1
|
Lim CY, Alonso A, Koh YY, Roydhouse S, McCormack L, Deans R, Nesbitt-Hawes E, Rao A, Causer L, Abbott JA. A Double-Blinded, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Non-Hysterectomy Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Gynaecological Conditions: A Pilot Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2022; 29:992-997. [PMID: 35513301 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility of a double-blinded randomised, placebo-controlled study in determining the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative infections (POI) in elective non-hysterectomy laparoscopic procedures for benign gynaecological conditions. DESIGN Double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING University-affiliated tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia. PATIENTS Women over the age of 18 undergoing elective non-hysterectomy laparoscopic procedures for benign gynaecological conditions were eligible for the study and approached. INTERVENTIONS Prior to surgery, participants were randomised to receive either 2g cephazolin or placebo (10ml normal saline) administered by the anaesthetist. Participants and other research staff were blinded to group allocation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was study feasibility measured by recruitment rates, compliance rates of drug administration, compliance rates of delivery, maintenance of double blinding and follow-up rates. Secondary outcomes included rate of postoperative infections, length of hospitalisation, re-admission to hospital, unscheduled presentations to healthcare facilities and antibiotic-related reactions. Between February 2019 and March 2021, 170 patients were approached with 117 (68.8%) participants recruited and randomised. The study had a high compliance rate of trial drug delivery (95.7%) and a high follow-up rate (99.1%). CONCLUSION This pilot study has demonstrated feasibility of a large-scale study with a recruitment rate of 68% of patients approached and excellent trial drug delivery and follow-up rates. As anticipated, it is underpowered for identifying clinically significant findings for postoperative infection rates. A large-scale study is appropriate and essential to determine the health-related risks of antibiotic prophylaxis with an emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship. The sample size for a large-scale study is 1678 participants based on infection rates in this pilot study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Yinn Lim
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anaïs Alonso
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yi Ying Koh
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephanie Roydhouse
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lalla McCormack
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Deans
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erin Nesbitt-Hawes
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Archana Rao
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Louise Causer
- Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jason A Abbott
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; The Gynaecological Research and Clinical Evaluation (GRACE) Unit, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bolton WS, Aruparayil N, Quyn A, Scott J, Wood A, Bundu I, Gnanaraj J, Brown JM, Jayne DG. Disseminating technology in global surgery. Br J Surg 2019; 106:e34-e43. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Effective dissemination of technology in global surgery is vital to realize universal health coverage by 2030. Challenges include a lack of human resource, infrastructure and finance. Understanding these challenges, and exploring opportunities and solutions to overcome them, are essential to improve global surgical care.
Methods
This review focuses on technologies and medical devices aimed at improving surgical care and training in low- and middle-income countries. The key considerations in the development of new technologies are described, along with strategies for evaluation and wider dissemination. Notable examples of where the dissemination of a new surgical technology has achieved impact are included.
Results
Employing the principles of frugal and responsible innovation, and aligning evaluation and development to high scientific standards help overcome some of the challenges in disseminating technology in global surgery. Exemplars of effective dissemination include low-cost laparoscopes, gasless laparoscopic techniques and innovative training programmes for laparoscopic surgery; low-cost and versatile external fixation devices for fractures; the LifeBox pulse oximeter project; and the use of immersive technologies in simulation, training and surgical care delivery.
Conclusion
Core strategies to facilitate technology dissemination in global surgery include leveraging international funding, interdisciplinary collaboration involving all key stakeholders, and frugal scientific design, development and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W S Bolton
- Section of Translational Anaesthesia and Surgery, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N Aruparayil
- Section of Translational Anaesthesia and Surgery, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A Quyn
- Section of Translational Anaesthesia and Surgery, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J Scott
- Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - A Wood
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - I Bundu
- Department of Surgery, Connaught Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - J Gnanaraj
- Karunya Institute of Technology and Science, Karunya Nagar, Coimbatore, India
| | - J M Brown
- Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D G Jayne
- Section of Translational Anaesthesia and Surgery, Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|