Technical Improvements in Head and Neck MR Imaging: At the Cutting Edge

CT and MR anatomy of the larynx and hypopharynx

Imaging of the larynx and hypopharynx is frequently requested to assess the extent of neoplasms beyond the field of view of endoscopic evaluation. The combination of optical and cross-sectional imaging allows tumors to be classified according to AJCC/UICC guidelines. A thorough understanding of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal anatomy is crucial to guide the radiological eye along the possible pathways of the spread of diseases and to guide differential diagnoses. Computed tomography (CT) has been the first cross-sectional imaging technique used to evaluate the larynx and hypopharynx; its spatial resolution combined with volumetric capability and the use of injectable contrast medium made CT the working horse in the assessment of neoplastic and inflammatory diseases. In the last two decades, magnetic resonance (MR) supported CT in the most challenging cases, when the optimal contrast resolution due to the multisequence portfolio is needed to assess the neoplastic involvement of laryngeal cartilages, paraglottic space(s), and extra laryngeal spread. The aim of this paper is to give a comprehensive radiological overview of larynx and hypopharynx complex anatomy, combining in vivo images, anatomical sections, and images of ex vivo specimens.

The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer and Recommended Reporting Guidance

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become standard diagnostic workup for head and neck malignancies and is currently recommended by most radiological societies for pharyngeal and oral carcinomas, its utilization in radiotherapy has been heterogeneous during the last decades. However, few would argue that implementing MRI for annotation of target volumes and organs at risk provides several advantages, so that implementation of the modality for this purpose is widely accepted. Today, the term MR-guidance has received a much broader meaning, including MRI for adaptive treatments, MR-gating and tracking during radiotherapy application, MR-features as biomarkers and finally MR-only workflows. First studies on treatment of head and neck cancer on commercially available dedicated hybrid-platforms (MR-linacs), with distinct common features but also differences amongst them, have also been recently reported, as well as "biological adaptation" based on evaluation of early treatment response via functional MRI-sequences such as diffusion weighted ones. Yet, all of these approaches towards head and neck treatment remain at their infancy, especially when compared to other radiotherapy indications. Moreover, the lack of standardization for reporting MR-guided radiotherapy is a major obstacle both to further progress in the field and to conduct and compare clinical trials. Goals of this article is to present and explain all different aspects of MR-guidance for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer, summarize evidence, as well as possible advantages and challenges of the method and finally provide a comprehensive reporting guidance for use in clinical routine and trials.

Improvement of image quality in diffusion-weighted imaging with model-based deep learning reconstruction for evaluations of the head and neck

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the utility of deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction using a model-based approach in head and neck diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 41 patients who underwent head/neck DWI. The DWI in 25 patients demonstrated an untreated lesion. We performed qualitative and quantitative assessments in the DWI analyses with both deep learning (DL)- and conventional parallel imaging (PI)-based reconstructions. For the qualitative assessment, we visually evaluated the overall image quality, soft tissue conspicuity, degree of artifact(s), and lesion conspicuity based on a five-point system. In the quantitative assessment, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the bilateral parotid glands, submandibular gland, the posterior muscle, and the lesion. We then calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the lesion and the adjacent muscle.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in the qualitative analysis between the DWI with PI-based and DL-based reconstructions for all of the evaluation items (p < 0.001). In the quantitative analysis, significant differences in the SNR and CNR between the DWI with PI-based and DL-based reconstructions were observed for all of the evaluation items (p = 0.002 ~ p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

DL-based image reconstruction with the model-based technique effectively provided sufficient image quality in head/neck DWI.

Synthetic MRI for the quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of synthetic MRI for quantitative and morphologic assessment of head and neck tumors and compare the results with the conventional MRI approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 92 patients with different head and neck tumor histology who underwent conventional and synthetic MRI were retrospectively recruited. The quantitative T1, T2, proton density (PD), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of 38 benign and 54 malignant tumors were measured and compared. Diagnostic efficacy for differentiating malignant and benign tumors was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and integrated discrimination index. The image quality of conventional and synthetic T1W/T2W images on a 5-level Likert scale was also compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

T1, T2 and ADC values of malignant head and neck tumors were smaller than those of benign tumors (all p < 0.05). T2 and ADC values showed better diagnostic efficacy than T1 for distinguishing malignant tumors from benign tumors (both p < 0.05). Adding the T2 value to ADC increased the area under the curve from 0.839 to 0.886, with an integrated discrimination index of 4.28% (p < 0.05). In terms of overall image quality, synthetic T2W images were comparable to conventional T2W images, while synthetic T1W images were inferior to conventional T1W images.

CONCLUSIONS

Synthetic MRI can facilitate the characterization of head and neck tumors by providing quantitative relaxation parameters and synthetic T2W images. T2 values added to ADC values may further improve the differentiation of tumors.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients' preoperative staging

Introduction

The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of MRI and CT with regard to the detection of lymph node metastases based on the data of specific patients with OSCC who received bilateral neck dissection.

Materials and methods

In a retrospective analysis from 01/2014 to 12/2020 patients who underwent primary tumor resection and bilateral neck dissection were evaluated.

Results

174 preoperative MRI (78.74%, N=137) and CT (21.26%, N=37) were correlated with the histopathological findings. CT had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 68% (p=0.76). MRI showed an overall sensitivity of 66% and a specificity of 68% (p=0.76). In 52.87% of all cases no differences between cN and pN were found. MRI is the method to overestimate lymph node involvement compared to CT (overestimation in 27% vs. 21.62%).

Conclusion

The current data indicate that MR and CT show poor efficacy in the detection of cervical metastases. Accordingly, attention must be paid to alternatives to correct local staging modalities. The application of structured bilateral neck dissection needs to be questioned.

Qualitative and Quantitative Performance of Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) Method: An Exploratory Analysis for Head and Neck Imaging

The present exploratory study investigates the performance of a new, rapid, synthetic MRI method for diagnostic image quality assessment and measurement of relaxometry metric values in head and neck (HN) tumors and normal-appearing masseter muscle. The multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequence was used for data acquisition, followed by synthetic image reconstruction on a 3T MRI scanner for 14 patients (3 untreated and 11 treated). The MDME enables absolute quantification of physical tissue properties, including T1 and T2, with a shorter scan time than the current state-of-the-art methods used for relaxation measurements. The vendor termed the combined package MAGnetic resonance imaging Compilation (MAGiC). In total, 48 regions of interest (ROIs) were analyzed, drawn on normal-appearing masseter muscle and tumors in the HN region. Mean T1 and T2 values obtained from normal-appearing muscle were 880 ± 52 ms and 46 ± 3 ms, respectively. Mean T1 and T2 values obtained from tumors were 1930 ± 422 ms and 77 ± 13 ms, respectively, for the untreated group, 1745 ± 410 ms and 107 ± 61 ms, for the treated group. A total of 1552 images from both synthetic MRI and conventional clinical imaging were assessed by the radiologists to provide the rating for T1w and T2w image contrasts. The synthetically generated qualitative T2w images were acceptable and comparable to conventional diagnostic images (93% acceptability rating for both). The acceptability ratings for MAGiC-generated T1w, and conventional images were 64% and 100%, respectively. The benefit of MAGiC in HN imaging is twofold, providing relaxometry maps in a clinically feasible time and the ability to generate a different combination of contrast images in a single acquisition.

Guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric head and neck pathologies: a multicentre international consensus paper

The use of standardized imaging protocols is paramount in order to facilitate comparable, reproducible images and, consequently, to optimize patient care. Standardized MR protocols are lacking when studying head and neck pathologies in the pediatric population. We propose an international, multicenter consensus paper focused on providing the best combination of acquisition time/technical requirements and image quality. Distinct protocols for different regions of the head and neck and, in some cases, for specific pathologies or clinical indications are recommended. This white paper is endorsed by several international scientific societies and it is the result of discussion, in consensus, among experts in pediatric head and neck imaging.

Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Head and Neck MRI: Prospective Intraindividual Image Quality Comparison of Spiral GRE, Cartesian GRE, and Cartesian TSE Sequences

BACKGROUND. Sequences with noncartesian k-space sampling may improve image quality of head and neck MRI. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare intraindividually the image quality of a spiral gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence and conventional cartesian GRE and cartesian turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences for contrast-enhanced T1-weighted head and neck MRI. METHODS. This prospective study included patients referred for contrast-enhanced head and neck MRI from August 2020 to May 2021. Patients underwent 1.5-T MRI including contrast-enhanced spiral GRE (2 minutes 28 seconds), cartesian GRE (4 minutes 27 seconds), and cartesian TSE (3 minutes 41 seconds) sequences, acquired in rotating order across patients. Three radiologists independently assessed image quality measures, including conspicuity of prespecified lesions, using 5-point Likert scales. One reader measured maximal extent of dental material artifact and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). RESULTS. Thirty-one patients (13 men, 18 women; mean age, 63.8 years) were enrolled. Nineteen patients had a focal lesion; 22 had dental material. Interreader agreement for image quality measures was substantial to excellent (Krippendorff alpha, 0.681-1.000). Scores for overall image quality (whole head and neck, neck only, and head only), pulsation artifact, muscular contour delineation, vessel contour delineation, motion artifact, and differentiation between mucosa and pharyngeal muscles were significantly better for spiral GRE than for cartesian GRE and cartesian TSE for all readers (p < .05). Scores for lesion conspicuity (whole head and neck, neck only, and head only), quality of fat suppression, flow artifact, and foldover artifact were not significantly different between spiral GRE and the cartesian sequences for any reader (p > .05). Dental material artifact scores were significantly worse for spiral GRE than the other sequences for all readers (p < .05). The mean maximum extent of dental material artifact was 39.6 ± 25.5 (SD) mm for spiral GRE, 35.6 ± 24.3 mm for cartesian GRE, and 29.6 ± 21.4 mm for cartesian TSE; the mean CNR was 221.1 ± 94.5 for spiral GRE, 151.8 ± 85.7 for cartesian GRE, and 153.0 ± 63.2 for cartesian TSE (p < .001 between spiral GRE and other sequences for both measures). CONCLUSION. Three-dimensional spiral GRE improves subjective image quality and CNR of head and neck MRI with shorter scan time versus cartesian sequences, though it exhibits larger dental material artifact. CLINICAL IMPACT. A spiral sequence may help overcome certain challenges of conventional cartesian sequences for head and neck MRI.

Detection and staging of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of FDG PET/MR

PURPOSE

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the accuracy of 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MR imaging in detection and staging of recurrent or metastatic NPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The PET/MR scans of 60 patients with clinically diagnosed recurrent or metastatic NPC between April 2017 and November 2019 were included in this study. Findings were evaluated according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Final diagnosis was confirmed at biopsy or imaging follow-up for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients, 25, 26 and 42 had developed local lesions, regional nodal metastases and distant metastases, respectively. The overall accuracy of PET/MR imaging for staging of recurrent or metastatic NPC was 88.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

For recurrent or metastatic NPC, 18 FDG PET/MRI might serve as a single-step staging modality.