Double seronegative myasthenia gravis with anti-LRP 4 antibodies

Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 4 Antibody Positivity in the Youngest Patient in the Caucasus Region: A Case Report

Juvenile myasthenia gravis is a rare disorder where antibodies targeting the acetylcholine receptor or, less frequently, muscle-specific kinase can be detected in the serum while about half of the patients can be seronegative. A pediatric patient with ocular myasthenia is presented whose serum was negative for acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific kinase antibodies but tested positive for low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 antibodies. A favourable clinical response was observed to medical treatment with pyridostigmine and prednisolone, as expected in isolated ocular juvenile myasthenia gravis. This case exemplifies the very rare association of juvenile myasthenia gravis with low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 positivity, reported in only a few cases so far. The specificity of the antibody and the efficiency of medical treatment emphasize the importance of clinical suspicion and appropriate serological testing in juvenile myasthenia gravis in the absence of acetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific kinase antibodies.

Diagnosis and Management of Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: Lights and Shadows

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated neuromuscular disease affecting the neuromuscular junction. In most cases, autoantibodies can be detected in the sera of MG patients, thus aiding in diagnosis and allowing for early screening. However, there is a small proportion of patients who have no detectable auto-antibodies, a condition termed "seronegative MG" (SnMG). Several factors contribute to this, including laboratory test inaccuracies, decreased antibody production, immunosuppressive therapy, immunodeficiencies, antigen depletion, and immune-senescence. The diagnosis of SnMG is more challenging and is based on clinical features and neurophysiological tests. The early identification of these patients is needed in order to ensure early treatment and prevent complications. This narrative review aims to examine the latest updates on SnMG, defining the clinical characteristics of affected patients, diagnostic methods, management, and therapeutic scenarios.

Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Current Overview

Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) is a neuromuscular disease characterized by autoantibody production against post-synaptic proteins in the neuromuscular junction. The pathophysiological auto-immune mechanisms of myasthenia are diverse, and this is governed primarily by the type of autoantibody production. The diagnosis of OMG relies mainly on clinical assessment, the use of serological antibody assays for acetylcholine receptors (AchR), muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MusK), and low-density lipoprotein 4 (LPR4). Other autoantibodies against post-synaptic proteins, such as cortactin and agrin, have been detected; however, their diagnostic value and pathogenic effect are not yet clearly defined. Clinical tests such as the ice test and electrophysiologic tests, particularly single-fiber electromyography, have a valuable role in diagnosis. The treatment of OMG is primarily through cholinesterase inhibitors (pyridostigmine), and steroids are frequently required in cases of ophthalmoplegia. Other immunosuppressive therapies include antimetabolites (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate) and biological agents such as B-cell depleting agents (Rituximab) and complement inhibitors (eculizumab). Evidence is scarce on the effect of immunosuppressive therapy on altering the natural course of OMG. Clinicians must be vigilant of a myasthenic syndrome in patients using immune-check inhibitors. Reliable and consistent biomarkers are required to assess disease severity and response to therapy to optimize the management of OMG. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current trends and the latest developments in diagnosing and treating OMG.

A Case Report and 31-Case Study: Does Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Myasthenia Gravis Patients Have a High Mortality Rate?

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder in which antibodies are formed against post-synaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that lead to impeded muscle contraction and commonly affects the oculomotor muscles. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC) is a dilated cardiomyopathy that can mimic a myocardial infarction and causes reversible systolic dysfunction. This is a case of a 66-year-old Caucasian male with a known history of ocular myasthenia gravis that presented to the emergency room with worsening dyspnea secondary to a myasthenic crisis. One day, following admission, his shortness of breath failed to improve and was found to meet the diagnostic criteria for takotsubo cardiomyopathy. A brief review of 31 previous cases summarizes the current case reports, patterns, and mortality associated with the myasthenic crisis associated with TTC.

Amino acid sequence homology between thyroid autoantigens and central nervous system proteins: Implications for the steroid-responsive encephalopathy associated with autoimmune thyroiditis

•

Alpha-enolase, aldehyde reductase-I and dimethylargininase-I are SREAT autoantigens.

•

Molecular mimicry between thyroid and CNS autoantigens is hypothesized in SREAT.

•

Homology with TSH-R, Tg and TPO exists for 6, 27 and 47 of 46,809 CNS-proteins.

•

The above homologies are often in epitope-containing parts of thyroid autoantigens.

•

Most of the above proteins are expressed in CNS regions which are altered in SREAT.

A few patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis or Graves’ disease develop a multiform syndrome of the central nervous system (CNS) termed Hashimoto’s encephalopathy or steroid-responsive encephalopathy associated with autoimmune thyroid disease (HE/SREAT). They have high levels of thyroid autoantibodies (TgAb, TPOAb and/or TSH-R-Ab) in blood and cerebrospinal fluid. Autoantibodies against alpha-enolase, aldehyde reductase-I (AKRIA) and/or dimethylargininase-I (DDAHI), proteins expressed in the CNS among other tissues, were detected in the blood and, when searched, in the cerebrospinal fluid of HE/SREAT patients. Recently, we reported that alpha-enolase, AKRIA and DDAHI share local sequence homology with each of the three autoantigens (TgAb, TPOAb, TSH-R-Ab), often in epitope-containing segments of the thyroid autoantigens. We hypothesized that there might be additional CNS-expressed proteins homologous to thyroid autoantigens, possibly overlapping known epitopes of the thyroid autoantigens. We used bioinformatic methods to address this hypothesis.

Six, 27 and 47 of 46,809 CNS-expressed proteins share homology with TSH-R, Tg and TPO, respectively. The homologous regions often contain epitopes, and some match regions of thyroid autoantigens which have homology with alpha-enolase, AKRIA and/or DDAHI. Several of the aforementioned proteins are present in CNS areas that show abnormalities at neuroimaging in HE/SREAT patients. Furthermore, autoantibodies against some of the said six, 27 and 47 proteins were reported to be associated with a number of autoimmune diseases.

Not only we validated our hypothesis, but we think that such a variety of potential CNS targets for thyroid Ab against epitopes contained in regions that have local homology with CNS proteins may explain the polymorphic phenotypes of HE/SREAT. Only when elevated amounts of these Ab are synthesized and trespass the blood-brain barrier, HE/SREAT appears. This might explain why HE/SREAT is so relatively rare.

Heterogeneity in myasthenia gravis: considerations for disease management

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis is a rare disease of the neuromuscular junction and a prototype of B cell-driven immunopathology. Pathogenic antibodies target post-synaptic transmembrane proteins, most commonly the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, inducing end-plate alterations and neuromuscular transmission impairment. Several clinical subtypes are distinct on the basis of associated antibodies, age at symptom onset, thymus pathology, genetic factors, and weakness distribution. These subtypes have distinct pathogenesis that can account for different responses to treatment. Conventional therapy is based on the use of symptomatic agents, steroids, immunosuppressants and thymectomy. Of late, biologics have emerged as effective therapeutic options.Areas covered: In this review, we will discuss the management of myasthenia gravis in relation to its phenotypic and biological heterogeneity, in the light of recent advances in the disease immunopathology, new diagnostic tools, and results of clinical trialsExpert opinion: Clinical management is shaped on serological subtype, and patient age at onset, lifestyle and comorbidities, balancing therapeutic needs and safety. Although reliable biomarkers predictive of clinical and biologic outcome are still lacking, recent developments promise a more effective and safe treatment. Disease subtyping according to serological testing and immunopathology is crucial to the appropriateness of clinical management.

Clinical features of LRP4/agrin-antibody-positive myasthenia gravis: A multicenter study

Introduction

Our aim in this study was to identify the prevalence and clinical characteristics of LRP4/agrin‐antibody–positive double‐seronegative myasthenia gravis (DNMG).

Methods

DNMG patients at 16 sites in the United States were tested for LRP4 and agrin antibodies, and the clinical data were collected.

Results

Of 181 DNMG patients, 27 (14.9%) were positive for either low‐density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4 (LRP4) or agrin antibodies. Twenty‐three DNMG patients (12.7%) were positive for both antibodies. More antibody‐positive patients presented with generalized symptoms (69%) compared with antibody‐negative patients (43%) (P ≤ .02). Antibody‐positive patients’ maximum classification on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) scale was significantly higher than that for antibody‐negative patients (P ≤ .005). Seventy percent of antibody‐positive patients were classified as MGFA class III, IV, or V compared with 39% of antibody‐negative patients. Most LRP4‐ and agrin‐antibody–positive patients (24 of 27, 89%) developed generalized myathenia gravis (MG), but with standard MG treatment 81.5% (22 of 27) improved to MGFA class I or II during a mean follow‐up of 11 years.

Discussion

Antibody‐positive patients had more severe clinical disease than antibody‐negative patients. Most DNMG patients responded to standard therapy regardless of antibody status.

Myasthenia Gravis: From the Viewpoint of Pathogenicity Focusing on Acetylcholine Receptor Clustering, Trans-Synaptic Homeostasis and Synaptic Stability

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a disease of the postsynaptic neuromuscular junction (NMJ) where nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (AChRs) are targeted by autoantibodies. Search for other pathogenic antigens has detected the antibodies against muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and low-density lipoprotein-related protein 4 (Lrp4), both causing pre- and post-synaptic impairments. Agrin is also suspected as a fourth pathogen. In a complex NMJ organization centering on MuSK: (1) the Wnt non-canonical pathway through the Wnt-Lrp4-MuSK cysteine-rich domain (CRD)-Dishevelled (Dvl, scaffold protein) signaling acts to form AChR prepatterning with axonal guidance; (2) the neural agrin-Lrp4-MuSK (Ig1/2 domains) signaling acts to form rapsyn-anchored AChR clusters at the innervated stage of muscle; (3) adaptor protein Dok-7 acts on MuSK activation for AChR clustering from “inside” and also on cytoskeleton to stabilize AChR clusters by the downstream effector Sorbs1/2; (4) the trans-synaptic retrograde signaling contributes to the presynaptic organization via: (i) Wnt-MuSK CRD-Dvl-β catenin-Slit 2 pathway; (ii) Lrp4; and (iii) laminins. The presynaptic Ca²⁺ homeostasis conditioning ACh release is modified by autoreceptors such as M1-type muscarinic AChR and A2A adenosine receptors. The post-synaptic structure is stabilized by: (i) laminin-network including the muscle-derived agrin; (ii) the extracellular matrix proteins (including collagen Q/perlecan and biglycan which link to MuSK Ig1 domain and CRD); and (iii) the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex. The study on MuSK ectodomains (Ig1/2 domains and CRD) recognized by antibodies suggested that the MuSK antibodies were pathologically heterogeneous due to their binding to multiple functional domains. Focussing one of the matrix proteins, biglycan which functions in the manner similar to collagen Q, our antibody assay showed the negative result in MG patients. However, the synaptic stability may be impaired by antibodies against MuSK ectodomains because of the linkage of biglycan with MuSK Ig1 domain and CRD. The pathogenic diversity of MG is discussed based on NMJ signaling molecules.

Nature and Action of Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis

This article discusses antibodies associated with immune-mediated myasthenia gravis and the pathologic action of these antibodies at the neuromuscular junctions of skeletal muscle. To explain how these antibodies act, we consider the physiology of neuromuscular transmission with emphasis on 4 features: the structure of the neuromuscular junction; the roles of postsynaptic acetylcholine receptors and voltage-gated Na⁺ channels and in converting the chemical signal from the nerve terminal into a propagated action potential on the muscle fiber that triggers muscle contraction; the safety factor for neuromuscular transmission; and how the safety factor is reduced in different forms of autoimmune myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia gravis seronegative for acetylcholine receptor antibodies in South Korea: Autoantibody profiles and clinical features

Acquired myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prototype autoimmune disease of the neuromuscular junction, caused in most patients by autoantibodies to the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). There seem to be ethnic and regional differences in the frequency and clinical features of MG seronegative for the AChR antibody. This study aimed to describe the autoantibody profiles and clinical features of Korean patients with generalized MG seronegative for the AChR antibody. A total of 62 patients with a high index of clinical suspicion of seronegative generalized MG were identified from 18 centers, and we examined their sera for antibodies to clustered AChR, muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK), and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) by cell-based assays (CBA) and to MuSK by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA). We also included 8 patients with ocular MG, 3 with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, 5 with motor neuron disease, and 9 with other diagnoses as comparators for the serological testing. Antibodies were identified in 25/62 (40.3%) patients: 7 had antibodies to clustered AChR, 17 to MuSK, and 2 to LRP4. Three patients were double seropositive: 1 for MuSK and LRP4, and 2 for MuSK and clustered AChR. The patients with MuSK antibodies were mostly female (88.2%) and characterized by predominantly bulbar involvement (70%) and frequent myasthenic crises (58.3%). The patients with antibodies to clustered AChR, including 2 with ocular MG, tended to have a mild phenotype and good prognosis.

Autoantibodies to Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 4 in Double Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction in which a clinical diagnosis may be confirmed with serological testing. The most common autoantibodies used to support a diagnosis of MG are anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies and anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies. In cases in which both of these autoantibodies are negative (termed double-seronegative [dSNMG]), other autoantibodies such as low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) may be used to aid in diagnosis. Methods: We have undertaken a systematic literature review to identify studies that have assessed the frequency of anti-LRP4 antibodies in dSNMG patients and the characteristics of anti-LRP4+ dSNMG patients (epidemiology, clinical features, electromyographic findings, or management). PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Scopus were searched on January 14, 2017, using the medical subject headings “myasthenia gravis” and “low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4” or “LRP4.” Results: The initial search identified 367 articles. Fourteen publications met the inclusion criteria. There were ten cross-sectional research studies, three were case series, and one was a case report. The majority of studies were limited by small sample sizes of LRP4+ dSNMG. There has been a wide range of frequencies of anti-LRP4 antibodies detected in different MG patient populations, some involving different laboratory techniques. Conclusions: LRP4+ dSNMG is more likely than LRP4– dSNMG to have a younger onset of disease and occur in females. LRP4+ dSNMG most often is mild in severity and often involves isolated ocular weakness. It typically responds well to pyridostigmine or prednisone.

Anti-LRP4 autoantibodies in Chinese patients with myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

We assessed antibodies against low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4-Ab) in a Chinese population with myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

Serum samples from 116 patients and 80 controls were collected. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies(AChR-Ab) and muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase antibodies (MuSK-Ab) were tested using an enzyme-linked immune absorption assay, and LRP4-Ab was identified using a cell-based assay. MG patients with neither AChR-Ab nor MuSK-Ab were defined as double-seronegative MG (dSN-MG).

RESULTS

Two of 116 (1.7%) of all patients and 2 of 50 (1%) dSN-MG patients were positive for LRP4-Ab. These 2 patients had ocular MG. Following treatment with acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and prednisone, both achieved full remission.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that LRP4-Ab is a pathogenic antibody in MG. LRP4-MG seems to be characterized by mild disease severity and favorable therapeutic effect in contrast with other types of MG. Muscle Nerve 56: 938-942, 2017.

Treatment of muscle weakness in neuromuscular disorders

INTRODUCTION

Weakness is one of the predominant clinical manifestations of neuromuscular disorders (NMDs), which strongly influences daily life, prognosis, and outcome of affected patients. One of the major therapeutic goals in NMD-patients is to completely resolve muscle weakness. Various treatment options are available and include physical therapy, electrotherapy, diet, drugs, avoidance or withdrawal of muscle-toxic and weakness-inducing agents, detoxification, stem-cell-therapy, plasma-exchange, respiratory therapy, or surgery. Most accessible to treatment is weakness from immune-mediated neuropathies, immune-mediated transmission-disorders, and idiopathic immune myopathies. Areas covered: This manuscript aims to summarize and discuss recent findings and future perspectives concerning the treatment of muscle weakness in NMDs. Data were obtained by a literature search in databases such as PubMed and Current-Contents. Expert commentary: Weakness is most easily treatable in acquired NMDs and in hereditary myopathies and neuropathies beneficial treatment options are also available. Research needs to be encouraged and intensified to further expand the spectrum of treatment options for weakness.

Double Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis with Anti-LRP4 Antibodies Presenting with Dropped Head and Acute Respiratory Insufficiency

We herein report the case of a 72-year-old man demonstrating myasthenia gravis (MG) with a dropped head and acute respiratory insufficiency. There was no ocular, bulbar, or limb involvement. The patient was seronegative for anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies and anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies. Subsequent tests showed seropositivity for anti-low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) antibodies. The addition of steroid pulse therapy resulted in a full remission of his respiratory symptoms. This presentation suggests that LRP4-positive MG should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with acute respiratory insufficiency without either cranial or limb involvement.

Myf5 and Myogenin in the development of thymic myoid cells - Implications for a murine in vivo model of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by autoantibodies against the neuromuscular junction of striated muscle. Most MG patients have autoreactive T- and B-cells directed to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR). To achieve immunologic tolerance, developing thymocytes are normally eliminated after recognition of self-antigen-derived peptides. Presentation of muscle-specific antigens is likely achieved through two pathways: on medullary thymic epithelial cells and on medullary dendritic cells cross-presenting peptides derived from a unique population of thymic myoid cells (TMC). Decades ago, it has been hypothesized that TMC play a key role in the induction of immunological tolerance towards skeletal muscle antigens. However, an experimental model to address this postulate has not been available. To generate such a model, we tested the hypothesis that the development of TMC depends on myogenic regulatory factors. To this end, we utilized Myf5-deficient mice, which lack the first wave of muscle cells but form normal skeletal muscles later during development, and Myogenin-deficient mice, which fail to form differentiated myofibers. We demonstrate for the first time that Myf5- and Myogenin-deficient mice showed a partial or complete, respectively, loss of TMC in an otherwise regularly structured thymus. To overcome early postnatal lethality of muscle-deficient, Myogenin-knockout mice we transplanted Myogenin-deficient fetal thymuses into Foxn1(nu/nu) mice that lack their own thymus anlage. We found that the transplants are functional but lack TMC. In combination with established immunization strategies (utilizing AChR or Titin), this model should enable us in the future testing the hypothesis that TMC play an indispensable role in the development of central tolerance towards striated muscle antigens.

Double seronegative myasthenia gravis with low density lipoprotein-4 (LRP4) antibodies presenting with isolated ocular symptoms

The detection of low density lipoprotein-4 (LRP4) antibodies in double seronegative (dSN) myasthenia gravis (MG) patients has provided new insights in the diagnosis and treatment of MG. However, there are limited data regarding the clinical presentation and treatment response in dSN MG patients with LRP4-antibodies. We present a case series of three Caucasian dSN MG patients with positive LRP4-antibodies sharing a common ethnic background that presented with isolated ocular symptoms (MGFA I). The demographic and clinical characteristics, the diagnostic work-up as well as the treatment response during a follow-up period of 12-24 months are described in detail. All patients were treated successfully with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AcheI) and prednisone with two exhibiting full remission of their symptoms, while the remaining exhibited mild residual diplopia. Notably, we documented no signs of generalized disease progression, while no patient required immunosuppressive treatment. In conclusion, the distinct clinical phenotype of our patients highlights the clinical relevance of screening for LRP4-antibodies in patients presenting with isolated ocular MG independent of age and gender, since it may lead to the timely diagnosis of MG and prompt initiation of effective therapy with ACheI and corticosteroids.

A comprehensive analysis of the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of anti-LRP4 in myasthenia gravis

Double-seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSN-MG, without detectable AChR and MuSK antibodies) presents a serious gap in MG diagnosis and understanding. Recently, autoantibodies against the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) have been identified in several dSN-MG sera, but with dramatic frequency variation (∼2-50%). We have developed a cell based assay (CBA) based on human LRP4 expressing HEK293 cells, for the reliable and efficient detection of LRP4 antibodies. We have screened about 800 MG patient sera from 10 countries for LRP4 antibodies. The overall frequency of LRP4-MG in the dSN-MG group (635 patients) was 18.7% but with variations among different populations (range 7-32.7%). Interestingly, we also identified double positive sera: 8/107 anti-AChR positive and 10/67 anti-MuSK positive sera also had detectable LRP4 antibodies, predominantly originating from only two of the participating groups. No LRP4 antibodies were identified in sera from 56 healthy controls tested, while 4/110 from patients with other neuroimmune diseases were positive. The clinical data, when available, for the LRP4-MG patients were then studied. At disease onset symptoms were mild (81% had MGFA grade I or II), with some identified thymic changes (32% hyperplasia, none with thymoma). On the other hand, double positive patients (AChR/LRP4-MG and MuSK/LRP4-MG) had more severe symptoms at onset compared with any single positive MG subgroup. Contrary to MuSK-MG, 27% of ocular dSN-MG patients were LRP4 antibody positive. Similarly, contrary to MuSK antibodies, which are predominantly of the IgG4 subtype, LRP4 antibodies were predominantly of the IgG1 and IgG2 subtypes. The prevalence was higher in women than in men (female/male ratio 2.5/1), with an average disease onset at ages 33.4 for females and 41.9 for males. Overall, the response of LRP4-MG patients to treatment was similar to published responses of AChR-MG rather than to MuSK-MG patients.