Evidence for dissociable effects of handedness and consistency of hand preference in allocation of attention and movement planning: An EEG investigation

Cortical neural activity during responses to mechanical perturbation: Effects of hand preference and hand used

Handedness is an important feature of human behavioral lateralization that has often been associated with hemispheric specialization. Existing neuroimaging research on the effect of handedness during motor control has focused on well-practiced or predictable tasks, but not tasks that involve unpredictable perturbations. We examined the extent to which handedness (measured by self-reported hand preference) and whether the dominant hand is used or not influence the motor and neural response during unimanual voluntary corrective actions. The experimental task involved controlling a robotic manipulandum to move a cursor from a center start point to a target presented above or below the start. In some trials, a mechanical perturbation of the hand was randomly applied by the robot either consistent or against the target direction, while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Fourteen left-handers and fourteen right-handers completed the experiment. Left-handed individuals had a greater negative peak in the frontal event-related potential (ERP) during the initial voluntary response stage (N140) than right-handed individuals. Furthermore, left-handed individuals showed more symmetrical ERP distributions between two hemispheres than right-handed individuals in the frontal and parietal regions during the late voluntary response stage (P380). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence to demonstrate the differences in the cortical control of voluntary corrective actions between left-handers and right-handers.

Cortical neural activity during responses to mechanical perturbation: Effects of hand preference and hand used

Handedness, as measured by self-reported hand preference, is an important feature of human behavioral lateralization that has often been associated with hemispheric specialization. We examined the extent to which hand preference and whether the dominant hand is used or not influence the motor and neural response during voluntary unimanual corrective actions. The experimental task involved controlling a robotic manipulandum to move a cursor from a center start point to a target presented above or below the start. In some trials, a mechanical perturbation of the hand was randomly applied by the robot either consistent or against the target direction, while electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. Twelve left-handers and ten right-handers completed the experiment. Left-handed individuals had a greater negative peak in the frontal event-related potential (ERP) than right-handed participants during the initial response phase (N150) than right-handed individuals. Furthermore, left-handed individuals showed more symmetrical ERP distributions between two hemispheres than right-handed individuals in the frontal and parietal regions during the late voluntary response phase (P390). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence that demonstrates the differences in the cortical control of voluntary corrective actions between left-handers and right-handers.

Hand preference for the visual and auditory modalities in humans

The sensory dominance effect refers to the phenomenon that one sensory modality more frequently receives preferential processing (and eventually dominates consciousness and behavior) over and above other modalities. On the other hand, hand dominance is an innate aspect of the human motor system. To investigate how the sensory dominance effect interacts with hand dominance, we applied the adapted Colavita paradigm and recruited a large cohort of healthy right-handed participants (n = 119). While the visual dominance effect in bimodal trials was observed for the whole group (n = 119), about half of the right-handers (48%) showed a visual preference, i.e., their dominant hand effect manifested in responding to the visual stimuli. By contrast, 39% of the right-handers exhibited an auditory preference, i.e., the dominant hand effect occurred for the auditory responses. The remaining participants (13%) did not show any dominant hand preference for either visual or auditory responses. For the first time, the current behavioral data revealed that human beings possess a characteristic and persistent preferential link between different sensory modalities and the dominant vs. non-dominant hand. Whenever this preferential link between the sensory and the motor system was adopted, one dominance effect peaks upon the other dominance effect's best performance.

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory in a sample of Chilean undergraduates

An individual's nervous and cognitive systems are lateralized, and handedness represents a behavioral manifestation of such organization. Therefore, accurately and reliably measuring handedness has repercussion on our understanding of both the human brain and cognition. The Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) is the most frequently used instrument to measure handedness both in clinical practice and research. We assessed the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the EHI in a sample of 348 Chilean university students by confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability were calculated to evaluate the internal consistency and reliability of the EHI, while the average variance extracted was estimated to evaluate its convergent validity. A 10-item unifactorial structure was confirmed, with factor loadings ≥0.50, showing excellent goodness-of-fit indicators, very high internal consistency and adequate composite reliability and convergent validity. Socio-demographic variables (sex, area of residence and belonging to an indigenous people or community) did not significantly modulate the EHI scores. Overall, by using this validated version of the EHI to accurately and reliably measure handedness in the greater Spanish population, researchers will be able to produce robust data to tackle the still open questions of lateralization in human cognitive and neural architecture.

Lateralized spontaneous exploratory behavior in maturing rats induced by new geometrically differentiated environments after administration with trace elements

Functional laterality is known as an intrinsic property of the brain. Since several studies have shown the presence of laterality in many species other than humans, it has been suggested that this is an adaptive mechanism to aid survival. Previous studies have shown that lateralized behavior observed during exposure to different environmental stimuli is not constant in normal animals, depending on the geometrical form of the exploratory field. In these exploratory fields, animals showed right- or left-biased exploratory behavior, according to the nature of the geometrical properties of the environment. Previously, it was found that tellurium (Te) was able to block spontaneous left-biased exploration in one defined geometrical environment. In the present work, the influence of Te and selenium (Se) in animals exposed to novel geometrically different environments were studied. Three geometrically different testing fields (square, rectangle, and T-shaped) were presented to Se- and Te-treated groups of rats. The results show that in the square field, only the Se treatment was able to block spontaneous right-biased exploratory responses; in the rectangular field, both Se and Te treatments blocked right-biased exploratory responses, and in the T-shaped field, only Te was able to block spontaneous left-biased exploratory responses. Data suggest that trace elements modify lateralized behavioral responses independently of the form of the novel exploratory field, suggesting the presence of a specific action in the brain.

Bimanual coordination positively predicts episodic memory: A combined behavioral and MRI investigation

Some people remember events more completely and accurately than other people, but the origins of individual differences in episodic memory are poorly understood. One way to advance understanding is by identifying characteristics of individuals that reliably covary with memory performance. Recent research suggests motor behavior is related to memory performance, with individuals who consistently use a single preferred hand for unimanual actions performing worse than individuals who make greater use of both hands. This research has relied on self-reports of behavior. It is unknown whether objective measures of motor behavior also predict memory performance. Here, we tested the predictive power of bimanual coordination, an important form of manual dexterity. Bimanual coordination, as measured objectively on the Purdue Pegboard Test, was positively related to correct recall on the California Verbal Learning Test-II and negatively related to false recall. Furthermore, MRI data revealed that cortical surface area in right lateral prefrontal regions was positively related to correct recall. In one of these regions, cortical thickness was negatively related to bimanual coordination. These results suggest that individual differences in episodic memory may partially reflect morphological variation in right lateral prefrontal cortex and suggest a relationship between neural correlates of episodic memory and motor behavior.