Feasibility of jejunal enteral nutrition for patients with severe duodenal injuries

Management of Traumatic Duodenal Injury: Is There a Role for Early Parenteral Nutrition?

INTRODUCTION

Traumatic duodenal injuries are complex in nature and pose major challenges to trauma surgeons. These injuries are associated with high mortality rates ranging from 18% to 30% and require prompt, comprehensive care. Traumatic injury induces a hypercatabolic state that mobilizes body energy stores, leading to muscle wasting, delayed healing, and potential multi-organ failure. Nutritional support is vital in keeping up with the metabolic demands of traumatically injured patients. However, exactly when and how nutrition should be provided for traumatic duodenal injuries is unclear. We hypothesize that patients who sustain high-grade duodenal injuries (grades III-V) will be unable to tolerate enteral nutrition (EN) and may benefit from early initiation of total parenteral nutrition (TPN).

METHODS

In this retrospective chart review study, we queried the trauma registry for patients admitted between January 2018 and December 2022 with duodenal injury. Individuals under the age of 18 and individuals who were pregnant were excluded. Twenty-eight patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was median number of days from initial injury to supplemental nutrition. We also evaluated the route used to achieve adequate nutrition based on duodenal injury grade (I-V), mortality based on duodenal injury grade, morbidity based on route of nutrition supplementation (hospital length of stay [LOS], intensive care unit LOS, and ventilator days), and complications based on route of nutrition supplementation.

RESULTS

Of the 28 patients analyzed, 11 received EN, 10 received TPN (6 of which survived to transition to EN), and 7 died within 3 d of admission and did not receive any form of nutrition. The median number of days post-trauma to toleration of enteral feeding (defined as by mouth or tube feeding that meet total caloric needs based on nutritionist recommendations) was 4 d for those who did tolerate and maintained tolerance of enteral feeding, compared to 7.5 d post-trauma to initiate total parenteral feeding (P = 0.061). Injury grades I and II tolerated EN within a median of 6 d, whereas injury grades III and IV showed inability to tolerate EN until after a median of 22 d or longer (P = 0.02). Mortality increased as injury grade increased. Patients who received TPN were more likely to develop abscesses than those receiving EN (80% vs 27%, P = 0.03) but not more likely to develop a duodenal leak (P = 0.31). Patients who received TPN had longer hospital LOS (35.5 d vs 9 d, P = 0.008), longer intensive care unit LOS (17 d vs 4 d, P = 0.005), and increased ventilator days (9 d vs 1 d, P = 0.005) when compared to patients who received EN.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with higher grade duodenal injuries showed inability to tolerate EN until after a median of 22 d, and therefore, consideration should be given to initiating TPN early to mitigate the catabolic effects of malnutrition. Further studies need to be done with a larger number of patients to evaluate the effects of malnutrition in these patients.

Surgical management of duodenal injury: experience from 92 cases

PURPOSE

Duodenal injury increases with traffic accidents, and delayed diagnosis or inappropriate operation increase mortality and complications. This study aimed to explore early recognition and timely surgical intervention.

METHODS

All patients with duodenal injuries treated operatively during the past 10 years were reviewed, and the data were analyzed retrospectively regarding the mechanism of injury, diagnostic and therapeutic methods, and outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients with duodenal injuries accounted for 7.3% of 1258 patients with abdominal injury. Of the 92 patients, 71 (77.17%) experienced blunt trauma, with traffic accidents accounting for 59.2% (42/71). In 35 patients, a preoperative diagnosis was obtained by reviewing abdominal signs, peritoneocentesis, and imaging. The remaining 57 patients underwent urgent laparotomy, through which a definitive diagnosis of duodenal injury was confirmed during the operation. In all 92 patients, the surgical procedures involved simple sutures; pedicled jejunal piece coverings; and various anastomoses following resection of the injured duodenal portion, including the Whipple procedure and damage-control surgery principles. The overall mortality rate was 12.0% (11/92) with deaths mainly occurring due to associated injuries. When excluding 2 cases of intraoperative death, there were 47 cases in the double-tube gastrostomy group and 43 cases in the traditional triple-tube group, with mortality rates of 10.64% and 9.30% in the two groups, respectively (χ2 = 0.045, P > 0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 15 patients (18.5%). There was a high incidence of duodenal (or pancreatic/biliary) leakage.

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis and operation of duodenal injury are crucial to reducing complications and mortality. Surgical methods should be based on injury grade, associated injuries, and vital signs. Double-tube gastrostomy can reduce complications such as intestinal obstruction.

Gastric feeding intolerance in critically ill patients during sustained pharmacologic neuromuscular blockade

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess gastric feeding intolerance for critically ill patients who received sustained neuromuscular blocker (NMB) pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

Adult patients (>17 years of age) admitted to the trauma intensive care unit who received continuous intravenous NMB pharmacotherapy (rocuronium, cisatracurium, vecuronium, or pancuronium) for ≥48 h during continuous intragastric enteral nutrition (EN) were retrospectively evaluated. Gastric feeding intolerance was defined by initiation of a prokinetic agent (metoclopramide, erythromycin, or both) for an elevated gastric residual volume (GRV) >300 ml and with distention of the abdomen by physical examination, observation of regurgitation or emesis, temporary discontinuation of EN with low intermittent gastric suctioning, or initiation of parenteral nutrition (PN). Patients were evaluated for gastric feeding intolerance for the first 3 days of combined EN and NMB pharmacotherapy. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Ten patients of the 47 patients (21%) were intolerant to EN during NMB pharmacotherapy. No statistically or clinically relevant differences in patient characteristics were found between patients who tolerated EN vs those who experienced gastric feeding intolerance, except for a higher median maximum GRV of 125 ml (28, 200) vs 300 (250, 400) ml, respectively (P < 0.001). Five patients responded to prokinetic therapy and five required PN.

CONCLUSION

Most patients tolerated intragastric EN during sustained NMB pharmacotherapy. Presence of NMB pharmacotherapy is not an absolute contraindication for EN.

Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines

Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree injuries are rare in both adult and pediatric trauma patients, and due to their anatomical location, associated injuries are very common. Mortality is primarily related to associated injuries, but morbidity remains high even in isolated injuries. Optimal management of duodeno-bilio-pancreatic injuries is dictated primarily by hemodynamic stability, clinical presentation, and grade of injury. Endoscopic and percutaneous interventions have increased the ability to non-operatively manage these injuries. Late diagnosis and treatment are both associated to increased morbidity and mortality. Sequelae of late presentations of pancreatic injury and complications of severe pancreatic trauma are also increasingly addressed endoscopically and with interventional radiology procedures. However, for moderate and severe extrahepatic biliary and severe duodeno-pancreatic injuries, immediate operative intervention is preferred as associated injuries are frequent and commonly present with hemodynamic instability or peritonitis. The aim of this paper is to present the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) duodenal, pancreatic, and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma management guidelines.

Jejunostomy with Enteroenterostomy for Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Trauma Patients. A Novel Technique

Purpose The aim of the current study was to report the surgical outcome and complications of jejunostomy with enteroenterostomy for enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill trauma patients with prolonged nasogastric (NG) nutrition. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out in a level I trauma center in Shiraz, southern Iran during a one-year period from 2016 to 2017. We included a total number of 30 patients with severe trauma admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with more than three months NG nutrition and bowel atrophy. We performed a novel jejunostomy with an enteroenterostomy procedure for providing a route for enteral nutrition in all 30 patients. The rate of complications, such as dislodgement, clogging, obstruction, leakage, mucosal bleeding, and infection, were recorded and reported. We also recorded the hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS). Results We included a total number of 30 patients with a mean age of 35.64 ± 8.91 years, and there were 23 (76.6%) men and seven (23.4%) women among the patients. Overall, 14 (46.6%) patients experienced complications related to the jejunostomy with enteroenterostomy. The most common complication was nausea and vomiting (33.3%) and distention (33.3%), followed by surgical site infection (30.0%). The mean ICU LOS and hospital LOS was found to be 16.8 ± 3.7 and 24.3 ± 4.1 days, respectively. The overall mortality rate was 17 (56.6%), which was secondary to the primary injury and was not related to the procedure. Conclusion Jejunostomy with enteroenterostomy is a safe and feasible method for providing a route for EN in critically ill trauma patients with prolonged NG nutrition and bowel atrophy.