Infrared meibography and molecular assessment of p63 gene mutations in a Mexican patient with EEC syndrome

Pathophysiology of aniridia-associated keratopathy: Developmental aspects and unanswered questions

Aniridia, a rare congenital disease, is often characterized by a progressive, pronounced limbal insufficiency and ocular surface pathology termed aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK). Due to the characteristics of AAK and its bilateral nature, clinical management is challenging and complicated by the multiple coexisting ocular and systemic morbidities in aniridia. Although it is primarily assumed that AAK originates from a congenital limbal stem cell deficiency, in recent years AAK and its pathogenesis has been questioned in the light of new evidence and a refined understanding of ocular development and the biology of limbal stem cells (LSCs) and their niche. Here, by consolidating and comparing the latest clinical and preclinical evidence, we discuss key unanswered questions regarding ocular developmental aspects crucial to AAK. We also highlight hypotheses on the potential role of LSCs and the ocular surface microenvironment in AAK. The insights thus gained lead to a greater appreciation for the role of developmental and cellular processes in the emergence of AAK. They also highlight areas for future research to enable a deeper understanding of aniridia, and thereby the potential to develop new treatments for this rare but blinding ocular surface disease.

Morphology of the Meibomian gland evaluated using meibography in patients with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia

INTRODUCTION

Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is a rare disease that results from the abnormal development of the ectodermal germ layer in early embryogenesis. In these patients, hypoplasia of Meibomian glands is one of the most frequent ophthalmological manifestations. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of meibography for the morphology of Meibomian glands in a group of patients with HED, and to compare it with a control group.

METHODS

A total of 14 eyes of 7 patients diagnosed with HED were included, and 32 eyes of 16 patients were included as a control group. The meibographic study was carried out using CA-800 Corneal Analyser (Topcon®). Grading of images was assessed by a meibomian gland atrophy score: grade 0, no alterations; grade 1, ≤25% gland atrophy; grade 2, 25% to 50% gland atrophy; grade 3, 51% to 75% gland atrophy; and grade 4 >75% gland atrophy. Both groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test.

RESULTS

All patients with HED showed some degree of gland atrophy, with 57% showing severe atrophy (>75% of gland atrophy), 35.8% with a grade 3, and 7.2% grade 2. The mean grade of glandular atrophy in HED was 3 (1-4). In the control group, 62.5% had no involvement (grade 0), with 28.1% showing grade 1 and 9.4% grade 2 gland atrophy. The mean glandular atrophy grade within the control group was 0 (0-2). There were statistically significant differences between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Meibography is a simple diagnostic tool that allows to differentiate between patients without disease and those with HED.