Applicability and Validity of an e-Health Tool for the Appropriate Referral and Selection of Patients With Chronic Pain for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results From a European Retrospective Study

Development and Feasibility Study of a Triage Tool for Early Referral to Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients With Chronic Low Back and Leg Pain

BACKGROUND

In recent years, delayed elective care and growing waiting lists increasingly resulted in postponed surgeries for patients with chronic back and leg pain.

OBJECTIVE

To develop, implement, and evaluate the feasibility of a triage tool for patients with chronic back and/or leg pain to identify those eligible for referral to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) consultation.

METHODS

A triage tool was developed, based on Dutch SCS guidelines, literature review and expert panel consultation. The triage process was detected and implemented in collaboration with a multidisciplinary team, prior to first orthopaedic consultation. Feasibility, reliability and predictive accuracy were analysed as part of the evaluation of the triage tool.

RESULTS

The triage indicators included: Pain location (leg/mixed), DN4 > 3, pain duration ≥ 3 months, leg pain ≥ back pain and NPRS leg pain ≥ 5. The triage tool was applied on patients on the orthopaedic waiting list, followed by a full orthopaedic review if they were not excluded. A total of 1025 orthopaedic patients with chronic back and leg pain were assessed with the triage tool. The triage tool was evaluated as feasible (mean System Usability Score 74.2 [SD 11.5]), reliable (inter-rater reliability [Fleiss' Kappa 0.79], intra-rater reliability [Cohen's Kappa 0.89]) and accurate (sensitivity [100%], specificity [98.8%], positive predictive value [40%] and negative predictive value [100%]).

CONCLUSION

Early triage of potential SCS candidates potentially supports rapid and appropriate care allocation, shortens waiting list time and improves clinical outcomes. Future research should explore strategies to optimise the tool's performance in identifying patients most likely to benefit from SCS therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

A novel triage tool was developed to identify patients with chronic back and leg pain for an early referral to SCS. This tool, evaluated for feasibility, reliability, and predictive accuracy, shows promise in reducing waiting times and improving patient selection. It can be a prelude to the further development of decision support for SCS and an acceleration in the care process for SCS candidates.

Development and Implementation of Automated Referral Triaging System for Spinal Cord Stimulation Procedure in Pain Medicine

Effective referral triaging enhances patient service outcomes, experience and access to care especially for specialized procedures. This study presents the development and implementation of an automated triaging system to predict patients who would benefit from Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) procedure for their pain management. The proposed triage system aims to improve the triage process by reducing unnecessary appointments before SCS assessment, ensuring appropriate pain management care. It compares various machine learning techniques for the prediction while addressing the class imbalance and overlap challenges inherent in the data. Both data-level and algorithm-level approaches were explored. Two years of patient data was collected including patient characteristics, diagnosis history, pain symptoms, appointment history, medication history, and concepts from clinical notes extracted using Natural Language Processing. EasyEnsemble with Ada Boosting method, an algorithm-level approach, showed the most promising results. The tenfold validation indicated the average area under curve of 0.82, true positive rate (TPR) of 77.3%, and true negative rate (TNR) of 73.0%. The probability threshold was adjusted to 0.575 to meet practice expectation of 15% or less on false positive rate (FPR). The implementation pipeline for the selected model was designed to be applicable to real clinical settings. The one-year implementation results showed TPR of 64.7% and TNR of 87.2%, which reduced FPR by 12.8% while reduced TPR by 12.6%. The trade-off was acceptable to practice. The proposed triage system demonstrated promising accuracy, leading to the enhancement of scheduling systems, patient care, and the reduction of unnecessary appointments in a pain medicine setting.

Neuromodulation for Neuropathic Pain Syndromes

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the principles, applications, and emerging trends of neuromodulation as a therapeutic approach for managing painful neuropathic diseases. By parsing evidence for possible mechanisms of action and clinical trial outcomes for various diseases, this article focuses on five common therapy modalities: cutaneous, peripheral nerve, spinal cord, and brain stimulation, and intrathecal drug delivery.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Recent advances in both invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation for pain have introduced personalized and closed-loop techniques, integrating real-time feedback mechanisms and combining therapies to improve physical and psychosocial function. Novel stimulation waveforms may influence distinct neural tissues to rectify pathologic pain signaling.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

With appropriate patient selection, peripheral nerve stimulation or epidural stimulation of the spinal cord can provide enduring relief for a variety of chronic pain syndromes. Newer technology using high frequencies, unique waveforms, or closed-loop stimulation may have selective advantages, but our current understanding of therapy mechanisms is very poor. For certain diagnoses and patients who meet clinical criteria, neuromodulation can provide profound, long-lasting relief that significantly improves quality of life. While many therapies are supported by data from large clinical trials, there is a risk of bias as most clinical studies were funded by device manufacturers or insurance companies, which increases the importance of real-world data analysis. Emerging methods like invasive or noninvasive brain stimulation may help us dissect basic mechanisms of pain processing and hold promise for personalized therapies for refractory pain syndromes. Finally, intrathecal delivery of drugs directly to segments of the spinal cord can also modify pain signaling to provide therapy for severe pain syndromes.

Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain: Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

BACKGROUND

Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain.

METHODS

The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.

The Predicted Outcome of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With a Psychopathological Disorder and Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: A Systematic Review From 2009 to 2021

OBJECTIVES

Psychologic screening is often included as a mandatory component of evaluation of the impact of psychopathology disorders on the predicted outcome of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for patients with chronic pain due to persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS type 2). The conclusion of such screenings can influence the decision to offer SCS therapy to a patient. However, evidence on the impact of psychopathology on SCS outcomes is still scarce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To address this knowledge gap, we systematically reviewed the literature from 2009 to 2021 to explore the correlation between the presence of a psychopathological disorder and the predicted outcome of SCS in patients with PSPS type 2. The literature search was conducted using various online data bases with "failed back surgery syndrome," "psychopathology," and "spinal cord stimulation" used as essential keywords. The identified studies were organized in a Rayyan AI data base, and the quality was analyzed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool.

RESULTS

Our search generated the identification of 468 original articles, of which two prospective and four retrospective studies met our inclusion criteria. These studies reported pain relief, a reduction of symptoms of anxiety and depression, and an improvement in rumination on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with PSPS type 2 after SCS therapy. The studies also found contradictory outcomes measured using the Oswestry Disability Index, and in terms of the impact of psychopathological disorder on the clinical outcome and revision rate of the SCS system.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review, we found no convincing evidence that the presence of a psychopathological disorder affects the predicted outcome of SCS therapy in patients with PSPS type 2.

Patient profiling and outcome assessment in spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and/or leg pain (the PROSTIM study): a study protocol

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment option in the multidisciplinary approach to chronic back and leg pain. Nevertheless, careful patient selection remains crucial to provide the most optimal treatment and prevent treatment failure. We report the protocol for the PROSTIM study, an ongoing prospective, multicentric and observational clinical study (NCT05349695) that aims to identify different patient clusters and their outcomes after SCS. Patients are recruited in different centers in Europe. Analysis focuses on identifying significant patient clusters based on different health domains and the changes in biopsychosocial variables 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months after implantation. This study is the first to include a biopsychosocial cluster analysis to identify significant patient groups and their response to treatment with SCS.

Real-world outcomes of single-stage spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain patients: A multicentre, European case series

Background

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in treating chronic neuropathic pain. A screening trial is typically conducted prior to implantation to evaluate whether a patient is a good candidate for SCS. However, the need for a screening trial has been debated. We evaluated real-world clinical outcomes in patients who underwent a single-stage procedure to receive SCS therapy (i.e., no screening trial period) (SS-SCS).

Methods

This observational, multicentre, real-world consecutive case series evaluated SS-SCS chronic pain patients. Pain and other functional outcomes were collected as part of standard care by site personnel with no sponsor involvement. Assessments included Numerical rating scale (NRS), Percent Pain Relief (PPR) and EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5L), recorded prior to SCS and following implantation.

Results

A total of 171 chronic pain patients (mean age: 59.4; 53.2% females) underwent a single-stage procedure (mean last follow-up, 408 days) and were included in the analysis. A 5.0 ​± ​2.1-point improvement in overall pain was reported at 3 months and sustained until the last follow-up post-implantation (p ​< ​0.0001). At last follow-up, 50.3% (86/171) of patients reported an NRS pain score ≤3. Additionally, quality of life also improved (46.1-point change, from 70.2 to 25) at the last follow-up, based on EQ-5D-5L scores.

Conclusions

In routine clinical practice, SS-SCS can provide significant long-term pain relief and improve quality of life in chronic pain patients. Our results suggest that effective long-term outcomes and success may be achieved without a trial period prior to permanent implantation of an SCS system.

Long-term safety of spinal cord stimulation systems in a prospective, global registry of patients with chronic pain

Aim: The availability of long-term (>2 years) safety outcomes of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) remains limited. We evaluated safety in a global SCS registry for chronic pain. Methods: Participants were prospectively enrolled globally at 79 implanting centers and followed out to 3 years after device implantation. Results: Of 1881 participants enrolled, 1289 received a permanent SCS implant (1776 completed trial). The annualized rate of device explant was 3.5% (all causes), and 1.1% due to inadequate pain relief. Total incidence of device explantation >3 years was 7.6% (n = 98). Of these, 32 subjects (2.5%) indicated inadequate pain relief as cause for removal. Implant site infection (11 events) was the most common device-related serious adverse event (<1%). Conclusion: This prospective, global, real-world study demonstrates a high-level of safety for SCS with low rate of explant/serious adverse events. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01719055 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Spinal stimulation for motor rehabilitation immediately modulates nociceptive transmission

Objective. Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in debilitating movement impairments and neuropathic pain. Electrical stimulation of spinal neurons holds considerable promise both for enhancing neural transmission in weakened motor pathways and for reducing neural transmission in overactive nociceptive pathways. However, spinal stimulation paradigms currently under development for individuals living with SCI continue overwhelmingly to be developed in the context of motor rehabilitation alone. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that motor-targeted spinal stimulation simultaneously modulates spinal nociceptive transmission.Approach. We characterized the neuromodulatory actions of motor-targeted intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) on the firing dynamics of large populations of discrete nociceptive specific and wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons. Neurons were accessed via dense microelectrode arrays implantedin vivointo lumbar enlargement of rats. Nociceptive and non-nociceptive cutaneous transmission was induced before, during, and after ISMS by mechanically probing the L5 dermatome.Main results. Our primary findings are that (a) sub-motor threshold ISMS delivered to spinal motor pools immediately modulates concurrent nociceptive transmission; (b) the magnitude of anti-nociceptive effects increases with longer durations of ISMS, including robust carryover effects; (c) the majority of all identified nociceptive-specific and WDR neurons exhibit firing rate reductions after only 10 min of ISMS; and (d) ISMS does not increase spinal responsiveness to non-nociceptive cutaneous transmission. These results lead to the conclusion that ISMS parameterized to enhance motor output results in an overall net decrease n spinal nociceptive transmission.Significance. These results suggest that ISMS may hold translational potential for neuropathic pain-related applications and that it may be uniquely suited to delivering multi-modal therapeutic benefits for individuals living with SCI.

Patient selection for spinal cord stimulation: The importance of an integrated assessment of clinical and psychosocial factors

BACKGROUND

A previously developed educational e-health tool considers both clinical and psychosocial factors when selecting patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The validity of the composite recommendations was evaluated in a retrospective study, demonstrating a strong relationship with patient outcomes after SCS.

METHODS

An additional retrospective analysis was performed to determine the added value of a psychosocial evaluation as part of the decision-making process on SCS. Data concerned 482 patients who were considered for SCS in 2018-2019. Analysis focused on the relationship between the different layers of the tool recommendations (clinical, psychosocial, composite) with trial results and patient outcomes at 6 months after SCS. Of the initial study population, 381 patients underwent SCS and had follow-up data on at least one of three pain-related outcome measures.

RESULTS

Pain improvement was observed in 76% of the patients for whom SCS was strongly recommended based on merely the clinical aspects. This percentage varied by the level of psychosocial problems and ranged from 86% in patients without any compromising psychosocial factors to 60% in those with severe problems. Similarly, the severity of psychosocial problems affected trial results in patients for whom SCS was either recommended or strongly recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The strong relationship between psychosocial factors embedded in the SCS e-health tool and patient outcomes supports an integrated and multidisciplinary approach in the selection of patients for SCS. The educational e-health tool, combining both clinical and psychosocial aspects, is believed to be helpful for further education and implementation of this approach.