, playful and complementary to the lecturer-centered courses. A randomized controlled study would be necessary to confirm these preliminary results.