Better than Optimal

More Than the Sum of Its Parts: Visual-Tactile Integration in the Behaving Rat

We experience the world by constantly integrating cues from multiple modalities to form unified sensory percepts. Once familiar with multimodal properties of an object, we can recognize it regardless of the modality involved. In this chapter we will examine the case of a visual-tactile orientation categorization experiment in rats. We will explore the involvement of the cerebral cortex in recognizing objects through multiple sensory modalities. In the orientation categorization task, rats learned to examine and judge the orientation of a raised, black and white grating using touch, vision, or both. Their multisensory performance was better than the predictions of linear models for cue combination, indicating synergy between the two sensory channels. Neural recordings made from a candidate associative cortical area, the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), reflected the principal neuronal correlates of the behavioral results: PPC neurons encoded both graded information about the object and categorical information about the animal's decision. Intriguingly single neurons showed identical responses under each of the three modality conditions providing a substrate for a neural circuit in the cortex that is involved in modality-invariant processing of objects.

Self-motion perception and sequential decision-making: where are we heading?

To navigate and guide adaptive behaviour in a dynamic environment, animals must accurately estimate their own motion relative to the external world. This is a fundamentally multisensory process involving integration of visual, vestibular and kinesthetic inputs. Ideal observer models, paired with careful neurophysiological investigation, helped to reveal how visual and vestibular signals are combined to support perception of linear self-motion direction, or heading. Recent work has extended these findings by emphasizing the dimension of time, both with regard to stimulus dynamics and the trade-off between speed and accuracy. Both time and certainty-i.e. the degree of confidence in a multisensory decision-are essential to the ecological goals of the system: terminating a decision process is necessary for timely action, and predicting one's accuracy is critical for making multiple decisions in a sequence, as in navigation. Here, we summarize a leading model for multisensory decision-making, then show how the model can be extended to study confidence in heading discrimination. Lastly, we preview ongoing efforts to bridge self-motion perception and navigation per se, including closed-loop virtual reality and active self-motion. The design of unconstrained, ethologically inspired tasks, accompanied by large-scale neural recordings, raise promise for a deeper understanding of spatial perception and decision-making in the behaving animal. This article is part of the theme issue 'Decision and control processes in multisensory perception'.

Temporal synchrony effects of optic flow and vestibular inputs on multisensory heading perception

Precise heading perception requires integration of optic flow and vestibular cues, yet the two cues often carry distinct temporal dynamics that may confound cue integration benefit. Here, we varied temporal offset between the two sensory inputs while macaques discriminated headings around straight ahead. We find the best heading performance does not occur under natural condition of synchronous inputs with zero offset but rather when visual stimuli are artificially adjusted to lead vestibular by a few hundreds of milliseconds. This amount exactly matches the lag between the vestibular acceleration and visual speed signals as measured from single-unit-activity in frontal and posterior parietal cortices. Manually aligning cues in these areas best facilitates integration with some nonlinear gain modulation effects. These findings are consistent with predictions from a model by which the brain integrates optic flow speed with a faster vestibular acceleration signal for sensing instantaneous heading direction during self-motion in the environment.

Cognitive, Systems, and Computational Neurosciences of the Self in Motion

Navigating by path integration requires continuously estimating one's self-motion. This estimate may be derived from visual velocity and/or vestibular acceleration signals. Importantly, these senses in isolation are ill-equipped to provide accurate estimates, and thus visuo-vestibular integration is an imperative. After a summary of the visual and vestibular pathways involved, the crux of this review focuses on the human and theoretical approaches that have outlined a normative account of cue combination in behavior and neurons, as well as on the systems neuroscience efforts that are searching for its neural implementation. We then highlight a contemporary frontier in our state of knowledge: understanding how velocity cues with time-varying reliabilities are integrated into an evolving position estimate over prolonged time periods. Further, we discuss how the brain builds internal models inferring when cues ought to be integrated versus segregated-a process of causal inference. Lastly, we suggest that the study of spatial navigation has not yet addressed its initial condition: self-location. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Visual self-motion cues are impaired yet overweighted during visual-vestibular integration in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease is prototypically a movement disorder. Although perceptual and motor functions are highly interdependent, much less is known about perceptual deficits in Parkinson's disease, which are less observable by nature, and might go unnoticed if not tested directly. It is therefore imperative to seek and identify these, to fully understand the challenges facing patients with Parkinson's disease. Also, perceptual deficits may be related to motor symptoms. Posture, gait and balance, affected in Parkinson's disease, rely on veridical perception of one's own motion (self-motion) in space. Yet it is not known whether self-motion perception is impaired in Parkinson's disease. Using a well-established multisensory paradigm of heading discrimination (that has not been previously applied to Parkinson's disease), we tested unisensory visual and vestibular self-motion perception, as well as multisensory integration of visual and vestibular cues, in 19 Parkinson's disease, 23 healthy age-matched and 20 healthy young-adult participants. After experiencing vestibular (on a motion platform), visual (optic flow) or multisensory (combined visual-vestibular) self-motion stimuli at various headings, participants reported whether their perceived heading was to the right or left of straight ahead. Parkinson's disease participants and age-matched controls were tested twice (Parkinson's disease participants on and off medication). Parkinson's disease participants demonstrated significantly impaired visual self-motion perception compared with age-matched controls on both visits, irrespective of medication status. Young controls performed slightly (but not significantly) better than age-matched controls and significantly better than the Parkinson's disease group. The visual self-motion perception impairment in Parkinson's disease correlated significantly with clinical disease severity. By contrast, vestibular performance was unimpaired in Parkinson's disease. Remarkably, despite impaired visual self-motion perception, Parkinson's disease participants significantly overweighted the visual cues during multisensory (visual-vestibular ) integration (compared with Bayesian predictions of optimal integration) and significantly more than controls. These findings indicate that self-motion perception in Parkinson's disease is affected by impaired visual cues and by suboptimal visual-vestibular integration (overweighting of visual cues). Notably, vestibular self-motion perception was unimpaired. Thus, visual self-motion perception is specifically impaired in early-stage Parkinson's disease. This can impact Parkinson's disease diagnosis and subtyping. Overweighting of visual cues could reflect a general multisensory integration deficit in Parkinson's disease, or specific overestimation of visual cue reliability. Finally, impaired self-motion perception in Parkinson's disease may contribute to impaired balance and gait control. Future investigation into this connection might open up new avenues of alternative therapies to better treat these difficult symptoms.

Supra-optimality may emanate from suboptimality, and hence optimality is no benchmark in multisensory integration

Within a multisensory context, "optimality" has been used as a benchmark evidencing interdependent sensory channels. However, "optimality" does not truly bifurcate a spectrum from suboptimal to supra-optimal - where optimal and supra-optimal, but not suboptimal, indicate integration - as supra-optimality may result from the suboptimal integration of a present unisensory stimuli and an absent one (audio = audio + absence of vision).