Postoperative changes in mandibular position after mandibular setback surgery via the surgery-first approach in relation to the increase of vertical dimension and the amount of mandibular setback

Three-dimensional evaluation of skeletal stability after surgery-first bimaxillary surgery for class III asymmetry in 70 consecutive patients

Background/purpose

Skeletal stability after orthognathic surgery is essential for positive treatment outcome. This study evaluated the stability of osteotomy segments after surgery-first bimaxillary surgery for class III asymmetry.

Materials and methods

Seventy adults with class III asymmetry consecutively corrected through surgery-first Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were investigated. Cone-beam computed tomography before treatment (T0), 1-week after surgery (T1), and after all treatment (T2, ≥1-year after surgery) was used to assess surgical movement (T0 to T1) and skeletal stability (T1 to T2) regarding the translation and rotation of the maxillary, mandibular distal, and proximal segments.

Results

At T1, the maxillary segment had moved forward and upward, turned to the deviated side, and rotated downward (all P < 0.01). The distal segment of mandible had moved forward and upward and rotated upward (all P < 0.001). The deviated proximal segment had moved upward, tilted to the opposite side, and rotated upward (all P < 0.001). The opposite proximal segment had moved upward and tilted to the deviated side (both P < 0.01). At T2, significant relapse occurred in the mandible. The distal segment moved forward and upward and rotated upward (all P < 0.001). The deviated proximal segment moved upward, tilted to the opposite side, and rotated upward (all P < 0.001). The opposite proximal segment moved upward and tilted to the deviated side (both P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Clinically significant relapse of class III asymmetry was discovered on the mandibular distal and opposite proximal segments.

Are We Correctly Measuring Mandibular Stability After Surgery-First Approach? A Comparative Study Based on Novel 3-Dimensional Measurements

Using traditional measures to assess mandibular stability after the surgery-first approach (SFA) may produce inaccurate results because unlike the conventional orthodontic-first approach (OFA), the main dental movements occur after surgery in SFA, which produce unavoidable mandibular movements, especially in cases with postsurgical premature dental contact. As these movements are part of the surgical-orthodontic plan, they should not be considered an actual relapse. In this study, to avoid postsurgical dental movement effects, the authors used the relationship between proximal and distal mandibular segments to evaluate stability after SFA. Four easily located points on computerized tomography/cone-beam computerized tomography reconstructed 3-dimensional images were used to calculate 4 measurements between proximal and distal mandibular segments across the osteotomy line in two matched groups of patients (SFA and OFA) at 3 different time points (before, immediately after, and 1 year after the surgery). A high level of skeletal stability was found in the SFA group, with changes 1 year after surgery not exceeding 0.5 mm. The SFA was as skeletally stable as OFA, and the mandibular counterclockwise rotation after surgery was related to the planned dental movements and not the instability of the surgery itself. To avoid the illusion of this preplanned relapse, stability should be measured as a relation between proximal and distal mandibular segments, across the osteotomy and fixation line, and not as a relation between maxillary and mandibular landmarks or between the mandible and facial planes as classically described.

Comparison of short-term condylar positional changes in mandibular prognathism after surgery-first approach: Symmetric setback versus asymmetric setback

The aim of this study was to compare how the displacement of the mandibular condyle changed after symmetric or asymmetric mandibular setback surgery using the surgery-first approach (SFA). Patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery using the SFA were selected and divided into a symmetry group (n = 18) with differences of less than 2 mm between the right and left setback, and an asymmetry group (n = 18) with a difference of greater than 2 mm. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-generated cephalograms were obtained after three-dimensional superimposition of CBCT images taken before surgery (T0), within one week after surgery (T1), and seven months after surgery (T2). The condylar positions were measured. Condylar positional changes according to time were compared between the two groups and correlation analysis was performed. There were significant positional changes in mandibular condyles over time in both groups. However, most of these changes returned to their initial state. In the asymmetry group, there was a greater internal rotation of the mandibular condyle on the lesser setback side. The correlation analysis results revealed that only the setback difference was associated with rotational displacement of the condyle on the lesser setback side at two time points (T1-T0, T2-T0). In the SFA, significant condylar displacement occurred immediately after both symmetric and asymmetric mandibular setback surgery, and the right/left difference in mandibular setback showed a significant positive correlation with rotational displacement. Although more significant rotational displacement of the mandibular condyle was observed after asymmetric mandibular setback surgery, the amount was not large enough to be clinically significant.

Evaluation of mandibular positional changes after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class II and class III surgery-first approach patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to predict and compare postoperative changes of mandibular position between mandibular setback and advancement surgery in a surgery-first approach (SFA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population included patients who underwent mandibular setback or advancement surgery using bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, those were divided into two groups: mandibular setback and advancement surgery. Surgical and postoperative mandibular positional changes were evaluated by lateral cephalograms and CTs taken within 2 months before surgery (T0), 1 week after surgery (T1), and after the debonding procedure (T2). The postoperative mandibular positional changes were predicted from the increase in vertical dimension (VD) in surgical occlusion and the counterclockwise rotation to the preoperative VD on the lateral cephalograms and CT at T1. Furthermore, resultant measurement on postoperative mandibular positional changes was performed. Finally, we compared the prediction with actual positional changes of the mandible after the debonding procedure.

RESULTS

Nine SFA patients with mandibular setback surgery and six with advancement surgery were evaluated and significant mandibular changes from T0 to T1 and from T1 to T2 were observed. Negative correlation between horizontal surgical changes and postoperative horizontal changes was present in both groups. The difference between the predicted and actual amount of postoperative mandibular movement was significant in the mandibular advancement surgery group.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative mandibular relapse appeared much larger in the mandibular advancement surgery group than in the setback group. Therefore, it is more important to consider the postoperative mandibular position change in mandibular advancement surgery in SFA.

Changes in the temporomandibular joint clicking and pain disorders after orthognathic surgery: Comparison of orthodontics-first approach and surgery-first approach

The purposes of this study were to investigate the influence of the orthodontics-first approach (OFA) and surgery-first approach (SFA) on changes in the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) and to compare pre- and postoperative orthodontic treatment duration and total treatment duration between the two approaches. This retrospective study recruited 182 adult patients with malocclusions treated with OFA and SFA and recorded variables such as age, gender, skeletal classification, and signs and symptoms of TMD (clicking and pain disorders) before the start of the surgical-orthodontic treatment and after surgery. Changes in the signs and symptoms of TMD and treatment duration were evaluated within each approach and compared between two approaches. A binary logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of the variables on the postoperative signs and symptoms of TMD. There were no significant postoperative changes in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain for OFA and SFA, whereas a significant reduction was found in TMJ clicking after surgery for both approaches. According to binary logistic regression, the type of surgical-orthodontic treatment (OFA or SFA) was not a significant risk factor for postoperative TMJ clicking and pain, and the risk of postoperative TMJ clicking and pain was significant only when TMJ clicking (OR = 10.774, p < 0.001) and pain (OR = 26.876, p = 0.008) existed before the start of the entire treatment, respectively. With regard to the treatment duration, SFA (21.1 ± 10.3 months) exhibited significantly shorter total treatment duration than OFA (34.4 ± 11.9 months) (p < 0.001). The results of this study suggest that surgical-orthodontic treatment using SFA can be a feasible option of treatment for dentofacial deformities based on the equivalent effect on TMD and shorter overall treatment period compared to conventional surgical-orthodontic treatment using OFA.

Is skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery for skeletal class III deformity related to surgical occlusal contact?

A stable occlusion at the time of surgery is considered important for post-surgical stability after orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study was to determine whether skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery using a surgery-first approach for skeletal class III deformity is related to the surgical occlusal contact or surgical change. Forty-two adult patients with a skeletal class III deformity corrected by Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with a surgery-first approach were studied. Dental models were set and used to measure the surgical occlusal contact, including contact distribution, contact number, and contact area. Cone beam computed tomography was used to measure the surgical change (amount and rotation) and post-surgical skeletal stability. The relationship between skeletal stability and surgical occlusal contact or surgical change was evaluated. No relationship was found between maxillary or mandibular stability and surgical occlusal contact. However, a significant relationship was found between maxillary and mandibular stability and the amount and rotation of surgical change. The results suggest that in the surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal class III deformity with a surgery-first approach, the post-surgical skeletal stability is not related to the surgical occlusal contact but is related to the surgical change.

Evaluation of Postoperative Mandibular Positional Changes After Mandibular Setback Surgery in a Surgery-First Approach: Isolated Mandibular Surgery Versus Bimaxillary Surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare postoperative positional changes in the mandible after isolated mandibular surgery (IMS) or bimaxillary surgery (BMS) in a surgery-first approach (SFA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study composed of patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery using the SFA. Surgical and postoperative changes were evaluated using lateral cephalograms taken 1 month before surgery (T0), 1 week after surgery (T1), and immediately after debonding of orthodontic appliances (T2; 16.6 ± 8.7 months after surgery). To predict postoperative mandibular positional changes from the increase in vertical dimension (VD) in surgical occlusion, the mandible was rotated counterclockwise to the preoperative VD on the lateral cephalogram at T1, and resultant mandibular positional changes were measured. To evaluate actual postoperative mandibular positional changes between each time point and compare them between the 2 groups, independent t test, paired t test, and repeated-measures analysis of variance were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were evaluated (16 in IMS group and 14 in BMS group). The 2 groups showed significant time-course mandibular positional changes from T0 to T1 and from T1 to T2 within each group (point B, P < .001), although no statistically significant differences were observed between groups. There was no statistically relevant difference between groups in the predicted and actual postoperative rotational movements. In addition to the mandibular forward movement that resulted from postoperative mandibular counterclockwise rotation, additional horizontal relapse occurred.

CONCLUSION

The present findings suggest that the mandible exhibits notable postoperative forward movement during postoperative orthodontic treatment, regardless of the extent of the orthognathic surgery in the SFA, and it is necessary to consider mandibular forward movement from the VD increase in surgical occlusion and additional relapse during the treatment planning stage.

Corrective outcome and transverse stability after orthognathic surgery using a surgery-first approach in mandibular prognathism with and without facial asymmetry

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate corrective outcome and transverse stability after orthognathic surgery via a surgery-first approach (SFA) in mandibular prognathism with and without facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-nine patients who received mandibular setback surgery using SFA were divided into 2 groups according to the menton deviation (4 mm): symmetry group (n = 17) and asymmetry group (n = 12). Using computed tomography images obtained before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 6 months after (T2) surgery, time-dependent changes in variables related to facial asymmetry, including maxillary height, ramal length, frontal and lateral ramal inclination, mandibular body length, and mandibular body height, were evaluated.

RESULTS

Immediately after surgery, the asymmetry group showed significantly decreased discrepancies between the longer and non-longer sides for all variables (P < .05); there were no significant differences in discrepancies between the 2 groups. During the postoperative period, no significant changes in discrepancies were found in any variable in either group. Compared with T0, the asymmetry group showed significantly decreased discrepancies in ramal length, frontal and lateral ramal inclination, and mandibular body length at T2.

CONCLUSIONS

Variables related to facial asymmetry showed significant improvement after surgical-orthodontic treatment using SFA, and corrected outcomes showed good postoperative stability in both the symmetry and asymmetry groups.