1
|
Fresnoza S, Ischebeck A. Probing Our Built-in Calculator: A Systematic Narrative Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Studies on Arithmetic Operation-Related Brain Areas. eNeuro 2024; 11:ENEURO.0318-23.2024. [PMID: 38580452 PMCID: PMC10999731 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0318-23.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
This systematic review presented a comprehensive survey of studies that applied transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation to parietal and nonparietal areas to examine the neural basis of symbolic arithmetic processing. All findings were compiled with regard to the three assumptions of the triple-code model (TCM) of number processing. Thirty-seven eligible manuscripts were identified for review (33 with healthy participants and 4 with patients). Their results are broadly consistent with the first assumption of the TCM that intraparietal sulcus both hold a magnitude code and engage in operations requiring numerical manipulations such as subtraction. However, largely heterogeneous results conflicted with the second assumption of the TCM that the left angular gyrus subserves arithmetic fact retrieval, such as the retrieval of rote-learned multiplication results. Support is also limited for the third assumption of the TCM, namely, that the posterior superior parietal lobule engages in spatial operations on the mental number line. Furthermore, results from the stimulation of brain areas outside of those postulated by the TCM show that the bilateral supramarginal gyrus is involved in online calculation and retrieval, the left temporal cortex in retrieval, and the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cerebellum in online calculation of cognitively demanding arithmetic problems. The overall results indicate that multiple cortical areas subserve arithmetic skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane Fresnoza
- Department of Psychology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Anja Ischebeck
- Department of Psychology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed, 8010 Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lazzaro G, Fucà E, Caciolo C, Battisti A, Costanzo F, Varuzza C, Vicari S, Menghini D. Understanding the Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Numerical Cognition: A Systematic Review for Clinical Translation. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11082082. [PMID: 35456176 PMCID: PMC9032363 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Atypical development of numerical cognition (dyscalculia) may increase the onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms, especially when untreated, and it may have long-term detrimental social consequences. However, evidence-based treatments are still lacking. Despite plenty of studies investigating the effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) on numerical cognition, a systematized synthesis of results is still lacking. In the present systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021271139), we found that the majority of reports (20 out of 26) showed the effectiveness of tES in improving both number (80%) and arithmetic (76%) processing. In particular, anodal tDCS (regardless of lateralization) over parietal regions, bilateral tDCS (regardless of polarity/lateralization) over frontal regions, and tRNS (regardless of brain regions) strongly enhance number processing. While bilateral tDCS and tRNS over parietal and frontal regions and left anodal tDCS over frontal regions consistently improve arithmetic skills. In addition, tACS seems to be more effective than tDCS at ameliorating arithmetic learning. Despite the variability of methods and paucity of clinical studies, tES seems to be a promising brain-based treatment to enhance numerical cognition. Recommendations for clinical translation, future directions, and limitations are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Lazzaro
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy; (G.L.); (E.F.); (C.C.); (A.B.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (S.V.)
| | - Elisa Fucà
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy; (G.L.); (E.F.); (C.C.); (A.B.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (S.V.)
| | - Cristina Caciolo
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy; (G.L.); (E.F.); (C.C.); (A.B.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (S.V.)
| | - Andrea Battisti
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy; (G.L.); (E.F.); (C.C.); (A.B.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (S.V.)
- Department of Human Science, LUMSA University, 00193 Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Costanzo
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy; (G.L.); (E.F.); (C.C.); (A.B.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (S.V.)
| | - Cristiana Varuzza
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy; (G.L.); (E.F.); (C.C.); (A.B.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (S.V.)
| | - Stefano Vicari
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy; (G.L.); (E.F.); (C.C.); (A.B.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (S.V.)
- Department of Life Science and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Centro di Riabilitazione Casa San Giuseppe, Opera Don Guanella, 00165 Rome, Italy
| | - Deny Menghini
- Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy; (G.L.); (E.F.); (C.C.); (A.B.); (F.C.); (C.V.); (S.V.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-066-859-7091
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garcia-Sanz S, Ghotme KA, Hedmont D, Arévalo-Jaimes MY, Cohen Kadosh R, Serra-Grabulosa JM, Redolar-Ripoll D. Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation for studying the neural basis of numerical cognition: A systematic review. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 369:109485. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
4
|
Mosbacher JA, Halverscheid S, Pustelnik K, Danner M, Prassl C, Brunner C, Vogel SE, Nitsche MA, Grabner RH. Theta Band Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Enhances Arithmetic Learning: A Systematic Comparison of Different Direct and Alternating Current Stimulations. Neuroscience 2021; 477:89-105. [PMID: 34648868 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Over the last decades, interest in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) has grown, as it might allow for causal investigations of the associations between cortical activity and cognition as well as to directly influence cognitive performance. The main objectives of the present work were to assess whether tES can enhance the acquisition and application of arithmetic abilities, and whether it enables a better assessment of underlying neurophysiological processes. To this end, the present, double-blind, sham-controlled study assessed the effects of six active stimulations (three tES protocols: anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), alpha band transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and theta band tACS; targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex or the left posterior parietal cortex) on the acquisition of an arithmetic procedure, arithmetic facts, and event-related synchronization/desynchronization (ERS/ERD) patterns. 137 healthy adults were randomly assigned to one of seven groups, each receiving one of the tES-protocols during learning. Results showed that frontal theta band tACS reduced the repetitions needed to learn novel facts and both, frontal and parietal theta band tACS accelerated the decrease in calculation times in fact learning problems. The beneficial effect of frontal theta band tACS may reflect enhanced executive functions, allowing for better control and inhibition processes and hence, a faster acquisition and integration of novel fact knowledge. However, there were no significant effects of the stimulations on procedural learning or ERS/ERD patterns. Overall, theta band tACS appears promising as a support for arithmetic fact training, but effects on procedural calculations and neurophysiological processes remain ambiguous.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen A Mosbacher
- Section of Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
| | | | - Kolja Pustelnik
- Mathematics Institute, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Martina Danner
- Section of Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christina Prassl
- Section of Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Clemens Brunner
- Section of Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stephan E Vogel
- Section of Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Michael A Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Roland H Grabner
- Section of Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria; BioTechMed Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lipka R, Ahlers E, Reed TL, Karstens MI, Nguyen V, Bajbouj M, Cohen Kadosh R. Resolving heterogeneity in transcranial electrical stimulation efficacy for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Exp Neurol 2020; 337:113586. [PMID: 33382986 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
While the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is dominated by pharmacological agents, transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) is gaining attention as an alternative method for treatment. Most current meta-analyses have suggested that tES can improve cognitive functions that are otherwise impaired in ADHD, such as inhibition and working memory, as well as alleviated clinical symptoms. Here we review some of the promising findings in the field of tES. At the same time, we highlight two factors, which hinder the effective application of tES in treating ADHD: 1) the heterogeneity of tES protocols used in different studies; 2) patient profiles influencing responses to tES. We highlight potential solutions for overcoming such limitations, including the use of active machine learning, and provide simulated data to demonstrate how these solutions could also improve the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Lipka
- Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, Berlin 12203, Germany
| | - Eike Ahlers
- Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, Berlin 12203, Germany
| | - Thomas L Reed
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory, Anna Watts Building, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom
| | - Malin I Karstens
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory, Anna Watts Building, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom
| | - Vu Nguyen
- Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6HT, United Kingdom
| | - Malek Bajbouj
- Department of Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, Berlin 12203, Germany
| | - Roi Cohen Kadosh
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory, Anna Watts Building, Woodstock Rd, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fresnoza S, Christova M, Purgstaller S, Jehna M, Zaar K, Hoffermann M, Mahdy Ali K, Körner C, Gallasch E, von Campe G, Ischebeck A. Dissociating Arithmetic Operations in the Parietal Cortex Using 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: The Importance of Strategy Use. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:271. [PMID: 32765240 PMCID: PMC7378795 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The triple-code model (TCM) of number processing suggests the involvement of distinct parietal cortex areas in arithmetic operations: the bilateral horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus (hIPS) for arithmetic operations that require the manipulation of numerical quantities (e.g., subtraction) and the left angular gyrus (AG) for arithmetic operations that require the retrieval of answers from long-term memory (e.g., multiplication). Although neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and brain stimulation studies suggest the dissociation of these operations into distinct parietal cortex areas, the role of strategy (online calculation vs. retrieval) is not yet fully established. In the present study, we further explored the causal involvement of the left AG for multiplication and left hIPS for subtraction using a neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) paradigm. Stimulation sites were determined based on an fMRI experiment using the same tasks. To account for the effect of strategy, participants were asked whether they used retrieval or calculation for each individual problem. We predicted that the stimulation of the left AG would selectively disrupt the retrieval of the solution to multiplication problems. On the other hand, stimulation of the left hIPS should selectively disrupt subtraction. Our results revealed that left AG stimulation was detrimental to the retrieval and online calculation of solutions for multiplication problems, as well as, the retrieval (but not online calculation) of the solutions to subtraction problems. In contrast, left hIPS stimulation had no detrimental effect on both operations regardless of strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane Fresnoza
- Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,BioTechMed, Graz, Austria
| | - Monica Christova
- Otto Loewi Research Center, Physiology Section, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,Department of Physiotherapy, University of Applied Sciences FH-Joanneum Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Margit Jehna
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Karla Zaar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Hoffermann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Kariem Mahdy Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christof Körner
- Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,BioTechMed, Graz, Austria
| | - Eugen Gallasch
- BioTechMed, Graz, Austria.,Otto Loewi Research Center, Physiology Section, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gord von Campe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Anja Ischebeck
- Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.,BioTechMed, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yan RB, Zhang XL, Li YH, Hou JM, Chen H, Liu HL. Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation on cognitive function in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233903. [PMID: 32516316 PMCID: PMC7282637 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive approach that can alter brain excitability. Several studies have shown the effectiveness of tDCS in improving language and movement function in stroke patients. However, the effect of tDCS on cognitive function after stroke remains uncertain. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the China Science and Technology Journal Database, and the Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform from inception to April 2, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. All statistical analyses were performed in RevMan 5.3, and the mean difference (MD) or standard mean difference (SMD) were used as the pooled statistics. RESULTS Fifteen studies involving 820 participants were included. When compared with passive tDCS, anodal tDCS was associated with improved general cognitive performance as examined by the Minimum Mental State Examination or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD = 1.31, 95% CI 0.91-1.71, P < 0.00001), attention performance (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI 0.11-1.20, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in memory performance (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI -0.67-1.50, P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS tDCS is likely to be effective for patients with cognitive impairment after stroke. The evidence for different effects based on population characteristics and stimulation methods was limited, but a real effect cannot be ruled out. More high-quality research in this field is required to determine the potential benefits of tDCS in the treatment of cognitive deficits after stroke and to establish the optimal treatment program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru-bing Yan
- Department of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, PLA Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | | | - Yong-hong Li
- Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing-ming Hou
- Department of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, PLA Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Han Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, PLA Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Hong-liang Liu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, PLA Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mosbacher JA, Brunner C, Nitsche MA, Grabner RH. Effects of Anodal tDCS on Arithmetic Performance and Electrophysiological Activity. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:17. [PMID: 32116605 PMCID: PMC7026470 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Arithmetic abilities are among the most important school-taught skills and form the basis for higher mathematical competencies. At the same time, their acquisition and application can be challenging. Hence, there is broad interest in methods to improve arithmetic abilities. One promising method is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). In the present study, we compared two anodal tDCS protocols in their efficacy to improve arithmetic performance and working memory. In addition, we investigated stimulation-related electrophysiological changes. Three groups of participants solved arithmetic problems (additions and subtractions) and an n-back task before, during, and after receiving either frontal or parietal anodal tDCS (25 min; 1 mA) or sham stimulation. EEG was simultaneously recorded to assess stimulation effects on event-related (de-) synchronisation (ERS/ERD) in theta and alpha bands. Persons receiving frontal stimulation showed an acceleration of calculation speed in large subtractions from before to during and after stimulation. However, a comparable, but delayed (apparent only after stimulation) increase was also found in the sham stimulation group, while it was absent in the group receiving parietal stimulation. In additions and small subtractions as well as the working memory task, analyses showed no effects of stimulation. Results of ERS/ERD during large subtractions indicate changes in ERS/ERD patterns over time. In the left hemisphere there was a change from theta band ERD to ERS in all three groups, whereas a similar change in the right hemisphere was restricted to the sham group. Taken together, tDCS did not lead to a general improvement of arithmetic performance. However, results indicate that frontal stimulation accelerated training gains, while parietal stimulation halted them. The absence of general performance improvements, but acceleration of training effects might be a further indicator of the advantages of using tDCS as training or learning support over tDCS as a sole performance enhancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen A. Mosbacher
- Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Clemens Brunner
- Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Michael A. Nitsche
- Department of Psychology and Neurosciences, Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Roland H. Grabner
- Educational Neuroscience, Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- BioTechMed-Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hartmann M, Singer S, Savic B, Müri RM, Mast FW. Anodal High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex Modulates Approximate Mental Arithmetic. J Cogn Neurosci 2019; 32:862-876. [PMID: 31851594 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
The representation and processing of numerosity is a crucial cognitive capacity. Converging evidence points to the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) as primary "number" region. However, the exact role of the left and right PPC for different types of numerical and arithmetic tasks remains controversial. In this study, we used high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to further investigate the causal involvement of the PPC during approximative, nonsymbolic mental arithmetic. Eighteen healthy participants received three sessions of anodal HD-tDCS at 1-week intervals in counterbalanced order: left PPC, right PPC, and sham stimulation. Results showed an improved performance during online parietal HD-tDCS (vs. sham) for subtraction problems. Specifically, the general tendency to underestimate the results of subtraction problems (i.e., the "operational momentum effect") was reduced during online parietal HD-tDCS. There was no difference between left and right stimulation. This study thus provides new evidence for a causal involvement of the left and right PPC for approximate nonsymbolic arithmetic and advances the promising use of noninvasive brain stimulation in increasing cognitive functions.
Collapse
|
10
|
Di Rosa E, Brigadoi S, Cutini S, Tarantino V, Dell'Acqua R, Mapelli D, Braver TS, Vallesi A. Reward motivation and neurostimulation interact to improve working memory performance in healthy older adults: A simultaneous tDCS-fNIRS study. Neuroimage 2019; 202:116062. [PMID: 31369810 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Several studies have evaluated the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex (PFC) for the enhancement of working memory (WM) performance in healthy older adults. However, the mixed results obtained so far suggest the need for concurrent brain imaging, in order to more directly examine tDCS effects. The present study adopted a continuous multimodal approach utilizing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to examine the interactive effects of tDCS combined with manipulations of reward motivation. Twenty-one older adults (mean age = 69.7 years; SD = 5.05) performed an experimental visuo-spatial WM task before, during and after the delivery of 1.5 mA anodal tDCS/sham over the left prefrontal cortex (PFC). During stimulation, participants received performance-contingent reward for every fast and correct response during the WM task. In both sessions, hemodynamic activity of the bilateral frontal, motor and parietal areas was recorded across the entire duration of the WM task. Cognitive functions and reward sensitivity were also assessed with standard measures. Results demonstrated a significant impact of tDCS on both WM performance and hemodynamic activity. Specifically, faster responses in the WM task were observed both during and after anodal tDCS, while no differences were found under sham control conditions. However, these effects emerged only when taking into account individual visuo-spatial WM capacity. Additionally, during and after the anodal tDCS, increased hemodynamic activity relative to sham was observed in the bilateral PFC, while no effects of tDCS were detected in the motor and parietal areas. These results provide the first evidence of tDCS-dependent functional changes in PFC activity in healthy older adults during the execution of a WM task. Moreover, they highlight the utility of combining reward motivation with prefrontal anodal tDCS, as a potential strategy to improve WM efficiency in low performing healthy older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Di Rosa
- Department of Neuroscience & Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA.
| | - Sabrina Brigadoi
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Simone Cutini
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Vincenza Tarantino
- Department of Neuroscience & Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberto Dell'Acqua
- Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Daniela Mapelli
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Todd S Braver
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - Antonino Vallesi
- Department of Neuroscience & Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Brain Imaging and Neural Dynamics Research Group, IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Modulation of automatic and creative features of the Remote Associates Test by angular gyrus stimulation. Neuropsychologia 2019; 129:348-356. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 04/14/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
12
|
Bieck SM, Artemenko C, Moeller K, Klein E. Low to No Effect: Application of tRNS During Two-Digit Addition. Front Neurosci 2018; 12:176. [PMID: 29674948 PMCID: PMC5895770 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial electric stimulation such as transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been used to investigate structure-function relationships in numerical cognition. Recently, tRNS was suggested to be more effective than tDCS. However, so far there is no evidence on the differential impact of tDCS and tRNS on numerical cognition using the same experimental paradigm. In the present study, we used a two-digit addition paradigm for which significant-albeit small-effects of tDCS were observed previously to evaluate the impact of parietal and frontal tRNS on specific numerical effects. While previous studies reported a modulation of numerical effects of this task through tDCS applied to parietal areas, we did not observe any effect of parietal tRNS on performance in two-digit addition. These findings suggest that tRNS seemed to influence concurrent mental arithmetic less than tDCS at least when applied over the IPS. These generally small to absent effects of tES on actual arithmetic performance in the current addition paradigm are in line with the results of a recent meta-analysis indicating that influences of tES may be more pronounced in training paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke M Bieck
- LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christina Artemenko
- LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Korbinian Moeller
- LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Elise Klein
- Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Möller A, Nemmi F, Karlsson K, Klingberg T. Transcranial Electric Stimulation Can Impair Gains during Working Memory Training and Affects the Resting State Connectivity. Front Hum Neurosci 2017; 11:364. [PMID: 28747878 PMCID: PMC5506218 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial electric stimulation (tES) is a promising technique that has been shown to improve working memory (WM) performance and enhance the effect of cognitive training. However, experimental set up and electrode placement are not always determined based on neurofunctional knowledge about WM, leading to inconsistent results. Additional research on the effects of tES grounded on neurofunctional evidence is therefore necessary. Sixty young, healthy, volunteers, assigned to six different groups, participated in 5 days of stimulation or sham treatment. Twenty-five of these subjects also participated in MRI acquisition. We performed three experiments: In the first one, we evaluated tES using either direct current stimulation (tDCS) with bilateral stimulation of the frontal or parietal lobe; in the second one, we used the same tDCS protocol with a different electrode placement (i.e., supraorbital cathode); in the third one, we used alternating currents (tACS) of 35 Hz, applied bilaterally to either the frontal or parietal lobes. The behavioral outcome measure was the WM capacity (i.e., number of remembered spatial position) during the 5 days of training. In a subsample of subjects we evaluated the neural effects of tDCS by measuring resting state connectivity with functional MRI, before and after the 5 days of tDCS and visuo-spatial WM training. We found a significant impairment of WM training-related gains associated with parietal tACS and frontal tDCS. Five days of tDCS stimulation was also associated with significant change in resting state connectivity revealed by multivariate pattern analysis. None of the stimulation paradigms resulted in improved WM performance or enhanced WM training gains. These results show that tES can have negative effects on cognitive plasticity and affect resting-state functional connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Möller
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| | - Federico Nemmi
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| | - Kim Karlsson
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| | - Torkel Klingberg
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schroeder PA, Dresler T, Bahnmueller J, Artemenko C, Cohen Kadosh R, Nuerk HC. Cognitive Enhancement of Numerical and Arithmetic Capabilities: a Mini-Review of Available Transcranial Electric Stimulation Studies. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s41465-016-0006-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
15
|
Hauser TU, Rütsche B, Wurmitzer K, Brem S, Ruff CC, Grabner RH. Neurocognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Arithmetic Learning and Performance: A Simultaneous tDCS-fMRI Study. Brain Stimul 2016; 9:850-858. [PMID: 27522169 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Revised: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A small but increasing number of studies suggest that non-invasive brain stimulation by means of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate arithmetic processes that are essential for higher-order mathematical skills and that are impaired in dyscalculic individuals. However, little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying such stimulation effects, and whether they are specific to cognitive processes involved in different arithmetic tasks. METHODS We addressed these questions by applying tDCS during simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while participants were solving two types of complex subtraction problems: repeated problems, relying on arithmetic fact learning and problem-solving by fact retrieval, and novel problems, requiring calculation procedures. Twenty participants receiving left parietal anodal plus right frontal cathodal stimulation were compared with 20 participants in a sham condition. RESULTS We found a strong cognitive and neural dissociation between repeated and novel problems. Repeated problems were solved more accurately and elicited increased activity in the bilateral angular gyri and medial plus lateral prefrontal cortices. Solving novel problems, in contrast, was accompanied by stronger activation in the bilateral intraparietal sulci and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. Most importantly, tDCS decreased the activation of the right inferior frontal cortex while solving novel (compared to repeated) problems, suggesting that the cathodal stimulation rendered this region unable to respond to the task-specific cognitive demand. CONCLUSIONS The present study revealed that tDCS during arithmetic problem-solving can modulate the neural activity in proximity to the electrodes specifically when the current demands lead to an engagement of this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias U Hauser
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, 10-12 Russel Square, London WC1B 5EH, UK.
| | - Bruno Rütsche
- Institute for Behavioral Sciences, ETH Zurich, Clausiusstrasse 59, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Karoline Wurmitzer
- Institute for Behavioral Sciences, ETH Zurich, Clausiusstrasse 59, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Brem
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland; Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian C Ruff
- Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Switzerland; Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research (SNS-Lab), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Bluemlisalpstrasse 10, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Roland H Grabner
- Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Grabner RH, Rütsche B, Ruff CC, Hauser TU. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex modulates arithmetic learning. Eur J Neurosci 2015; 42:1667-74. [DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2015] [Revised: 05/06/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roland H. Grabner
- Department of Psychology; University of Graz; Maiffredygasse 12b A-8010 Graz Austria
- Department of Psychology; University of Göttingen; Göttingen Germany
| | - Bruno Rütsche
- Institute for Behavioral Sciences; ETH Zurich; Zurich Switzerland
| | - Christian C. Ruff
- Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research (SNS-Lab); Department of Economics; University of Zurich; Zurich Switzerland
| | - Tobias U. Hauser
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging; Institute of Neurology; University College London; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul 2015; 8:535-50. [PMID: 25701175 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 407] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Revised: 01/09/2015] [Accepted: 01/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last 15-years, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a relatively novel form of neuromodulation, has seen a surge of popularity in both clinical and academic settings. Despite numerous claims suggesting that a single session of tDCS can modulate cognition in healthy adult populations (especially working memory and language production), the paradigms utilized and results reported in the literature are extremely variable. To address this, we conduct the largest quantitative review of the cognitive data to date. METHODS Single-session tDCS data in healthy adults (18-50) from every cognitive outcome measure reported by at least two different research groups in the literature was collected. Outcome measures were divided into 4 broad categories: executive function, language, memory, and miscellaneous. To account for the paradigmatic variability in the literature, we undertook a three-tier analysis system; each with less-stringent inclusion criteria than the prior. Standard mean difference values with 95% CIs were generated for included studies and pooled for each analysis. RESULTS Of the 59 analyses conducted, tDCS was found to not have a significant effect on any - regardless of inclusion laxity. This includes no effect on any working memory outcome or language production task. CONCLUSION Our quantitative review does not support the idea that tDCS generates a reliable effect on cognition in healthy adults. Reasons for and limitations of this finding are discussed. This work raises important questions regarding the efficacy of tDCS, state-dependency effects, and future directions for this tool in cognitive research.
Collapse
|
18
|
Cohen Kadosh R. Modulating and enhancing cognition using brain stimulation: Science and fiction. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2014.996569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
19
|
Clemens B, Jung S, Mingoia G, Weyer D, Domahs F, Willmes K. Influence of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right angular gyrus on brain activity during rest. PLoS One 2014; 9:e95984. [PMID: 24760013 PMCID: PMC3997501 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2013] [Accepted: 04/02/2014] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Although numerous studies examined resting-state networks (RSN) in the human brain, so far little is known about how activity within RSN might be modulated by non-invasive brain stimulation applied over parietal cortex. Investigating changes in RSN in response to parietal cortex stimulation might tell us more about how non-invasive techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulate intrinsic brain activity, and further elaborate our understanding of how the resting brain responds to external stimulation. Here we examined how activity within the canonical RSN changed in response to anodal tDCS applied over the right angular gyrus (AG). We hypothesized that changes in resting-state activity can be induced by a single tDCS session and detected with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Significant differences between two fMRI sessions (pre-tDCS and post-tDCS) were found in several RSN, including the cerebellar, medial visual, sensorimotor, right frontoparietal, and executive control RSN as well as the default mode and the task positive network. The present results revealed decreased and increased RSN activity following tDCS. Decreased RSN activity following tDCS was found in bilateral primary and secondary visual areas, and in the right putamen. Increased RSN activity following tDCS was widely distributed across the brain, covering thalamic, frontal, parietal and occipital regions. From these exploratory results we conclude that a single session of anodal tDCS over the right AG is sufficient to induce large-scale changes in resting-state activity. These changes were localized in sensory and cognitive areas, covering regions close to and distant from the stimulation site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Clemens
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Brain Imaging Facility, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Neurological Clinic, Section Neuropsychology, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Stefanie Jung
- Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
- Knowledge Media Research Center, IWM-KMRC, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gianluca Mingoia
- Brain Imaging Facility, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - David Weyer
- Brain Imaging Facility, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Frank Domahs
- Department of Germanic Linguistics, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Willmes
- Brain Imaging Facility, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Neurological Clinic, Section Neuropsychology, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|