Additive effect of harmane and muscimol for memory consolidation impairment in inhibitory avoidance task

Additive effect of histamine and muscimol upon induction of antinociceptive and antidepressant effects in mice

We investigated the effects of histamine and GABA A receptor agents on pain and depression-like behaviors and their interaction using a tail-flick test and the forced swimming test (FST) in male mice. Our data revealed that intraperitoneal administration of muscimol (0.12 and 0.25 mg/kg) increased the percentage of maximum possible effect (%MPE) and area under the curve (AUC) of %MPE, indicating an antinociceptive response. Intraperitoneal injection of bicuculline (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) decreased %MPE and AUC of %MPE, suggesting hyperalgesia. Moreover, muscimol by reducing the immobility time of the FST elicited an antidepressant-like response but bicuculline by enhancing the immobility time of the FST caused a depressant-like response. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) microinjection of histamine (5 µg/mouse) enhanced %MPE and AUC of %MPE. i.c.v. infusion of histamine (2.5 and 5 µg/mouse) decreased immobility time in the FST. Co-administration of different doses of histamine along with a sub-threshold dose of muscimol potentiated antinociceptive and antidepressant-like responses produced by histamine. Cotreatment of different doses of histamine plus a noneffective dose of bicuculline reversed antinociception and antidepressant-like effects elicited by histamine. Cotreatment of histamine, muscimol, and bicuculline reversed antinociceptive and antidepressant-like behaviors induced by the drugs. The results demonstrated additive antinociceptive and antidepressant-like effects between histamine and muscimol in mice. In conclusion, our results indicated an interaction between the histaminergic and GABAergic systems in the modulation of pain and depression-like behaviors.

The effects of citalopram, SB-334867 and orexin-1, alone or in various combinations, on the anxiogenic-like effects of REM sleep deprivation in male mice

Sleep deprivation may induce anxiety. On the other hand, anxiety disorders elicit main changes in the quality of sleep. Moreover, orexin and citalopram play a role in the modulation of insomnia and mood diseases. Thus, we planned preclinical research to evaluate the effect of combinations of orexin agents and citalopram on anxiety behavior in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep-deprived mice. For drug intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion, the guide cannula was surgically implanted in the left lateral ventricle of mice. REM sleep deprivation was conducted via water tank apparatus for 24 h. The anxiety behavior of mice was evaluated using the elevated plus maze (EPM). Our results revealed that REM sleep deprivation reduced the percentage of open arm time (%OAT) and the percentage of the open arm entries (%OAE) but not closed arm entries (locomotor activity) in the EPM test, presenting an anxiogenic response ( P  < 0.05). We found a sub-threshold dose of SB-334867, orexin-1 receptor antagonist, and orexin-1 which did not alter anxiety reaction in the REM sleep-deprived mice ( P  > 0.05). Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of citalopram (5 and 10 mg/kg) increased both %OAT and %OAE ( P  < 0.001) representing an anxiolytic effect, but not locomotor activity in the REM sleep-deprived mice. Interestingly, co-treatment of citalopram (1, 5 and 10 mg/kg; i.p.) and SB-334867 (0.1 µg/mouse; i.c.v.) potentiated the anxiolytic effect in the REM sleep-deprived mice. On the other hand, co-treatment of different dosages of citalopram along with a sub-threshold dose of orexin-1 did not alter %OAT, %OAE, and locomotor activity in the REM sleep-deprived mice. We found a synergistic anxiolytic effect of citalopram and SB-334867 in the REM sleep-deprived mice. These results suggested an interaction between citalopram and SB-334867 to prevent anxiogenic behavior in the REM sleep-deprived mice.

GABA-ergic agents modulated the effects of histamine on male mice behavior in the elevated plus-maze

NEW FINDINGS

What is the main question of this study? Is there an interaction between histamine and GABAergic system on modulation of anxiety in mice? What is the main finding and its importance? There is a synergistic anxiogenic effect between histamine and bicuculline in mice. This effect may be due to a direct or indirect effect of the histaminergic system on the GABAergic system.

ABSTRACT

There are documents that both histaminergic and GABAergic systems are participated in the neurobiology of anxiety behavior. In the current research, we investigated the effects of the histaminergic system and GABAA receptor agents on anxiety-related behaviors and their interaction using the elevated plus-maze (EPM) test in mice. Intraperitoneally (i.p.) administration of muscimol (0.12 and 0.25 mg/kg) increased the open arm time (OAT) (p < 0.001) without affecting the open arm entries (OAE) and locomotor activity, showing an anxiolytic effect. I.p. injection of bicuculline (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) decreased OAT (p < 0.001) but not OAE and locomotor activity, suggesting an anxiogenic behavior. Intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) microinjection of histamine (2.5 and 5 μg/mouse) declined OAT (p < 0.001) but not OAE and locomotor activity, indicating an anxiogenic response. Co-administration of histamine with GABAergic agents, muscimol (0.06 mg/kg; i.p.) and bicuculline (0.25 mg/kg; i.p.), decreased (p < 0.001) and increased (p < 0.05) the anxiogenic-like response of the effective dose (5 μg/mouse; i.c.v.) of histamine, respectively. In addition, co-treatment of effective doses of histamine (2.5 and 5 μg/mouse;i.c.v.) along with an effective dose of muscimol (0.12 mg/kg;i.p.) and not-effective dose of bicuculline (0.25 mg/kg; i.p.) significantly decreased OAT (p < 0.001), suggesting a likely interaction between the histaminergic and GABAergic systems on the regulation of anxiety. The results demonstrated a synergistic anxiogenic-like effect between histamine and bicuculline in mice. In conclusion, our results presented an interaction between the histaminergic and GABAergic systems on anxiolytic/anxiogenic-like behaviors in the EPM test. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Synergistic effect between quinpirole and L-NAME as well as sulpiride and L-arginine on the modulation of anxiety and memory processes in the 6-OHDA mouse model of Parkinson's disease: An isobologram analysis

We evaluated interactions between dopamine D2 receptor and nitric oxide (NO) actions on the regulation of anxiety and memory in the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) mouse model of Parkinson's disease (PD). A unilateral guide cannula was stereotaxically implanted over the right striatum. Elevated plus-maze test (EPM) test-retest protocol was employed to evaluate anxiety and memory in mice. The results revealed that injection of L-NAME (9 mg/kg) induced anxiolytic and amnesic effects, while L-arginine (9 mg/kg) produced anxiogenic and memory-improvement effects in the 6-OHDA mouse model of PD. Administration of sulpiride (20 mg/kg) induced anxiogenic and memory-improvement effects, whereas quinpirole (20 mg/kg) caused anxiolytic and amnesic effects in PD mice. Co-injection of sulpiride (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) plus L-NAME (3 mg/kg) induced anxiolytic and amnesic effects. Co-injection of sulpiride (20 mg/kg) plus L-arginine (3 mg/kg) induced anxiogenic and memory-improvement effects. Co-administrations of quinpirole (20 mg/kg) and L-NAME (3 mg/kg) induced anxiolytic effect, but co-administration of quinpirole (20 mg/kg) plus L-arginine (3 mg/kg) caused anxiogenic and memory-improvement effects. The isobologram analysis revealed that there is a synergistic effect between sulpiride and L-arginine as well as quinpirole and L-NAME upon induction of anxiogenic and anxiolytic effects, respectively in PD mice. Our results suggested: (1) NO and dopamine D2 receptor mechanisms affect anxiety and memory in PD mice; (2) L-NAME reversed anxiogenic and memory-improvement effect induced by sulpiride; (3) Anxiolytic and amnesic effects induced by quinpirole reversed by L-arginine; (4) There is a synergistic effect between dopamine D2 receptor and NO systems on the modulation of anxiety and memory.

Synergistic antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like effects of harmaline along with cinanserin in acute restraint stress-treated mice

RATIONALE

Acute restraint stress (ARS) is an experimental paradigm used for the induction of rodent models of stress-produced neuropsychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety. β-carbolines and serotonin (5-HT) systems are involved in the modulation of depression and anxiety behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to examine the effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of cinanserin (5-HT2 receptor antagonist) on harmaline-induced responses on depression- and anxiety-like behaviors in the ARS mice.

METHODS

For i.c.v. infusion, guide cannula was surgically implanted in the left lateral ventricle of mice. The ARS model was conducted via movement restraint at a period of 4 h. Depression- and anxiety-related behaviors were evaluated by forced swim test (FST) and elevated plus maze (EPM), respectively.

RESULTS

The results displayed that the ARS mice showed depressive- and anxiety-like responses. I.p. administration of different doses of harmaline (0.31, 0.625 and 1.25 mg/kg) or i.c.v. microinjection of cinanserin (1, 2.5, and 5 μg/mouse) blocked depression- and anxiogenic-like behaviors in the ARS mice. Furthermore, co-administration of harmaline (1.25 mg/kg; i.p.) and cinanserin (5 μg/mouse; i.c.v.) prevented the depression- and anxiogenic-like effects in the ARS mice. We found a synergistic antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like effects of harmaline and cinanserin in the ARS mice.

CONCLUSIONS

These results propose an interaction between harmaline and cinanserin to prevent depressive- and anxiogenic-like behaviors in the ARS mice.

How do stupendous cannabinoids modulate memory processing via affecting neurotransmitter systems?

In the present study, we wanted to review the role of cannabinoids in learning and memory in animal models, with respect to their interaction effects with six principal neurotransmitters involved in learning and memory including dopamine, glutamate, GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid), serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenaline. Cannabinoids induce a wide-range of unpredictable effects on cognitive functions, while their mechanisms are not fully understood. Cannabinoids in different brain regions and in interaction with different neurotransmitters, show diverse responses. Previous findings have shown that cannabinoids agonists and antagonists induce various unpredictable effects such as similar effect, paradoxical effect, or dualistic effect. It should not be forgotten that brain neurotransmitter systems can also play unpredictable roles in mediating cognitive functions. Thus, we aimed to review and discuss the effect of cannabinoids in interaction with neurotransmitters on learning and memory. In addition, we mentioned to the type of interactions between cannabinoids and neurotransmitter systems. We suggested that investigating the type of interactions is a critical neuropharmacological issue that should be considered in future studies.

Synergistic effect between citalopram and citicoline on anxiolytic effect in non-sensitized and morphine-sensitized mice: An isobologram analysis

In the present study, the effects of intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of citalopram and citicoline on morphine-induced anxiolytic effects were investigated in non-sensitized and morphine-sensitized mice using elevated plus-maze (EPM). Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration morphine (5 mg/kg) increased the percentage of open arm time (%OAT, in morphine-sensitized mice), and open arm entries (%OAE, in non-sensitized mice), but not a locomotor activity, indicating an anxiolytic response to morphine. On the other hand, i.p. administration of naloxone decreased %OAT (morphine-sensitized mice), and %OAE (non-sensitized and morphine-sensitized mice), but not a locomotor activity, showing an anxiogenic effect to naloxone. Moreover, i.p.co-administration of citalopram (5 and 10 mg/kg) and citicoline (75 mg/kg) induced the anxiolytic effect. Interestingly, i.p. co-administration of low doses of citalopram (0.5, 1 and 2.5 mg/kg) and citicoline (25 mg/kg) significantly increased %OAT and %OAE in non-sensitized as well as %OAT in morphine-sensitized mice, indicating an anxiolytic effect. An isobolographic analysis of data was performed, presenting a synergistic interaction between citalopram and citicoline upon the production of anxiolytic effect in non-sensitized and morphine-sensitized mice. In conclusion, it seems that (1) morphine sensitization affects the anxiety behavior in the EPM, (2) μ-opioid receptors play an important role in morphine anxiolytic effect, (3) citalopram and citicoline induced anti-anxiety effect, (4) a synergistic effect of citalopram and citicoline upon induction of anti-anxiety behavior in non-sensitized and morphine-sensitized mice.

The effect of CA1 dopaminergic system on amnesia induced by harmane in mice

In the present study, the effects of bilateral injections of dopaminergic drugs into the hippocampal CA1 regions (intra-CA1) on harmane-induced amnesia were examined in mice. We used a single-trial step-down inhibitory avoidance task for the assessment of memory acquisition in adult male mice. Our data indicated that pre-training intra-peritoneal (i.p.) administration of harmane (12 mg/kg) impaired memory acquisition. Moreover, intra-CA1 administration of dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF38393 (0.25 µg/mouse), dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390 (0.25 µg/mouse), dopamine D2 receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.125 and 0.25 µg/mouse) and dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride (0.2 and 0.4 µg/mouse) decreased the learning of a single-trial inhibitory avoidance task. Furthermore, pre-training intra-CA1 injection of sub-threshold doses of SKF38393 (0.0625 µg/mouse) or sulpiride (0.1 µg/mouse) increased pre-training harmane (4 and 8 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced amnesia. On the other hand, pre-training intra-CA1 injection of a sub-threshold dose of SCH23390 (0.0625 µg/mouse) reversed amnesia induced by an effective dose of harmane (12 mg/kg; i.p.). In addition, Pre-training intra-CA1 injection of quinpirole (0.0625 µg/mouse) had no effect on memory impairment induced by harmane. These findings indicate the involvement of CA1 dopaminergic system on harmane-induced impairment of memory acquisition.