Evaluation and treatment of failed carpal tunnel release

State of the art review. Upper extremity revision nerve compression surgery

Although surgical release of upper extremity nerve compression syndromes is highly effective, persistence or recurrence of symptoms and signs may occur. Thorough investigation is necessary in this situation before treatment is recommended. If the symptoms cannot be explained by other pathology than compression of the affected nerve and if conservative management has not provided improvement, reoperation may be considered. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic and surgical considerations in the revision of carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome and thoracic outlet syndrome.Level of evidence: V.

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment disorder worldwide. The epidemiology and risk factors, including family burden, for developing CTS are multi-factorial. Despite much research, its intricate pathophysiological mechanism(s) are not fully understood. An underlying subclinical neuropathy may indicate an increased susceptibility to developing CTS. Although surgery is often performed for CTS, clear international guidelines to indicate when to perform non-surgical or surgical treatment, based on stage and severity of CTS, remain to be elucidated. Neurophysiological examination, using electrophysiology or ultrasonography, performed in certain circumstances, should correlate with the history and findings in clinical examination of the person with CTS. History and clinical examination are particularly relevant globally owing to lack of other equipment. Various instruments are used to assess CTS and treatment outcomes as well as the effect of the disorder on quality of life. The surgical treatment options of CTS - open or endoscopic - offer an effective solution to mitigate functional impairments and pain. However, there are risks of post-operative persistent or recurrent symptoms, requiring meticulous diagnostic re-evaluation before any additional surgery. Health-care professionals should have increased awareness about CTS and all its implications. Future considerations of CTS include use of linked national registries to understand risk factors, explore possible screening methods, and evaluate diagnosis and treatment with a broader perspective beyond surgery, including psychological well-being.

State of the art review. Complications after carpal tunnel release

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is the most performed surgery of the upper extremity. It is effective but not without complications. This state-of-the-art review covers most common intra- and postoperative complications after CTR. As endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) has developed over time, severe complications, such as nerve lesions, have diminished. ECTR still has a higher risk on transient nerve lesions. Open CTR on the other hand has a higher incidence of wound-related problems, including scar tenderness, irrespective of incision used. Most complications, such as pillar pain and infection, are ill-defined in the literature, leaving the exact incidence unknown and proposing challenges in treatment. The same is true for failure of treatment. Optimizing the length and location of incisions has played a vital role in reducing intra- and postoperative complications in CTR. It is expected that technical advances, such as ultrasound-guided percutaneous carpal tunnel release, will continue to play a role in the future.Level of evidence: V.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Revision Within 1 Year of Primary Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

The annual volume of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in the United States has been estimated to be 577 000 per year. Our objectives were to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for revision CTR within 1 year of primary CTR.

METHODS

We identified all adult patients undergoing primary CTR from October 2015 to September 2019 in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We used the CPT modifier codes to determine laterality of index and revision procedures. We estimated multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models to evaluate risk factors for revision CTR within 1 year.

RESULTS

Of the 80 423 primary CTR procedures, 178 (0.22%) underwent a revision CTR within 1 year of the index surgery. The mean (SD) age of the entire cohort was 58.69 (14.43) years, 61.1% were women, 73.2% were non-Hispanic white, 42.9% were covered through private insurance, and 9.5% had diabetes mellitus. Workers' compensation insurance (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.98, P = .02) and simultaneous bilateral CTR (OR = 14.91, 95% CI, 9.62-23.12, P < .001) were associated with revision CTR within 1 year of the index procedure. No models demonstrated an association between endoscopic technique or surgeon volume and revision CTR.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of revision CTR within 1 year was lower than that previously reported. Patients covered by workers' compensation and those undergoing simultaneous bilateral CTR had higher likelihood of a revision CTR within 1 year, whereas endoscopic technique and surgeon volume were not associated with revision CTR within 1 year.

Compression Neuropathies: Revisions and Managing Expectations

Most compression neuropathies can be reliably treated with surgical decompression; however, in approximately 25% of the cases, this release fails, requiring revision surgery. Defining the correct diagnosis after a failed nerve decompression (ie, persistent, recurrent, or new symptoms) is of the utmost importance and guides toward the optimal treatment. This article describes the clinical categorization of secondary carpal tunnel syndrome and cubital tunnel syndrome, intraoperative principles of revision surgery and treatment options that are currently available.

A clinical study of thread carpal tunnel release with a newly developed thread: A retrospective pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown that, thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR), an ultrasound-guided transverse carpal ligament (TCL) transection procedure through needle and thread, to be a safe and effective technique for carpal tunnel release, compared to an open and endoscopic technique. We developed a newly improved thread (Smartwire-01, 0.27mm in diameter, Korea). This pilot study was performed to propose the effectiveness of TCTR with Smartwire-01 compared to the commercial thread in clinical settings.

METHODS

A total of 22 TCTR procedures have been performed on 19 patients by one physiatrist during a 42-month period. The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome was based on standard clinical criteria including electromyography (EMG). Patients were divided into two groups, one dissected with commercial thread and the other with Smartwire-01. The technique was standardized by keeping the entry point at the middle of the palm and the exit point at just medial to the palmaris longus tendon. The Numeric Rating Scale and Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) were used to assess monthly outcomes for 6 months following the procedure. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Mann-Whitney-U test were performed to analyze the above variables in the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no definite evidence that the two groups have significant differences for any of the surveyed variables. The TCTR procedure with our newly developed thread also had significant improvements for all variables, showing its effectiveness in both pain and functional ability. The NRS and BCTQ severity and functional scales showed significant decreases just after the dissection and progressive improvement during each monthly follow-up of our study until the last assessment at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that, our newly developed thread is as safe and effective as the commercial thread in TCTR, we therefore recommend a randomize controlled trial with above methodology.

Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Mechanical Wrist Traction as Non-Invasive Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Background: For patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the only long-term effective treatment option is carpal tunnel release surgery. Up to one-third report recurrent symptoms, and 12% needs repeated surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of mechanical traction as a non-invasive treatment option for CTS compared to care as usual.

Methods: Patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS [N = 181; mean age, 58.1 (13.0) years; 67% women] were recruited from an outpatient neurology clinic in the Netherlands. Patients completed baseline questionnaires and randomized to the intervention group (12 treatments with mechanical traction, twice a week for 6 weeks) or care as usual. The primary clinical outcome measure was surgery during the 12-month follow-up. Secondly, we assessed symptom severity with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. Changes in CTS symptom severity between baseline and the 12-month follow-up were analyzed between groups using t-tests and a multiple linear regression analyses, adjusting for duration of complaints, age, gender, and symptom severity at baseline.

Results: At the 12-month follow-up, 35 of 94 (37%) patients in the intervention group had surgery, compared to 38 of 87 (44%) in the care-as-usual group (χ12 = 0.78, p = 0.377). Symptom severity and functional status scores did not significantly differ between the intervention (n = 81) and care-as-usual group (n = 55) at follow-up. For patients who did not have surgery, BCTQ scores decreased significantly more from baseline to the 12-month follow-up in the intervention group (n = 53) compared to patients in the care-as-usual group (n = 25). For patients who did not have surgery, belonging to the intervention group and a higher BCTQ score at baseline were related to a greater decrease in BCTQ scores from baseline to the 12-month follow-up, as well as symptom severity and functional status.

Conclusions: Mechanical traction is effective in reducing symptom severity compared to current conservative treatment options in standard care and can therefore benefit the large number of patients that prefer conservative treatment for CTS.

Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical Trials NL44692.008.13. Registered 19 September 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01949493

Unplanned Return to the Operating Room in Upper-Extremity Surgery: Incidence and Reason for Return

PURPOSE

Complications after upper-extremity surgery are generally infrequent. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of early unplanned return to the operating room (URTO) within 3 months after surgery) in upper-extremity surgical procedures. Our hypotheses were that the rate of URTO in upper-extremity surgery would be low and that surgically treated fractures would be at greatest risk for complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all upper-extremity surgical procedures performed at a large academic practice of fellowship-trained hand surgeons over a 5-year period. A chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent a second surgery within 3 months of the initial surgery. The surgical billing database was queried to determine the incidence of URTO per Current Procedural Terminology code.

RESULTS

There were 422 Current Procedural Terminology codes with URTO out of a total of 62,608, for an incidence of 0.6%. The most frequently performed procedures were carpal tunnel release (10,674; 0.1% URTO), trigger finger release (4,549; 0.5% URTO), and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fracture (2,728; 1.2% URTO). Procedures with the highest incidences of URTO were open reduction and internal fixation of the ulna (4.9%) and excision of the olecranon bursa (4.1%). Traumatic injuries were more commonly associated with URTO compared with elective procedures. Bony trauma and soft tissue trauma had URTO incidences of 1.4% and 1.1%, respectively, whereas bony elective and soft tissue elective cases were 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 90-day URTO rate after upper-extremity surgery was low but higher than previously reported 30-day reoperation rates. Elbow procedures were most likely to result in URTO, as were procedures relating to bony and soft tissue trauma. Based on these results, we are able to counsel patients that the most common procedures we perform have low URTO rates, but surgically treated fractures are at greatest risk.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Revision Peripheral Nerve Surgery of the Upper Extremity

Peripheral nerve injuries of the upper extremity can result from a wide array of etiologies, with the two most common being compression neuropathy and traumatic injuries. These types of injuries are common and can be psychologically, functionally, and financially devastating to the patient. A detailed preoperative evaluation is imperative for appropriate management. Traumatic injuries can typically be treated with local burial techniques, targeted muscle reinnervation, and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces. Median nerve compression is frequently managed with complete release of the antebrachial fascia/transverse carpal ligament and/or use of flap coverage such as the hypothenar fat pad flap and local muscle flaps. Ulnar nerve compression is commonly managed via submuscular transposition, subcutaneous transposition, neurolysis, and nerve wrapping. In this review, we discuss the preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and advantages and disadvantages of each treatment modality for patients with compressive and traumatic upper extremity nerve injuries.

Comparison of amniotic membrane transplantation and carpal tunnel syndrome release surgery (CTRS) and CTRS alone: Clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common focal entrapment mononeuropathy, comprising medium nerve chronic inflammation and fibrosis. Although carpal tunnel release surgery (CTRS) has demonstrated to be effective, around 3% to 25% of CTRS show recurrence. Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) has been used in different pathologies inhibiting inflammation and fibrosis and promoting nerve repair. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of AMT in CTRS. The present study comprised a randomized, single-blind controlled trial to compare the 1-year follow-up outcomes of AMT in CTRS (AMT group) or CTRS alone (control group) in patients with CTS. Thirty-five patients with unilateral or bilateral CTS were enrolled, and 47 wrists were randomized into two groups: the AMT group and the control group. To compare the outcomes, three different questionnaires scores (Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and Historical-Objective scale) were used. Evaluations were assessed at baseline and at 15 days, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Compared with the control group, the AMT group showed significant (p < 0.05) reductions in all scores from 6 months after surgery until the end of the study. Both AMT and control groups showed significant intragroup differences in all scores, since the first month after surgery until the end of the study in comparison with the baseline scores. Taken together, these results indicate that CTRS in conjunction with AMT is more effective than CTRS alone in patients with CTS at 1-year follow-up. Clinical Trial: NCT04075357; Amniotic Membrane in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Controllable forces for reproducible chronic constriction injury mimicking compressive neuropathy in rat sciatic nerve

BACKGROUND

Compressive neuropathy is a recurring and challenging disease for patients, regardless of medical or surgical treatment. Neuropathological severity is associated with the force of mechanical compression. Available animal models do not address mechanical issues with reproducible outcomes. We used a chronic constriction injury model to analyze tension-controlled compressive neuropathy and achieve reproducible functional outcomes.

NEW METHOD

We refined a modified animal model for chronic constriction nerve injury under controllable compressive tensile strength to target the unilateral sciatic nerve of adult rats. Sensory outcomes were evaluated using the Von Frey test. Muscle atrophy and nerve degeneration were analyzed, including markers of neural degeneration, neuroinflammation, and neuropathic pain in the affected nerve.

RESULTS

The compressive force significantly affected the neuropathological severity of sensory dysfunction and muscle atrophy. Greater mechanical forces (i.e., tight-knot) contributed to muscle atrophy and hypoesthesia. Low forces (i.e., loose-knot) induced mechanical allodynia with better residual muscle weight. Well-controlled loose knotting can avoid myelin degradation while lessening neuroinflammation and macrophage infiltration. Neuropathic pain was enhanced with increased nociceptive pain markers expression within the affected nerve. Comparison with Existing Method(s): Our chronic constriction injury model, unlike previous models, controls the ligation forces applied for different levels of injury.

CONCLUSION

The functional influences of different compressive forces recapitulate the diverse clinical symptoms involved in clinical compressive neuropathy. This controllable and reproducible model of compressive neuropathy revealed the underlying molecular mechanisms of neural degeneration and inflammation. It will lead to the future development of translational therapeutics for neuropathic pain and nerve regeneration.

Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Plus Intraoperative Corticosteroid Injection versus Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Alone: A Double Blinded Clinical Trial

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a prevalent disease with significant morbidity. The current treatments range from oral medication and local corticosteroid injection to surgical carpal tunnel release (CTR). In this study, we tried to assess the results of Carpal Tunnel Release surgery in combination with the anti-inflammatory effect of local corticosteroid injection. Methods: 65 patients were enrolled by clinical and electrodiagnostic tests and randomly divided into two groups, 32 in group one which underwent surgery with Dexamethasone injection and 33 in group 2 which intervened with carpal tunnel release surgery alone. Data on Boston questionnaire of patients were conducted before and two weeks after surgery. Distal motor and sensory latencies of patients were recorded before and two months after surgery. Mean values were compared between groups before and after surgery. Results: The mean preoperative Boston index was 35.83 in group one and 37.7 in group two, these data postoperative were 15.83 and 19.15 respectively. The mean preoperative distal sensory latency was 54.8 in group one and 47.6 in group two, these data postoperative were 34.1 and 35.1 respectively. The mean preoperative distal motor latency was 63.2 in group one and 62.3 in group two, these data postoperative were 44.5 and 46.55 respectively. Conclusions: CTR surgery plus local corticosteroid injection did not significantly change in results of Electrodiagnostic test or Boston index compared to the non-injection group.

Skeletal Status in Women With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-A 1-Yr Prospective Study

Functional deterioration due to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may influence the bone status of the forearm and hand. The aim of this prospective study was to establish whether CTS has an impact on bone status at distal parts of the upper limb and to monitor the longitudinal changes of that status during a 1-yr follow-up after surgical treatment. Fifteen women with CTS at mean age of 55.13 ± 9.3 yr, mean weight of 79.18 ± 20.37 kg, and mean height of 157.8 ± 6.17 cm were enrolled into the study. All women had unilateral CTS that negatively affected upper limb function and were qualified to surgical treatment. Functional status was established at baseline using Levine's scale, motor latency, and nerve conduction velocity in electrophysiologic examinations. Bone status was established using densitometric measurements (Hologic Explorer, Bedford, MA) at the forearm, spine, and hip (bone mineral density [BMD], g/cm²) and with quantitative ultrasound measurements (amplitude-dependent speed of sound, m/s) at hand phalanges (DBM Sonic, IGEA, Carpi, Italy). Longitudinal changes were established for Levine's scale score and for forearm and phalanges measurements at 3, 6, and 12 mo after surgery. Levine's scale results improved significantly over a period of observation (p < 0.0001). Longitudinal BMD measurements for ultradistal forearm have shown a decrease only for measurement at 6 mo vs baseline result (0.386 ± 0.08 g/cm² vs 0.375 ± 0.08 g/cm², p < 0.05) with onward increase. Amplitude-dependent speed of sound did not differ over the period of observation. Correlation analysis has shown that functional status expressed by Levine's scale was most strongly related to the longitudinal BMD measurements for ultradistal forearm at 6 mo (r = -0.52, p < 0.05). Successful surgery in patients with CTS does not lead to permanent deterioration in bone status within the affected upper limb in a 1-yr longitudinal observation.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Making Evidence-Based Treatment Decisions

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. Comorbidities associated with the development of CTS include diabetes and obesity. Although a high rate of repetitive hand/wrist motions is a risk factor, there is insufficient evidence to implicate computer use in the development of CTS. Initial treatment generally is nonoperative, with the strongest evidence supporting bracing/splinting. Strong evidence supports operative treatment, regardless of technique, as superior to nonoperative treatment. Complications are infrequent and most are minor and transient.

Mechanical wrist traction as a non-invasive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common, compressive nerve-entrapment disorder with symptoms of numbness, paresthesia, and pain. Carpal tunnel release surgery is the only known long-term effective treatment. However, surgery is invasive and up to 30% of patients report recurrence or persistence of symptoms or suffer from post-surgical complications. A promising non-surgical treatment for CTS is mechanical wrist traction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following mechanical traction in patients with CTS compared to care as usual.

METHODS

Adult patients (N = 181, mean age 58.1 (13.0) years, 67% women) with electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS were recruited from an outpatient neurology clinic in the Netherlands between October 2013 and April 2015. After baseline assessments, patients were randomized to either the intervention group (12 treatments with mechanical traction, twice a week for a period of 6 weeks) or "care as usual". The main clinical outcome measure was surgery during 6 months' follow-up. In addition, symptom severity was measured using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) at baseline, 3, and 6 months' follow-up. Baseline characteristics and severity of CTS symptoms at follow-up were compared between the intervention and care-as-usual groups using a t test and χ 2 tests. Time to event (surgery) between the groups was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

The intervention group had fewer surgeries (28%) compared to the care-as-usual group (43%) during follow-up (χ21 = 4.40, p = .036). Analyses of the survival curves revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups over time (log-rank test χ 21 = 6.94, p = .008). At 6 months' follow-up, symptom severity and functional status scores had significantly decreased from baseline in both groups (p < .001) and the improvements did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical traction is associated with fewer surgical interventions compared to care as usual in CTS patients. Reductions in patient-reported symptoms at 6 months' follow-up was similar in both groups. The long-term effects of mechanical traction require further evaluation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NL44692.008.13 . Registered on 19 September 2013.

Concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome and pronator syndrome: A retrospective study of 21 cases

PURPOSE

Concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome and pronator syndrome are rarely considered and the proximal compression sites are easily overlooked. We retrospectively studied 21 concurrent cases in our series from 2009 to 2015 and report the results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The typical symptoms were pain, tingling, and numbness of the radial 3½ digits. If paresthesia involved the thenar eminence and proximal forearm pain was noted in cases of carpal tunnel syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome combined with pronator syndrome was considered. Additionally, nocturnal paresthesia symptoms are absent in pronator syndrome. Therefore, if nocturnal symptoms occurred in pronator syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome was considered. We included concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome and pronator syndrome. We used arthroscopic release of the transverse carpal ligament and open decompression for the pronator teres in cases that underwent surgery for the first time. However, recurrent carpal tunnel cases were treated with the open carpal tunnel release and open pronator decompression procedure in our hospital. The two-point discrimination was used for evaluation of sensory deficit. The grip and pinch (thumb tip to index) strength were measured by dynamometry and pinch gauge respectively.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 344 cases of sustained carpal tunnel syndrome or pronator syndrome from the medical records of our institution. Of the 344 cases, 322 involved carpal tunnel syndrome alone, 1 involved pronator syndrome alone, and 21 involved carpal tunnel syndrome combined with pronator syndrome. The 21 cases of carpal tunnel syndrome combined with pronator syndrome were included in our study. Among the total cases of carpal tunnel syndrome, 6% (21/343) had pronator syndrome. The patients included 3 men and 18 women with a mean age of 52 years (range: 42-69 years). Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies were routinely performed. Postoperative evaluation showed that 15 out of 21 patients (71%) were completely relieved of pain and paresthesia and had no sensory deficit, satisfied strength improved (>85% of the opposite hand). Six patients (29%) had occasional paresthesia and pain, but no sensory deficit; grip and pinch strength deficit were recorded (<50% of the opposite hand). Six cases of these partially relieved patients had recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome but no one needed to perform tendon transfer for thenar muscle atrophy.

CONCLUSION

It is important to consider the diagnosis of double crush syndrome of the median nerve, as carpal tunnel syndrome combined with pronator syndrome may impede treatment of the carpal tunnel syndrome.

Ultrasound-Assisted Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

Various surgical procedures for carpal tunnel syndrome exist, such as open release, ultrasound-guided percutaneous release, and endoscopic release. Postoperative pain, scarring, and slow recovery to normal function are reported complications of open release. Damage to vessels and the median nerve and its branches underlying the transverse carpal ligament is a reported complication of ultrasound-guided percutaneous release. Damage to the superficial palmar arch and incomplete release are reported complications of endoscopic release. By performing endoscopic carpal tunnel release with ultrasound assistance, we could visualize neurovascular structures directly with the endoscope and also indirectly with ultrasound to minimize complications. We could also evaluate the morphologic changes of the median nerve dynamically before and after the release. We discuss the technique for this procedure and outline pearls and pitfalls for success.

Complications of Carpal Tunnel Release

Carpal tunnel release for compression of the median nerve at the wrist is one of the most common and successful procedures in hand surgery. Complications, though rare, are potentially devastating and may include intraoperative technical errors, postoperative infection and pain, and persistent or recurrent symptoms. Patients with continued complaints after carpal tunnel release should be carefully evaluated with detailed history and physical examination in addition to electrodiagnostic testing. For those with persistent or recurrent symptoms, a course of nonoperative management including splinting, injections, occupational therapy, and desensitization should be considered prior to revision surgery.

Complications of compressive neuropathy: prevention and management strategies

Compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity are common and can result in profound disability if left untreated. Nerve releases are frequently performed, but can be complicated by both iatrogenic events and progression of neuropathy. In this review, we examine the management of postoperative complications after 2 common nerve compression release procedures: carpal tunnel release and cubital tunnel release.

Median nerve superficial to the transverse carpal ligament

Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome occurs in up to 12% of cases after carpal tunnel release. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome is defined as recurrence of classic symptoms confirmed by electrodiagnostic studies after a symptom-free interval of a minimum of 6 months, as opposed to persistent carpal tunnel syndrome, where a symptom-free interval never occurs after carpal tunnel release, which is attributed to incomplete release of the transverse carpal ligament. The most common causes of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome requiring reoperation are incomplete release of the transverse carpal ligament and scarring of the median nerve to the surrounding structures. Surgical exploration, release of the reconstituted transverse carpal ligament, and freeing of the median nerve from constricting scar will usually result in symptom relief. The authors describe an unusual presentation of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome with healing of the transverse carpal ligament dorsal to the median nerve, trapping the median nerve in the subcutaneous tissue. Hand surgeons must be aware of this anomalous location when performing revision carpal tunnel release. The surgeon must locate the median nerve proximally in normal tissue before proceeding distally to avoid iatrogenic injury during revision carpal tunnel release.

In-continuity neuroma of the median nerve after surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome: case report

Iatrogenic injuries of the median nerve after surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome resulting in the formation of a neuroma are rare. We present here the case of two patients, one with a bifid median nerve, showing in-continuity neuroma after surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome. The patients reported persistent post-operative pain and showing symptoms. In both cases, ultrasound showed an in-continuity neuroma with a hypoechoic and enlarged median nerve at the carpal tunnel. The case report shows that ultrasound may be helpful in confirming the clinical diagnosis of neuroma and it is useful for evaluation of the percentage of the area affected by the tear.

Conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison between laser therapy and Fascial Manipulation(®)

The etiopathogenesis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is multifactorial and most cases are classified as idiopathic (Thurston 2013). A randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the effectiveness of Fascial Manipulation(®) (FM) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) for CTS. This prospective trial included 42 patients (70 hands with symptoms) with clinical and electroneuromyographic diagnosis of CTS. The patients were randomly assigned to receive multiple sessions of FM or multiple session of LLLT. The Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) were performed at baseline, end of treatment and after three months. The group that received FM showed a significant reduction in subjective pain perception and an increased function assessed by BCTQ at the end of the treatment and follow-up. The group that received LLLT showed an improvement in the BCTQ at the end of the treatment but the improvement level was not sustained at the three month follow-up. FM is a valid alternative treatment for CTS.

Effectiveness of mechanical traction as a non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome compared to care as usual: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common condition (prevalence of 4%) where the median nerve is compressed within the carpal tunnel resulting in numbness, tingling, and pain in the hand. Current non-surgical treatment options (oral medication, corticosteroid injections, splinting, exercise, and mobilization) show limited effects, especially in the long-term. Carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery is effective in 70 to 75% of patients, but is relatively invasive and can be accompanied by complications. In an observational study, mechanical traction proved to be effective in up to 70% of patients directly after treatment and in 60% after two years follow-up. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will examine the effectiveness of mechanical traction compared to care as usual in CTS.

METHODS/DESIGN

Patients diagnosed with CTS will be recruited from an outpatient neurology clinic and randomly assigned to the intervention group (mechanical traction) or the control group (care as usual). Participants in the intervention group will receive 12 treatments with mechanical traction during six consecutive weeks. Primary outcome is symptom severity and functional status, which are measured with the Boston Carpel Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ). Secondary outcomes are quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), health related resource utilization, and absenteeism from work. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after inclusion. Linear mixed effect models will be used to determine the change from baseline at 12 months on the BCTQ, WHOQOL-BREF, absenteeism from work and health related resource utilization. The baseline measurement, change from baseline at three and six months, as well as duration of symptoms until inclusion, age, gender, and co-morbidity will be included as covariates The Pearson's correlation coefficient will be generated to assess the correlation between depression and anxiety and treatment outcome.

DISCUSSION

Since current non-surgical treatment options are not effective long-term and CTR is relatively invasive, there is a need for an effective and non-invasive treatment option. Mechanical traction is a safe treatment option that may provide a good alternative for the usual care. Considering the prevalence of CTS, the study is of great clinical value to a large patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials NL44692.008.13 (registered on 19 September 2013).

[Rupture by attrition of the median nerve found during a carpal tunnel release procedure]

We report the finding of a subtotal rupture of the median nerve caused by a "bridge" or"easel" erosion due to a sequela of childhood wrist fracture. This unpublished observation was made during a carpal tunnel release procedure on an 80-year-old patient who was operated on for recurrence of a severe carpal tunnel syndrome 30 years after a previous neurolysis. If the flexor tendon ruptures are widely described, as well as nerve sections following high energy trauma, the median nerve rupture caused by its erosion over a bony projection has never been published at the best of our knowledge.

Use of the Accordion Severity Grading System for negative outcomes of carpal tunnel syndrome

A universal classification of the negative outcomes of carpal tunnel release surgery does not, as yet, exist. In order to avoid the use of arbitrary factors we have applied the Accordion Severity Grading System, which uses rigorously defined qualitative terms to classify complications. It also provides a uniform manner for grading the severity of complications, enabling outcome comparisons between centres. We analysed the negative outcomes of 500 device-assisted carpal tunnel releases performed over a 2-year period in the author's department. In order to establish a standardised list of complications we used the terms employed within the guidelines of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Most of these terms were subsequently defined using the data variables and definitions taken from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program or the Medical Subject Headings of the National Library of Medicine. We also adopted the quantitative severity weighting, as proposed by the Accordion system, in order to determine the postoperative morbidity index for our assisted carpal tunnel releases. The most common complications were pain and reversible damage to peripheral nerves. Other common negative events, other than complications, included hand weakness, which we classified as a sequela of the procedure, and incomplete retinaculum release, which we classified as failure to cure. The overall postoperative morbidity index for complications was 0.014. Although the Accordion system was developed for more complex procedures, it may also be adopted for carpal tunnel release surgery where it provides an objective and universal method for the classification of complications.