The yield of diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with myalgia, exercise intolerance, or fatigue

Case Report and Literature Review of an Atypical Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Its Management

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a systemic inflammatory disease of the elderly population that increases in incidence as age advances. It is characterised by the sudden or sub-acute onset of symptoms affecting the shoulder and pelvic girdles, often accompanied by constitutional symptoms. Due to the lack of consensual diagnostic criteria and specific laboratory or radiological investigations for PMR, its diagnosis can be very challenging, particularly because it can be mimicked or masked by other geriatric syndromes. PMR responds well to glucocorticoid treatment, but if left untreated, can lead to morbidity and poor quality of life. We present the case of an 87-year-old male who presented with a one-week history of localised pain in the left hip joint, later involving the contralateral hip. Previously able to ambulate unaided, his mobility was now severely impaired. Due to his Alzheimer's dementia and multiple comorbid geriatric conditions, extensive investigations were undertaken before a diagnosis of atypical PMR was reached. Treatment with a low dose of prednisolone led to a full recovery. This case highlights the inconsistency between an atypical presentation and the classic presentation of PMR and draws attention to the possibility of missed diagnosis in older, frail patients. Atypical symptomatology on top of cognitive impairment and language barriers can be easily overlooked and left untreated and could lead to severe adverse outcomes. Accurate diagnosis is crucial, as PMR is readily diagnosed, but the treatment with glucocorticoids, though generally straightforward, can pose challenges, particularly when dealing with polypharmacy and multiple coexisting health conditions.

Detecting impaired muscle relaxation in myopathies with the use of motor cortical stimulation

Impaired muscle relaxation is a notable feature in specific myopathies. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex can induce muscle relaxation by abruptly halting corticospinal drive. Our aim was to quantify muscle relaxation using TMS in different myopathies with symptoms of muscle stiffness, contractures/cramps, and myalgia and explore the technique's diagnostic potential. In men, normalized peak relaxation rate was lower in Brody disease (n = 4) (-3.5 ± 1.3 s^-1), nemaline myopathy type 6 (NEM6; n = 5) (-7.5 ± 1.0 s^-1), and myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2; n = 5) (-10.2 ± 2.0 s^-1) compared to healthy (n = 14) (-13.7 ± 2.1 s^-1; all P ≤ 0.01) and symptomatic controls (n = 9) (-13.7 ± 1.6 s^-1; all P ≤ 0.02). In women, NEM6 (n = 5) (-5.7 ± 2.1 s^-1) and McArdle patients (n = 4) (-6.6 ± 1.4 s^-1) had lower relaxation rate compared to healthy (n = 10) (-11.7 ± 1.6 s^-1; both P ≤ 0.002) and symptomatic controls (n = 8) (-11.3 ± 1.8 s^-1; both P ≤ 0.008). TMS-induced muscle relaxation achieved a high level of diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.94 (M) and 0.92 (F)) to differentiate symptomatic controls from myopathy patients. Muscle relaxation assessed using TMS has the potential to serve as a diagnostic tool, an in-vivo functional test to confirm the pathogenicity of unknown variants, an outcome measure in clinical trials, and monitor disease progression.

Muscle biopsy: what and why and when?

Skeletal muscle biopsy remains an important investigative tool in the diagnosis of a variety of muscle disorders. Traditionally, someone with a limb-girdle muscle weakness, myopathic changes on electrophysiology and raised serum creatine kinase (CK) would have a muscle biopsy. However, we are living through a genetics revolution, and so do all such patients still need a biopsy? When should we undertake a muscle biopsy in patients with a distal, scapuloperoneal or other patterns of muscle weakness? When should patients with myositis, rhabdomyolysis, myalgia, hyperCKaemia or a drug-related myopathy have a muscle biopsy? What does normal muscle histology look like and what changes occur in neurogenic and myopathic disorders? As with Kipling's six honest serving men, we hope that by addressing these issues we can all become more confident about when to request a muscle biopsy and develop clearer insights into muscle pathology.

The ratio of maximal handgrip force and maximal cycloergometry power as a diagnostic tool to screen for metabolic myopathies

Metabolic myopathies comprise a diverse group of inborn errors of intermediary metabolism affecting skeletal muscle, and often present clinically as an inability to perform normal exercise. Our aim was to use the maximal mechanical performances achieved during two functional tests, isometric handgrip test and cycloergometer, to identify metabolic myopathies among patients consulting for exercise-induced myalgia. Eighty-three patients with exercise-induced myalgia and intolerance were evaluated, with twenty-three of them having a metabolic myopathy (McArdle, n = 9; complete myoadenylate deaminase deficiency, n = 10; respiratory chain deficiency, n = 4) and sixty patients with non-metabolic myalgia. In all patients, maximal power (MP) was determined during a progressive exercise test on a cycloergometer and maximal voluntary contraction force (MVC) was assessed using a handgrip dynamometer. The ratio between percent-predicted values for MVC and MP was calculated for each subject (MVC%pred:MP%pred ratio). In patients with metabolic myopathy, the MVC%pred:MP%pred ratio was significantly higher compared to non-metabolic myalgia (1.54 ± 0.62 vs. 0.92 ± 0.25; p < 0.0001). ROC analysis of MVC%pred:MP%pred ratio showed AUC of 0.843 (0.758–0.927, 95% CI) for differentiating metabolic myopathies against non-metabolic myalgia. The optimum cutoff was taken as 1.30 (se = 69.6%, sp = 96.7%), with a corresponding diagnostic odd ratio of 66.3 (12.5–350.7, 95% CI). For a pretest probability of 15% in our tertiary reference center, the posttest probability for metabolic myopathy is 78.6% when MVC%pred:MP%pred ratio is above 1.3. In conclusion, the MVC%pred:MP%pred ratio is appropriate as a screening test to distinguish metabolic myopathies from non-metabolic myalgia.

Molecular diagnosis of muscular diseases in outpatient clinics: A Canadian perspective

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic yield of an 89-gene panel in a large cohort of patients with suspected muscle disorders and to compare the diagnostic yield of gene panel and exome sequencing approaches.

Methods

We tested 1,236 patients from outpatient clinics across Canada using a gene panel and performed exome sequencing for 46 other patients with sequential analysis of 89 genes followed by all mendelian genes. Sequencing and analysis were performed in patients with muscle weakness or symptoms suggestive of a muscle disorder and showing at least 1 supporting clinical laboratory.

Results

We identified a molecular diagnosis in 187 (15.1%) of the 1,236 patients tested with the 89-gene panel. Diagnoses were distributed across 40 different genes, but 6 (DMD, RYR1, CAPN3, PYGM, DYSF, and FKRP) explained about half of all cases. Cardiac anomalies, positive family history, age <60 years, and creatine kinase >1,000 IU/L were all associated with increased diagnostic yield. Exome sequencing identified a diagnosis in 10 (21.7%) of the 46 patients tested. Among these, 3 were attributed to genes not included in the 89-gene panel. Despite differences in median coverage, only 1 of the 187 diagnoses that were identified on gene panel in the 1,236 patients could have been potentially missed if exome sequencing had been performed instead.

Conclusions

Our study supports the use of gene panel testing in patients with suspected muscle disorders from outpatient clinics. It also shows that exome sequencing has a low risk of missing diagnoses compared with gene panel, while potentially increasing the diagnostic yield of patients with muscle disorders.

Take two: Utility of the repeat skeletal muscle biopsy

INTRODUCTION

The utility of repeat muscle biopsy has not been adequately evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of 144 repeat muscle biopsies performed from 1980 to 2017. Repeat biopsy was considered clinically relevant if it provided a new diagnosis, changed the existing diagnosis, or led to treatment changes or further investigations.

RESULTS

Repeat biopsy was abnormal in 118 cases, different from the initial biopsy in 67 cases, and specific in 40 cases. Factors with a significant effect on clinical relevance of the repeat biopsy (P < 0.05) were an abnormal, specific, or inflammatory initial biopsy, proximal muscle weakness, absence of myalgia, and a repeat biopsy that is different, specific, or consistent with polymyositis or inclusion body myositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Utility of repeat biopsy was limited to weak patients whose initial biopsy showed inflammatory myositis. Ongoing advances in the diagnosis of immune inflammatory myopathies have led to evolution of the role of repeat biopsy. Muscle Nerve, 2019.

Indications for neuromuscular ultrasound: Expert opinion and review of the literature

Over the last two decades, dozens of applications have emerged for ultrasonography in neuromuscular disorders. We wanted to measure its impact on practice in laboratories where the technique is in frequent use. After identifying experts in neuromuscular ultrasound and electrodiagnosis, we assessed their use of ultrasonography for different indications and their expectations for its future evolution. We then identified the earliest papers to provide convincing evidence of the utility of ultrasound for particular indications and analyzed the relationship of their date of publication with expert usage. We found that experts use ultrasonography often for inflammatory, hereditary, traumatic, compressive and neoplastic neuropathies, and somewhat less often for neuronopathies and myopathies. Usage significantly correlated with the timing of key publications in the field. We review these findings and the extensive evidence supporting the value of neuromuscular ultrasound. Advancement of the field of clinical neurophysiology depends on widespread translation of these findings.