Comparison of the characteristics in hen and quail corneas as experimental models of refractive surgery

Evaluation of the common pauraque (Nyctidromus albicollis) cornea using light and scanning electron microscopy

The common pauraque Nyctidromus albicollis (Gmelin, 1789) is a widespread avian species; however due to its nocturnal habits and reclusive behaviour, little is known about their vision and ecology. Most avian species are visually dependent with advanced visual systems providing high spatial resolution, on the species needs. Each ocular structure has a specific role in contributing towards high visual function, and the cornea is the first refractive structure in the visual process. However, the common pauraque cornea had not been described until the present data. Therefore, this study aims to describe the morphology and morphometry of the common pauraque cornea by means of light and scanning electron microscopy to evaluate the cross-sectional anatomy as well as the ultrastructure of the endothelial cells. Histological similarities with the cornea of other birds have been observed, but the thickness of the common pauraque cornea is much smaller than the other described corneas. A better understanding of the common pauraque cornea can help us better explain the physiology of vision and the visual requirements of this species. In turn, this will help us better understand how this species successfully interacts with its environment, and will improve our knowledge on how to interpret pathological changes in their cornea in a clinical setting.

Human-relevant approaches to assess eye corrosion/irritation potential of agrochemical formulations

There are multiple in vitro and ex vivo eye irritation and corrosion test methods that are available as internationally harmonized test guidelines for regulatory use. Despite their demonstrated usefulness to a broad range of substances through inter-laboratory validation studies, they have not been widely adopted for testing agrochemical formulations due to a lack of concordance with parallel results from the traditional regulatory test method for this endpoint, the rabbit eye test. The inherent variability of the rabbit test, differences in the anatomy of the rabbit and human eyes, and differences in modelling exposures in rabbit eyes relative to human eyes contribute to this lack of concordance. Ultimately, the regulatory purpose for these tests is protection of human health, and, thus, there is a need for a testing approach based on human biology. This paper reviews the available in vivo, in vitro and ex vivo test methods with respect to their relevance to human ocular anatomy, anticipated exposure scenarios, and the mechanisms of eye irritation/corrosion in humans. Each of the in vitro and ex vivo methods described is generally appropriate for identifying non-irritants. To discriminate among eye irritants, the human three-dimensional epithelial and full thickness corneal models provide the most detailed information about the severity of irritation. Consideration of the mechanisms of eye irritation, and the strengths and limitations of the in vivo, in vitro and ex vivo test methods, show that the in vitro/ex vivo methods are as or more reflective of human biology and less variable than the currently used rabbit approach. Suggestions are made for further optimizing the most promising methods to distinguish between severe (corrosive), moderate, mild and non-irritants and provide information about the reversibility of effects. Also considered is the utility of including additional information (e.g. physical chemical properties), consistent with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's guidance document on an integrated approach to testing and assessment of potential eye irritation. Combining structural and functional information about a test substance with test results from human-relevant methods will ensure the best protection of humans following accidental eye exposure to agrochemicals.

Bowman's layer in the cornea- structure and function and regeneration

Bowman's layer lies immediately posterior to the epithelial basement membrane (EBM) and anterior to the stroma proper in humans, chickens, quail, zebra fish, deer, giraffe, antelope, California sea lions, guinea pig and several other species. It is not found in dog, wolf, cat, tiger, lions, rabbit, pigs, cows, goats, or horses. Developmental anomalies of Bowman's layer are rare, but acquired damage to Bowman's layer, or even complete destruction, is frequently seen in advanced bullous keratopathy or Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. No detrimental effects of removal of Bowman's layer over the central 6-7 mm of central cornea have been noted in millions of patients who've had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Recent studies have suggested the randomly-oriented collagen fibrils that make up Bowman's layer do not have a significant barrier function in modulating the passage of moderate- to large-sized proteins. It is hypothesized that Bowman's layer develops in the corneas of those species that have one because of cytokine-mediated interactions occurring between corneal epithelial cells and underlying keratocytes, including negative chemotactic and apoptotic effects on the keratocytes by low levels of cytokines such as interleukin-1α that are gradually released as epithelial cells die and slough during their normal development. A "Bowman's like layer" can generate around stromal epithelial plugs after radial keratotomy, and possibly beneath the central corneal epithelial basement membrane many years after PRK.