Benign and malignant odontogenic neoplasms of the jaws show a concordant nondiscriminatory p63/p40 positive immunophenotype

Differential Expression of Immunohistochemical Markers in Ameloblastoma & Ameloblastic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of observational studies

Background

Differentiating between ameloblastoma (AB) and ameloblastic carcinoma (AC) is difficult, especially when AB has atypical cytological characteristics or an uncommon clinical history. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the differential expression of immunohistochemical markers between AB and AC.

Methods

We conducted a thorough search of PUBMED and SCOPUS according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify cross-sectional studies that compared the expression of immunohistochemical markers in AB and AC. We used a random-effects model to analyze the risk ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The Egger's test was used to assess publication bias.

Results

In total, 301 articles were identified. After excluding irrelevant titles and abstracts, 86 articles were selected for full-text review. We categorized the 41 markers into proliferative and non-proliferative markers. Among non-proliferative markers, nuclear markers were differentially expressed in AB and AC. SOX2 was the only marker that significantly differentiated AB and AC, with an RR of -0.19 (CI 0.10-0.36, I2=0).

Conclusion

The current evidence suggests the significance of SOX2 in differentiating between AB and AC, warranting prospective confirmation in well-defined extensive studies. We highlight the paucity of high-quality replicated studies of other markers in this field. Collaborative efforts with standardized techniques are necessary to generate clinically useful immunohistochemical markers.

An Unusual Maxillary Tumor with Tubuloductal Epithelial Structures, Solid Epithelial Nests and Stromal Odontogenic Ameloblast-Associated Protein Deposits. Tubuloductal/Syringoid Variant of Central Odontogenic Fibroma with Amyloid?

Glandular tumors of jaw bones present, most often, histopathologic features of salivary gland and, rarely, of cutaneous glandular neoplasms. They are thought to originate from odontogenic epithelium. An unusual maxillary tumor presenting as a radiolucency in the periapical area of the right permanent lateral incisor of a 74-year-old male is presented causing root resorption. Preparations revealed occasionally branching tubular cords and ductal structures characterized, mostly, by a bilayer composed of luminal cuboidal to low columnar cytokeratin (CK) 7, Ber-EP4 and occasionally CK8/18 positive cells, and abluminal, CK5/6 positive, basal/basaloid cells revealing nuclear reactivity for p63/p40. Smooth muscle actin and calponin were negative, save for a single focus of calponin positive cells, confirming absence of myoepithelial support or epithelial mesenchymal transition. CK19 exhibited staining of both layers, the luminal being more intense. Eosinophilic secretory material and, occasionally, a luminal pellicle were decorated with CK8/18 and polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). CD1a identified only rare Langerhans' cells and Ki67 decorated 1-2% of abluminal cell nuclei. Small solid nests of epithelial cells were also present. Infrequently, an apparent transition of a nest into a tubular structure was appreciated. The partially inflamed stroma featured multiple hyalinized acellular deposits consistent with amyloid, as confirmed by bright orange Congo red reactivity with apple-green birefringence, which reacted with odontogenic ameloblast-associated (ODAM) protein antibody but not with antibodies for amelotin and secretory calcium-binding phosphoprotein proline-glutamine rich 1. Based on the above, the diagnosis of tubuloductal/syringoid variant of central odontogenic fibroma with ODAM amyloid is favored.

Squamous Odontogenic Tumor: Review of the Literature and Report of a New Case

PURPOSE

Squamous odontogenic tumor (SOT) is a rare, benign, locally infiltrative odontogenic tumor of the gnathic bones. It is composed of islands of bland, well-differentiated squamous epithelium of varying shape and size. Because of histologic overlap, SOT has often been overdiagnosed as ameloblastoma and squamous cell carcinoma. It thus becomes important to understand the clinical, radiologic, histopathologic, and treatment characteristics of this tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases, we searched for reported cases of SOT published in the English-language literature. We were able to retrieve 49 acceptable cases and perform a comprehensive literature review of the intraosseous SOTs, with emphasis on their clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characteristics, as well as treatment strategies. In addition, we present an additional case of SOT affecting the posterior mandible in a 44-year-old female patient.

RESULTS

The tumor in the posterior mandible in our patient was accompanied by acute pain and treated by enucleation. Histopathologic evaluation showed variably sized islands of benign squamous epithelium scattered in a fibrous stroma, consistent with the diagnosis of an SOT. Uneventful healing was noted at the 1-month postoperative appointment. However, the patient was lost to long-term follow-up. Our literature review showed that the average age at the time of diagnosis of SOT is 34.2 years. Men and women are equally affected, and the tumor does not show a predilection for either jaw bone. The most common locations are the anterior maxilla and posterior mandible. Most SOTs are treated conservatively by enucleation or curettage, whereas aggressive or recurrent tumors require radical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful evaluation of the excised specimen, with immunohistochemical investigations, may prove rewarding in differentiating an SOT from other odontogenic neoplasms and thus minimize the patient's chances of undergoing an unnecessary aggressive intervention.

Plasmacytoid cells in salivary pleomorphic adenoma: an alternative interpretation of their immunohistochemical characteristics highlights function and capability for epithelial-mesenchymal transition

OBJECTIVES

Plasmacytoid cells (PLCs) in salivary pleomorphic adenoma (SPA) are regarded as modified neoplastic myoepithelia and define plasmacytoid myoepithelioma (pMYO). However, histochemically, immunohistochemically and ultrastructurally, PLCs fail to demonstrate frank myogenous properties. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) may explain the phenotypes in SPA. Our aim was to evaluate (1) PLCs with accepted or purported myoepithelial and EMT-related markers; and (2) pMYOs for PLAG1 aberrations by using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

STUDY DESIGN

Eight SPAs with or without PLC-predominance and 3 pMYOs were immunohistochemically studied.

RESULTS

PLCs in SPA and pMYO exhibited strong, scattered to diffuse positivity for K7, rare K14 positivity and were mostly negative for α-smooth muscle actin, h-caldesmon, and p63/p40. S100 staining was strong and diffuse, whereas calponin was variable. DOG1 was negative. PLCs in pMYO and PLC-rich SPA exhibited selective or diffuse WT1 and D2-40 immunoreactivity. EMT markers SNAIL/SLUG exhibited strong and variable immunoreactivity in PLCs in contrast to weak or absent E-cadherin expression. SOX10 was diffusely and strongly positive. PLAG1 rearrangement was present in 1 pMYO.

CONCLUSIONS

PLCs mostly fail to express myoepithelial markers; PLCs are neoplastic cells adapting to microenvironmental changes and capable of EMT; and tumors composed solely of PLCs are apparently SPAs depleted of a ductal component.

Intraoral Cutaneous Hamartomas-Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Characteristics of 3 Cases

Intraoral cutaneous hamartomas (ICHs) are uncommon mucosal lesions characterized microscopically by a combination of cutaneous structures, including various stages of follicular and sebaceous elements. Due to their rarity, the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical attributes of ICHs have not been thoroughly delineated. Three cases of ICH were identified from our records, and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were immunohistochemically stained with antibodies against androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor, p63, factor XIIIα, and CD34. All 3 ICHs involved the buccal mucosa with an M:F ratio = 2:1 and mean age = 42.3 years (age range: 27-61 years). ICHs presented as thickened, painless, white and yellow plaques or nodules of long duration, measuring 0.6-1.5 cm. No history of skin graft in the area of the lesions was reported. Histopathologically, the lesions showed aggregates of rudimentary folliculosebaceous structures. Although well-defined piloerector muscles were present in all cases of ICH, bona fide hair follicles and isolated hair shafts were identified only in 1 case. The overlying oral epithelium exhibited epidermis-like morphological features, while inflammation was generally absent. Immunohistochemically, strong and diffuse nuclear staining for androgen receptor and factor XIIIα was observed in the sebaceous glands, and estrogen receptor and p63 reactivity were confined exclusively to the peripheral basal cells, while progesterone receptor staining was negative in ICHs. CD34 diffusely decorated the lesional stroma. In conclusion, ICH is a rare lesion composed of cutaneous elements in an abnormal location. A predilection for the buccal mucosa is reported in the current study.