The effect of extracapsular injuries on growth and development of the mandible condyle: an experimental study in growing dogs

Etiology, Clinical Presentation, and Outcome of Mandibular Fractures in Immature Dogs Treated with non-Invasive or Minimally Invasive Techniques

This study was performed to report etiology, clinical presentation, and outcome of mandibular fractures in immature dogs treated with non-invasive or minimally invasive techniques. Immature dogs diagnosed with mandibular fractures from 2001 to 2016 were included in this study. Diagnosis of the mandibular fracture was achieved by oral examination and diagnostic imaging in the anesthetized dog. Twenty-nine immature dogs with 54 mandibular fractures were selected. Within the mandibular body, the regions of the developing permanent canine and first molar teeth were most commonly involved (46.4% and 35.0%, respectively). Within the mandibular ramus, 53.8% of the fractures were located in its ventral half, and 38.5% in the condylar process. Muzzling was applied in 72.4% of the dogs. All dogs had clinical healing with resolution of signs of pain and recovery of mandibular function. Mean time for clinical healing was 21 ± 9 days. Age of the dog and duration of muzzling were significantly associated with the time needed for clinical healing. In immature dogs, fractures of the mandibular body occur most commonly in the regions of the developing permanent canine and first molar teeth, while fractures of the mandibular ramus are most commonly found in its ventral half and the condylar process. Non-invasive or minimally invasive management of mandibular fractures in immature dogs carries a good prognosis regarding clinical healing and recovery of mandibular function. Dogs should be monitored for the development of dental abnormalities and/or skeletal malocclusion until permanent teeth have erupted and jaw growth is completed.

The Stability Evaluation of Two Internal Fixation Patterns of Extracapsular Condylar Fracture Based on One Novel Measuring Method

PURPOSE

The most stable internal fixation pattern for extracapsular condylar fracture (ECF) has been controversial. In this study we aimed to evaluate the stability of 2 common internal fixation patterns using 1 or 2 miniplates separately. One novel measuring method based on the angle of miniplates' localization was introduced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with 30 sides of extracapsular condylar fracture were enrolled in this retrospective study. All cases were performed open reduction and internal fixation using 1 or 2 titanium plates with both the postoperative immediate CT (T1) and the over 6 months' follow-up CT (T2). Mandibles and implants were segmented and reconstructed respectively using SIMPANT 14.04 software. For 1 miniplate group, the sagittal crossing angle (<1) between miniplate (P1) and posterior border of ipsilateral ramus was measured. For 2 miniplates group, the sagittal crossing angle (<2) between 2 miniplates (P2a, P2b) was measured. Both anteroposterior (∠AP) and mediolateral angle change (∠ML) of each miniplate between T1 and T2 was measured. The stability of 2 internal fixation patterns was measured and evaluated based on the angle change of miniplates. And also the stability of each internal fixation pattern could be investigated based on the relationship between the placement patterns of miniplates and the angle change.

RESULTS

Fifty-two miniplates were finally segmented and reconstructed successfully, including 8 of 1 miniplate group and 44 of 2 miniplate group. For 1 miniplate group, the average ∠AP and ∠ML were 6.10° and 8.54°, respectively. For 2 miniplate group, the average ∠AP and ∠ML of P2a were 3.02° and 2.56°, respectively, as well as 3.12° and 3.07° of P2b.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel measuring method based on the angle of miniplates' localization showed potential for the stability evaluation of internal fixation of condylar fracture. In summary, the internal fixation patterns using 2 miniplates shows better stability than that of 1 miniplate.