MR Imaging Selection of Acute Stroke Patients with Emergent Large Vessel Occlusions for Thrombectomy

Advanced Imaging for Acute Stroke Treatment Selection: CT, CTA, CT Perfusion, and MR Imaging

There is constant evolution in the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to advances in treatments, imaging, and outreach. Two major revolutions were the advent of intravenous thrombolysis in the 1990s and endovascular thrombectomy in 2010s. Neuroimaging approaches have also evolved with key goals-detect hemorrhage, augment thrombolysis treatment selection, detect arterial occlusion, estimate infarct core, estimate viable penumbra, and augment thrombectomy treatment selection. The ideal approach to diagnosis and treatment may differ depending on the system of care and available resources. Future directions include expanding indications for these treatments, including a shift from time-based to tissue-based selection.

Refined Ischemic Penumbra Imaging with Tissue pH and Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Imaging has played a vital role in our mechanistic understanding of acute ischemia and the management of acute stroke patients. The most recent DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials showed that endovascular therapy could be extended to a selected group of late-presenting stroke patients with the aid of imaging. Although perfusion and diffusion MRI have been commonly used in stroke imaging, the approximation of their mismatch as the penumbra is oversimplified, particularly in the era of endovascular therapy. Briefly, the hypoperfusion lesion includes the benign oligemia that does not proceed to infarction. Also, with prompt and effective reperfusion therapy, a portion of the diffusion lesion is potentially reversible. Therefore, advanced imaging that provides improved ischemic tissue characterization may enable new experimental stroke therapeutics and eventually further individualize stroke treatment upon translation to the clinical setting. Specifically, pH imaging captures tissue of altered metabolic state that demarcates the hypoperfused lesion into ischemic penumbra and benign oligemia, which remains promising to define the ischemic penumbra's outer boundary. On the other hand, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) differentiates the most severely damaged and irreversibly injured diffusion lesion from the portion of diffusion lesion that is potentially reversible, refining the inner boundary of the penumbra. Altogether, the development of advanced imaging has the potential to not only transform the experimental stroke research but also aid clinical translation and patient management.

Workflow Times and Outcome of Endovascular Therapy in Stroke Patients with Initial MRI or CT

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke is highly time dependent. MRI and CT are both used as primary neuroimaging modalities in these patients, which may be associated with differences in workflow times of endovascular therapy (ET), thus potentially affecting clinical outcome. We here aimed to compare workflow times and clinical outcome in a large cohort of patients initially examined by MRI or CT.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who underwent ET between 2015 and 2019 and were enrolled into the prospective multicenter German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Therapy (GSR-ET). Patients who had an MRI prior to ET were compared to patients with a pretreatment CT regarding baseline data, in-hospital workflow times, and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy out of 4,638 patients were examined with an initial MRI (8.0%). Compared to patients with an initial CT, MRI patients had a longer median time from hospital admission to imaging acquisition (23 vs. 14 min). All consecutive workflow times did not significantly differ between both groups after adjustment for confounders. Moreover, the clinical outcome did not differ between MRI and CT patients after adjustment for confounders.

CONCLUSION

In LVO stroke patients undergoing ET, pretreatment imaging with MRI instead of CT leads to a delay of imaging acquisition after hospital admission without having a measurable impact on consecutive workflow steps and clinical outcome.

Combined Use of X-ray Angiography and Intraprocedural MRI Enables Tissue-based Decision Making Regarding Revascularization during Acute Ischemic Stroke Intervention

Background For patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with x-ray angiography, the use of adjuncts to maintain vessel patency, such as stents or antiplatelet medications, can increase risk of periprocedural complications. Criteria for using these adjuncts are not well defined. Purpose To evaluate use of MRI to guide critical decision making by using a combined biplane x-ray neuroangiography 3.0-T MRI suite during acute ischemic stroke intervention. Materials and Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated consecutive patients undergoing endovascular intervention for acute ischemic stroke between July 2019 and May 2020 who underwent either angiography with MRI or angiography alone. Cerebral tissue viability was assessed by using MRI as the reference standard. For statistical analysis, Fisher exact test and Student t test were used to compare groups. Results Of 47 patients undergoing acute stroke intervention, 12 patients (median age, 69 years; interquartile range, 60-77 years; nine men) underwent x-ray angiography with MRI whereas the remaining 35 patients (median age, 80 years; interquartile range, 68-86 years; 22 men) underwent angiography alone. MRI results influenced clinical decision making in one of three ways: whether or not to perform initial or additional mechanical thrombectomy, whether or not to place an intracranial stent, and administration of antithrombotic or blood pressure medications. In this initial experience, decision making during endovascular acute stroke intervention in the combined angiography-MRI suite was better informed at MRI, such that therapy was guided in real time by the viability of the at-risk cerebral tissue. Conclusion Integrating intraprocedural 3.0-T MRI into acute ischemic stroke treatment was feasible and guided decisions of whether or not to continue thrombectomy, to place stents, or to administer antithrombotic medication or provide blood pressure medications. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Lev and Leslie-Mazwi in this issue.

Initial Experience of Challenge-Free MRI-Based Oxygen Extraction Fraction Mapping of Ischemic Stroke at Various Stages: Comparison With Perfusion and Diffusion Mapping

MRI-based oxygen extraction fraction imaging has a great potential benefit in the selection of clinical strategies for ischemic stroke patients. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a challenge-free oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) mapping in a cohort of acute and subacute ischemic stroke patients. Consecutive ischemic stroke patients (a total of 30 with 5 in the acute stage, 19 in the early subacute stage, and 6 in the late subacute stage) were recruited. All subjects underwent MRI including multi-echo gradient echo (mGRE), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and 3D-arterial spin labeling (ASL). OEF maps were generated from mGRE phase + magnitude data, which were processed using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) + quantitative blood oxygen level-dependent (qBOLD) imaging with cluster analysis of time evolution. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were reconstructed from 3D-ASL and DWI, respectively. Further, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) was calculated as the product of CBF and OEF. OEF, CMRO2, CBF, and ADC values in the ischemic cores (absolute values) and their contrasts to the contralateral regions (relative values) were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare OEF, CMRO2, CBF, and ADC values and their relative values among different stroke stages. The OEF value of infarct core showed a trend of decrease from acute, to early subacute, and to late subacute stages of ischemic stroke. Significant differences among the three stroke stages were only observed in the absolute OEF (F = 6.046, p = 0.005) and relative OEF (F = 5.699, p = 0.009) values of the ischemic core, but not in other measurements (absolute and relative CMRO2, CBF, ADC values, all values of p > 0.05). In conclusion, the challenge-free QSM + qBOLD-generated OEF mapping can be performed on stroke patients. It can provide more information on tissue viability that was not available with CBF and ADC and, thus, may help to better manage ischemic stroke patients.

Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endovascular thrombectomy (ET), the standard of treatment for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) strokes, has been subject to rigorous efforts to further improve its usage and delivery for optimised patient outcomes. This review aims to provide an outline and discussion about the recently established and emerging recommendations regarding endovascular treatment of stroke.

RECENT FINDINGS

The indications for ET have expanded continually, with perfusion imaging now enabling selection of patients presenting 6-24 h after last-known-well, and improved device and operator proficiency allowing treatment of M2-MCA occlusions and tandem occlusions. Further inclusion of paediatric patients and patients with larger infarct core or milder stroke symptoms for ET has been proposed; however, this remains unproven. This growing applicability is supported by more efficient systems of care, employing modern techniques such as telemedicine, mobile stroke units and helicopter medical services. Ongoing debate exists regarding thrombolytic agent, thrombectomy technique, anaesthesia method and the role of advanced neuroimaging, with upcoming RCTs expected to provide clarification. The journey to further improving the efficacy of ET has advanced and diversified rapidly over recent years, involving improved patient selection, increased utility of advanced neuroimaging and ongoing device redevelopment, within the setting of more efficient, streamlined systems of care. This dynamic and ongoing influx of evidence-based refinements is key to further optimising outcomes for ELVO patients.