Pain Management Strategies in Shoulder Arthroplasty

The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided cervical erector spinae block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block technique that can provide effective perioperative analgesia for thoracic, abdominal and lumbar surgeries. However, the effect of cervical ESPB on postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effect and safety of ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

METHODS

Seventy patients undergoing arthroscopy shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups: ESPB group (n = 35) or control group (n = 35). Patients in the ESPB group received an ultrasound-guided ESPB at the C7 level with 30 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine 30 min before induction of general anesthesia, whereas patients in the control group received no block. The primary outcome measures were the static visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at 4, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) before anesthesia (t1), 5 min after anesthesia (t2), 10 min after skin incision (t3), and 10 min after extubation (t4); intraoperative remifentanil consumption; the Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) score, quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale score and the number of patients who required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery; and adverse events.

RESULTS

The static VAS scores at 4, 12 and 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the ESPB group than those in the control group (2.17 ± 0.71 vs. 3.14 ± 1.19, 1.77 ± 0.77 vs. 2.63 ± 0.84, 0.74 ± 0.66 vs. 1.14 ± 0.88, all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HR or MAP at any time point during the perioperative period between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was significantly less in the ESPB group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of BCS and QoR-15 scale were higher in the ESPB group 24 h after surgery than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, fewer patients in the ESPB group required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). No serious complications occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB can provide effective postoperative analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, resulting in a better postoperative recovery with fewer complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chictr.org.cn identifier ChiCTR2300070731 (Date of registry: 21/04/2023, prospectively registered).

Periarticular injection in addition to interscalene nerve block can decrease opioid consumption and pain following total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison cohort study

BACKGROUND

Interscalene nerve block (INB) is an effective technique to provide postoperative analgesia for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, the analgesic effects of the block typically resolve between 8 and 24 hours postadministration, which results in rebound pain and subsequent increased opioid use. The objective of this study was to address this issue by determining how adding an intraoperative periarticular injection (PAI) in combination with INB affects acute postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores in patients undergoing TSA. We hypothesized that compared with INB alone, INB + PAI will significantly reduce opioid consumption and pain scores for the first 24 hours postsurgery.

METHODS

We reviewed 130 consecutive patients who underwent elective primary TSA at a single tertiary institution. The first 65 patients were treated with INB alone, followed by 65 patients treated with INB + PAI. The INB used was 15-20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. The PAI used was 50 mL of a combination of ropivacaine (123 mg), epinephrine (0.25 mg), clonidine (40 μg), and ketorolac (15 mg). The PAI was injected using a standardized protocol: 10 mL into the subcutaneous tissues prior to incision, 15 mL into the supraspinatus fossa, 15 mL at the base of the coracoid process, and 10 mL into the deltoid and pectoralis muscles-a protocol analogous with a previously described technique. For all patients, a standardized postoperative oral pain medication protocol was used. The primary outcome was acute postoperative opioid consumption represented by morphine equivalent units (MEUs), whereas the secondary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores over the first 24 hours postsurgery, operative time, length of stay, and acute perioperative complications.

RESULTS

No significant differences in demographics existed between patients who received INB alone vs. INB + PAI. Patients who received INB + PAI had a significantly lower 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption compared to the INB alone group (38.6 ± 30.5 MEU vs. 60.5 ± 37.3 MEU, P < .001). Additionally, VAS pain scores for the first 24 hours postsurgery in the INB + PAI group were significantly lower compared to those for the INB alone group (2.9 ± 1.5 vs. 4.3 ± 1.6, P ≤ .001). No differences existed between groups regarding operative time, length of inpatient stay, and acute perioperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing TSA with INB + PAI demonstrated significantly decreased 24-hour postoperative total opioid consumption and 24-hour postoperative pain scores compared to the group treated with INB alone. No increase in acute perioperative complications related to PAI was observed. Thus, compared to an INB, the addition of an intraoperative periarticular cocktail injection appears to be a safe and effective method to reduce acute postoperative pain following TSA.

Evolution of Perioperative Pain Management in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Historically, opioids have been used as a primary conservative treatment for pain related to glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). However, this practice is concerning as it often leads to overuse, which has contributed to the current epidemic of addiction and overdoses in the United States. Studies have shown that preoperative opioid use is associated with higher complication rates and worse outcomes following surgery, particularly for shoulder arthroplasty. To address these concerns, perioperative pain management for shoulder arthroplasty has evolved over the years to the use of multimodal analgesia.

Liposomal bupivacaine nerve block provides better pain control post-total shoulder arthroplasty than continuous indwelling catheter

BACKGROUND

Pain control is essential to successful total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This non-blinded, randomized clinical trial compared shoulder pain, narcotic use, interscalene (IS) block application time, and costs in 76 subjects who were randomly assigned to receive either a single injection IS nerve block of 10 cc (133 mg) liposomal bupivacaine mixed with 10 cc of 0.5% bupivacaine (Group 1), or 20 cc of 0.5% ropivacaine direct injection combined with an indwelling IS nerve block catheter delivering 0.2% ropivacaine at a continual 4 cc/h infusion for the initial 3 post-operative days (Group 2). Surgical time, local anesthesia duration, hospital stay length, morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed, worst shoulder pain at 24, 48 and 72 h, and complications were recorded. Patient reported function, pain and activity level surveys were completed before, and 6-week post-TSA (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

Group 1 had less pain 24-h (0.72 ± 0.8 vs. 3.4 ± 2.9, p < 0.0001) and 48-h (2.5 ± 2.2 vs. 4.8 ± 2.6, p = 0.005) post-TSA. At 24-h post-TSA, MME consumption was similar (Group 1 = 4.5 ± 6.4 vs. Group 2 = 3.7 ± 3.8, p = 0.54), but was lower for Group 1 at 48 h (0.0 ± 0.0 vs. 0.64 ± 0.99, p = 0.001). Group 2 had longer IS block application time (10.00 ± 4.6 min vs. 4.84 ± 2.7 min, p < 0.0001). Only group 2 had a strong relationship between MME consumption over the first 24-h post-TSA and pain 24-h post-TSA (r = 0.76, p < 0.0001), a moderate relationship with pain 48-h post-TSA (r = 0.59, P = 0.001), and a weak relationship with pain 72-h post-TSA (r = 0.44, P = 0.02). Significant relationships for these variables were not observed for Group 1 (r ≤ 0.30, p ≥ 0.23). Group 1 IS block costs were less/patient than Group 2 ($190.17 vs. $357.12 USD).

CONCLUSION

A single shot, liposomal bupivacaine interscalene nerve block provided better post-TSA pain control with less narcotic consumption, less time for administration and less healthcare system cost compared to interscalene nerve block using a continuous indwelling catheter.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, Prospective, Randomized.

Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine for pain control in shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Total shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair surgery result in considerable postoperative pain. Optimal postoperative pain management based on a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to promote early postoperative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to compare liposomal bupivacaine (LB) with traditional, non-LB agents after total arthroplasty or rotator cuff repair surgery.

METHODS

Two independent authors searched the PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library websites for suitable articles. We included randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes after the administration of LB and non-LB agents for rotator cuff repair or total shoulder arthroplasty. The outcome measures for our meta-analysis were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 24 and 48 hours after surgery, opioid consumption 24 and 48 hours after surgery, hospital stay duration, and complications within 48 hours after surgery. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) tool to assess the degree of evidence for the outcomes, and we used the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

The current meta-analysis comprised 11 randomized controlled studies with 846 subjects. Seven studies used local infiltration to administer LB, and 3 used a block. Our pooled analysis results showed no significant difference in VAS pain scores at 24 hours after surgery (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.55 to 0.01; prediction interval, -1.25 to 0.70), VAS pain scores at 48 hours after surgery (SMD, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.46 to 0.09; prediction interval, -1.10 to 0.73), opioid consumption at 24 hours after surgery (SMD, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.27 to 0.34; prediction interval, -1.01 to 1.09), and opioid consumption at 48 hours after surgery (SMD, 0.10; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.64; prediction interval, -1.76 to 1.96) between the LB and non-LB groups. The LB and non-LB groups had similar hospital stay durations (SMD, -0.38; 95% CI, -1.51 to 0.74; prediction interval, -14.7 to 13.9) and adverse events (risk ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.36) following the shoulder procedures. The level of evidence was low according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis provides evidence indicating that LB is similar to non-LB agents in terms of overall pain relief and opioid requirements. The duration of hospital stay and complication rates were also similar in the 2 groups. Future well-designed and adequately powered randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm our results and to be able to recommend LB for various types of shoulder operations.

The transition to outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Transitioning shoulder arthroplasty (SA) from an inpatient to outpatient procedure is associated with increased patient satisfaction and potentially decreased costs; however, concerns exist about complications following same-day discharge. We hypothesized that outpatient SA would be associated with low rates of failed discharges, readmissions, and complications, rendering it a safe and effective option for SA.

METHODS

A systematic review of the outpatient SA literature identified 16 of 447 studies with level III and IV evidence that met the inclusion criteria with at least 90 days of follow-up. Data on patient demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative protocols, surgery characteristics, failed discharges, complications, and readmissions were collected and pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 990 patients were included in our analysis. Many studies identified specific institutional protocols for determining eligibility for outpatient SA, including preoperative clearance from an anesthesiologist; identification of a perioperative caretaker; and exclusion of patients based on cardiac, pulmonary, or hematologic risk factors. Failed same-day discharge occurred in only 0.9% of patients (7 of 788), and 2.1% of patients (9 of 418) and 0.79% of patients (2 of 252) presented to an emergency department or urgent care facility for a perioperative concern. The readmission rate for periprosthetic fracture, arthrofibrosis, infection, subscapularis rupture, and anterior subluxation was 1.3% (7 of 529 patients). Complications occurred in 7.0% of patients (70 of 990), with 5.4% of patients (53 of 990) experiencing a surgical complication and 1.7% (17 of 990) having a medical complication. There were 28 total reoperations (2.9%, 28 of 955 patients).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Outpatient SA is associated with low rates of failed discharges, readmissions, and complications. Additionally, the medical and surgical complications that occur after outpatient SA are unlikely to be prevented by the short inpatient stay characteristic of traditional SA. With careful screening measures to identify appropriate candidates for same-day discharge, outpatient SA represents a safe approach to prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and to decrease costs associated with SA.

Initiation Timing of Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Blocks in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Before-and-After Study

A continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CIBPB) is usually administered before surgery in awake patients. However, the use of CIBPB before surgery could hinder the identification of nerve injuries after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of preoperatively and postoperatively initiated CIBPBs in patients undergoing TSA. The medical records of patients who underwent TSA between January 2016 and August 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The following analgesic phases were used: intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) phase (IV PCA group, n = 40), preoperative block phase (PreBlock group, n = 44), and postoperative block phase (PostBlock group, n = 33). The postoperative initiation of CIBPB after a neurologic exam provided better analgesia than IV PCA and had no differences with the preoperative initiation of CIBPB, except for the worst pain at the postanesthetic care unit. Opioid consumption was significantly greater in the IV PCA group, but there were no differences between the PreBlock and PostBlock groups on operation day after the transfer to the general ward. The initiation of CIBPB after a patient’s emergence from general anesthesia had comparable analgesic efficacy with preoperative CIBPB but offered the chance of a postoperative neurologic exam.

The Anesthetic Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery and Its Effect on Postoperative Analgesia

Objective

To investigate the anesthetic effect of anterior serratus muscle plane block under ultrasound guidance in arthroscopic shoulder surgery and its effect on postoperative analgesia.

Methods

A total of 94 patients who received arthroscopic shoulder surgery in our hospital were selected as the research subjects, and they were divided into a control group and a study group according to the random number table method. The control group underwent brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance, and the study group underwent anterior serratus plane block under ultrasound guidance. The visual analogue score (VAS) of pain at each time point, intraoperative anesthetic dosage, the use of postoperative analgesic, pain mediators and oxidative stress factors before and after surgery, and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups after surgery.

Results

At 6, 12, 48, and 72 h after surgery, there was no obvious difference in the VAS score between the two groups (P > 0.05); 24 h after surgery, the VAS score of the study group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The intraoperative dosage of propofol and remifentanil in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of effective compressions of analgesic pump and the total amount of sufentanil in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group within 48 hours after operation, and the time of first compressions of analgesic pump was significantly longer than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Before surgery, there were no significant differences in CGRP, NPY, and MDA levels and SOD enzyme activity between the two groups (P > 0.05). After surgery, the levels of pain mediators CGRP and NPY in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The level of MDA was lower than that of the control group, and SOD enzyme activity was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided anterior serratus plane block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery has a good anesthesia effect and long action time. It can significantly reduce the dosage of opioids, enhance the postoperative analgesic effect, effectively inhibit postoperative pain and oxidative stress reaction, and has good safety.

Pain management in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) can be challenging. Given the variety of pain management options available, the purpose of this investigation was to systematically review the literature for randomized controlled trials reporting on pain control after shoulder arthroplasty. We sought to determine which modalities are most effective in managing postoperative pain and reducing postoperative opioid use.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for Level I-II randomized controlled trials that compared interventions for postoperative pain control after TSA. Pain control measures included nerve blocks and nerve block adjuncts, local injections, patient-controlled analgesia, oral medications, and other modalities. The 2 primary outcome measures were pain level measured on a 0-10 visual analog scale and opioid use. The risk of study bias and methodologic quality were analyzed using The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Network meta-analyses were performed for visual analog scale pain scores at postsurgical time points and opioid use using a frequentist approach and random-effects model, with heterogeneity quantified using the I² statistic. Treatments were ranked using the P score, and statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 2391 articles (695 duplicates, 1696 screened, 53 undergoing full-text review). Eighteen articles (1358 shoulders; 51% female patients; mean age range, 65-73.7 years; 4 studies with low risk of bias, 12 with some risk, and 2 with high risk) were included and analyzed. At 4 and 8 hours postoperatively, patients receiving local liposomal bupivacaine (LB) injection (P < .001 for 4 and 8 hours) or local ropivacaine injection (P < .001 for 4 hours and P = .019 for 8 hours) had significantly more pain compared with patients who received either a continuous interscalene block (cISB) or single-shot interscalene block (ssISB). No differences in opioid use (at P < .05) were detected between modalities. The P scores of treatments demonstrated that ssISBs were most favorable at time points < 24 hours, whereas pain at 24 and 48 hours after surgery was best managed with cISBs or a combination of an ssISB with a local LB injection.

CONCLUSION

Interscalene blocks are superior to local injections alone at managing pain after TSA. Single-shot interscalene blocks are optimal for reducing early postoperative pain (< 24 hours), whereas pain at 24-48 hours after surgery may be best managed with cISBs or a combination of an ssISB with a local LB injection.

Discharge Destination After Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Discharge Outcomes, Placement Risk Factors, and Recent Trends

INTRODUCTION

Rates of shoulder arthroplasty continue to increase. Factors influencing disposition and the effect discharge destination may have on perioperative outcomes are currently unknown. This study (1) investigates patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty subsequently discharged to home, skilled nursing facilities, and or independent rehabilitation facilities; (2) identifies differences in perioperative outcomes; and (3) investigates the risk of adverse events and readmission after nonhome disposition.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty from 2013 to 2018. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between patient characteristics and risks of discharge to a non-home destination, discharge to an independent rehabilitation facility as opposed to a skilled nursing facility, severe postdischarge adverse events, and unplanned readmission.

RESULTS

Factors associated with discharge to a non-home facility included those older than 85 years of age (odds ratio [OR], 14.38), dialysis requirement (OR, 4.16), transfer from a non-home facility (OR, 3.69), dependent functional status (OR, 3.17), female sex (OR, 2.78), history of congestive heart failure (2.05), American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (OR, 1.97), longer length of stay (OR, 1.47), and body mass index >35 (OR, 1.29) (P < 0.05). Patients discharged to a non-home facility had an approximately quadrupled rate of both major adverse events (8.6% vs 2.4%, P < 0.001) and minor adverse events (6.1% vs 1.4%, P < 0.001). Discharge to a non-home facility had a higher likelihood of a severe adverse event (OR, 1.82, P = 0.029) or unplanned readmission (OR, 1.60, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-home discharge destination demonstrated a notable negative impact on postoperative outcomes independent of medical complexity. Preoperative management of modifiable risk factors may decrease length of inpatient stay, rates of disposition to non-home facilities, and total cost of care. The benefit of more intense postoperative management at a non-home discharge destination must be carefully weighed against the independent risk of postoperative adverse events and readmissions.

Opioid requirements in primary versus revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inpatient pain medication use of patients who had a revision shoulder arthroplasty procedure performed and compare them to a cohort of patients who had a primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) performed to determine whether revision shoulder arthroplasty requires more pain medication..

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing revision arthroplasty (n = 75) and primary rTSA (n = 340). Inpatient medication records were reviewed to tabulate the visual analog pain (VAS) all narcotic medication use, and total morphine equivalent units (MEUs) were calculated for the duration of the inpatient stay.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative narcotic pain medication use, tobacco use, postoperative VAS scores or hospital length of stay. There were no predictors of total postoperative MEUs identified. Overall, patients in the revision arthroplasty group received significantly less total MEUs than those in the primary rTSA group, 134.96 MEUs vs. 69.79 MEUs, respectively (p < .0005).

CONCLUSION

The perceived notion that revision shoulder arthroplasty is more painful may cause providers to be more inclined to increase narcotic use, or use more invasive pain control techniques. Based on these data, we found that revision shoulder arthroplasty did not require an increased opioid requirement, longer length of stay or increase VAS, suggesting that these patients can often be managed similarly to primary rTSA.

Presurgical and Postsurgical Opioid Rates in Patients Undergoing Total Shoulder Replacement Surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to describe the pre- and postsurgical opioid prescription rates and average morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per day in patients undergoing total shoulder replacement (TSR) procedures.

METHODS

Patients undergoing TSR were identified from the electronic health records (EMR). In addition to patient demographics, opioid prescription 12-months presurgery and postsurgery were recorded. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients with no opioid prescriptions within 12 months before surgery and patients with an opioid prescription after surgery. McNemar tests were conducted to test for significant presurgical to postsurgical changes in opioid rate changes. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test for significant pre- to postsurgical changes in average MME/day/person, and bivariate logistic regression analyses and covariate-adjusted logistic regressions were used to predict postsurgical opioid prescriptions.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,076 patients underwent TSR. More than 900 patients received presurgical opioid prescriptions. There was a significant increase (p = .0015) in pre-surgical to postsurgical prescription rates. Postsurgical opioid prescriptions were 4.6 times more likely to be prescribed to a pre-surgical non-opioid patient than an opioid patient (p < .0001). Among those prescribed an opioid, the median dosage was <50 MME/day and over 82% of patients were at low overdose risk. Patients with comorbidities and without pre-surgical alcohol use were more likely to receive postsurgical opioids. Postsurgical opioid prescriptions were 4.6 times more likely to be prescribed to a presurgical non-opioid patient than an opioid patient (p < .0001). More than 80% of patients undergoing TSR received presurgical opioids. Among those prescribed any opioid, the median dosage was <50 MME/day and greater than 82% of patients were at low overdose risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Although presurgical non-opioid patients were more likely to receive a postsurgical opioid prescription, based on dosage, most patients were at low risk for an opioid-related overdose or death according to CDC guidelines.

Permeable spaces between glenohumeral ligaments as potential gateways for rapid regional anesthesia of the shoulder

Shoulder pain is a highly prevalent condition, often resulting in major life limitations, and requiring effective treatments. In this work, we explore the anatomical basis of a proposed approach to the regional anesthesia of the shoulder through a single injection under the subscapularis muscle. Bilateral experimental injections in shoulders from body donors (Radiolar ® and Methylene-Blue) under the subscapular muscle (n = 11) and cadaveric systematic dissections of other 35 shoulders from body donors were performed. Injectate spread was then qualitatively assessed. Long axis of permeable foramina in the anterior aspect of the shoulder joint capsule was measured in centimeters using a digital caliper. More than 40% of specimens had at least one permeable space (Weitbrech and/or Rouvière foramina) communicating the subscapular bursa and the articular space. We further demonstrate that an ultrasonography-guided injection under the subscapularis muscle allows the spread of the injectate through the anterior, inferior and posterodorsal walls of the articular capsule, the subacromial bursa, and the bicipital groove, as well as into the articular space for some injections. The odds of accidental intraarticular injection decrease when injecting with low volumes. This anatomical study provides a detailed description of foramina between glenohumeral ligaments. Furthermore, the data shown in this work supports, as a proof of concept, a safe alternative for rapid and specific blockade of terminal sensory branches innervating the shoulder joint capsule.

Preoperative characteristics predictive of PROMIS Pain Interference two years after shoulder surgery

Introduction

The objective of this study was to identify preoperative characteristics associated with worse Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) two years after shoulder surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 293 patients who underwent elective shoulder surgery. Survey questionnaires were collected within one week of surgery and then two years postoperatively. Bivariate analysis was used to identify associations and multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables.

Results

Worse two-year PROMIS PI was significantly correlated with older age, higher BMI, greater comorbidities, more prior surgeries, and multiple socio-demographic factors. Less improvement in PROMIS PI was significantly correlated with greater comorbidities, more previous surgeries, unemployment, prior orthopaedic surgery on the operative joint, and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Better scores on all preoperative patient-reported outcome measures correlated with better two-year PROMIS PI. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that worse two-year PROMIS PI was independently predicted by the following preoperative factors: Workers' Compensation claim, opioid use, worse whole body Numeric Pain Score, and worse PROMIS PI. Less improvement in two-year PROMIS PI was predicted by the same preoperative factors.

Conclusion

Worse PROMIS PI after shoulder surgery was associated with older age, greater comorbidities, mental health impairment, and lower socioeconomic status. Preoperative predictors of worse pain interference two years after shoulder surgery included Workers' Compensation, opioid use, worse whole body pain, and worse PROMIS PI.

Level of evidence

III.

Perioperative Management in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A successful reverse total shoulder arthroplasty requires careful preoperative planning and perioperative management. Preoperative comorbidity risks, perioperative pain management, and postoperative rehabilitation are all critical components of this arthroplasty. The current review examines available literature to guide the perioperative care of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

One of the most important advances for shoulder arthroplasty in recent years has been heightened awareness of various modalities for perioperative pain management. A number of recent studies have focused on the options for regional blockade as a critical tool for postoperative pain relief and the use of either continuous interscalene blocks or single shot blocks are supported. Additional studies are necessary to define the best local anesthetic agent and delivery mechanism to provide appropriate pain relief with a low side effect profile. Management of the patient throughout the perioperative course is a critical component in achieving better patient outcomes delivering high quality patient care. An orthopedic surgery team focused on perioperative management is better positioned to decrease adverse events and improve patient outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Perioperative Pain Management in Ambulatory and Inpatient Shoulder Surgery

»

Acetaminophen is an effective addition to a multimodal pain regimen; however, evidence to support intravenous versus oral administration requires further evaluation.

»

While nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are a valuable addition to a multimodal pain strategy, concerns regarding their effect on healing after certain procedures (i.e., rotator cuff repair) in select patients may preclude their use.

»

The use of perioperative gabapentinoids have varied results for pain control, and additional research is warranted to support their use after certain shoulder procedures.

»

Opioid-prescribing should be limited and reserved for severe postoperative pain. When prescribed, opioids should be taken at the lowest possible dose and for the shortest period.

»

Centrally acting analgesics such as tramadol have been shown to be as effective as opioids and have a lower risk of complications.

»

Nerve blocks are an excellent addition to multimodal pain management strategies. Longer-lasting formulations of perioperative single-shot injections and indwelling catheters may reduce rebound pain.

Perioperative pain management for shoulder surgery: evolving techniques

Improving management of postoperative pain following shoulder surgery is vital for optimizing patient outcomes, length of stay, and decreasing addiction to narcotic medications. Multimodal analgesia (ie, controlling pain via multiple different analgesic methods with differing mechanisms) is an ever-evolving approach to enhancing pain control perioperatively after shoulder surgery. With a variety of options for the shoulder surgeon to turn to, this article succinctly reviews the pros and cons of each approach and proposes a potential pain management algorithm.

Anxiety and Osteoarthritis Disability: Updated Overview and Commentary

Introduction:

Osteoarthritis, a widespread highly painful often incapacitating joint disease continues to impose immense personal and societal challenges among adults of all ages, especially among older adults. In the absence of any effective cure or treatment, it has become essential to explore all correlates of this chronic disabling disease, especially those that might be preventable or modifiable. Anxiety, a potentially remediable state of mental distress - found linked to chronically disabling forms of arthritis, in various imperceptible ways, and which may have an immense bearing on the outcomes of osteoarthritis, has not received as much attention in the related literature as other topics, such as surgery.

Objective:

In line with previous promising work, this narrative review elected to explore the extent to which current researchers in the field are pursuing this topic, and if so, the degree to which prevailing peer-reviewed data sources support an important role for continued research in this realm, and in what regard.

Methods:

Primarily explored were the key databases housing relevant publications that emerged over Aug 1, 2018-Feb 26, 2020 using the keywords Osteoarthritis and Anxiety. Using a descriptive approach, the relative progress made over the past five previous years in this regard was assessed, in addition to what joints have been studied and with what frequency, and how the degree of interest compares to other currently researched osteoarthritis themes. The potential for intervening in the osteoarthritis pain cycle by addressing anxiety was also examined.

Results:

Findings show a high level of current interest in this topic, and that despite the paucity of prospective studies, studies on joints other than the knee and hip joints, some equivocal conclusions, small numbers of anxiety-related studies compared to other topics, and substantive design limitations, it appears that future research in this realm is strongly indicated.

Conclusion:

This topic if examined further is likely to produce highly advantageous results at all stages of the osteoarthritic disease process and in the context of primary, secondary, as well as tertiary measures to ameliorate osteoarthritis pain and disability.

Does the Serratus Plane Block Added to the Interscalene Block Improve the Quality of Anesthesia in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Study

Background: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) is the gold standard method in shoulder surgery. Serratus plane block (SPB) provides anesthesia in hemithorax, axillary region, and posterior of the shoulder. This randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of SPB added to ISBPB on surgical anesthesia quality in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Methods: Sixty patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to two groups. All surgeries were performed under regional anesthesia. The Group I (Group Interscalene) (n=30) received ultrasound-guided interscalene block. In the Group IS (Group Interscalene + Serratus) (n=30), ultrasound-guided interscalene block and SPB were performed. Intraoperative anesthetic agent consumption, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: Intraoperative propofol (60.00 ± 45.49 vs. 24.00 ± 32.97, respectively) and fentanyl (33.33 ± 23.97 vs. 18.33 ± 24.51, respectively) consumption were significantly higher in Group I than in Group IS (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups at any of the times the postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores were evaluated (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: SPB added to the ISBPB increases the quality of surgical anesthesia and reduces the need for intraoperative sedoanalgesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Study of variations in inpatient opioid consumption after total shoulder arthroplasty: influence of patient- and surgeon-related factors

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to examine variances in inpatient opioid consumption after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to determine factors influencing inpatient opioid utilization.

METHODS

The sample included patients undergoing elective TSA at a tertiary-level institution between January 2016 and April 2018. Opioid consumption during the inpatient stay was converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), accounting for dosage and route of administration. The MMEs were calculated per patient encounter and used to calculate mean opioid consumption. Bivariate linear regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of patient-related factors and surgery-related factors on inpatient opioid consumption.

RESULTS

Altogether 20 surgeons performed 622 TSAs. The average opioid dose per encounter was 47.4 ± 65.7 MME/d. MMEs prescribed varied significantly among surgeon providers (P < .01). Pre-existing psychiatric disorders (P = .00012), preoperative opioid use (P = .0013), highest quartile of median household income (P = .048), current-smoker status (P < .001), age < 60 years (P < .01), and general anesthesia (vs. regional anesthesia, P = .005) were associated with significant inpatient opioid consumption after TSA. Sex, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, replacement type (anatomic TSA vs. reverse TSA), and prior shoulder surgery did not show any significant differences.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable variation in inpatient opioid consumption after TSA at the same institution. Knowledge of modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors that increase inpatient opioid consumption will help to optimize multimodal analgesia protocols for TSA.

Outpatient narcotic consumption following total shoulder arthroplasty

Introduction

In the setting of the opioid epidemic, physicians continue to scrutinize ways to minimize exposure to narcotic medications. Several studies emphasize improvements in perioperative pain management following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, there is a paucity of literature describing outpatient narcotic consumption requirements following TSA.

Methods

A single-institution, prospective study of patients undergoing primary TSA was performed. Preoperative demographics including exposure to narcotics, smoking history, and alcohol exposure were collected. The primary outcome was measurement of total outpatient narcotic consumption 6 weeks from surgery. Narcotic consumption was verified by counting leftover pills at the final follow-up visit.

Results

Overall, 50 patients were enrolled. The median narcotic consumption in the cohort was 193 morphine equivalent units (MEUs), approximately 25 (5-mg) tablets of oxycodone, and the mean consumption was 246 MEUs, approximately 32 (5-mg) tablets. Almost 25% of patients consumed fewer than 10 total tablets, with 10% of patients taking no narcotics at home. Multivariate regression found preoperative narcotic exposure associated with increased consumption of 31 MEUs (P = .004). Older age was found to be protective of narcotic consumption, with increasing age by 1 year associated with 0.75 MEU decrease in consumption (P = .04).

Conclusions

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in general provides quick, reliable pain relief and does not require a significant amount of narcotic medication postoperatively. For most patients, it is reasonable to prescribe the equivalent of 25-30 (5-mg) oxycodone tablets following TSA.

Efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety, efficacy, and opioid-sparing effect of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) vs. nonliposomal local anesthetic agents (NLAs) for postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of randomized controlled clinical studies comparing the efficacy of LB with NLAs in shoulder surgery was conducted. Seven level I and II studies were included in the meta-analysis, and shoulder surgical procedures included arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and shoulder arthroplasty. Bias was assessed using The Cochrane Collaboration's tool. The primary outcome measures were visual analog scale pain scores and opioid consumption 24 and 48 hours after shoulder surgery. Subgroup analysis was performed for the method of LB administration (interscalene nerve block vs. local infiltration).

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies (535 patients) were included in the final meta-analysis comparing LB (n = 260) with NLAs (n = 275). No significant difference was found between the LB and NLA groups in terms of visual analog scale pain scores at 24 hours (95% confidence interval, -1.02 to 0.84; P = .86) and 48 hours (95% confidence interval, -0.53 to 0.71; P = .78). Both groups had comparable opioid consumption at both 24 hours (P = .43) and 48 hours (P = .78) postoperatively and with respect to length of stay (P = .87) and adverse events (P = .97). Subgroup analysis demonstrated comparable efficacy irrespective of the method of administration of LB.

CONCLUSION

LB is comparable to NLAs with respect to pain relief, the opioid-sparing effect, and adverse effects in the first 48 hours after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty.

Quantification of patient-level costs in outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patient-level costs of inpatient and outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) irrespective of payer status are seldom reported. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-level costs of primary elective TSA between inpatient and outpatient surgery centers.

METHODS

By use of the Texas Health Care Information Collection database, inpatient and outpatient TSAs performed between 2010 and 2015 were identified according to billing codes. Patient-level costs (total charges and itemized charges) were analyzed according to type of surgery center (inpatient vs outpatient) and inpatient volume (high volume vs low volume). Statistical comparisons were performed using 1-way analysis of variance and 2-sample independent t tests. Mixed-model analysis of variance was used to compare the rate of cost change between inpatient and outpatient TSAs from 2010-2015. P < .05 represented statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 21,331 inpatient TSAs and 1542 outpatient TSAs were performed from 2010-2015 in the state of Texas. Inpatient TSA costs were significantly higher than outpatient TSA costs ($76,109 [standard deviation (SD), $48,981] vs $22,907 [SD, $13,599]; P < .001). After exclusion of inpatient-specific charges, inpatient TSA remained 41.1% more expensive than outpatient TSA ($32,330 [SD, $24,221] vs $22,907 [SD, $13,599]; P < .0001). High-volume inpatient TSA was less expensive than low-volume inpatient TSA; however, high-volume inpatient TSA remained 33.4% more costly than outpatient TSA even after exclusion of inpatient-specific charges ($30,579 [SD, $23,233] vs $22,907 [SD, $13,599]; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the state of Texas, the patient-level costs of primary elective inpatient TSA were significantly higher than those of the equivalent outpatient procedure. This difference persisted after exclusion of low-volume inpatient TSA centers and inpatient-specific ancillary charges.

Enhanced Recovery After Shoulder Arthroplasty

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols depend on multidisciplinary care and should be peer-reviewed and data-driven. ERAS has reduced hospital length of stay and complications, simultaneously improving patient outcomes. ERAS protocol after shoulder arthroplasty features multidisciplinary collaboration among different perioperative services and multimodal analgesia with a focus on regional anesthesia. Despite success, adoption is not universal because ERAS protocols are resource intensive. They require clinicians invested in the success of these programs and patients who can take charge of their own health. Future protocols need to include quality of life and functional outcome measures to gauge success from the patient perspective.