Impact of visceral adipose tissue on long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

Usefulness of the preoperative inflammation-based prognostic score and the ratio of visceral fat area to psoas muscle area on predicting survival for surgically resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenic obesity is associated with gastrointestinal cancer prognosis through systemic inflammation. However, in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), the relationship between the inflammation-based prognostic score (IBPS), muscle loss, visceral fat mass, and prognosis has not been sufficiently evaluated. We investigated the prognostic value of the preoperative IBPS and the visceral fat area ratio to the psoas muscle area (V/P ratio) in patients with AEG undergoing surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 92 patients with AEG who underwent surgery. The prognostic value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, systemic inflammation response index, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, prognostic nutritional index, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, and V/P ratio at the third lumbar vertebra was investigated using univariate and multivariate survival analyses.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that a high pathological stage (p = 0.0065), high PLR (p = 0.0421), and low V/P ratio (p = 0.0053) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival (OS). When restricted to patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2, a high V/P ratio was a poor prognostic factor (p = 0.0463) for OS. Conversely, when restricted to patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2, a low V/P ratio was a poor prognostic factor (p = 0.0021) for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both PLR and V/P ratios may be useful prognostic biomarkers in surgical cases of AEG. V/P ratio and BMI may provide an accurate understanding of the muscle and fat mass's precise nature and may help predict AEG prognosis.

Impact of Preoperative Nutritional Assessment on Other-Cause Survival after Gastrectomy in Patients with Gastric Cancer

This study aimed to clarify the factors associated with death due to other diseases after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who had undergone gastrectomy between April 2008 and June 2018 for primary stage II-III gastric cancer. The primary outcome was other-cause survival. To identify prognostic factors for other-cause survival for univariate analysis, we used a Cox proportional hazard regression model. A total of 512 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 67.93 years, and the average body mass index was 22.75 kg/m², with 84 (16.4%) being moderately malnourished and 88 (17.2%) being severely malnourished, as defined by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. The other-cause survival for the malnourished group was significantly worse than that for the normal group (p < 0.001). The prognosis was worse when the severity of malnutrition was worse (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that severe malnutrition was significantly independent of prognostic factors for other-cause survival (hazard ratio: 3.310; 95% confidence interval: 1.426-7.682; p = 0.005). Undernutrition, as defined by the GLIM criteria, is useful for the preoperative prediction of death due to other diseases after gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Impact of Sex-Specific Preoperative Fat Mass Assessment on Long-Term Prognosis after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

We investigated the impact of the difference in fat distribution between men and women on long-term prognosis after gastrectomy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with advanced gastric cancer deeper than p-T2 who underwent gastrectomy between April 2008 and June 2018 were included. Visceral fat mass index (VFI) and subcutaneous fat mass index (SFI) were calculated by dividing the cross-sectional area at the umbilical level by the height squared. The medians of VFI and SFI by sex were defined as cut-off values, below which values were defined as low VFI and low SFI. Of the 485 patients, 323 (66.6%) were men and 162 (33.4%) were women. Men with a low VFI had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) (p = 0.004) and women with a low SFI had a significantly worse OS (p = 0.007). Patients with a low VFI and low SFI had the worst prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that a low VFI was an independent poor prognostic factor in men, while a low SFI was an independent poor prognostic factor in women. In conclusion, a low visceral fat mass in men and a low subcutaneous fat mass in women were independent poor prognostic factors after radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Association of visceral adipose tissue with postoperative outcome in upper gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the relation between visceral fat mass and long-term postoperative prognosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of preoperative visceral fat mass with postoperative complications and overall survival (OS) in patients with upper GI cancer.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE (Dialog), the WHO International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov and identified observational studies published from inception through 20 July 2022. We conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of studies including patients who were surgically treated for upper GI cancer and whose visceral fat mass was assessed on the basis of body composition. We independently assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence using the Quality In Prognosis Studies and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, respectively. The primary outcome was OS. HRs and 95% CIs for OS were pooled.

RESULTS

Ninety-one studies (n = 20,583) were included. All studies used computed tomography (CT) to assess the body composition of patients. Twenty-four studies reported the relation between high visceral fat and postoperative outcomes, and their results were synthesized. Compared with low visceral adipose tissue, high visceral adipose tissue assessed by CT may improve OS (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.87; I2 = 65%; n = 3407). The risk of bias for OS in each study was moderate or high. The certainty of evidence for OS was very low because of inconsistency in the forest plot, the moderate or high risk of bias, and publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

High visceral fat may be associated with improved OS after radical resection in patients with upper GI cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and mitigate the risk.

Visceral Adipose Tissue Assessment Enhances the Prognostic Value of GLIM Criteria in Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy after Neoadjuvant Treatment

BACKGROUND

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria has been recently published for diagnosing malnutrition in adults. However, the validity of the GLIM criteria has not been well-established in patients with gastric cancer (GC) treated with neoadjuvant treatment (NT) followed by radical gastrectomy. The present study aimed to explore the prognostic value of GLIM-defined malnutrition before NT and after NT in GC patients and to investigate whether additional visceral adipose tissue (VAT) assessment could improve the predictive power of the GLIM criteria for NT-related adverse events (AEs) and long-term survival.

METHODS

GC patients who underwent radical surgery after NT from June 2016 to June 2020 were enrolled in this study. The cross-sectional areas of total skeletal muscle (TSM) and VAT were measured using computed tomography (CT) before NT and after NT. GLIM-defined malnutrition was diagnosed using the two-step approach, including nutritional risk screening and diagnostic assessment. Low VAT was also added to the diagnosis of malnutrition in this study. The predictive value of these malnutrition diagnoses for NT-related AEs, and long-term survival was evaluated in GC patients.

RESULTS

A total of 182 GC patients were included in this study, of which 66 (36.3%) patients before NT and 55 (30.2%) patients after NT were diagnosed with GLIM-defined malnutrition, respectively. In addition to GLIM-defined malnutrition, 54 (29.7%) patients had additional low VAT before NT, and 39 (21.4%) patients had additional low VAT after NT. GLIM-defined malnutrition alone before NT was not associated with NT-related AEs in GC patients. The addition of low VAT to GLIM-defined malnutrition led to a significant predictive value for NT-related AEs. Furthermore, GLIM-defined malnutrition before NT and after NT were both identified as independent risk factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The combination of low VAT and GLIM-defined malnutrition showed a higher hazard ratio for the prediction of OS and DFS both before NT and after NT.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of VAT assessment using CT improved the predictive value of GLIM-defined malnutrition for NT-related AEs and long-term survival in GC patients treated with NT followed by radical gastrectomy, which further supports the prognostic importance of assessing adipose tissue simultaneously during the routine nutritional assessment in patients with cancer.

Impact of malnutrition as defined by the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria on the long-term prognosis in older patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy

PURPOSE

This study investigated whether or not the impact of malnutrition, as defined by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, on the long-term prognosis after gastrectomy differed between older and young patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

This study included patients with primary stage I-III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between April 2008 and June 2018. Patients were divided into normal, moderate, and severe malnutrition groups according to the GLIM criteria for the body mass index (BMI) and body weight loss (BWL). The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 512 patients, 274 (53.5%) were included in the younger group (< 70 years old) and 238 (46.5%) in the older group (≥ 70 years old). The prevalence of moderate and severe malnutrition was significantly higher in the older group than in the younger group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). A multivariate analysis showed that moderate malnutrition [hazard ratio (HR) 1.793, P = 0.028] and severe malnutrition (HR 2.374, P = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors in the older group but not in the younger group.

CONCLUSION

GLIM criteria-defined malnutrition did not correlate with the prognosis in the younger group, whereas moderate and severe malnutrition were independent poor prognostic factors for the OS in the older group.