Myasthenia gravis after etanercept and ustekinumab treatment for psoriatic arthritis: A case report

New Targeted Agents in Myasthenia Gravis and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease for which multiple immunomodulatory therapies are available. Nevertheless, MG has a significant impact on patient quality of life. In recent years, experts' main efforts have focused on optimizing treatment strategies, since disease burden is considerably affected by their safety and tolerability profiles, especially in patients with refractory phenotypes. This article aims to offer neurologists caring for MG patients an overview of the most innovative targeted drugs specifically designed for this disease and summarizes the recent literature and more recent evidence on agents targeting B cells and plasmablasts, complement inhibitors, and neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonists. Positive clinical trial results have been reported, and other studies are ongoing. Finally, we briefly discuss how the introduction of these novel targeted immunological therapies in a changing management paradigm would affect not only clinical outcomes, disease burden, safety, and tolerability, but also health spending in a condition that is increasingly managed based on a patient-centred model.

Clinically reversible ustekinumab-induced encephalopathy: case report and review of the literature

Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 approved for the treatment of Crohn’s disease, has shown to be an effective therapy with a favourable safety profile. Clinical trials and real-world studies have reported very few neurological adverse events, including posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, idiopathic intracranial hypertension and headache. We describe the case of a 48-year-old man with Crohn’s disease who initiated treatment with ustekinumab on top of ongoing treatment with methotrexate 25 mg/week who presented with an acute-onset encephalopathy that rapidly evolved to severe tetraparesis and akinetic mutism, associated with extensive leukoencephalopathy and restricted diffusion on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 1 month after the second dose of ustekinumab. Comprehensive in-patient diagnostic testing ruled out vascular, demyelinating, metabolic, tumoral and infectious etiologies. Brain biopsy showed patchy infiltrates of foamy histiocytes with perivascular distribution, associated with edema, diffuse astrocytic gliosis and focal perivascular axonal destruction without demyelination, and ustekinumab-induced neurotoxicity was suspected. After drug discontinuation, the patient presented a complete clinical recovery despite the persistence of leukoencephalopathy. In conclusion, in an era in which biological therapies are continually evolving and expanding, knowledge about the potential neurotoxicity of these new therapies and their management becomes crucial. Although ustekinumab-induced encephalopathy is uncommon, the recognition of this potentially serious side effect is important because prompt withdrawal is associated with a favourable outcome. Whether methotrexate played an additional contributing role is currently unknown, but it is a factor that should be considered.

Neurological Complications of Biological Treatment of Psoriasis

In the available literature, little attention has been paid to the assessment of psoriasis and the biological therapy used for it and the nervous system. The purpose of this article is to discuss the relationship between psoriasis and the nervous system as well as to analyze the mechanisms that lead to neurological complications during anticytokine therapies in psoriasis. However, this connection requires further analysis. The use of biological drugs in psoriasis, although it yields positive therapeutic results, is not without numerous side effects. Serious neurological side effects of the therapy are most often visible with the use of anti-TNF-alpha, which is why patients should be monitored for their potential occurrence. Early detection of complications and rapid discontinuation of treatment with the drug may potentially increase the patient’s chances of a full recovery or improvement of his/her neurological condition. It also seems reasonable that, in the case of complications occurring during anti-TNF-alpha therapy, some of the drugs from other groups should be included in the therapy.

Rheumatoid arthritis and myasthenia gravis: a case-based review of the therapeutic options

Introduction

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease affecting the neuromuscular junction, often associated with other autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis present an increased prevalence of myasthenia gravis compared to the general population. While these two diseases share some therapeutic options, such as glucocorticoids, methotrexate, and rituximab, there are no guidelines for treating concomitant disease. We aim to review the available evidence and to discuss the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic options in patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with myasthenia gravis.

Method

We described three patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with myasthenia gravis and we performed a systematic review of the associated literature.

Results

A 48-year-old man and two women (48 and 55 years old) with concomitant diagnoses of active rheumatoid arthritis and well-controlled myasthenia gravis are described. They were treated with methotrexate, leflunomide, upadacitinib, and adalimumab. None of them experienced changes in their myasthenic symptoms. We found 9 additional cases from our literature review. Methotrexate, rituximab, upadacitinib, diphenyl sulfone, auranofin, and loxoprofen sodium did not show an impact on the seven patients with previously well-controlled myasthenia. Glucocorticoids, methotrexate, and rituximab proved effective in active myasthenia gravis and arthritis. Conflicting data emerged for Tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors.

Conclusions

Although the available evidence remains scarce, we consider glucocorticoids, methotrexate, and rituximab as safe and effective options. The role of tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors remains uncertain. Eventually, Janus Kinase inhibitors are a novel interesting option for these patients.

Key Points • To date, the only evidence on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant myasthenia gravis derives from case reports. • Based on the review of the available case reports and on the cases we described, we consider glucocorticoids, methotrexate, and rituximab as safe and effective options, while the role of Tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors remains uncertain. • Based on the cases we described, Janus Kinase inhibitors are a novel interesting option for patients with concomitant rheumatoid arthritis and myasthenia gravis.

Benefit and danger from immunotherapy in myasthenia gravis

In the last years, significant advances have improved the knowledge of myasthenia gravis (MG) immunopathogenesis and have enabled to realize new molecules with a selective action targeting compounds of the immunological system. This review discusses emerging treatments for MG, including complement inhibitors, neonatal Fc receptor targeting agents, and B cell interfering drugs, focusing on benefit and danger. In the second section of the review, several related adverse events of immunotherapy, including MGonset, are debated.