Xu X, Yang Z, Ma T, Li Z, Chen Y, Zheng Y, Dong J. Novel equation for estimating resting energy expenditure in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Am J Clin Nutr 2021;
113:1647-1656. [PMID:
33693520 DOI:
10.1093/ajcn/nqaa431]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
In chronic kidney disease (CKD), determining energy expenditure is the precondition for recommending energy intake in nutrition management.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to develop and validate a resting energy expenditure (REE) equation for patients with CKD.
METHODS
This cross-sectional study enrolled 300 patients with CKD (stages 3-5) according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stepwise linear regression analysis was used to derive a new REE equation (eREE-CKD) according to actual REE (aREE) measured using indirect calorimetry in the development dataset. The eREE-CKD value was then validated with aREE in the validation dataset and compared with values from existing equations obtained in general populations, namely, the Harris-Benedict, Mifflin, WHO, and Schofield equations in terms of bias, precision, and accuracy.
RESULTS
The eREE-CKD equation: eREE-CKD (kcal) = (1 if male; 0 if female) × 106.0 - [1 if diabetes mellitus (DM); 0 if non-DM] × 51.6 - 4.7 × age (y) + 13.1 × weight (kg) + 645.5 (R2 = 0.779).The bias, precision, and accuracy (percentage of estimates that differed >20% from the measured REE) of the eREE-CKD equation were -0.4 (IQR: -29.8, 23.8) kcal, 98.4 (IQR: 79.5, 116.6) kcal, and 5.4%, respectively with indirect calorimetry as the reference method. Both bias and precision of the eREE-CKD were significantly better than the Harris-Benedict, WHO, and Schofield equations (P < 0.001) and similar to the Mifflin equation (P = 0.125 for bias and 0.268 for precision). Accuracy of the eREE-CKD was significantly better than the Harris-Benedict, WHO, Mifflin, and Schofield equations (P < 0.001). Bias, precision, and accuracy of the eREE-CKD equation were consistent when applied to subgroups categorized according to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations and CKD stages, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The eREE-CKD equation using age, sex, weight, and DM data could serve as a reliable tool for estimating REE in patients with CKD. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03377413.
Collapse