Office Hysteroscopy

The use of oral nomegestrol acetate/estradiol in rapid and random start preparation of endometrium before office hysteroscopic polypectomies: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of oral nomegestrol acetate/estradiol in random start rapid preparation of endometrium before office hysteroscopic polypectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

80 adult women undergoing office hysteroscopic polypectomy between January 2023 and March 2024 were randomized to intervention (n = 40) or control (n = 40). Exclusion criteria included the presence of endouterine pathology other than endometrial polyps solely.

METHODS

Subjects in the intervention group were treated with oral nomegestrol acetate/estradiol 1.5 mg/2.5 mg/day started taking the drug from an indefinite time in the menstrual cycle (random start) for 14 days. Subjects in the control group did not receive any pharmaceutical treatment and underwent polypectomy between days 8 and 11 of the menstrual cycle.

RESULTS

On the day of the procedure, the difference in pre- and post-office hysteroscopic polypectomy endometrial ultrasound thickness was statistically significant between the two groups, with endometrial thickness in both measurements being thinner for the intervention group (p < 0.001). In the nomegestrol acetate/estradiol-treated group, compared with the control, there was also a statistically significant difference in the physician's assessment of the quality of endometrial preparation (p < 0.001), the quality of visualization of the uterine cavity (p < 0.001), and satisfaction with the performance of the procedure (p < 0.001). Finally, all surgical outcomes analyzed were better in the treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with nomegestrol acetate/estradiol could provide rapid, satisfactory and low-cost preparation of the endometrium before office polypectomy, thus improving surgical performance and woman's compliance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06316219.

Barriers to Office Hysteroscopy in Fellowship Education and Practice

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify the top 3 perceived barriers to performing office hysteroscopy (OH) by minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) faculty and fellows and identify opportunities for education on this key topic that will be most effective in fellowship training and MIGS practice.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey study targeted at all American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists-accredited Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery fellows, program directors, and associate program directors in February to April 2022. The survey was designed by faculty who have extensive experience in OH procedures. In addition, a literature search was performed to aid with question design.

SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

This was a REDCap electronic survey administered through the Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery listserv. No additional follow-up was performed after survey completion. The 15-minute survey was sent to 60 program directors, 92 assistant program directors, and 158 fellows, including the incoming class of 2024 and the 2022 fellowship graduates.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 93 responses were received; 67% of respondents performed OH but 73% of those performed 5 procedures or less per month. Most participants controlled pain with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs +/- paracervical block. The most common perceived barrier to performing OH was concern over pain management. Other commonly cited concerns were equipment costs, sterilization costs, and office staff training; 37% to 44% of respondents also cited lack of departmental support and insufficient clinic time, respectively, as barriers, and 56% indicated they are interested in educational materials on OH.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests general interest in, but a low volume of, OH among MIGS fellows and faculty. The most common perceived barrier was concern regarding pain management. This has been well studied in the literature and likely presents an area for greater education to improve OH utilization. We also uncovered concerns regarding systemic barriers, such as equipment costs, departmental support, and clinic structure. This is an area for further research and advocacy efforts to address barriers to OH on a system level.