Soft tissue and biomechanical challenges encountered with the management of distal tibia nonunions

Proximal tibial replacement with megaprosthesis in the setting of proximal tibial nonunion: A case report

Background

Fracture nonunion is a major concern among an orthopaedic patient population, especially in those who have sustained traumatic fractures involving the tibia. Strong risk factors for nonunion include age, smoking history, and a poor diet. The incidence of nonunion also increases with each additional failed surgical intervention.

Methods

Our retrospective case study involved 56-year-old woman with a history of chronic low back pain, osteopenia, malnutrition, smoking, marijuana use, and alcohol use, who presented with a proximal tibia fracture after a fall, initial treatment included temporization with multiplanar external fixation and subsequent internal fixation. Five weeks later, she presented with atrophic nonunion. She subsequently underwent multiple unsuccessful surgeries to address her nonunion, including open repair with bone grafting and multiplanar external fixation for bone transport. Ultimately, the nonunion was addressed by proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis with excellent clinical results.

Results and conclusion

Replacement of a proximal tibia with megaprosthesis is a viable option for limb salvage, especially when all alternative treatments have been unsuccessful.

Nonunion of the distal one-fourth of the tibia treated by retrograde tibial intramedullary nail

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of retrograde tibial intramedullary nail (RTN) in addressing nonunion in the distal one-fourth of the tibia.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients who were treated with RTN for nonunion in the distal one-fourth of the tibia between December 2020 and August 2023. Data regarding age, sex, injury mechanism, fracture type, initial fixation method, nonunion duration and type, risk factors, surgical duration, hospital stay, time to bone union, ankle function at final follow-up, and any complications were extracted from hospital records and analysed.

RESULTS

Five patients in total were included, with previous treatments comprising locking plates and/or external fixation. The mean duration of RTN surgery was 94.0 ± 13.7 min, and mean duration of hospital stay was 9.8 ± 1.9 days. Patients were monitored for 10-18 months post RTN, achieving complete bone healing within a mean of 4.8 months. At the latest follow-up, the mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 84.4 ± 6.8 (range, 77-95). No complications, such as infection, reoperation, implant issues, rotational deformity, or shortening were reported.

CONCLUSION

RTN emerges as a dependable, minimally invasive, and safe treatment modality for managing nonunion in the distal one-fourth of the tibia.

Antibiotic cement-coated plate is a viable and efficient technique for the definitive management of metaphyseal septic nonunions of the femur and tibia

OBJECTIVE

the management of septic metaphyseal nonunions is challenging, with inconsistent outcomes. Antibiotic cement-coated implants have been demonstrated good outcome for diaphyseal infected nonunions, however there is no data in metaphyseal infected nonunions.

METHODS

fifteen adult patients with septic metaphyseal nonunions of the femur or tibia were treated with antibiotic cement-coated plates. The antibiotic cement-coated plate was prepared with either gentamicin or vancomycin. Outcome measures were infection control, bone healing, return to pre-injury level on daily activities, and quality of life at the last follow-up visit. A p value of <5% was considered significant.

RESULTS

Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus was isolated in 53.3% cases. Average postoperative follow-up time was 18 months. Local infection control and radiographic bone healing were adequately achieved in 93.3% patients. No patient presented recurrent symptoms of surgical site infection. Fourteen patients reported to be either able, or on the same level as before injury, with 73.3% reporting no problems in all five dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L. Persistent infection was the only variable associated with a reduced long-term quality of life.

CONCLUSION

antibiotic cement-coated plate is a viable and efficient surgical technique for the definitive management of juxta-articular metaphyseal septic nonunions of the femur and tibia.

O uso de placas revestidas de cimentado com antibiótico é uma técnica viável e eficiente para o tratamento da pseudoartrose infectada da metáfise do fêmur e da tíbia

RESUMO Introdução: implantes revestidos de cimento com antibiótico vêm demonstrando bons resultados no tratamento da pseudoartrose infectada da diáfise, no entanto seu uso na metáfise dos ossos longos ainda é pouco explorado. Neste estudo relatamos uma série de casos de pseudoartrose infectada da metáfise do fêmur e da tíbia tratados com o uso de placas revestidas de cimento com antibiótico. Métodos: Os antibióticos usados foram gentamicina e/ou vancomicina. Os desfechos analisados na última visita ambulatorial foram controle de infecção, consolidação óssea, retorno às atividades diárias e qualidade de vida. Regressão linear bivariada foi usada para avaliar fatores individuais que afetaram a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. Um valor p<5% foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados: quinze pacientes adultos foram incluídos no estudo. S. aureus suscetível à meticilina foi isolado em 53,3% dos casos. O tempo médio de acompanhamento pós-operatório foi de 18 meses. Controle local da infecção e consolidação óssea radiográfica foram alcançados em 93,3% dos pacientes. Nenhum paciente apresentou sintomas recorrentes de infecção de sítio cirúrgico. Quatorze pacientes relataram ser capazes, mas não no nível pré-lesional ou no mesmo nível de antes da lesão, com 73,3% relatando nenhum problema em todas as cinco dimensões do EQ-5D-3L. Infecção persistente foi a única variável associada à redução da qualidade de vida a longo prazo. Conclusão: A placa revestida de cimento com antibiótico mostrou-se uma técnica cirúrgica viável e eficiente para o tratamento da pseudoartrose infectada da metáfise do fêmur e da tíbia.

Treatment of open and comminuted mid-distal tibial fractures by bilateral external fixation combined with limited-internal fixation

Open and comminuted mid-distal fractures often result from high-energy trauma, and a concomitant poor blood supply often leads to skin necrosis, infection, and bone union. To circumvent such complications, we used limited-reduction and bilateral-external fixators to treat open and comminuted mid-distal tibial fractures with compromised soft tissue. A retrospective series of 34 patients who had open and comminuted mid-distal tibial fractures and treated by bilateral-external fixators with limited-internal fixation were analyzed. Patients were followed for 10-25 months (mean: 12 months) post-treatment and osseous union was achieved in each case. The average union time was 16.3 weeks. Based on the Johner- Wruhs criteria, the retrospective series consisted of 21 'excellent' cases, 8 'good' cases, 4 'fair' cases, and a 'poor' case. The total percentage of 'excellent' and 'good' cases of fracture recovery was 85.29%. Bilateral-external and limited-internal fixators pro- vided high bone union rate and excellent ankle-joint motion. Hence, it is an appropriate surgical approach for treating open and comminuted mid-distal tibial fractures with compromised soft tissue.

A Novel technique of three-ring Ilizarov fixator frame in gap non-union of tibia

INTRODUCTION

Gap non-union of tibia occurring mostly after trauma and many times complicated by infection, is a difficult problem to treat. The study aimed to assess the outcome of the three-ring construct of the Ilizarov fixator frame in the management of gap non-union of the tibia.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 30 patients of gap non-union of tibia operated from April 2016 to March 2019 with a three-ring Ilizarov fixator frame and follow-up done till March 2021. The mean age was 39.27 (range 10-66) years. The results were assessed by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. MPTA, PPTA, and LDTA after removal of the frame were also measured.

RESULTS

Out of the total 30 cases, all the patients showed complete union. The Ilizarov fixator was kept for an average period of 11.43 months and the mean defect size was 7.17 (range 2-12) cm. All patients were followed up for an average period of 39.36 (range 24-54) months. According to the ASAMI score bone/radiological results, 27 were classified as excellent, 2 as good, and 1 as poor. Functionally 28 were graded as excellent and the remainder as good. The normal ranges of MPTA, LDTA & PPTA were also achieved in a majority (80%) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results after using only a three-ring Ilizarov fixator frame are almost equivalent to earlier studies and have advantages such as less weight, better patient compliance, superior radiographic visualization, easy mobilization, and reduced costs. Ilizarov ring fixator remains an excellent treatment modality for tibial non-union with a defect, regarding bone union, deformity correction, infection eradication, limb-length achievement, and limb function.

Growth Factors, Carrier Materials, and Bone Repair

This chapter provides an overview of the growth factors active in bone regeneration and healing. Both normal and impaired bone healing are discussed, with a focus on the spatiotemporal activity of the various growth factors known to be involved in the healing response. The review highlights the activities of most important growth factors impacting bone regeneration, with a particular emphasis on those being pursued for clinical translation or which have already been marketed as components of bone regenerative materials. Current approaches the use of bone grafts in clinical settings of bone repair (including bone grafts) are summarized, and carrier systems (scaffolds) for bone tissue engineering via localized growth factor delivery are reviewed. The chapter concludes with a consideration of how bone repair might be improved in the future.

Open reduction and internal fixation of Gustilo type-I and type-II open pilon fractures using a lateral approach

BACKGROUND

Traditional anteromedial incision for pilon fractures would further increase the damage to the subcutaneous tissues anterior and medial to tibia. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the method and the outcomes of lateral approach for surgical treatment of Gustilo type-I and type-II open pilon fractures with medial soft tissue injuries.

METHODS

From May 2014 to September 2017, 35 patients with Gustilo type-I and type-II open pilon fractures were treated with standard protocol using a lateral approach. The initial wound debridement and application of a spanning external fixator or traction of calcaneal tubercle were performed within 24 h and a definitive fixation was performed when the wound was healed. The mean time from primary surgery to definite surgery was 11.8 (range: 8-16) days. Postoperative radiographs, complications, bone union, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle/hind foot score were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 17 months (range: 13-23). The average time to bone union was 22 weeks (range: 18-25). In 35 patients, 2 patients had a superficial wound infection and another 1 patient showed limitation of ankle joint motion. No cases of deep infection, skin necrosis, and symptomatic implant reported. The mean AOFAS score was 89.8 (range: 84-95). On final outcome, 25 patients come under excellent and 10 patients had good result.

CONCLUSION

From the results of this study, we can conclude that the lateral approach to treat Gustilo type-I and type-II open pilon fractures was a safe option with a low complication rate. On the other hand, it provides sufficient exposure to restore anatomic articulation, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

Comparison of intramedullary nail, plate, and external fixation in the treatment of distal tibia nonunions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine time to union of extra-articular distal tibia nonunions based on fracture type and fixation methods: intramedullary nail (IMN), plate osteosynthesis (PO), and external fixation (EF).

METHODS

This retrospective chart review included all patients who presented at a Level I trauma center with AO/OTA 43A & distal third 42A-C fracture nonunions between 2008 and 2014. Fixation methods were recorded and patient course was followed until nonunion had healed clinically.

RESULTS

Thirty-three distal tibia nonunions were included, and 29 reached eventual union (88%). Five AO/OTA fracture types were present. Mean times to union from nonunion diagnosis between original fracture types were compared (p = 0.203). Comminuted fracture types had longer times to union from nonunion diagnosis compared to simple fracture types (78 vs. 46 weeks, p = 0.051) and more revision fixations (1.5 vs. 0.5, p = 0.037). Mean time to union from nonunion diagnosis was shorter when no revision fixation was done compared to revisions (15 vs. 42 weeks, p = 0.102). Times to union from nonunion diagnosis without revision fixation were: IMN (12 weeks), PO (27 weeks), and EF (13 weeks) (p = 0.202). Times to union from definitive revision fixation were: IMN (17 weeks), PO (21 weeks), and EF (66 weeks) (p = 0.009), with EF taking significantly longer than both other methods. 21 patients (64%) underwent revision fixation. Revision fail rates were: IMN (0/6, 0%), PO (2/8, 25%), and EF (15/21, 71%). Time to union was longer in revisions that changed fixation method compared to revisions that used the same method (51 vs. 18 weeks, p = 0.030). Deep infections were also associated with longer union times (81 vs. 47 weeks, p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nonunion population, comminuted fracture types needed more time and revisions to reach union. Time to union was only clinically shorter when revision fixation was not performed, but IMN and PO were both successful fixation options with significantly shorter times to union than EF. Mean time to union increased even more when revision of fixation method was performed vs. exchange revision, as did nonunions with deep infections.