Relationship between cardiac arrhythmias and sleep apnoea in permanently paced patients with type I myotonic dystrophy

An evaluation of 24 h Holter monitoring in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of routine 24 h Holter monitoring to screen for conduction disturbances and arrhythmias in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective two-centre study was conducted including DM1-affected individuals undergoing routine cardiac screening with at least one 24 h Holter monitoring between January 2010 and December 2020. For each individual, the following data were collected: Holter results, results of electrocardiograms (ECGs) performed at the same year as Holter monitoring, presence of cardiac complaints, and neuromuscular status. Holter findings were compared with the results of cardiac screening (ECG + history taking) performed at the same year. Cardiac conduction abnormalities and/or arrhythmias that would have remained undiagnosed based on history taking and ECG alone were considered de novo findings. A total 235 genetically confirmed DM1 patients were included. Abnormal Holter results were discovered in 126 (54%) patients after a mean follow-up of 64 ± 28 months in which an average of 3 ± 1 Holter recordings per patient was performed. Abnormalities upon Holter mainly consisted of conduction disorders (70%) such as atrioventricular (AV) block. Out of 126 patients with abnormal Holter findings, 74 (59%) patients had de novo Holter findings including second-degree AV block, atrial fibrillation/flutter and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Patient characteristics were unable to predict the occurrence of de novo Holter findings. In 39 out of 133 (29%) patients with normal ECGs upon yearly cardiac screening, abnormalities were found on Holter monitoring during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring is of added value to routine cardiac screening for all DM1 patients.

An overview of heart rhythm disorders and management in myotonic dystrophy type 1

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most common adult form of muscular dystrophy, presenting with a constellation of systemic findings secondary to a CTG triplet expansion of the noncoding region of the DMPK gene. Cardiac involvement is frequent, with conduction disease and supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias being the most prevalent cardiac manifestations, often developing from a young age. The development of cardiac arrhythmias has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality, with sudden cardiac death well described. Strategies to mitigate risk of arrhythmic death have been developed. In this review, we outline the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of rhythm abnormalities in patients with myotonic dystrophy and summarize available knowledge on arrhythmic risk stratification. We also review management strategies from an electrophysiological perspective, attempting to underline the substantial unmet need to address residual arrhythmic risks for this population.

Clinical Care Recommendations for Cardiologists Treating Adults With Myotonic Dystrophy

Myotonic dystrophy is an inherited systemic disorder affecting skeletal muscle and the heart. Genetic testing for myotonic dystrophy is diagnostic and identifies those at risk for cardiac complications. The 2 major genetic forms of myotonic dystrophy, type 1 and type 2, differ in genetic etiology yet share clinical features. The cardiac management of myotonic dystrophy should include surveillance for arrhythmias and left ventricular dysfunction, both of which occur in progressive manner and contribute to morbidity and mortality. To promote the development of care guidelines for myotonic dystrophy, the Myotonic Foundation solicited the input of care experts and organized the drafting of these recommendations. As a rare disorder, large scale clinical trial data to guide the management of myotonic dystrophy are largely lacking. The following recommendations represent expert consensus opinion from those with experience in the management of myotonic dystrophy, in part supported by literature-based evidence where available.

Cardiovascular manifestations of myotonic dystrophy

Patients with myotonic dystrophy, the most common neuromuscular dystrophy in adults, have a high prevalence of arrhythmic complications with increased cardiovascular mortality and high risk for sudden death. Sudden death prevention is central and relies on annual follow-up and prophylactic permanent pacing in patients with conduction defects on electrocardiogram and/or infrahisian blocks on electrophysiological study. Implantable cardiac defibrillator therapy may be indicated in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia does not affect the prognosis of neuromuscular diseases: A preliminary and retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is sometimes observed in patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs). The aim of this study was to assess the role of NSVT in the survival prognosis of NMD patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the patients with NMDs who had undergone Holter ECG recordings at a single center between February and August 2012. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. The 5 year follow-up was assessed according to the cumulative event-free rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients died during the follow-up, seven of whom died by cardiac death. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve that compared the patients with NSVT and those without NSVT indicated the NSVT was not related to the rate of all causes of death or cardiac death in those patients with NMDs. The survival curve was not significantly changed after the adjustment by age and ejection fraction.

CONCLUSION

No significant correlations between NSVT and the prognosis in patients with NMDs were found.

Incidence and predictors of sudden death, major conduction defects and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 1388 patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

AIMS

To describe the incidence and identify predictors of sudden death (SD), major conduction defects and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) in myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively enrolled 1388 adults with DM1 referred to six French medical centres between January 2000 and October 2013. We confirmed their vital status, classified all deaths, and determined the incidence of major conduction defects requiring permanent pacing and sustained VTA. We searched for predictors of overall survival, SD, major conduction defects, and sustained VTA by Cox regression analysis. Over a median 10-year follow-up, 253 (18.2%) patients died, 39 (3.6%) suddenly. Analysis of the cardiac rhythm at the time of the 39 SD revealed sustained VTA in 9, asystole in 5, complete atrioventricular block in 1 and electromechanical dissociation in two patients. Non-cardiac causes were identified in the five patients with SD who underwent autopsies. Major conduction defects developed in 143 (19.3%) and sustained VTA in 26 (2.3%) patients. By Cox regression analysis, age, family history of SD and left bundle branch block were independent predictors of SD, while age, male sex, electrocardiographic conduction abnormalities, syncope, and atrial fibrillation were independent predictors of major conduction defects; non-sustained VTA was the only predictor of sustained VTA.

CONCLUSIONS

SD was a frequent mode of death in DM1, with multiple mechanisms involved. Major conduction defects were by far more frequent than sustained VTA, whose only independent predictor was a personal history of non-sustained VTA. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01136330.

Congenital and childhood myotonic dystrophy: Current aspects of disease and future directions

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is multisystem disease arising from mutant CTG expansion in the non-translating region of the dystrophia myotonica protein kinase gene. While DM1 is the most common adult muscular dystrophy, with a worldwide prevalence of one in eight thousand, age of onset varies from before birth to adulthood. There is a broad spectrum of clinical severity, ranging from mild to severe, which correlates with number of DNA repeats. Importantly, the early clinical manifestations and management in congenital and childhood DM1 differ from classic adult DM1. In neonates and children, DM1 predominantly affects muscle strength, cognition, respiratory, central nervous and gastrointestinal systems. Sleep disorders are often under recognised yet a significant morbidity. No effective disease modifying treatment is currently available and neonates and children with DM1 may experience severe physical and intellectual disability, which may be life limiting in the most severe forms. Management is currently supportive, incorporating regular surveillance and treatment of manifestations. Novel therapies, which target the gene and the pathogenic mechanism of abnormal splicing are emerging. Genetic counselling is critical in this autosomal dominant genetic disease with variable penetrance and potential maternal anticipation, as is assisting with family planning and undertaking cascade testing to instigate health surveillance in affected family members. This review incorporates discussion of the clinical manifestations and management of congenital and childhood DM1, with a particular focus on hypersomnolence and sleep disorders. In addition, the molecular genetics, mechanisms of disease pathogenesis and development of novel treatment strategies in DM1 will be summarised.

Myotonic dystrophy and the heart: A systematic review of evaluation and management

Myotonic dystrophy (MD) is a multisystem, autosomal dominant disorder best known for its skeletal muscle manifestations. Cardiac manifestations arise as a result of myocardial fatty infiltration, degeneration and fibrosis and present most commonly as arrhythmias or conduction disturbances. Guidelines regarding the optimal cardiac management of patients with MD are lacking. The present article provides a summary of the pathophysiology of cardiac problems in patients with MD and provides a practical approach to contemporary cardiac monitoring and management of these patients with a focus on the prevention of complications related to conduction disturbances and arrhythmias.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Medline. The keywords used in the search included "myotonic dystrophy", "cardiac manifestations", "heart", "arrhythmia", "pacemaker" and "defibrillator", all terms were used in combination. In addition, "myotonic dystrophy" was searched in conjunction with "electrophysiology", "electrocardiogram", "echocardiograph", "signal averaged electrocardiograph", "magnetic resonance imaging" and "exercise stress testing". The titles of all the articles revealed by the search were screened for relevance. The abstracts of relevant titles were read and those articles which concerned the cardiac manifestations of myotonic dystrophy or the investigation and management of cardiac manifestations underwent a full manuscript review.

[When do you implant a pacemaker in myotonic dystrophy?]

Myotonic dystrophy is the most frequent adult form of hereditary muscular dystrophy caused by a mutation on the DMPK gene. Myotonic dystrophy leads to multiple systemic complications related to weakness, respiratory failure, cardiac arrhythmias and cardiac conduction disturbances. Age of death is earlier in myotonic dystrophy patients than in general population with a high frequency of sudden death. Several mechanisms are involved in sudden death: atrio-ventricular block, severe ventricular arrhythmias or non-cardiac mechanism. The high degree of atrio-ventricular block is a well-recognized indication of pacemaker implantation but the prophylactic implantation of pacemaker should be considered to prevent sudden death in asymptomatic myotonic dystrophy patients. A careful clinical evaluation needs to be done for the identification of patients at high risk of sudden death. The resting ECG and SA ECG are non-invasive tools useful to select the patients who need an electrophysiologic study. In presence of prolonged HV interval more than or equal to 70 ms one can discuss the implantation of a prophylactic pacemaker. The choice of an implantable cardiac defibrillator is preferred in presence of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia or an alteration of the left ventricular ejection fraction.

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2

Myotonic dystrophies (dystrophia myotonica, or DM) are inherited disorders characterized by myotonia and progressive muscle degeneration, which are variably associated with a multisystemic phenotype. To date, two types of myotonic dystrophy, type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2), are known to exist; both are autosomal dominant disorders caused by expansion of an untranslated short tandem repeat DNA sequence (CTG)(n) and (CCTG)(n), respectively. These expanded repeats in DM1 and DM2 show different patterns of repeat-size instability. Phenotypes of DM1 and DM2 are similar but there are some important differences, most conspicuously in the severity of the disease (including the presence or absence of the congenital form), muscles primarily affected (distal versus proximal), involved muscle fiber types (type 1 versus type 2 fibers), and some associated multisystemic phenotypes. The pathogenic mechanism of DM1 and DM2 is thought to be mediated by the mutant RNA transcripts containing expanded CUG and CCUG repeats. Strong evidence supports the hypothesis that sequestration of muscle-blind like (MBNL) proteins by these expanded repeats leads to misregulated splicing of many gene transcripts in corroboration with the raised level of CUG-binding protein 1. However, additional mechanisms, such as changes in the chromatin structure involving CTCN-binding site and gene expression dysregulations, are emerging. Although treatment of DM1 and DM2 is currently limited to supportive therapies, new therapeutic approaches based on pathogenic mechanisms may become feasible in the near future.