A pilot study of the effects of a vacuum sealing barrier method for photostimulable phosphor plates regarding plate damage and prevention of microbiologic cross-contamination

Disinfection of intraoral photostimulable phosphor plates with 70% ethyl alcohol and 70% isopropyl alcohol alters image contrast and produces image artifacts

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated changes in image quality and the presence and size of artifacts on radiographs obtained with photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates after disinfection with 70% ethyl alcohol and 70% isopropyl alcohol.

STUDY DESIGN

Eight PSP receptors (4 Express and 4 VistaScan) were used for the investigation. Two Express and 2 VistaScan receptors were disinfected with 70% ethyl alcohol, and 2 Express and 2 VistaScan receptors were disinfected with 70% isopropyl alcohol. Before disinfection and after every 5 disinfections, 2 radiographs of an aluminum stepwedge and 2 radiographs of an acrylic block were acquired using each receptor. The gray values of the radiographs were analyzed regarding contrast, density, uniformity, and noise. Four oral radiologists evaluated the images for the presence of artifacts, and 2 measured the artifacts.

RESULTS

Differences in image contrast were significantly larger with isopropyl alcohol (P < .0001). Artifact size was significantly greater with the VistaScan system when isopropyl alcohol was used as the disinfectant (P < .0001). The correlation between the number of disinfections and artifact size was moderately positive with the Express system (P < .05) and strongly positive with the VistaScan system (P < .05) with both disinfectants.

CONCLUSIONS

Small artifacts restricted to the edges of the image were observed with disinfection using both types of alcohol, and a positive correlation was found between artifact size and the number of disinfections. However, artifacts appeared earlier and of greater size with the VistaScan system when disinfected with 70% isopropyl alcohol. Thus, we recommend using 70% ethyl alcohol to disinfect PSP receptors, with attention placed on its action and evaporation times.

Ambient light exposure of photostimulable phosphor plates: is there a safe limit for acceptable image quality?

OBJECTIVES

To subjectively assess radiographs obtained with photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates exposed to clinical levels of ambient light prior to read-out to potentially set a safe limit for acceptable image quality.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six dental regions of a dry human skull were X-rayed using PSP plates from VistaScan and Express under four exposure times: 0.1, 0.2, 0.32, and 0.4 s. Before read-out, the PSP plates were exposed to ambient light for 0, 5, 10, 30, 60, and 90 s. Six observers were asked to classify the 288 resulting radiographs as acceptable or unacceptable based on the identification of anatomical structures and global image quality. The number of answers classifying radiographs as unacceptable was used to calculate a rejection rate; a pairwise comparison for better image quality was further conducted among radiographs considered acceptable. Reproducibility was tested by having 25% of all experimental groups reassessed.

RESULTS

Intra- and interobserver agreement ranged from 0.87 to 1.00 and from 0.81 to 0.92, respectively. Exposure of PSP plates to ambient light increased rejection rates mostly as of 10 s. In the pairwise comparison, subtle differences were observed between radiographs obtained with PSP plates not exposed and those exposed to ambient light for 5 s.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambient light exposure of PSP plates impairs the image quality of radiographs. A safe limit of ambient light exposure of 5 s for VistaScan and Express should be considered. Ambient light exposure of PSP plates within safe limits can avoid retakes and reduce unnecessary patient exposure to X-rays.

Could the radiographic image quality be affected by the excessive use of the photostimulable phosphor plate?

The study aimed to assess the influence of excessive use of a photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) on the density, image noise, and contrast of radiographs. For that, radiographs of an acrylic block were acquired with a PSP of the Express intraoral system to assess the density and image noise. Initially, five images were obtained and exported (first group). After 400 exposures to X-rays and scannings of PSP, other five images were obtained and exported (second group). The same procedure was done after 800 (third group), 1200 (fourth group), 1600 (fifth group), and 2000 acquisitions (sixth group), resulting in 30 images to be evaluated. The mean and standard deviation of the gray values were calculated for the images using the ImageJ software. For contrast analysis, radiographs of an aluminum step-wedge were acquired with a new PSP following the same acquisition intervals. The percentage of contrast variation was calculated. Another two unused PSP receptors were employed to evaluate the method's reproducibility. The comparison of the results among the acquisition groups was performed with one-way Analysis of Variance (α=0.05). Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) assessed the reproducibility of the receptors. Image noise did not differ among the groups (p>0.05). There was a slight increase in density after 400 acquisitions and a slight difference in contrast for all acquisition groups without a pattern of increase or decrease (p<0.05). ICC showed excellent reliability for the methods. Therefore, excessive PSP use slightly affected the radiograph's density and contrast.

Influence of extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the extensive use of a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) receptor on the diagnosis of proximal carious lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty posterior teeth were paired and mounted in 20 phantoms. Using a PSP receptor of the Express intraoral system, 1 radiograph of each phantom was acquired, totaling 20 radiographs (group 1). After 400 acquisitions, another radiograph of each phantom was obtained, totaling 20 new radiographs (group 2). This procedure was also done after 800 (group 3), 1,200 (group 4), and 1,600 (group 5) acquisitions, resulting in 100 radiographs. Another 40 radiographs (20 phantoms × 2 groups) were obtained with a second PSP sensor to evaluate the diagnostic replicability of the receptors. All 140 radiographs were assessed independently by 5 examiners for the presence of proximal caries. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared among the groups by analysis of variance. The Student t test evaluated the diagnostic replicability of the receptors. The significance level was set at 5% (P < .05).

RESULTS

The diagnostic outcomes for proximal caries did not differ among the groups (P ≥ .37). The diagnostic values did not differ among the radiographs acquired with the 2 PSP receptors (P ≥ .75).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of proximal carious lesions was not affected by extensive use of the PSP receptor.

Effect of enveloping and disinfection methods on artefact formation on enveloped PSP plate images

Objectives

To investigate the artefacts caused by different disinfection and protection methods that can be used for infection control of photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.

Methods

The plates that were enveloped with single or double envelopes were sprayed with an alcohol-containing solution or wiped with an alcohol-containing tissue. Four PSP groups with two plates in each group were formed (A = wiping single envelope, B = wiping double envelopes, C = spraying onto single envelope, and D = spraying onto double envelopes). Any artefacts (1 = no artefact, 2 = presence of artefact less than 0.5 cm wide, and 3 = presence of artefact larger than 0.5 cm wide) on the 12 acquired images were evaluated.

Results

Artefacts (score-3) occurred on the images of Group C-2 PSP plate after the 3rd exposure. According to the Kruskal–Wallis test the difference between the artefact score of the four methods was found significant. Post-hoc comparisons showed the Group C artefact scores were higher than the others and the difference was significant. The total time of enveloping and disinfection processes for groups was; A = 6.30 min, B = 7.58 min, C = 5.48 min, and D = 7.14 min.

Conclusions

Regardless of the number of envelopes, wiping with a tissue was less likely to cause artefacts, while spraying was reliable only when double envelopes were used. However, using a tissue and double envelopes, which are less risky in terms of artefact, causes time loss, difficulty in manipulation, environmental pollution and high cost.

Cross-contamination and infection control in intraoral digital imaging: a comprehensive review

Dental health care workers are subjected to various infectious disease agents that are present in patients' saliva and blood which make infection control and universal prevention methods indispensable to the dental practice given that some of these diseases cause loss of work and time for dental staff and patients; some of them cause serious morbidity; and some of them currently have a poor prognosis and no effective treatments. Although dental radiographic procedures are not invasive, and there are no incidents such as injuries caused by dental instruments, they are a potential infection source because of contamination with saliva and blood, and comprehensive infection control procedures also apply to the radiology clinic. In addition, contact with a large number of patients in dental schools and clinics in a short period of time, and the fact that radiographic procedures are performed in the same environment as other dental procedures in dental offices increase the significance of infection control in dental radiology. Major advances in computer technology have enabled digital imaging systems to develop rapidly and to become common in dental practice as an alternative to conventional film-based imaging. The use of digital sensors in dental radiology introduced unique infection control challenges and required the revision and modification of existing infection control techniques. In this review, studies concerning the risk of cross-contamination and challenges of infection control with digital image sensors are comprehensively reviewed and infection control protocols that should be followed in intraoral digital imaging using both direct and indirect systems are thoroughly examined.