Spinal cord stimulation: beyond pain management

Clinical study of short-term spinal cord stimulation for herpes zoster-associated pain

BACKGROUND

Zoster-associated neuralgia refers to neuropathic pain from herpes zoster, which can persist as postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Preventing the progression to chronic PHN is crucial, yet optimal interventions is still not clear.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the efficacy of short-term spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) in patients with subacute and chronic PHN.

METHODS

A clinical study involved 135 patients with herpes zoster-associated pain (HZAP), divided into two groups: Experimental group which received short-term spinal cord stimulation therapy, and Control group which received conventional medical treatment and nerve block therapy. Pain intensity, sleep quality, anxiety and depression and quality of life were assessed at baseline and at 2 weeks, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified factors associated with treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

At 1-month follow-up, the experimental group showed significantly higher efficacy in pain reduction (P < 0.01). Higher Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (β = 0.093, P = 0.004) and PHQ-9 scores (β = 0.065, P = 0.031) before treatment were associated with better outcomes. At 3 months, longer disease duration (β = 0.103, P = 0.008) and higher Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores (β = 0.114, P = 0.002) correlated with better efficacy, while higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores were negatively correlated (β = - 0.023, P = 0.036). Although as follow-up time increases, the significant superiority of efficacy gradually shrinks compared with nerve block therapy at 6-12 months, the tSCS group still had better effects in improving sleep quality, anxiety and depression symptoms, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term spinal cord stimulation is a safe and effective short-term treatment for HZAP, offering faster and more effective pain relief and quality of life improvement compared to nerve block therapy. However, there are challenges in maintaining the long-term effects of tSCS. Further studies with larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.

Multi-session transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation prevents chloridehomeostasis imbalance and the development of spasticity after spinal cordinjury in rat

Spasticity is a complex and multidimensional disorder that impacts nearly 75% of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and currently lacks adequate treatment options. This sensorimotor condition is burdensome as hyperexcitability of reflex pathways result in exacerbated reflex responses, co-contractions of antagonistic muscles, and involuntary movements. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has become a popular tool in the human SCI research field. The likeliness for this intervention to be successful as a noninvasive anti-spastic therapy after SCI is suggested by a mild and transitory improvement in spastic symptoms following a single stimulation session, but it remains to be determined if repeated tSCS over the course of weeks can produce more profound effects. Despite its popularity, the neuroplasticity induced by tSCS also remains widely unexplored, particularly due to the lack of suitable animal models to investigate this intervention. Thus, the basis of this work was to use tSCS over multiple sessions (multi-session tSCS) in a rat model to target spasticity after SCI and identify the long-term physiological improvements and anatomical neuroplasticity occurring in the spinal cord. Here, we show that multi-session tSCS in rats with an incomplete (severe T9 contusion) SCI (1) decreases hyperreflexia, (2) increases the low frequency-dependent modulation of the H-reflex, (3) prevents potassium-chloride cotransporter isoform 2 (KCC2) membrane downregulation in lumbar motoneurons, and (4) generally augments motor output, i.e., EMG amplitude in response to single pulses of tSCS, particularly in extensor muscles. Together, this work displays that multi-session tSCS can target and diminish spasticity after SCI as an alternative to pharmacological interventions and begins to highlight the underlying neuroplasticity contributing to its success in improving functional recovery.

The Invasive Management of Pain: Diagnosis and New Treatment Options

Both the diagnosis and treatment of pain are evolving, especially in interventional approaches. Diagnosis of low back pain combines old and new methodologies, in particular, it involves an expanded role for ultrasound. While low back pain is a common complaint, there are many etiologies to the condition which must be explored before a final diagnosis can be made and treatment planned. Tumors and infections are rarely involved in low back pain but should be ruled out in the initial phase itself since failing to address them early can have devastating consequences. Some invasive treatments seem promising in the management of low back pain. Treating musculoskeletal pain with regenerative medicine, such as platelet-rich plasma, holds great promise. Autologous blood products are safe and may help stimulate the body's own responses for regeneration. The so-called "orthobiologics" play a role in sports medicine and the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Neuromodulation, especially spinal cord stimulation, is undergoing a renaissance with new waveforms, devices, and a greater albeit incomplete understanding of its mechanisms of action. Spinal cord stimulation is not a first-line therapy and not all patients or all back problems respond to this treatment. Nevertheless, the therapy can be safe, effective, and cost-effective with appropriate patient selection. Radiofrequency ablation of nerves in the form of neurotomy can be effective in reducing the pain of osteoarthritis. These procedures, including the newer cooled radiofrequency neurotomy, can restore function, reduce pain, and may potentially have an opioid-sparing effect. Technical expertise in nerve and anatomy is needed for the use of this technique. This review article aims to provide updated information on some invasive intervention techniques in pain management.

A Case Report on Spinal Neurostimulator Treatment for Painful Postsurgical Neuropathy of the Genitofemoral Nerve

Painful postsurgical neuropathy is an adverse event inherent to a wide variety of surgical treatments, so its diagnosis and specialized treatment are essential to maintaining the quality of life of the people who suffer from it. We present the case of a 31-year-old male with neuropathy of the genitofemoral nerve diagnosed by electromyography, resulting in intractable left testicular and thigh pain associated with a recent history of ipsilateral inguinal hernioplasty. After assessment by pain medicine and motor and sensory tests, a neurostimulator was placed in T8-T9 with action at the L1-L2 level, as well as a simultaneous electrode in S3, generating optimal pain relief and recovery of functionality.

Spinal Cord Stimulation Meets Them All: An Effective Treatment for Different Pain Conditions. Our Experience and Literature Review

IntroductionSpinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is an emerging minimally invasive technique which uses neuromodulation to manage different forms of intractable pain. SCS is a well-established option for the treatment of various pain conditions, and nowadays, indications are ever increasing.Materials and MethodsIn this study, we present our case series of 49 patients who underwent SCS at our Institution for the treatment of pain from different etiologies, and discuss our 10-year experience in SCS. For the purpose of this study, we also performed a systematic review of current indications and new perspectives in SCS.ResultsAmong our case series, patients were differentiated into two groups upon prior spinal surgery: patients who had undergone prior spinal surgery for back pain were defined as the "FBSS (failed back surgery syndrome) group," instead patient suffering from different types of pain but who had never undergone surgery were defined as the "naive group." As regards clinical response to SCS, 20 patients out of 36 (55.56%) were classified as responders in the FBSS group; in the "naïve" group, 10 patients out of 13 (76.92%) were classified as responders. Among the "not responders" group, several patients suffered from infections.Of the recent literature about SCS, 2124 records were screened and 37 studies were finally included in the qualitative synthesis for our systematic review.DiscussionIn case of FBSS, surgical revision is often associated with a high morbidity and corresponding low rates of success. Unfortunately, patients affected by chronic pain often become refractory to conservative treatments. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is nowadays considered as an effective therapy for several chronic and neuropathic pain conditions, such as failed back surgery syndrome. As regards the economic impact of SCS, implantation of an SCS system results in short-term costs increase, but the annual cumulative costs decrease during the following years after implantation, when compared to the costs of conventional management. Beyond the application for the treatment of FBSS, SCS has also been used for the treatment of other types of chronic non-oncological pain such as neuropathic pain and chronic back pain ineligible for surgical intervention. This evidence paved the way to establishing the potential role of SCS also for the treatment of oncological pain. However, the effectiveness and relative safety of SCS for cancer-related pain has not yet been adequately established.ConclusionsSpinal Cord Stimulation is a well-established treatment option in for FBSS. Beyond that, SCS has also been used for the treatment of "naive" patients, suffering from other types of chronic, both oncological and non-oncological, medical-refractory pain such as neuropathic pain and chronic back pain ineligible for surgical intervention.

Regulation of Human Respiration by Electrical Stimulation

The review addresses modern methods of electrical stimulation used to regulate the function of external respiration in humans. The methods include abdominal functional stimulation of respiratory muscles, diaphragmatic stimulation, phrenic nerve stimulation, epidural and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. The physiological rationale of their application is described along with the examples of their use in clinical practice, including stimulation parameters and electrode placement diagrams for each of the methods. We analyze the effectiveness of each of the methods in patients with respiratory muscle paresis and the features of their use depending on the level of spinal cord injury. Special attention is paid to the method of epidural spinal cord stimulation because this technique is widely used in electrophysiological studies on animal models, providing deeper insight into the spinal levels of the functional control of external respiration. The review substantiates the great potential of using the method of transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation both in fundamental studies of external respiration and in clinical practice.

Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Unresponsive Cancer Pain: A Possible Solution in Palliative Oncological Therapy

(1) Background: Treatment of cancer-related pain is still challenging, and it can be managed by both medical and interventional therapies. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique, and its use is rapidly increasing in the treatment of chronic pain. (2) Materials and Methods: Our study aims to perform a review of the pertinent literature about current evidences in cancer pain treatment by Spinal Cord Stimulation. Moreover, we created a database based on case reports or case series (18 studies) in the literature. We analyzed a clinical group of oncological patients affected by intractable pain undergoing SCS implantation, focusing on outcome. (3) Results: The analysis of the 18 included studies in our series has shown a reduction in painful symptoms in 48 out of 56 treated patients (87.51%); also 53 out of 56 patients (96.64%) have shown an improvement in their Quality of Life (QoL). (4) Conclusions: Spinal Cord Stimulation can be considered an efficient method in the treatment of cancer-related pain. However, literature regarding SCS for the treatment of cancer-related pain is largely represented by case reports and small case series, with no effective population studies or Randomized Controlled Trials demonstrating the efficacy and the level of evidence. Further prospective studies are needed.