1
|
Barak S, Landa J, Eisenstein E, Gerner M, Ravid Vulkan T, Neeman-Verblun E, Silberg T. Agreement and disagreement in pediatric functional neurological symptom disorders: Comparing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinician assessments. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2024; 24:350-361. [PMID: 38741721 PMCID: PMC11089279 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.04.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Youth with functional neurological symptom disorder (FNSD) often perceive themselves as having limited capabilities, which may not align with clinical evaluations. This study assessed the disparities between clinician evaluations and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) regarding pain, motor function, and learning difficulties in youth with FNSD. Sixty-two youths with FNSD participated in this study, all of whom reported experiencing pain, motor problems, and/or learning difficulties. Clinicians also assessed these domains, resulting in a two-by-two categorization matrix: (1) agreement: child and clinician report "problems"; (2) agreement: child and clinician report "no problems"; (3) disagreement: child reports "problems" while the clinician does not; and (4) disagreement: clinician reports "problems" while the child does not. Agreement/disagreement differences were analyzed. No significant differences in prevalence were observed between the evaluators regarding pain (clinician-85%, child-88%), motor (clinician-98%, child-95%), or learning problems (clinician-69%, child-61%). More than 80% of the children and clinicians report pain and motor disorders. Instances in which children and clinicians reported learning problems (40.3%) exceeded cases in which both reported no problems (9.6%) or only the child reported problems (20.9%). Overall, the agreement between pain and motor function assessments was high (>90%), whereas that concerning learning difficulties was moderate (49.9%). Disagreement in pain/motor assessments was minimal (<5%), whereas for learning difficulties, disagreement rates were high (>20%). In conclusion, a significant concordance exists between PROMs and clinician assessments of pain and motor problems. However, the higher frequency of disagreements regarding learning difficulties emphasizes the importance of incorporating patient and clinician evaluations in pediatric FNSD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Barak
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat-Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - J. Landa
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat-Gan 5262000, Israel
- The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 39040, Israel
| | - E. Eisenstein
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat-Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - M. Gerner
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat-Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - T. Ravid Vulkan
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat-Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - E. Neeman-Verblun
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat-Gan 5262000, Israel
| | - T. Silberg
- Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Ramat-Gan 5262000, Israel
- Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mark VW. Biomarkers and Rehabilitation for Functional Neurological Disorder. J Pers Med 2024; 14:948. [PMID: 39338202 PMCID: PMC11433361 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14090948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2024] [Revised: 08/21/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Functional neurological disorder, or FND, is widely misunderstood, particularly when considering recent research indicating that the illness has numerous biological markers in addition to its psychiatric disorder associations. Nonetheless, the long-held view that FND is a mental illness without a biological basis, or even a contrived (malingered) illness, remains pervasive both in current medical care and general society. This is because FND involves intermittent disability that rapidly and involuntarily alternates with improved neurological control. This has in turn caused shaming, perceived low self-efficacy, and social isolation for the patients. Until now, biomarker reviews for FND tended not to examine the features that are shared with canonical neurological disorders. This review, in contrast, examines current research on FND biomarkers, and in particular their overlap with canonical neurological disorders, along with the encouraging outcomes for numerous physical rehabilitation trials for FND. These findings support the perspective endorsed here that FND is unquestionably a neurological disorder that is also associated with many biological markers that lie outside of the central nervous system. These results suggest that FND entails multiple biological abnormalities that are widely distributed in the body. General healthcare providers would benefit their care for their patients through their improved understanding of the illness and recourses for support and treatment that are provided in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor W. Mark
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; ; Tel.: +1-205-934-3499
- Department of Neurology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
- Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Westlin C, Guthrie AJ, Paredes-Echeverri S, Maggio J, Finkelstein S, Godena E, Millstein D, MacLean J, Ranford J, Freeburn J, Adams C, Stephen C, Diez I, Perez DL. Machine learning classification of functional neurological disorder using structural brain MRI features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2024:jnnp-2024-333499. [PMID: 39033019 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2024-333499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain imaging studies investigating grey matter in functional neurological disorder (FND) have used univariate approaches to report group-level differences compared with healthy controls (HCs). However, these findings have limited translatability because they do not differentiate patients from controls at the individual-level. METHODS 183 participants were prospectively recruited across three groups: 61 patients with mixed FND (FND-mixed), 61 age-matched and sex-matched HCs and 61 age, sex, depression and anxiety-matched psychiatric controls (PCs). Radial basis function support vector machine classifiers with cross-validation were used to distinguish individuals with FND from HCs and PCs using 134 FreeSurfer-derived grey matter MRI features. RESULTS Patients with FND-mixed were differentiated from HCs with an accuracy of 0.66 (p=0.005; area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUROC)=0.74); this sample was also distinguished from PCs with an accuracy of 0.60 (p=0.038; AUROC=0.56). When focusing on the functional motor disorder subtype (FND-motor, n=46), a classifier robustly differentiated these patients from HCs (accuracy=0.72; p=0.002; AUROC=0.80). FND-motor could not be distinguished from PCs, and the functional seizures subtype (n=23) could not be classified against either control group. Important regions contributing to statistically significant multivariate classifications included the cingulate gyrus, hippocampal subfields and amygdalar nuclei. Correctly versus incorrectly classified participants did not differ across a range of tested psychometric variables. CONCLUSIONS These findings underscore the interconnection of brain structure and function in the pathophysiology of FND and demonstrate the feasibility of using structural MRI to classify the disorder. Out-of-sample replication and larger-scale classifier efforts incorporating psychiatric and neurological controls are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiana Westlin
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew J Guthrie
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara Paredes-Echeverri
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Julie Maggio
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara Finkelstein
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ellen Godena
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Millstein
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Julie MacLean
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica Ranford
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer Freeburn
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Speech, Language, and Swallowing Disorders, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Caitlin Adams
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher Stephen
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Movement Disorders Division, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ibai Diez
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David L Perez
- Functional Neurological Disorder Research Group, Division of Behavioral Neurology & Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Flasbeck V, Jungilligens J, Lemke I, Beckers J, Öztürk H, Wellmer J, Seliger C, Juckel G, Popkirov S. Heartbeat evoked potentials and autonomic arousal during dissociative seizures: insights from electrophysiology and neuroimaging. BMJ Neurol Open 2024; 6:e000665. [PMID: 38860229 PMCID: PMC11163632 DOI: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Dissociative seizures often occur in the context of dysregulated affective arousal and entail dissociative symptoms such as a disintegration of bodily awareness. However, the interplay between affective arousal and changes in interoceptive processing at the onset of dissociative seizures is not well understood. Methods Using retrospective routine data obtained from video-electroencephalography telemetry in a university hospital epilepsy monitoring unit, we investigate ictal changes in cardiac indices of autonomic arousal and heartbeat evoked potentials (HEPs) in 24 patients with dissociative seizures. Results Results show autonomic arousal during seizures with increased heart rate and a shift towards sympathetic activity. Compared with baseline, ictal HEP amplitudes over central and right prefrontal electrodes (F8, Fz) were significantly less pronounced during seizures, suggesting diminished cortical representation of interoceptive information. Significant correlations between heart rate variability measures and HEPs were observed at baseline, with more sympathetic and less parasympathetic activity related to less pronounced HEPs. Interestingly, these relationships weakened during seizures, suggesting a disintegration of autonomic arousal and interoceptive processing during dissociative seizures. In a subgroup of 16 patients, MRI-based cortical thickness analysis found a correlation with HEP amplitudes in the left somatosensory association cortex. Conclusions These findings possibly represent an electrophysiological hint of how autonomic arousal could negatively impact bodily awareness in dissociative seizures, and how these processes might be related to underlying brain structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Flasbeck
- Division of Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, Ruhr University, LWL University Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| | - Johannes Jungilligens
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr University, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
| | - Isabell Lemke
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr University, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jule Beckers
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr University, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
| | - Hilal Öztürk
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr University, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
- Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jörg Wellmer
- Ruhr Epileptology, Department of Neurology, Ruhr University, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
| | - Corinna Seliger
- Department of Neurology, Ruhr University, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Bochum, Germany
| | - Georg Juckel
- Division of Clinical and Experimental Neurophysiology, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, Ruhr University, LWL University Hospital, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stoyan Popkirov
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jungilligens J, Perez DL. Predictive Processing and the Pathophysiology of Functional Neurological Disorder. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2024. [PMID: 38755514 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2024_473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
The contemporary neuroscience understanding of the brain as an active inference organ supports that our conscious experiences, including sensorimotor perceptions, depend on the integration of probabilistic predictions with incoming sensory input across hierarchically organized levels. As in other systems, these complex processes are prone to error under certain circumstances, which may lead to alterations in their outcomes (i.e., variations in sensations and movements). Such variations are an important aspect of functional neurological disorder, a complex disorder at the interface of brain-mind-body interactions. Thus, predictive processing frameworks offer fundamental mechanistic insights into the pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder. In recent years, many of the aspects relevant to the neurobiology of functional neurological disorder - e.g., aberrant motor and sensory processes, symptom expectation, self-agency, and illness beliefs, as well as interoception, allostasis, and emotion - have been investigated through the lens of predictive processing frameworks. Here, we provide an overview of the current state of research on predictive processing and the pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Jungilligens
- Behavioral Neurology Research Group, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - David L Perez
- Division of Behavioral Neurology and Integrated Brain Medicine, Department of Neurology, Functional Neurological Disorder Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Neuropsychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kapur N, Kemp S. Words Matter: "Functional Neurologic Disorder" or "Functional Symptom Disorder"? Neurol Clin Pract 2024; 14:e200238. [PMID: 38250138 PMCID: PMC10795004 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000200238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Narinder Kapur
- University College London (NK); Leeds Beckett University (SK)
| | - Steven Kemp
- University College London (NK); Leeds Beckett University (SK)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bühler J, Weber S, Loukas S, Walther S, Aybek S. Non-invasive neuromodulation of the right temporoparietal junction using theta-burst stimulation in functional neurological disorder. BMJ Neurol Open 2024; 6:e000525. [PMID: 38361967 PMCID: PMC10868242 DOI: 10.1136/bmjno-2023-000525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Disrupted sense of agency (SoA)-the sense of being the agent of one's own actions-has been demonstrated in patients with functional neurological disorder (FND), and a key area of the corresponding neuronal network is the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ). Several functional MRI (fMRI) studies have found hypoactivation as well as hyperactivation of the rTPJ in FND. In a proof-of-concept study, we tested whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the rTPJ could restore this aberrant activity. Methods In a randomised, crossover, single-blinded, sham-controlled study design, theta-burst stimulation (tb-rTMS) was applied over the rTPJ in 23 patients with FND and 19 healthy controls (HC), with each participant undergoing three stimulatory visits (inhibitory continuous TBS (cTBS), excitatory intermittent TBS (iTBS) and sham). During fMRI, participants played a visuomotor task artificially reducing their SoA (manipulated agency, MA), repeated after each neurostimulation. We compared brain activity and behavioural SoA as primary outcomes before and after tb-rTMS and investigated the feasibility of tb-rTMS over the rTPJ in FND as secondary outcome. Results At baseline, patients showed decreased accuracy in detecting reduced agency compared with controls (p<0.001), paralleled by lower brain activation in the rTPJ during MA (p=0.037, volume of interest). A region of interest analysis on the rTPJ showed no effect of the sham condition in FND or HC (p=0.917; p=0.375) but revealed a significant effect of stimulation protocol (cTBS/iTBS, p=0.037) in patients with FND, with the excitatory protocol increasing the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal, whereas this effect was not found in HC. In neither group, a behavioural effect of tb-rTMS was observed. Conclusion Aberrant processing of agency in FND was confirmed at baseline, reflected in behavioural outcome and reduced activity in the rTPJ. Tb-rTMS over this key region elicited neuronal changes in patients, paving ways for future studies exploring TMS as neurobiologically informed intervention to restore SoA in FND. We critically discuss methodological intricacies and outline further steps in this research line.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Bühler
- Psychosomatic Medicine, Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Health Sciences (GHS), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Samantha Weber
- Psychosomatic Medicine, Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Serafeim Loukas
- Psychosomatic Medicine, Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Bioengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Walther
- University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Selma Aybek
- Psychosomatic Medicine, Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stone J, Hoeritzauer I, McWhirter L, Carson A. Functional neurological disorder: defying dualism. World Psychiatry 2024; 23:53-54. [PMID: 38214630 PMCID: PMC10785980 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Stone
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ingrid Hoeritzauer
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Laura McWhirter
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alan Carson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dadario NB, Piper K, Young IM, Sherman JH, Sughrue ME. Functional connectivity reveals different brain networks underlying the idiopathic foreign accent syndrome. Neurol Sci 2023; 44:3087-3097. [PMID: 36995471 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06762-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Foreign accent syndrome (FAS) is characterized by new onset speech that is perceived as foreign. Available data from acquired cases suggests focal brain damage in language and sensorimotor brain networks, but little remains known about abnormal functional connectivity in idiopathic cases of FAS without structural damage. Here, connectomic analyses were completed on three patients with idiopathic FAS to investigate unique functional connectivity abnormalities underlying accent change for the first time. Machine learning (ML)-based algorithms generated personalized brain connectomes based on a validated parcellation scheme from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). Diffusion tractography was performed on each patient to rule out structural fiber damage to the language system. Resting-state-fMRI was assessed with ML-based software to examine functional connectivity between individual parcellations within language and sensorimotor networks and subcortical structures. Functional connectivity matrices were created and compared against a dataset of 200 healthy subjects to identify abnormally connected parcellations. Three female patients (28-42 years) who presented with accent changes from Australian English to Irish (n = 2) or American English to British English (n = 1) demonstrated fully intact language system structural connectivity. All patients demonstrated functional connectivity anomalies within language and sensorimotor networks in numerous left frontal regions and between subcortical structures in one patient. Few commonalities in functional connectivity anomalies were identified between all three patients, specifically 3 internal-network parcellation pairs. No common inter-network functional connectivity anomalies were identified between all patients. The current study demonstrates specific language, and sensorimotor functional connectivity abnormalities can exist and be quantitatively shown in the absence of structural damage for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas B Dadario
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Keaton Piper
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Jonathan H Sherman
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Martinsburg, WV, USA
| | - Michael E Sughrue
- Centre for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Suite 3, Level 7 Barker St, Randwick, New South Wales, 2031, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stone J. Functional neurological disorder: Past, present and future. L'ENCEPHALE 2023:S0013-7006(23)00090-8. [PMID: 37400334 DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Stone
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4SA Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|