Magnetic resonance arthrography

Ferumoxytol magnetic resonance imaging detects joint and pleural infiltration of bone sarcomas in pediatric and young adult patients

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of joint infiltration by a malignant bone tumor affects surgical management. The specificity of standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing joint infiltration is limited. During our MRI evaluations with ferumoxytol nanoparticles of pediatric and young adult patients with bone sarcomas, we observed a surprising marked T1 enhancement of joint and pleural effusions in some patients but not in others.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if nanoparticle extravasation differed between joints and pleura with and without tumor infiltration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 15 pediatric and young adult patients (mean age: 16±4 years) with bone sarcomas who underwent 18 MRI scans at 1 h (n=7) or 24 h (n=11) after intravenous ferumoxytol infusion. Twelve patients also received a gadolinium-enhanced MRI. We determined tumor invasion into the joint or pleural space based on histology (n=11) and imaging findings (n=4). We compared the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of the joint or pleural fluid for tumors with and without invasion using a Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

MRI scans 24 h after intravenous ferumoxytol infusion demonstrated a positive T1 enhancement of the effusion in all joints and pleural spaces with tumor infiltration and no joint or pleural space without infiltration. Corresponding SNR (P=0.004) and CNR (P=0.004) values were significantly higher for joints and pleural spaces with tumor infiltration than without. By contrast, unenhanced MRI, gadolinium-enhanced MRI and 1-h post-contrast ferumoxytol MRI did not show any enhancement of the joint or pleural effusion, with or without tumor infiltration.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that 24-h post-contrast ferumoxytol MRI scans can noninvasively differentiate between joints with and without tumor infiltration.

Chondrolysis of the Hip following Septic Arthritis: A Rare Complication of Magnetic Resonance Arthrography

Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) is commonly used to detect labral tears of the hip. Complications of MRA are unusual and include minor reactions such as chemical synovitis and urticaria. This paper presents a rapidly progressive chondrolysis of the hip in a young patient after arthrography. The patient had suffered from acute septic arthritis and was treated by emergent arthroscopic surgery followed by appropriate antibiotics. At 18 months of followup, there were no signs of active infection but evidence of joint chondrolysis. Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the hip is an invasive procedure and should therefore be recommended judiciously. Post-MRA pain is common but often mild and temporary, while post-MRA joint infection is rare; nevertheless, severe joint pain and limitation should raise suspicion for septic hip.

CT arthrography, MR arthrography, PET, and scintigraphy in osteoarthritis

CT arthrography and MR arthrography are accurate methods for the study of surface cartilage lesions and cartilage loss. They also provide information on subchondral bone and marrow changes, and ligaments and meniscal lesions that can be associated with osteoarthritis. Nuclear medicine also offers new insights in the assessment of the disease. This article discusses the strengths and limitations of CT arthrography and MR arthrography. It also highlights nuclear medicine methods that may be relevant to the study of osteoarthritis in research and clinical practice.

MR arthrography of the ankle: indications and technique

MR arthrography has become an important tool for the assessment of a variety of ankle disorders. MR arthrography permits more sensitive imaging of suspected intra-articular pathology in cases in which conventional MR imaging is either insufficient or inadequate for diagnosis or treatment planning. The main indications for MR arthrography are the evaluation of ligamentous injuries, impingement syndromes, cartilage lesions, osteochondral lesions of the talus, loose bodies, and several synovial joint disorders. Indirect MR arthrography can be a useful adjunct to conventional MR imaging and may be preferable to direct MR arthrography in those cases in which an invasive procedure is contraindicated or image guidance is not available.