Broad analgesic activity of a novel, selective M1 agonist

Exploring Cholinergic Compounds for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Management: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Rodent Model Studies

Neuropathic pain affects about 7-8% of the population, and its management still poses challenges with unmet needs. Over the past decades, researchers have explored the cholinergic system (muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: mAChR and nAChR) and compounds targeting these receptors as potential analgesics for neuropathic pain management. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of studies on peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) in rodent models, exploring compounds targeting cholinergic neurotransmission. The inclusion criteria were original articles on PNP in rodent models that explored the use of compounds directly targeting cholinergic neurotransmission and reported results of nociceptive behavioral assays. The literature search was performed in the PubMed and Web of Science databases (1 January 2000-22 April 2023). The selection process yielded 82 publications, encompassing 62 compounds. The most studied compounds were agonists of α4β2 nAChR and α7 nAChR, and antagonists of α9/α10 nAChR, along with those increasing acetylcholine and targeting mAChRs. Studies mainly reported antinociceptive effects in traumatic PNP models, and to a lesser extent, chemotherapy-induced neuropathy or diabetic models. These preclinical studies underscore the considerable potential of cholinergic compounds in the management of PNP, warranting the initiation of clinical trials.

Potential Role for Combined Subtype-Selective Targeting of M1 and M3 Muscarinic Receptors in Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases

Despite structural similarity, the five subtypes comprising the cholinergic muscarinic family of G protein-coupled receptors regulate remarkably diverse biological functions. This mini review focuses on the closely related and commonly co-expressed M₁R and M₃R muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes encoded respectively by CHRM1 and CHRM3. Activated M₁R and M₃R signal via G_q and downstream initiate phospholipid turnover, changes in cell calcium levels, and activation of protein kinases that alter gene transcription and ultimately cell function. The unexpectedly divergent effects of M₁R and M₃R activation, despite similar receptor structure, distribution, and signaling, are puzzling. To explore this conundrum, we focus on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and liver because abundant data identify opposing effects of M₁R and M₃R activation on the progression of gastric, pancreatic, and colon cancer, and liver injury and fibrosis. Whereas M₃R activation promotes GI neoplasia, M₁R activation appears protective. In contrast, in murine liver injury models, M₃R activation promotes and M₁R activation mitigates liver fibrosis. We analyze these findings critically, consider their therapeutic implications, and review the pharmacology and availability for research and therapeutics of M₁R and M₃R-selective agonists and antagonists. We conclude by considering gaps in knowledge and other factors that hinder the application of these drugs and the development of new agents to treat GI and liver diseases.

Similar role of mPFC orexin-1 receptors in the acquisition and expression of morphine- and food-induced conditioned place preference in male rats

Self-control problems are a typical character of drug addiction and excessive food consumption and it has been shown that natural rewards and drugs of abuse share parts of the same neural substrate and reward processing in the brain. Different brain areas are involved in natural and drug reward processing including the mesolimbic pathway, amygdala, nucleus accumbens (NAc), and prefrontal cortex. Considering the important role of orexins in the addictive behavior and the presence of orexin-1 subtype receptors (Orx1R) in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), this study investigated the role of mPFC in natural- and drug-reward seeking behaviors to deepen our understanding of possible similarities or differences. To induce food- or morphine-conditioned place preference (CPP), adult male Wistar rats underwent CPP testing and received intra-mPFC doses of SB334867 (3, 10, or 30 nM/0.5 μl DMSO 12%), as an Orx1R antagonist, during the acquisition or expression phases of the CPP test. Results indicated that microinjection of Orx1R antagonist into the mPFC had similar effects on both morphine- and food-induced CPP and attenuated CPP scores in the acquisition and expression phases of the CPP test. The data demonstrated that Orx1Rs in the mPFC regulate the reward-related effects of morphine- and food-induced reward.

The muscarinic agonist pilocarpine modifies cocaine-reinforced and food-reinforced responding in rats: comparison with the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine

Activation of muscarinic receptors in the brain antagonizes the actions of cocaine, blocking both its discriminative stimulus and reinforcing properties. Pilocarpine is a nonselective muscarinic agonist that is used clinically, but has not been well characterized for its actions during cocaine-reinforced behavior. This study evaluated its effects on cocaine-reinforced and food-reinforced behaviors in rats, using the cholinesterase inhibitor tacrine as a comparator. Intraperitoneal pilocarpine or tacrine at doses of 1.0 mg/kg or more attenuated self-administration of low-dose cocaine (0.1 mg/kg injection) but also increased oral movements. Pilocarpine was less potent than tacrine in decreasing responding supported by low or intermediate amounts of liquid food. Combined treatment with pilocarpine and tacrine was more effective than either compound alone in attenuating self-administration of intermediate-dose cocaine. At a low (0.66 mg/kg) dose which did not modify reinforced responding, pilocarpine increased nonspecific behavior (sniffing, rearing, and activity) in cocaine-reinforced but not in food-reinforced animals; with greater doses increasing cholinergic or gastrointestinal signs. These effects were most consistently correlated with changes in reinforcement in rats responding for cocaine relative to food-reinforced animals. Overall, pilocarpine exhibited modest selectivity for attenuating self-administration of low-dose cocaine without affecting a nondrug reinforcer.

G-Protein Coupled Receptors Targeted by Analgesic Venom Peptides

Chronic pain is a complex and debilitating condition associated with a large personal and socioeconomic burden. Current pharmacological approaches to treating chronic pain such as opioids, antidepressants and anticonvulsants exhibit limited efficacy in many patients and are associated with dose-limiting side effects that hinder their clinical use. Therefore, improved strategies for the pharmacological treatment of pathological pain are urgently needed. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitously expressed on the surface of cells and act to transduce extracellular signals and regulate physiological processes. In the context of pain, numerous and diverse families of GPCRs expressed in pain pathways regulate most aspects of physiological and pathological pain and are thus implicated as potential targets for therapy of chronic pain. In the search for novel compounds that produce analgesia via GPCR modulation, animal venoms offer an enormous and virtually untapped source of potent and selective peptide molecules. While many venom peptides target voltage-gated and ligand-gated ion channels to inhibit neuronal excitability and blunt synaptic transmission of pain signals, only a small proportion are known to interact with GPCRs. Of these, only a few have shown analgesic potential in vivo. Here we review the current state of knowledge regarding venom peptides that target GPCRs to produce analgesia, and their development as therapeutic compounds.