Intraoperative imaging O-Arm™ in secondary surgical correction of post-traumatic orbital fractures

Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review

Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. This review aims to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were: clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were: duplicates; non-English publications; non-full-text publications; studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9%). With regards to intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). Intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case that had a complication (transient exophthalmos). Mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography Use in Orbital Fracture Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) allows surgeons to make adjustments during orbital fracture repair that may impact postoperative outcomes. Learning/Study Objectives: To determine the impact of intraoperative CT use on intraoperative revision and surgical outcomes for orbital fracture repair. Methods: A systematic review was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines: the population was patients undergoing orbital fracture repair; intervention was use of intraoperative CT; comparison was patients not undergoing intraoperative CT; and outcomes were intraoperative revision rate, postoperative complications, and secondary revision surgeries. Meta-analysis was performed on the rate of intraoperative revision. Results: The search criteria yielded 790 articles, 377 were eligible for review, and 20 articles met criteria for analysis. In 19, intraoperative imaging led to immediate surgical corrections, with a random pooled effect size of 0.27 (0.20-0.35). Six studies reported secondary revision surgery rates (range 0-10.5%), and six studies reported postoperative complication rates (range 10-30%). Conclusions: Intraoperative imaging helps surgeons make precise, real-time adjustments in 27% of orbital fracture repair cases, which may improve surgical outcomes; however, more research is needed to investigate its impact on health care costs, operating time, and radiation exposure.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography Image Fusion for Orbital Blowout Fracture Reconstruction

Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) has been previously described and acknowledged for its use in orbital blowout fracture reconstructions. We described a clinical case series managed by this technique combined with intraoperative image fusion for accuracy in orbital implant position. In total, eight patients who sustained a total number of 19 orbital wall fractures were described. From the total number of 19 blowout orbital fracture reconstructions comprised of medial and inferior (floor) orbital fractures, malposition was identified in a total of four orbital implants by using image fusion. All cases of implant malposition were immediately revised intraoperatively. Subsequent fusion was carried out to confirm whether the revision was satisfactorily achieved. We found that the intraoperative image fusion technique utilised to determine orbital implant position, especially at the posterior ledge, further augmented the role of intraoperative CT scanning. Image fusion conceptually provides an immediate, real-time, and objective solution for intraoperative image analysis and potentially eliminates problems with misaligned CT images. It also reduces the need for the surgeon to ‘eye-ball’ the CT images acquired or the need for additional intraoperative time, since the patient’s head orientation is always axially at random during the acquisition of the CT. Conventional methods for CT image assessment are subjected to one’s own interpretation and may introduce inconsistent or longer intraoperative decision-making. The technique facilitates intraoperative decision-making and reduces the risk of orbital implant malposition in orbital blowout fracture reconstructions. Hence, surgical complication in relation to orbital implant malposition in orbital blowout fracture management could be minimised. In addition, no further postoperative imaging is required.

Clinical outcome following intraoperative computed tomography-assisted secondary orbital reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Secondary post-traumatic orbital reconstructions are challenging. Portable computed tomography (CT) provides the option to acquire real-time, intraoperative images that help to detect the insufficient reconstruction of the orbit immediately. We retrospectively analyzed patients who received intraoperative CT imaging and analyzed the effect of intraoperative CT scans on revision rates and orbital volume changes before, during, and after surgery.

METHODS

From August 2014 to September 2016, eleven patients received intraoperative cone-beam CT scans to evaluate the results of secondary orbit reconstruction using Medpor + titanium implants. Patient demographics, surgical details, CT scanning protocol, and follow-up results were analyzed. 3D CT volumetry was used to analyze the orbital volume based on OsiriX MD software.

RESULTS

Based on intraoperative CT findings, seven cases required intraoperative revision to further augment the orbital cavity or adjust implants. The mean preoperative measured enophthalmos was 3.41±1.4 mm (range: 2-6 mm), which decreased to 0.73±0.4 mm (range: 0-1 mm) at postop assessment (p<0.0001). On the fracture side, there was a significant difference between preoperative vs. intraoperative and preoperative vs. postoperative volume measurements (p<0.01 for both subsets), but no significant difference between intraoperative vs. postoperative measurements.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative CT is a valuable tool in secondary orbital reconstruction cases based on clinical enophthalmos evaluation and 3D CT volumetry. For these patients, the avoidance of another revision surgery may outweigh the disadvantage of increased operation time and additional radiation exposure.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography Scan for Orbital Fracture Reconstruction

Orbital fractures pose specific challenge in its surgical management. One of the greatest challenges is to obtain satisfactory reconstruction by correct positioning of orbital implant. Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) scan may facilitate this procedure. The aim of this study was to describe the early use of intraoperative CT in orbital fractures repair in our center. The authors assessed the revision types and rates that have occurred with this technique. With the use of pre-surgical planning, optical intraoperative navigation, and intraoperative CT, the impact of intraoperative CT on the management of 5 cases involving a total number of 14 orbital wall fractures were described. There were 6 pure orbital blowout wall fractures reconstructed, involving both medial and inferior wall of the orbit fracturing the transition zone and 8 impure orbital wall fractures in orbitozygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. 4 patients underwent primary and 1 had delayed orbital reconstruction. Intraoperative CT resulted in intraoperative orbital implant revision, following final navigation planning position, in 40% (2/5) of patients or 14% (2/14) of the fractures. In revised cases, both implant repositioning was conducted at posterior ledge of orbit. Intraoperative CT confirmed true to original reconstruction of medial wall, inferior wall and transition zone of the orbit. Two selected cases were illustrated. In conclusion, intraoperative CT allows real-time assessment of fracture reduction and immediate orbital implant revision, especially at posterior ledge. As a result, no postoperative imaging was indicated in any of the patients. Long-term follow-ups for orbital fracture patients managed with intraoperative CT is suggested.