Acuity of Proprioceptive Localization Varies with Body Region

Extended physiological proprioception is affected by transhumeral Socket-Suspended prosthesis use

The objective of this study was to define targeted reaching performance without visual information for transhumeral (TH) prosthesis users, establishing baseline information about extended physiological proprioception (EPP) in this population. Subjects completed a seated proprioceptive targeting task under simultaneous motion capture, using their prosthesis and intact limb. Eight male subjects, median age of 58 years (range 29-77 years), were selected from an ongoing screening study to participate. Five subjects had a left-side TH amputation, and three a right-side TH amputation. Median time since amputation was 9 years (range 3-54 years). Four subjects used a body-powered prosthetic hook, three a myoelectric hand, and one a myoelectric hook. The outcome measures were precision and accuracy, motion of the targeting hand, and joint angular displacement. Subjects demonstrated better precision when targeting with their intact limb compared to targeting with their prosthesis, 1.9 cm2 (0.8-3.0) v. 7.1 cm2 (1.3-12.8), respectively, p = 0.008. Subjects achieved a more direct reach path ratio when targeting with the intact limb compared to with the prosthesis, 1.2 (1.1-1.3) v. 1.3 (1.3-1.4), respectively, p = 0.039 The acceleration, deceleration, and corrective phase durations were consistent between conditions. Trunk angular displacement increased in flexion, lateral flexion, and axial rotation while shoulder flexion decreased when subjects targeted with their prosthesis compared to the intact limb. The differences in targeting precision, reach patio ratio, and joint angular displacements while completing the targeting task indicate diminished EPP. These findings establish baseline information about EPP in TH prosthesis users for comparison as novel prosthesis suspension systems become more available to be tested.

Proprioceptive acuity for landmarks on the hand and digits

Previous work using visually guided reaches to localize landmarks on a hidden hand has suggested that proprioceptive acuity for hand targets is low and representation of hand dimensions is highly distorted (e.g., hand width estimated to be 60% wider than actual hand width). We re-examined these issues using a pure proprioceptive task in which 20 blindfolded subjects reached in a single movement without terminal corrections to touch the right index-tip to landmarks of the left hand placed in various locations in 3D space. Subjects were also tested with vision allowed to estimate minimal errors. Based on previous reports of high proprioceptive acuity for some hand landmarks, we hypothesized that the proprioceptive representation of the hand was much less distorted than described previously and that errors were not correlated with target hand location. Mean distance errors in proprioceptively guided reaches to the landmarks averaged less than 3 cm and were only 0.5-1.3 cm larger than when vision was allowed. Errors were not correlated with hand location in most subjects. Distortions of hand width averaged less than 20% wider than actual width and were not correlated with hand location in most subjects. We conclude that relatively accurate proprioceptive awareness of locations of hand/digit structures and dimensions is available for use in control of hand movements, which are executed largely subconsciously. Studying acuity of proprioception using conscious perceptual tasks and involving vision may not provide accurate measures of proprioceptive acuity as used by the motor system.