A systematic review of the application of machine-learning algorithms in multiple sclerosis

An update on the role of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting and monitoring multiple sclerosis progression

INTRODUCTION

While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is established in diagnosing and monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), its utility in predicting and monitoring disease progression is less clear.

AREAS COVERED

The authors consider changing concepts in the phenotypic classification of MS, including progression independent of relapses; pathological processes underpinning progression; advances in MRI measures to assess them; how well MRI features explain and predict clinical outcomes, including models that assess disease effects on neural networks, and the potential role for machine learning.

EXPERT OPINION

Relapsing-remitting and progressive MS have evolved from being viewed as mutually exclusive to having considerable overlap. Progression is likely the consequence of several pathological elements, each important in building more holistic prognostic models beyond conventional phenotypes. MRI is well placed to assess pathogenic processes underpinning progression, but we need to bridge the gap between MRI measures and clinical outcomes. Mapping pathological effects on specific neural networks may help and machine learning methods may be able to optimize predictive markers while identifying new, or previously overlooked, clinically relevant features. The ever-increasing ability to measure features on MRI raises the dilemma of what to measure and when, and the challenge of translating research methods into clinically useable tools.

Assessing treatment switch among patients with multiple sclerosis: A machine learning approach

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) frequently switch their Disease-Modifying Agents (DMA) for effectiveness and safety concerns. This study aimed to develop and compare the random forest (RF) machine learning (ML) model with the logistic regression (LR) model for predicting DMA switching among MS patients.

METHODS

This retrospective longitudinal study used the TriNetX data from a federated electronic medical records (EMR) network. Between September 2010 and May 2017, adults (aged ≥18) MS patients with ≥1 DMA prescription were identified, and the earliest DMA date was assigned as the index date. Patients prescribed any DMAs different from their index DMAs were considered as treatment switch. . The RF and LR models were built with 72 baseline characteristics and trained with 70% of the randomly split data after up-sampling. Area Under the Curves (AUC), accuracy, recall, G-measure, and F-1 score were used to evaluate the model performance.

RESULTS

In this study, 7258 MS patients with ≥1 DMA were identified. Within two years, 16% of MS patients switched to a different DMA. The RF model obtained significantly better discrimination than the LR model (AUC = 0.65 vs. 0.63, p < 0.0001); however, the RF model had a similar predictive performance to the LR model with respect to F- and G-measures (RF: 72% and 73% vs. LR: 72% and 73%, respectively). The most influential features identified from the RF model were age, type of index medication, and year of index.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the LR model, RF performed better in predicting DMA switch in MS patients based on AUC measures; however, judged by F- and G-measures, the RF model performed similarly to LR. Further research is needed to understand the role of ML techniques in predicting treatment outcomes for the decision-making process to achieve optimal treatment goals.