Phaco-endocycloplasty versus Phacotrabeculectomy in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Prospective Randomized Study

Efficacy and Safety of Different Types of Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Surgeries in Patients with Primary Angle Closure (PAC) or PAC Glaucoma: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of different types of surgery available in the literature using a network meta-analysis (NMA) based on a systematic review.

METHODS

PubMed and the Cochrane database were searched. Randomized clinical trials involving surgical interventions for high IOP for PAC (primary angle closure) or PACG (primary angle closure glaucoma) were included. Descriptive statistics and outcomes were extracted. Bayesian NMA was performed to compare the IOP-lowering effect and the change in the number of antiglaucoma drugs required between baseline and endpoint, as well as success rates.

RESULTS

This NMA included 21 articles with 1237 eyes with PAC or PACG. Interventions were characterised as phacoemulsification (phaco), trabeculectomy, goniosynechialysis (GSL) with viscoelastic or blunt device, goniosurgery (GS) (trabeculotomy or goniotomy), micro-bypass stent (Istent®), endocyclophotocoagulation (ECPL) or various combinations of these procedures. Phaco+GSL [-1.73 (95%CrI: -3.53 to -0.13)] and phaco+GSL+GS [-3.92 (95%CrI: -6.91 to -1.31)] provided better IOP lowering effects than phaco alone. Phaco+trabeculectomy [-3.11 (95%CrI: -5.82 to -0.44)] was inferior to phaco+GSL+GS. Phaco+trabeculectomy [-0.45 (95%CrI: -0.81 to -0.13)] provided a better outcome in terms of reducing the need for antiglaucoma drug compared to phaco alone. There were no differences between the other surgeries in terms of reduction of antiglaucoma drug number and IOP lowering effect. Success rates were similar for all surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Phaco+GSL+GS showed the most promising results for lowering IOP. Phaco+trabeculectomy resulted in a significant reduction in the number of antiglaucoma drugs compared to phaco alone.

Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy versus peripheral iridectomy plus goniotomy in advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma: study protocol for a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (the TVG study)

INTRODUCTION

Primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) is a major subtype of glaucoma that accounts for most bilateral glaucoma-related blindness globally. Filtering surgery is a conventional strategy for PACG, yet it has a long learning curve and undesirable disastrous complications. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) plays an increasing role in the management of glaucoma due to its safer and faster recovery profile; cataract surgery-based MIGS is the most commonly performed such procedure in PACG. However, for patients with a transparent lens or no indications for cataract extraction, incorporation of MIGS into PACG treatment has not yet been reported. Therefore, this multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy versus peripheral iridectomy plus an ab interno goniotomy in advanced PACG with no or mild cataracts.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial will be conducted at seven ophthalmic departments and institutes across China. Eighty-eight patients with no or mild cataracts and advanced PACG will be enrolled and randomised to undergo trabeculectomy or peripheral iridectomy plus ab interno goniotomy. Enrolled patients will undergo comprehensive ophthalmic examinations before and after surgery. The primary outcome is intraocular pressure (IOP) at 12 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are cumulative success rate of surgery, surgery-related complications and number of IOP-lowering medications. Participants will be followed up for 36 months postoperatively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the ethical committees of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, China (ID: 2021KYPJ191) and of all subcentres. All participants will be required to provide written informed consent. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated in international academic meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05163951.

Efficacy and safety of phacotrabeculectomy versus phacogoniotomy in advanced primary angle-closure glaucoma: study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (PVP Study)

INTRODUCTION

Primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) has a high prevalence and blinding rate across Asia. The first-line treatment of PACG is surgery, and phacotrabeculectomy remains the mainstream surgery for advanced PACG. However, it may cause vision-threatening complications with long learning curve. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery has been gradually used in PACG combined with cataract surgery and achieved efficacy without excessive injury, of which goniotomy is the most commonly performed. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a multicentre, non-inferiority randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of phacotrabeculectomy versus phacogoniotomy in advanced PACG.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a non-inferiority multicentre randomised controlled trial and will be conducted at eight ophthalmic departments and institutes in China. 124 patients with advanced PACG will be enrolled and randomised to undergo phacotrabeculectomy or phacogoniotomy. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations will be performed before and after the surgery. The primary outcome is the change of intraocular pressure at 12 months after surgery compared with the baseline intraocular pressure. An extended follow-up period of 36 months will be required. Cumulative success rate of surgery, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and number of anti-glaucomatous medications will also be compared between the groups as secondary outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been obtained from the ethical committee of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, China (ID: 2021KYPJ090) and all subcentres. All the participants will be required to provide written informed consent. The results will be disseminated through scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04878458.