Office-Based Percutaneous Fasciotomy for Dupuytren Contracture

Cost Analysis and National Trends in the Treatment of Dupuytren Contracture Comparing Collagenase Injection, Needle Fasciotomy, and Open Fasciectomy Procedures

BACKGROUND

Dupuytren contracture (DC) is a common disorder characterized by progressive fibrosis of palmar fascia. This study analyzed cost trends of 3 common treatments for DC: fasciotomy, fasciectomy, and collagenase injection (CI)/cord manipulation.

METHODS

The Vizient Clinical Data/Resource Manager electronic database was reviewed for all procedures for the treatment of DC at participating hospitals in the United States (US) from October 1, 2015, to September 1, 2019. Cases were placed into 1 of 3 categories: (1) CI, (2) needle fasciotomy (NF), and (3) open fasciectomy (OF). Total and direct costs were averaged for each procedure and compared nationally and regionally. Temporal trends and specific market share were analyzed. One-tailed t test and Pearson correlation analysis was performed (P < 0.05 and r > 0.9 or r < -0.9 was considered significant).

RESULTS

A total of 22,974 total cases were identified. A total of 16,966 OF, 3962 NF, and 2046 CI were performed. There was a nearly a 4-fold increase in number of procedures to treat DC from 2015 to 2018. Market share percentage of each procedure stayed relatively similar over time. However, market share percentage differed between procedures. Needle fasciotomy had the lowest market share percentage approximately 7%. Collagenase injection had the highest average cost at US $4453.66 and was significantly higher than OF at US $3394.90 and NF at US $2010.75. Cost and distribution of procedures were further analyzed by geographic regions. In 2018, 32% of procedures performed were in the Northeastern US, 29% in the Midwestern US, 23% in the Southern US, and 16% in the Western US. Total number of Dupuytren procedures increased more than 300% in all regions across the US from 2015 to 2018. In every region, NF was the lowest cost intervention. Cost of OF and CI varied between regions and was often the most expensive intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of DCs with NF seems to be the least costly treatment option. Needle fasciotomy seems to be the least commonly performed procedure. Regional data show variations in the cost of OF and CI. However, OF has the majority market share nationally and regionally. Although the cost of these procedures seems to vary regionally, the type of procedures being performed seem to be similar across regions.

Versatility of percutaneous needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren's disease across a spectrum of disease severity: A single-surgeon experience of 118 rays

Background

Percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) represents the only minimally invasive approach for treatment of Dupuytren's disease in Europe since withdrawal of collagenase from European markets. Though well-established, surgeon preference and uncertainty regarding safety and efficacy, results in limited provision in favour of open fasciectomy.

Methods

A retrospective review of 74 patients who self-opted to receive PNF between 2017 and 2020 was conducted. Demographic data, complications and degree of release achieved were compared across three cohorts based on contracture severity as per Tubiana staging (TS): Stage 1, 0-45°; Stage 2, 46-90°; Stage 3, 91-130° with χ² analysis.

Results

One hundred and eighteen rays were treated amongst 74 patients (mean age, 68 years (R, 32-86), males: 74%) with mean follow-up 51 weeks (IQR 28-76 weeks) with no significant difference in baseline characteristics across cohorts. No cases of permanent sensory disturbance, flexor tendon rupture, arterial transection nor infection were observed. Neuropraxia was seen in six patients, resolving with mean recovery of 6 weeks. 86% (n = 166) of joints had satisfactory release (residual passive extension deficit (PED) ≤10°) with full release in 67%. Full release was most likely in metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ; 93%) than distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ; 67%) or proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ; 45%; p<0.0001). Mean release was 54° in MCPJ and 56° in PIPJ. All TS1 patients achieved release with ≤10° residual PED versus 75% of TS2 patients and 22% of TS3 patients (p<0.05), the latter of whom had a mean residual PED of 12° Ninety-two percent of patients stated they would undergo PNF again if necessary, in preference to open fasciectomy.

Conclusion

We find PNF to facilitate a safe, effective yet minimally invasive approach amongst patients of varying disease severity, across different age groups, with recurrent disease, associated comorbidities or concurrent anticoagulation therapy. Patients reported high satisfaction in preference to open procedures. We, therefore, intend to recommend PNF first-line to all patients regardless of disease severity.