Investigating the role of substance P in photic responses of the circadian system: individual and combined actions with gastrin-releasing peptide

Circuit development in the master clock network of mammals

Daily rhythms are generated by the circadian timekeeping system, which is orchestrated by the master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of mammals. Circadian timekeeping is endogenous and does not require exposure to external cues during development. Nevertheless, the circadian system is not fully formed at birth in many mammalian species and it is important to understand how SCN development can affect the function of the circadian system in adulthood. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the ontogeny of cellular and circuit function in the SCN, with a focus on work performed in model rodent species (i.e., mouse, rat, and hamster). Particular emphasis is placed on the spatial and temporal patterns of SCN development that may contribute to the function of the master clock during adulthood. Additional work aimed at decoding the mechanisms that guide circadian development is expected to provide a solid foundation upon which to better understand the sources and factors contributing to aberrant maturation of clock function.

Phase shifts to light are altered by antagonists to neuropeptide receptors

The mammalian circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is a heterogeneous structure. Two key populations of cells that receive retinal input and are believed to participate in circadian responses to light are cells that contain vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP). VIP acts primarily through the VPAC2 receptor, while GRP works primarily through the BB2 receptor. Both VIP and GRP phase shift the circadian clock in a manner similar to light when applied to the SCN, both in vivo and in vitro, indicating that they are sufficient to elicit photic-like phase shifts. However, it is not known if they are necessary signals for light to elicit phase shifts. Here we test the hypothesis that GRP and VIP are necessary signaling components for the photic phase shifting of the hamster circadian clock by examining two antagonists for each of these neuropeptides. The BB2 antagonist PD176252 had no effect on light-induced delays on its own, while the BB2 antagonist RC-3095 had the unexpected effect of significantly potentiating both phase delays and advances. Neither of the VIP antagonists ([d-p-Cl-Phe6, Leu17]-VIP, or PG99-465) altered phase shifting responses to light on their own. When the BB2 antagonist PD176252 and the VPAC2 antagonist PG99-465 were delivered together to the SCN, phase delays were significantly attenuated. These results indicate that photic phase shifting requires participation of either VIP or GRP; phase shifts to light are only impaired when signalling in both pathways are inhibited. Additionally, the unexpected potentiation of light-induced phase shifts by RC-3095 should be investigated further for potential chronobiotic applications.

Dynamic neuronal network organization of the circadian clock and possible deterioration in disease

In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCNs) function as a circadian pacemaker that drives 24-h rhythms in physiology and behavior. The SCN is a multicellular clock in which the constituent oscillators show dynamics in their functional organization and phase coherence. Evidence has emerged that plasticity in phase synchrony among SCN neurons determines (i) the amplitude of the rhythm, (ii) the response to continuous light, (iii) the capacity to respond to seasonal changes, and (iv) the phase-resetting capacity. A decrease in circadian amplitude and phase-resetting capacity is characteristic during aging and can be a result of disease processes. Whether the decrease in amplitude is caused by a loss of synchronization or by a loss of single-cell rhythmicity remains to be determined and is important for the development of strategies to ameliorate circadian disorders.

Gastrin-releasing peptide links stressor to cancer progression

INTRODUCTION

Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) plays an important role in cancer growth and metastasis; however, the mechanisms of how GRP affects cancer progression are not well understood. Recent studies revealed that chronic stress is a major risk factor for cancer progression, and this effect may be mediated by GRP. In this review, we will discuss the mechanisms and implications of GRP linking stressor to cancer progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrieved the studies of the relationship between GRP, stress and cancers through PubMed using systematic methods to search, select, and evaluate the findings.

RESULTS

The results suggested that GRP can mediate the effects of stress on cancers at systemic, tissue and cellular levels: Stress elicits the secretion of GRP in the brain and GRP in turn activates the stress response pathways resulting in an elevation of stress hormones and GRP in the plasma and tissues. GRP in synergy with stress hormones stimulates the growth and invasion of cancer cells by suppressing the anti-tumor immune function and directly activating the pro-proliferative and pro-migratory signaling pathways in cancer cells.

CONCLUSION

GRP is a multi-functional peptide, which acts as a stress mediator as well as a growth factor linking stressor to cancer progression. GRP and its high-affinity receptor are useful targets for the diagnosis and treatment of cancers.

Physiological responses of the circadian clock to acute light exposure at night

Circadian rhythms in physiological, endocrine and metabolic functioning are controlled by a neural clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). This structure is endogenously rhythmic and the phase of this rhythm can be reset by light information from the eye. A key feature of the SCN is that while it is a small structure containing on the order of about 20,000 cells, it is amazingly heterogeneous. It is likely that anatomical heterogeneity reflects an underlying functional heterogeneity. In this review, we examine the physiological responses of cells in the SCN to light stimuli that reset the phase of the circadian clock, highlighting where possible the spatial pattern of such responses. Increases in intracellular calcium are an important signal in response to light, and this increase triggers many biochemical cascades that mediate responses to light. Furthermore, only some cells in the SCN are actually endogenously rhythmic, and these cells likely do not receive strong direct input from the retina. Therefore, this review also considers how light information is conveyed from the retinorecipient cells to the endogenously rhythmic cells that track circadian phase. A number of neuropeptides, including vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, gastrin-releasing peptide and substance P, may be particularly important in relaying such signals, but other neurochemicals such as GABA and nitric oxide may participate as well. A thorough understanding of the intracellular and intercellular responses to light, as well as the spatial arrangements of such responses may help identify important pharmacological targets for therapeutic interventions to treat sleep and circadian disorders.