Bioinformatic and biochemical studies on the phylogenetic variability of proenkephalin-derived octapeptides

Functional Characterization and Molecular Marker Development of the Proenkephalin as Biomarker of Food Addiction in Food Habit Domestication of Mandarin Fish (Siniperca Chuatsi)

Proenkephalin (PENK), as the precursor of endogenous opioid enkephalin (ENK), is widely present in the nervous system and plays an important role in animal food addiction and rewarding behavior. In our study, we intend to study the functional characterization and molecular marker development of the penk gene related to food habit domestication of mandarin fish. We found that the penk gene of mandarin fish had three types of endogenous opioid peptide sequences. Compared with other tissues, penk mRNA was highly expressed in the whole brain. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of lysine or methionine significantly increased the expression of penk mRNA. The expression of penk mRNA in the brain of mandarin fish that could be easily domesticated from eating live prey fish to artificial diets was significantly higher than those that could not. After feeding with high-carbohydrate artificial diets, the expression of penk mRNA showed no significant difference between mandarin fish with hypophagia and those that still ate normally. A total of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) loci related to easy domestication toward eating artificial diets were screened from the mandarin fish population. Additionally, the TT genotype at one of the loci was significantly correlated with the food habit domestication of mandarin fish.

Opioid Peptides and Their Receptors in Chickens: Structure, Functionality, and Tissue Distribution

Opioid peptides, derived from PENK, POMC, PDYN and PNOC precursors, together with their receptors (DOR, MOR, KOR and ORL1), constitute the opioid system and are suggested to participate in multiple physiological/pathological processes in vertebrates. However, the question whether an opioid system exists and functions in non-mammalian vertebrates including birds remains largely unknown. Here, we cloned genes encoding opioid system from the chicken brain and examined their functionality and tissue expression. As in mammals, 6 opioid peptides encoded by PENK (Met-enkephalin and Leu-enkephalin), POMC (β-endorphin), PDYN (dynorphin-A and dynorphin-B) and PNOC (nociceptin) precursors and four opioid receptors were found to be highly conserved in chickens. Using pGL3-CRE-luciferase and pGL4-SRE-luciferase reporter systems, we demonstrated that chicken opioid receptors (cDOR, cMOR, cKOR and cORL1) expressed in CHO cells, could be differentially activated by chicken opioid peptides, and resulted in the inhibition of cAMP/PKA and activation of MAPK/ERK signaling pathways. cDOR is potently activated by Met-enkephalin and Leu-enkephalin, and cKOR is potently activated by dynorphin-A, dynorphin-B and nociceptin, whereas cORL1 is specifically activated by nociceptin. Unlike cDOR, cKOR and cORL1, cMOR is moderately/weakly activated by enkephalins and other opioid peptides. These findings suggest the ligand-receptor pair in chicken opioid system is similar, but not identical to, that in mammals. Quantitative real-time PCR revealed that the opioid system is mainly expressed in chicken central nervous system including the hypothalamus. Collectively, our data will help to facilitate the better understanding of the conserved roles of opioid system across vertebrates.

Perspectives on Endogenous Opioids in Birds

The present review summarizes the state of knowledge of endogenous opioids in birds. Endogenous opioid peptides acts in a neuromodulatory, hormonal and paracrine manner to mediate analgesic and other physiological functions. These peptides act through specific G-protein coupled receptors. Opioid receptors consist of a family of four closely-related proteins. The three types of opioid receptors are the mu (MOR or μ), delta (DOR or δ), and kappa (KOR or κ) opioid receptor proteins. The role of the fourth member of the opioid receptor family, the nociceptin or orphanin FQ receptor (ORL), is not clear. The ligands for opioid receptors are: β –endorphin (MOR), Met- enkephalin, Leu-enkephalin (DOR) and dynorphin (KOR), together with probably endomorphins 1 and 2. In spite of long history of research on endogenous opioid peptides, there are no studies of endogenous opioids per se in wild birds and few in poultry species. β-endorphin is present in all birds investigated and there is close agreement between the structures of β-endorphin in different birds. Plasma concentrations of β-endorphin are increased by ether stress in geese. There is evidence that β-endorphin plays a role in the control of luteinizing hormone release in chickens. Met-enkephalin is present in tissues such as the retina, hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and adrenals together with circulation of birds. Stresses such as crowding and withholding water increase circulating concentrations of Met-enkephalin in chickens. The structures of chicken dynorphin A and B have been deduced from cDNA. What is missing are comprehensive studies of plasma concentrations and expression of the full array of endogenous opioids in multiple avian species under different situations. Also, what is not known is the extent to which circulating or locally released or intra-cellular Met-enkephalin influence physiological process in birds. Thus, there is considerable scope for investigation of the physiology of endogenous opioids in birds.

Further Characterization of Hemopressin Peptide Fragments in the Opioid and Cannabinoid Systems

BACKGROUND

Hemopressin, so-called because of its hypotensive effect, belongs to the derivatives of the hemoglobin α-chain. It was isolated from rat brain membrane homogenate by the use of catalytically inactive forms of endopeptidase 24.15 and neurolysin. Hemopressin has antihyperalgesic features that cannot be prevented by the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone.

METHODS

In the present study, we investigated whether hemopressin (PVNFKFLSH) and its C-terminally truncated fragment hemopressin 1-7 (PVNFKFL) have any influence on opioid-dependent signaling. Peptides have been analyzed using G-protein-stimulating functional and receptor bindings in this experimental setup.

RESULTS

These 2 compounds efficiently activated the G-proteins, and naloxone slightly blocked this stimulation. At the same time, they were able to displace radiolabeled [3H]DAMGO, a selective ligand for μ-opioid system, at micromolar concentrations. Displacement caused by the heptapeptide was more modest compared with hemopressin. Experiments performed on cell lines overexpressing μ-opioid receptors verified the opioid activity of both hemopressins. Moreover, the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, AM251, significantly decreased their G-protein stimulatory effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we further confirm that hemopressins can modulate CB1 receptors and can have a slight modulatory effect on the opioid system.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2010

This paper is the thirty-third consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2010 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).